NATION

PASSWORD

Russian airstrikes in Syria

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:37 pm

The balkens wrote:
Shofercia wrote:
GDP of the EU/US: $36 trillion
GDP of the SCO: $32 trillion

Numbers according to the World Bank, with the purchasing power parity ratio factored in. Oh, you meant the Eurasian Union, the organization that in its infancy. Yes, organizations that haven't had time to develop are generally outperformed by those that had time to develop.


What else is the Eurasian union going to do? Have more Poor nations in it?

The EU has some of the richest nations on earth, what can Russia and its gang of the Former USSR possibly do?


I'm focusing on watching the SCO's growth, that's where the future might be. My guess would be that the Eurasian Union, ASEAN and SCO combine to promote stability in Asia, and perhaps Europe, if Kiev starts having a sane governments and the EU stops the austerity insanity.


Neu Leonstein wrote:
Shofercia wrote:GDP of the EU/US: $36 trillion
GDP of the SCO: $32 trillion

I wouldn't necessarily quote numbers like that as evidence of Russia's importance... it rather invites the question of how the GDP is distributed within the SCO.


I was talking about the importance of organizations that Russia's in.
Last edited by Shofercia on Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Capitalizt

Postby Grand Britannia » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:38 pm

Neu Leonstein wrote:
Shofercia wrote:GDP of the EU/US: $36 trillion
GDP of the SCO: $32 trillion

I wouldn't necessarily quote numbers like that as evidence of Russia's importance... it rather invites the question of how the GDP is distributed within the SCO.


I think it's obvious China has most of that.

Then again with how China acts with it's neighbors they don't promote much confidence in keeping the peace.
Last edited by Grand Britannia on Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ଘ( ˘ ᵕ˘)つ----x .*・。゚・ᵕ

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:38 pm

Neu Leonstein wrote:
Shofercia wrote:GDP of the EU/US: $36 trillion
GDP of the SCO: $32 trillion

I wouldn't necessarily quote numbers like that as evidence of Russia's importance... it rather invites the question of how the GDP is distributed within the SCO.

The only reason the SCO can boast that GDP is because of China's membership. Also important to note that it's called the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Republic of Wreptzle
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 430
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of Wreptzle » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:38 pm

Neu Leonstein wrote:
Shofercia wrote:GDP of the EU/US: $36 trillion
GDP of the SCO: $32 trillion

I wouldn't necessarily quote numbers like that as evidence of Russia's importance... it rather invites the question of how the GDP is distributed within the SCO.


Considering the members of the SCO, almost all the wealth in the combined GDP is made up by Russia and China. (Assuming that those figures aren't including India)

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:39 pm

Shofercia wrote:
The balkens wrote:
What else is the Eurasian union going to do? Have more Poor nations in it?

The EU has some of the richest nations on earth, what can Russia and its gang of the Former USSR possibly do?


I'm focusing on watching the SCO's growth, that's where the future might be. My guess would be that the Eurasian Union, ASEAN and SCO combine to promote stability in Asia, and perhaps Europe, if Kiev starts having a sane governments and the EU stops the austerity insanity.



So bending over for russia is sane?

Spending less in bad economic times more or less made since at the time, but i agree with you at this point it has gone insane as European economies seem to depend on government spending but this was the case since the end of the cold war.

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:39 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:
Neu Leonstein wrote:I wouldn't necessarily quote numbers like that as evidence of Russia's importance... it rather invites the question of how the GDP is distributed within the SCO.


I think it's obvious China has most of that.


True. The reason I brought that up is because Balkens compared Eurasian Union with the EU, which is a stupid comparison. SCO vs the EU would be a better one.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:41 pm

Shofercia wrote:
Grand Britannia wrote:
I think it's obvious China has most of that.


True. The reason I brought that up is because Balkens compared Eurasian Union with the EU, which is a stupid comparison. SCO vs the EU would be a better one.


SCO has Belaus, Russia and Kazachstan right?

If so, i apologize for the assumption.

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:41 pm

Republic of Wreptzle wrote:
Neu Leonstein wrote:I wouldn't necessarily quote numbers like that as evidence of Russia's importance... it rather invites the question of how the GDP is distributed within the SCO.


Considering the members of the SCO, almost all the wealth in the combined GDP is made up by Russia and China. (Assuming that those figures aren't including India)


They include India and Pakistan.


The balkens wrote:
Shofercia wrote:
I'm focusing on watching the SCO's growth, that's where the future might be. My guess would be that the Eurasian Union, ASEAN and SCO combine to promote stability in Asia, and perhaps Europe, if Kiev starts having a sane governments and the EU stops the austerity insanity.



So bending over for russia is sane?

Spending less in bad economic times more or less made since at the time, but i agree with you at this point it has gone insane as European economies seem to depend on government spending but this was the case since the end of the cold war.


Didn't realize that paying the market price for gas was the equivalent of bending over. Can't wait to tell my utility company the good news!
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:42 pm

I was agreeing with you on the latter part though, Shof. We have common ground. Finally.

User avatar
New Werpland
Senator
 
Posts: 4647
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Werpland » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:42 pm

Shofercia wrote:Balkens despises Putin because under Putin, Russia became strong, but in order to get people like you on his side, he'll jump on the Human Rights bandwagon.

This makes me want to vomit. "Russia becoming strong" correlates with Russia poisoning the futures of it's neighboring nations. And what makes you think this has nothing to do with civil rights? Putin wants to rebuild Russia as a superpower, and with that he'll bring his populist conservative bullshit around with him. And unfortunately now that Russia's state as a superpower has become apparent to the world, various idiots (like the glorious Orban) have gotten the idea that they too can build civil rights abusing kleptocracies anywhere in the world.

Besides that this is a new tone Shof. I remember how you claimed Freedom House was wrong, and that political freedom has not actually decayed in Russia over the last decade. Maybe you're the one jumping on the human rights bandwagon?
Last edited by New Werpland on Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:45 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5771
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Neu Leonstein » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:46 pm

Shofercia wrote:I was talking about the importance of organizations that Russia's in.

That's not the way it sounded earlier, but I may have misinterpreted. Anyway, the degree to which this matters to the topic at hand is the degree to which these organisations are relevant only because China is a member, and will play a meaningful role to the extent to which Chinese leaders feel their country would benefit. Chinese policy is to, if in doubt, not put all their eggs in any one basket and maintain as much multipolarity in the world as possible. Which makes Russia useful to them. But the idea that the SCO or any other such organisation could be used to promote Russian interests if the Chinese did not share those interests is pretty far-fetched, and to that extent I think the size or importance of the SCO tells us very little about Russia's importance in the world.
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:50 pm

Shofercia wrote:
Republic of Wreptzle wrote:
Considering the members of the SCO, almost all the wealth in the combined GDP is made up by Russia and China. (Assuming that those figures aren't including India)


They include India and Pakistan.


From Wiki:
On July 10 2015, the SCO decided to admit India and Pakistan as full members, and they are expected to join by 2016.[2][3]

Technically they haven't joined yet and that will make Russia even less influential in the SCO.
Last edited by Geilinor on Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
West Aurelia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5793
Founded: Sep 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby West Aurelia » Mon Oct 05, 2015 3:56 am

Turkey intercepted a Russian fighter that had violated its airspace. Russia has said that the violation was the result of a navigation error. I'm glad that this wasn't a deliberate provocation and nothing went out of control.

However other sources are saying that unidentified MiG-29s harassed two Turkish F-16s. I'm not sure if this is related to the other incident, since Turkey called out Russia on that one. Syria uses MiG-29s but I doubt they would actually harass Turkish jets with tensions in the region already so high.
_REPUBLIC OF WEST AURELIA_
Official factbook
#Valaransofab

User avatar
Ameige
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5794
Founded: Jan 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Ameige » Mon Oct 05, 2015 5:36 am

Zorbae wrote:At this point the Vatican could start bombing Syria, and I still wouldn't even raise an eyebrow.


Same here. I cant imagine a single non-middle eastern country out there has good feelings toward syria at this point.
If they get bombed by someone, its cause they are jerks who dont know how to play well with others and they got whats coming to them.

Syria gets bombed cause they are jerks and no one likes them.

User avatar
The Military Department of Freedonia
Envoy
 
Posts: 293
Founded: Sep 19, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Military Department of Freedonia » Mon Oct 05, 2015 7:22 am

Shofercia wrote:
The Military Department of Freedonia wrote:The current Russian government is not that awful to its own citizens; but, Iran is an evil and murderous regime that seeks to exterminate Christians and Jews, just as ISIS does. The Russians have launched 2-3 serious airstrikes against ISIS, but all the SERIOUS Russian and Iranian effort is going towards supporting the ASSad regime in Syria. We should focus on ISIS in Iraq, and then move into Syria after letting all the Syrian troops, rebel terrorists, and ISIS fighters kill each other. There are SIX evil groups in the region who pose threats to security :
Iran
Russia
ASSad's Syrian regime
The rebels fighting ASSad, who are largely composed of Al-Quaeda left-overs, with a VERY SMALL amount of "moderates"(a relative term there)
Taliban left-overs; like the ones who took over Kunduz in Iraq
ISIS

The order we should fight them (or take highly aggressive action against) is:
1.ISIS
2.Iran
3.ASSad
4.The rebels
5.The Taliban
6.Russia


The US is unable to fight Iran or Russia in the Middle East, and since they're protecting Assad, fighting Assad would also lead to defeat, much like the US was unable to fight Vietnam in Vietnam.


We shouldn't fight Russia, necessarily, but we can and should help Israel exterminate the Iranian government. Remember, there are Iranians who hate their oppressive government. We should let Assad and the rebels fight each other for a while and then step in and choose a winner, so to speak. If we unleash our military they can do pretty much anything (In other words, remove the strict rules of engagement that they were under in Iraq and Afghanistan, and allow enhanced interoggation).
"A man's gotta have something to believe in. I believe I'll have another drink." --- W.C. Fields
Light a man a fire, keep him warm for the night.
Set a man on fire, keep him warm for the rest of his life.

Political Compass (my personal scores, not in-character ones; although my in-character is conservative too):
Economic Left/RIGHT: 4.38
Social Libertarian/AUTHORITARIAN: 2.72

User avatar
The Military Department of Freedonia
Envoy
 
Posts: 293
Founded: Sep 19, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Military Department of Freedonia » Mon Oct 05, 2015 7:25 am

New Werpland wrote:
Shofercia wrote:Balkens despises Putin because under Putin, Russia became strong, but in order to get people like you on his side, he'll jump on the Human Rights bandwagon.

This makes me want to vomit. "Russia becoming strong" correlates with Russia poisoning the futures of it's neighboring nations. And what makes you think this has nothing to do with civil rights? Putin wants to rebuild Russia as a superpower, and with that he'll bring his populist conservative bullshit around with him. And unfortunately now that Russia's state as a superpower has become apparent to the world, various idiots (like the glorious Orban) have gotten the idea that they too can build civil rights abusing kleptocracies anywhere in the world.

Besides that this is a new tone Shof. I remember how you claimed Freedom House was wrong, and that political freedom has not actually decayed in Russia over the last decade. Maybe you're the one jumping on the human rights bandwagon?


Putin is a bad actor, but he has done well for Russia. Their GDP is up, their wages are up, and he cut their unemployment in half. As icing on the cake he annexed Crimea and part of Eastern Ukraine. You may think, as I do, that this aggression is wrong, but it is STRENGTH.
"A man's gotta have something to believe in. I believe I'll have another drink." --- W.C. Fields
Light a man a fire, keep him warm for the night.
Set a man on fire, keep him warm for the rest of his life.

Political Compass (my personal scores, not in-character ones; although my in-character is conservative too):
Economic Left/RIGHT: 4.38
Social Libertarian/AUTHORITARIAN: 2.72

User avatar
Rio Cana
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10825
Founded: Dec 21, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Rio Cana » Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:47 am

West Aurelia wrote:Turkey intercepted a Russian fighter that had violated its airspace. Russia has said that the violation was the result of a navigation error. I'm glad that this wasn't a deliberate provocation and nothing went out of control.

However other sources are saying that unidentified MiG-29s harassed two Turkish F-16s. I'm not sure if this is related to the other incident, since Turkey called out Russia on that one. Syria uses MiG-29s but I doubt they would actually harass Turkish jets with tensions in the region already so high.


It could be a message to Turkey to stop playing hidden games. Has we all know, Turkey is part of NATO but they have kind of been playing there own game in Syria. Looking the other way while IISIS and those other anti-Western groups were being supplied via Turkey. When it comes to Assad, being more obsessed with Assad then with ISIS and those other groups. It seems Turkey is playing NATO but they know better not to play the same game against Russia.
National Information
Empire of Rio Cana has been refounded.
We went from Empire to Peoples Republic to two divided Republics one called Marina to back to an Empire. And now a Republic under a military General. Our Popular Music
Our National Love SongOur Military Forces
Formerly appointed twice Minister of Defense and once Minister of Foreign Affairs for South America Region.

User avatar
Minoa
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6082
Founded: Oct 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Minoa » Mon Oct 05, 2015 10:30 am

The situation is getting really depressing given the fears about nuclear war and what the weapons could do: if it sadly turns out that way, then the world is going to be more than a depressing place.
Mme A. d'Oiseau, B.A. (State of Minoa)

User avatar
Jamzmania
Senator
 
Posts: 4863
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Jamzmania » Mon Oct 05, 2015 10:36 am

Minoa wrote:The situation is getting really depressing given the fears about nuclear war and what the weapons could do: if it sadly turns out that way, then the world is going to be more than a depressing place.

Nuclear war? Doubtful it'll go that far.
The Alexanderians wrote:"Fear no man or woman,
No matter what their size.
Call upon me,
And I will equalize."

-Engraved on the side of my M1911 .45

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Mon Oct 05, 2015 12:48 pm

West Aurelia wrote:Turkey intercepted a Russian fighter that had violated its airspace. Russia has said that the violation was the result of a navigation error. I'm glad that this wasn't a deliberate provocation and nothing went out of control.

However other sources are saying that unidentified MiG-29s harassed two Turkish F-16s. I'm not sure if this is related to the other incident, since Turkey called out Russia on that one. Syria uses MiG-29s but I doubt they would actually harass Turkish jets with tensions in the region already so high.


It's funny that Turkey is getting its airspace violated for a change.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Kalifati Arab shqiptar
Minister
 
Posts: 2244
Founded: Aug 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kalifati Arab shqiptar » Mon Oct 05, 2015 5:58 pm

Baltenstein wrote:
West Aurelia wrote:Turkey intercepted a Russian fighter that had violated its airspace. Russia has said that the violation was the result of a navigation error. I'm glad that this wasn't a deliberate provocation and nothing went out of control.

However other sources are saying that unidentified MiG-29s harassed two Turkish F-16s. I'm not sure if this is related to the other incident, since Turkey called out Russia on that one. Syria uses MiG-29s but I doubt they would actually harass Turkish jets with tensions in the region already so high.


It's funny that Turkey is getting its airspace violated for a change.

Turkey should also fix their weapons systems, they seem to miss ISIS with their airstrikes. ;)

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:04 pm

Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Staythefout
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 424
Founded: Aug 11, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Staythefout » Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:19 pm

Putin's doing what he always has : flexing. He's a cunt, but he's a muscular cunt. He wants to play the mid east because he knows Obama's strategy is weaksauce and he can stake another claim in the world. I think he used to be a kgb agent...he probably has delusions of bringing the soviet union back. He can do what he likes in syria but if he oversteps that there may be...trouble. At least if it's after obama leaves office. He won't do anything, lol. Just look at him work out compared to putin:

http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/ ... rsaw-video
http://static.deathandtaxesmag.com/uplo ... -tiger.jpg
:rofl:
Last edited by Staythefout on Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If there has to be a bloodbath, then let's get it over with."

User avatar
West Aurelia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5793
Founded: Sep 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby West Aurelia » Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:30 am

Russian jets violated Turkey's airspace for a second time.

Russia has been accused of bombing hospitals in Syria. I seriously doubt that these are deliberate attacks as the doctors are suggesting, since Russia would lose all legitimacy that it is fighting terrorism if it were true. It's likely an unfortunate consequence of the unguided bombs Russia is using.
_REPUBLIC OF WEST AURELIA_
Official factbook
#Valaransofab

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:02 am

West Aurelia wrote:sources are saying that unidentified MiG-29s harassed two Turkish F-16s. I'm not sure if this is related to the other incident, since Turkey called out Russia on that one. Syria uses MiG-29s but I doubt they would actually harass Turkish jets with tensions in the region already so high.


That depends. Turkey has already shot down two helicopters and a MiG-23 so far during the conflict so either the Syrians haven't learnt from their previous losses or Russia hasn't got the memo that Turkey is prepared to meet what it deems threats to its security.

The government has basically said that it's airspace is off limits and it is well within its rights to respond to any aircraft that the military deems concerning enough to scramble fighter aircraft.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Almonaster Nuevo, Ask Jeeves [Bot], Cessarea, Duvniask, Elejamie, Greeley, Gudetamia, Kreigsreich of Iron, New Temecula, Ovstylap, Plan Neonie, Soviet Belcraine-Russian Unionstate, Statesburg, Stellar Colonies, The Wyrese Empire, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads