NATION

PASSWORD

Should we ban the impovershed from having children?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should we ban the impovershed from having children?

Yes
52
14%
No
304
80%
Certain groups, but not all of the very poor
22
6%
 
Total votes : 378

User avatar
New Werpland
Senator
 
Posts: 4647
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Werpland » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:23 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Geilinor wrote:"When compared to alternatives" and the United States is not the gold standard of capitalism.


Then who is?

Germany.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:24 pm

Geilinor wrote:

"When compared to alternatives" and the United States is not the gold standard of capitalism.

Inasmuch as there is a social ladder to climb in capitalism, you're right.
That is however the lowest possible standard by which you are correct.

There are simply vaccinations for many childhood diseases. They are widely used in the west. They are less widely used in the developing world, despite the low cost and mass-production. Many children die from these simple, preventable diseases in the developing world.
This line of reasoning is worryingly analogous to capitalism's social mobility.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:25 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Geilinor wrote:"When compared to alternatives" and the United States is not the gold standard of capitalism.


Then who is?

There are lots of capitalist countries with higher social mobility than the United States.
Last edited by Geilinor on Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The Salvatagard Republic
Envoy
 
Posts: 248
Founded: Apr 29, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Salvatagard Republic » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:27 pm

Padanyia wrote:I'm asking if we should require licenses to have children, with those who can't afford children without government assistance not allowed to. If you had children illegally, you would either have some kind of penalty if you could manage or your child would be given to a relative or the state. I can see many advantages to doing this.

- Much fewer welfare payments

- Much less crime

- Much better educational outcomes/less behavioral disturbances in school

- Better for the economy/higher gdp per capita due to less welfare and other economic advantages

- More globally competitive

- Likely a genetic eugenic effect; with a smarter population and all that entails

I don't refer to forced sterilization, or to deliberately targeting any certain ethnic group. I think we should have a parental licensing program like you need to drive a car, and you would have to pass a test and meet a certain income threshold to prove you can take care of a child without government and ideally even charitable assistance. I think that the first nation to implement a program like this or some other eugenic program will quickly become the best/most competitive in the world. For those who would tell me there's a chance I'll be not allowed to have children/sterilized, I can honestly tell you I would be willing to be sterilized to further the cause of eugenics if I could eventually adopt children.

ok.
I didn't know that I was spamming.

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:33 pm

Valkalan wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:You're being sarcastic, right?

What are the alternatives to capitalism that you mean to imply are better at advancing the poor? I imagine some variety of socialism. Classic socialist states existed in a state of economic stagnation with equality through shared wretchedness. Of perhaps you refer to the welfare states of today can only exist through on the backs of capitalist production.

Fuck the economy, I care about people.

Libertarian socialism is the answer. Anarchy.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:33 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Then who is?

There are lots of capitalist countries with higher social mobility than the United States.

Social Democracy is a band-aid, not a cure, to the detrimental aspects of capitalism.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Shiraan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 191
Founded: Aug 25, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Shiraan » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:34 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Anarchy.

you've instantly lost all credibility
what

User avatar
The Hobbesian Metaphysician
Minister
 
Posts: 3311
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Hobbesian Metaphysician » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:35 pm

Shiraan wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Anarchy.

you've instantly lost all credibility

Not really...I mean they have repeatedly broadcasted their anarchist ideology for years.

So this isn't surprising someone would want to fulfill it.
I am just going to lay it out here, I am going to be very blunt.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65248
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:37 pm

Shiraan wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Anarchy.

you've instantly lost all credibility


That's silly
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Shiraan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 191
Founded: Aug 25, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Shiraan » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:37 pm

The Hobbesian Metaphysician wrote:
Shiraan wrote:you've instantly lost all credibility

Not really...I mean they have repeatedly broadcasted their anarchist ideology for years.

So this isn't surprising someone would want to fulfill it.

anarchy would never work and you're a fool for thinking it would.
what

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:38 pm

Shiraan wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Anarchy.

you've instantly lost all credibility

Says the guy with twenty-five posts to one with more than fifteen thousand.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
New Werpland
Senator
 
Posts: 4647
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Werpland » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:39 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Geilinor wrote:There are lots of capitalist countries with higher social mobility than the United States.

Social Democracy is a band-aid, not a cure, to the detrimental aspects of capitalism.

All alternatives are a fantasy at this point in time.

User avatar
Shiraan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 191
Founded: Aug 25, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Shiraan » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:39 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Shiraan wrote:you've instantly lost all credibility

Says the guy with twenty-five posts to one with more than fifteen thousand.

use a real argument or get out
what

User avatar
New Werpland
Senator
 
Posts: 4647
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Werpland » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:39 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Shiraan wrote:you've instantly lost all credibility

Says the guy with twenty-five posts to one with more than fifteen thousand.

Big Jim P has more posts than you.

I think I know his opinion. :)
Last edited by New Werpland on Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:39 pm

The Hobbesian Metaphysician wrote:
Shiraan wrote:you've instantly lost all credibility

Not really...I mean they have repeatedly broadcasted their anarchist ideology for years.

So this isn't surprising someone would want to fulfill it.

Thanks for at least not acting like anarchism is some childish phase.

The people who do have apparently never heard of Bakunin, Proudhon, Tucker, or even Chomsky or Carson.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:39 pm

New Werpland wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Says the guy with twenty-five posts to one with more than fifteen thousand.

Big Jim P has more posts than you.

...correct?
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:40 pm

Shiraan wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Says the guy with twenty-five posts to one with more than fifteen thousand.

use a real argument or get out

You took one word from my statement and told me I'm no longer credible. How is that a valid argument?
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65248
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:40 pm

Shiraan wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Says the guy with twenty-five posts to one with more than fifteen thousand.

use a real argument or get out


As good argument as yours.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:40 pm

New Werpland wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Social Democracy is a band-aid, not a cure, to the detrimental aspects of capitalism.

All alternatives are a fantasy at this point in time.

Which is why we need to work toward them.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
New Werpland
Senator
 
Posts: 4647
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Werpland » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:42 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
New Werpland wrote:All alternatives are a fantasy at this point in time.

Which is why we need to work toward them.

Liberal Democracy will be the best system possible until perhaps robots and post scarcity becomes a thing.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:42 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
New Werpland wrote:All alternatives are a fantasy at this point in time.

Which is why we need to work toward them.

I have no interest in working toward a fantasy.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65248
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:44 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Which is why we need to work toward them.

I have no interest in working toward a fantasy.


I bet they said same about heavier than air flight.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:44 pm

Shiraan wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Says the guy with twenty-five posts to one with more than fifteen thousand.

use a real argument or get out

Okay then.
Explain why "anarchy" has cause him to "lose all credibility".
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Shiraan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 191
Founded: Aug 25, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Shiraan » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:44 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Shiraan wrote:use a real argument or get out

You took one word from my statement and told me I'm no longer credible. How is that a valid argument?

because anarchism is a social stance for a) whiny teenagers or b) conspiracy theorists that live in the woods with $100k worth of automatic weapons
what

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Oct 02, 2015 1:44 pm

Immoren wrote:
Geilinor wrote:I have no interest in working toward a fantasy.


I bet they said same about heavier than air flight.

Steel ships?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Escalia, Fartsniffage, Immoren, Kostane, New Ciencia, The Grand Duchy of Muscovy, Utquiagvik, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads