NATION

PASSWORD

Russian airstrikes in Syria

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Sat Oct 10, 2015 3:03 pm

The balkens wrote:
Kubra wrote: afghanistan


poland, finland. the west.


Japan and Estonia.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Sat Oct 10, 2015 3:13 pm

Uxupox wrote:
The balkens wrote:
poland, finland. the west.


Japan and Estonia.


The ottoman empire.

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Sat Oct 10, 2015 3:46 pm

The balkens wrote:
Kubra wrote: afghanistan


poland, finland. the west.


i never noticed western armies conquering Russia :roll:

i mean, Poles had once upper hand, then Russia destroyed them. Twice.
French actually marched into Moscow, and then they were, like, exterminated by fire, weather and pissed off Russians. (i am still wondering why Germans thought it would be different with Wehrmacht).
Last edited by Socialist Czechia on Sat Oct 10, 2015 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Sat Oct 10, 2015 3:58 pm

Socialist Czechia wrote:
The balkens wrote:
poland, finland. the west.


i never noticed western armies conquering Russia :roll:

i mean, Poles had once upper hand, then Russia destroyed them. Twice.
French actually marched into Moscow, and then they were, like, exterminated by fire, weather and pissed off Russians. (i am still wondering why Germans thought it would be different with Wehrmacht).


But did Russia actually "smash" poland into non existence forever? France? Germany? or anyone? Russia can win wars but it cant wipe out its enemies with its brute forces. hell, id wager that Russia STILL has to recover from the mongols.
Russia is not some invincible monster that some of its shills claim. As proven before, it can be beaten, past, present and future.
Last edited by The balkens on Sat Oct 10, 2015 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Greater Lebanon
Envoy
 
Posts: 284
Founded: Nov 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Greater Lebanon » Sat Oct 10, 2015 4:05 pm

The balkens wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:
i never noticed western armies conquering Russia :roll:

i mean, Poles had once upper hand, then Russia destroyed them. Twice.
French actually marched into Moscow, and then they were, like, exterminated by fire, weather and pissed off Russians. (i am still wondering why Germans thought it would be different with Wehrmacht).


But did Russia actually "smash" poland into non existence forever? France? Germany? or anyone? Russia can win wars but it cant wipe out its enemies with its brute forces. hell, id wager that Russia STILL has to recover from the mongols.
Russia is not some invincible monster that some of its shills claim. As proven before, it can be beaten, past, present and future.


Russia wins in defensive wars, and at a huge cost..mostly. As for the Soviet Finnish war, it took a lot of dead Russian bodies for Finland to give the territory it did. You are right, Russia isn't this invincible monster people make it to be.

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Sat Oct 10, 2015 4:09 pm

The Greater Lebanon wrote:
The balkens wrote:
But did Russia actually "smash" poland into non existence forever? France? Germany? or anyone? Russia can win wars but it cant wipe out its enemies with its brute forces. hell, id wager that Russia STILL has to recover from the mongols.
Russia is not some invincible monster that some of its shills claim. As proven before, it can be beaten, past, present and future.


Russia wins in defensive wars, and at a huge cost..mostly. As for the Soviet Finnish war, it took a lot of dead Russian bodies for Finland to give the territory it did. You are right, Russia isn't this invincible monster people make it to be.


Russia also lost to the Central powers in ww1.

I mean Afghanistan? Its the place called the "graveyard of Empires."

The US has to its credit that its not as Fucked as the USSR, internally, economically as well as a number of factors.

User avatar
May Mays
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1572
Founded: Jun 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby May Mays » Sat Oct 10, 2015 4:14 pm

The balkens wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:
i never noticed western armies conquering Russia :roll:

i mean, Poles had once upper hand, then Russia destroyed them. Twice.
French actually marched into Moscow, and then they were, like, exterminated by fire, weather and pissed off Russians. (i am still wondering why Germans thought it would be different with Wehrmacht).


But did Russia actually "smash" poland into non existence forever? France? Germany? or anyone? Russia can win wars but it cant wipe out its enemies with its brute forces. hell, id wager that Russia STILL has to recover from the mongols.
Russia is not some invincible monster that some of its shills claim. As proven before, it can be beaten, past, present and future.

The Russian state was almost entirely born anew after Batu Khan's western campaign. The already dying Kievan Rus' was finally shattered, while the Novgorod Republic and Muscovites/Vladimir-Suzdal gathered power. There is absolutely nothing to be recovering from. The Russian states have gone through so many transformations. Suzdal was totally demolished by the Golden Horde, yeah but eventually the crown prince of Vladimir-Suzdal surrendered. Novgorod was never even reached by the bulk of the Mongols, since they didn't want to take their horses through the marshes. Instead they just demanded tribute, which Novgorod reluctantly paid. A few Mongol overseers were left in Russia, but the Mongols always sucked at administration and almost always left the current officials in power or replaced them with other local officials. In the case of the Russian principalities, their governance was left almost exclusively to them. Taxes/tribute was hefty, but for the most part the Rus just gathered power, until the Muscovites were born from Vladimir-Suzdal and 'purged' the Mongols from Russia. They formed the Grand Duchy of Moscow, which eventually swallowed the other principalities and became the Russian empire.

Russia can be beaten, sure. But the Khanate of the Golden Horde only existed for a short 100 years. Most of what was happening in Russia under their influence wasn't very different from normal affairs.
It's just me against the world.

RIP ZYZZ
Husseinarti wrote:yeah fun is shitty and gay

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Sat Oct 10, 2015 4:38 pm

The balkens wrote:
I mean Afghanistan? Its the place called the "graveyard of Empires."

A wholly undeserved title.

But yes, your general thing is correct. Russia is not an undefeated champion and has lost numerous times. It tends to do better in defensive wars (for what should be obvious reasons) but offensive wars tend to be a mixed bag.

Not to mention that Russia (albeit not being "Russia Russia") lost one of the most important conflicts in human history - the Cold War.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sat Oct 10, 2015 4:38 pm

May Mays wrote:The western world is winning battles left and right.

The media is its biggest enemy. Negative spins on everything, making it seem like we're losing battles.

A new PR nightmare every day. The middle east today is very different from what it was 20 years ago, 30, 40 years ago. All that's left now is a western nation that doesn't want to admit how bad it fucked everything up, and a power-crazed "president" propping up a valuable pawn. And a few small factions, fighting over scraps, like they're fist-sized diamonds, giving more fuel for anti-west propaganda.


We Could Have Won Vietnam!!
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Ndaku
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1249
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Ndaku » Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:15 pm

At least Russia is getting the job done by not supporting the rebels.
'Preach the word! Be ready in season and out of season. Convince, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching. I charge you therefore before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead at His appearing and His kingdom: For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables. But you be watchful in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.' (II Timothy 4:1-5 NKJV)

Non-denominational Christian. Savopia is my WA puppet nation. Feel free to telegram me!

User avatar
Rio Cana
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10777
Founded: Dec 21, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Rio Cana » Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:18 pm

May Mays wrote:
The balkens wrote:
But did Russia actually "smash" poland into non existence forever? France? Germany? or anyone? Russia can win wars but it cant wipe out its enemies with its brute forces. hell, id wager that Russia STILL has to recover from the mongols.
Russia is not some invincible monster that some of its shills claim. As proven before, it can be beaten, past, present and future.

The Russian state was almost entirely born anew after Batu Khan's western campaign. The already dying Kievan Rus' was finally shattered, while the Novgorod Republic and Muscovites/Vladimir-Suzdal gathered power. There is absolutely nothing to be recovering from. The Russian states have gone through so many transformations. Suzdal was totally demolished by the Golden Horde, yeah but eventually the crown prince of Vladimir-Suzdal surrendered. Novgorod was never even reached by the bulk of the Mongols, since they didn't want to take their horses through the marshes. Instead they just demanded tribute, which Novgorod reluctantly paid. A few Mongol overseers were left in Russia, but the Mongols always sucked at administration and almost always left the current officials in power or replaced them with other local officials. In the case of the Russian principalities, their governance was left almost exclusively to them. Taxes/tribute was hefty, but for the most part the Rus just gathered power, until the Muscovites were born from Vladimir-Suzdal and 'purged' the Mongols from Russia. They formed the Grand Duchy of Moscow, which eventually swallowed the other principalities and became the Russian empire.

Russia can be beaten, sure. But the Khanate of the Golden Horde only existed for a short 100 years. Most of what was happening in Russia under their influence wasn't very different from normal affairs.


The Russians really paid the Golden Horde back many times over especially in 1556 when they attacked Kazan the Hordes Capital and destroyed it. The city was heavily populated back then.

It was something like this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI3SQg7-dY0

For those that prefer a more modern version then this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuR1MvZ1r6E
National Information
Empire of Rio Cana has been refounded.
We went from Empire to Peoples Republic to two divided Republics one called Marina to back to an Empire. And now a Republic under a military General. Our Popular Music
Our National Love SongOur Military Forces
Formerly appointed twice Minister of Defense and once Minister of Foreign Affairs for South America Region.

User avatar
May Mays
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1572
Founded: Jun 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby May Mays » Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:21 pm

Gauthier wrote:
May Mays wrote:The western world is winning battles left and right.

The media is its biggest enemy. Negative spins on everything, making it seem like we're losing battles.

A new PR nightmare every day. The middle east today is very different from what it was 20 years ago, 30, 40 years ago. All that's left now is a western nation that doesn't want to admit how bad it fucked everything up, and a power-crazed "president" propping up a valuable pawn. And a few small factions, fighting over scraps, like they're fist-sized diamonds, giving more fuel for anti-west propaganda.


We Could Have Won Vietnam!!

The Middle East is not Vietnam.

This conflict should never have been our business in the first place, yes.
It's just me against the world.

RIP ZYZZ
Husseinarti wrote:yeah fun is shitty and gay

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:34 pm

Gauthier wrote:
May Mays wrote:The western world is winning battles left and right.

The media is its biggest enemy. Negative spins on everything, making it seem like we're losing battles.

A new PR nightmare every day. The middle east today is very different from what it was 20 years ago, 30, 40 years ago. All that's left now is a western nation that doesn't want to admit how bad it fucked everything up, and a power-crazed "president" propping up a valuable pawn. And a few small factions, fighting over scraps, like they're fist-sized diamonds, giving more fuel for anti-west propaganda.


We Could Have Won Vietnam!!


We could actually have.

But without public support? Nah.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16349
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kubra » Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:28 pm

Socialist Czechia wrote:
The balkens wrote:
poland, finland. the west.


i never noticed western armies conquering Russia :roll:

i mean, Poles had once upper hand, then Russia destroyed them. Twice.
French actually marched into Moscow, and then they were, like, exterminated by fire, weather and pissed off Russians. (i am still wondering why Germans thought it would be different with Wehrmacht).
so we were right about afghanistan estonia and japan
prob cuz the germans legit won in ww1 against the russians
Last edited by Kubra on Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Kraylandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5523
Founded: Sep 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kraylandia » Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:30 pm

They are accomplishing more than what the US has managed in more than a fucking year, and it's good that they are possibly striking the other "rebels" as well. I don't particularly like Assad, but he's better than any other US puppet government will ever be.
You can call me Luci
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent..
Jello is my bored buddy!
Lito's NS wife

⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing ⚧

User avatar
Krasny-Volny
Minister
 
Posts: 3181
Founded: Nov 20, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Krasny-Volny » Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:33 pm

Can't find any reliable sources about the Turkish F-16s shooting down an in identified (MiG?) Russian aircraft which aren't second hand.

I guess we'll know for sure pretty soon.
Krastecexport. Cheap armaments for the budget minded, sold with discretion.

User avatar
May Mays
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1572
Founded: Jun 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby May Mays » Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:37 pm

Kraylandia wrote:They are accomplishing more than what the US has managed in more than a fucking year, and it's good that they are possibly striking the other "rebels" as well. I don't particularly like Assad, but he's better than any other US puppet government will ever be.

At least a US puppet won't gas his own people.

Political genusies in the White House will continue to fuck up the middle east the same way they have been over the last decade or two. This conflict should never have been one we got involved in. There's no way out in sight.

Even if the US propels the remains of the FSA into power, and free-elections are forced, what the fuck does that change? It will be a corrupt election, and none of the candidates will be nice guys, know'm sayin'?
It's just me against the world.

RIP ZYZZ
Husseinarti wrote:yeah fun is shitty and gay

User avatar
Kraylandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5523
Founded: Sep 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kraylandia » Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:42 pm

May Mays wrote:
Kraylandia wrote:They are accomplishing more than what the US has managed in more than a fucking year, and it's good that they are possibly striking the other "rebels" as well. I don't particularly like Assad, but he's better than any other US puppet government will ever be.

At least a US puppet won't gas his own people.

Political genusies in the White House will continue to fuck up the middle east the same way they have been over the last decade or two. This conflict should never have been one we got involved in. There's no way out in sight.

Even if the US propels the remains of the FSA into power, and free-elections are forced, what the fuck does that change? It will be a corrupt election, and none of the candidates will be nice guys, know'm sayin'?


Nah, they'll just blow them up instead.
You can call me Luci
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent..
Jello is my bored buddy!
Lito's NS wife

⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing ⚧

User avatar
Republic of the Cristo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12261
Founded: Apr 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of the Cristo » Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:45 pm

I am shaking my head at the hypocrisy of the shock by most people when they hear this.

When America bombs Syria, everyone is for it

But when Russia does it, they are the imperialists.

Also, the claims that Russia is bombing rebel targets, I and most of the western world are almost sure of.

But lets be frank here, America is probably also bombing Assad targets.

Lets just recognize that we are both doing something very shady.
Orthodox Christian, Nationalist, Reactionary, Stoic


(2 Kings 2:23-25): you won't be dissappointed

User avatar
Kraylandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5523
Founded: Sep 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kraylandia » Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:46 pm

Republic of the Cristo wrote:I am shaking my head at the hypocrisy of the shock by most people when they hear this.

When America bombs Syria, everyone is for it

But when Russia does it, they are the imperialists.

Also, the claims that Russia is bombing rebel targets, I and most of the western world are almost sure of.

But lets be frank here, America is probably also bombing Assad targets.

Lets just recognize that we are both doing something very shady.


Sure, but at least the Russians actually have permission to be in Syria from the legitimate government. The Americans don't, so if anything - they're the real imperialists.
You can call me Luci
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent..
Jello is my bored buddy!
Lito's NS wife

⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing ⚧

User avatar
Republic of the Cristo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12261
Founded: Apr 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of the Cristo » Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:49 pm

Kraylandia wrote:
Republic of the Cristo wrote:I am shaking my head at the hypocrisy of the shock by most people when they hear this.

When America bombs Syria, everyone is for it

But when Russia does it, they are the imperialists.

Also, the claims that Russia is bombing rebel targets, I and most of the western world are almost sure of.

But lets be frank here, America is probably also bombing Assad targets.

Lets just recognize that we are both doing something very shady.


Sure, but at least the Russians actually have permission to be in Syria from the legitimate government. The Americans don't, so if anything - they're the real imperialists.


Russia and America both are.

Its really hard to pick a side in Syria.

On the one hand you have a brutal military dictatorship

On the other hand you have a brutal rebel coalition that is more and more wavering towards Islamism.
Orthodox Christian, Nationalist, Reactionary, Stoic


(2 Kings 2:23-25): you won't be dissappointed

User avatar
Kraylandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5523
Founded: Sep 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kraylandia » Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:52 pm

Republic of the Cristo wrote:
Kraylandia wrote:
Sure, but at least the Russians actually have permission to be in Syria from the legitimate government. The Americans don't, so if anything - they're the real imperialists.


Russia and America both are.

Its really hard to pick a side in Syria.

On the one hand you have a brutal military dictatorship

On the other hand you have a brutal rebel coalition that is more and more wavering towards Islamism.


No, they're not. Russia is merely assisting an ally - the US just want this so called "dictator" gone because he doesn't bow down to their interests.
You can call me Luci
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent..
Jello is my bored buddy!
Lito's NS wife

⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing ⚧

User avatar
Republic of the Cristo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12261
Founded: Apr 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of the Cristo » Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:55 pm

Kraylandia wrote:
Republic of the Cristo wrote:
Russia and America both are.

Its really hard to pick a side in Syria.

On the one hand you have a brutal military dictatorship

On the other hand you have a brutal rebel coalition that is more and more wavering towards Islamism.


No, they're not. Russia is merely assisting an ally - the US just want this so called "dictator" gone because he doesn't bow down to their interests.


You do not think that America has at least some allies in the Free Syrian Army? You think that Russia is only helping because of their and Syria's good bond and have no other foreign interests?
Orthodox Christian, Nationalist, Reactionary, Stoic


(2 Kings 2:23-25): you won't be dissappointed

User avatar
Kraylandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5523
Founded: Sep 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kraylandia » Sat Oct 10, 2015 10:00 pm

Republic of the Cristo wrote:
Kraylandia wrote:
No, they're not. Russia is merely assisting an ally - the US just want this so called "dictator" gone because he doesn't bow down to their interests.


You do not think that America has at least some allies in the Free Syrian Army? You think that Russia is only helping because of their and Syria's good bond and have no other foreign interests?


FSA are not a legitimate ruling entity, essentially the US is just helping terrorists. Pretty much, there might be some "other interests" such as to be a thorn in the side of the US, which is always a good thing to be honest. Fuck America.
You can call me Luci
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent..
Jello is my bored buddy!
Lito's NS wife

⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing ⚧

User avatar
Republic of the Cristo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12261
Founded: Apr 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of the Cristo » Sat Oct 10, 2015 10:04 pm

Kraylandia wrote:
Republic of the Cristo wrote:
You do not think that America has at least some allies in the Free Syrian Army? You think that Russia is only helping because of their and Syria's good bond and have no other foreign interests?


FSA are not a legitimate ruling entity, essentially the US is just helping terrorists. Pretty much, there might be some "other interests" such as to be a thorn in the side of the US, which is always a good thing to be honest. Fuck America.


They may not be a legitimate ruling entity, but the US would like some of the moderate seculars to become the ruling government. Also, do you not think Russia would also like another power outlet in the middle east? Not to mention all the business they do
Orthodox Christian, Nationalist, Reactionary, Stoic


(2 Kings 2:23-25): you won't be dissappointed

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alris, American Legionaries, Bradfordville, Getijden, Grinning Dragon, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Maya Luna, Necroghastia, Simbatia, The Black Forrest, The Huskar Social Union, The Jamesian Republic, The Republic of Western Sol, Tinhampton, Uminaku, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads