Sociobiology wrote:BK117B2 wrote:
I do. The person selling it does. A couple other parties involved in the sale do. The government does.
exactly , the contract is enforced by the government, you are again using their services, think of it like a buffet, you still have to pay for the whole thing even if you only eat the lettuce and crackers.
Contract enforcement by government isn't a service government provides. It is forced regardless of whether you want it or not.
.Sociobiology wrote:
Incorrect. Not leaving your home is not the same as using services from someone else.
it is if your home is inside a states borders.
Wrong. It just means that borders exist beyond your property.
Sociobiology wrote:
Well, if they are stateless, then their friends/family/whatever.
which is just might makes right, no real rights here.
you want rights you got to pay for them.
That's not might makes right. That would be might makes might.
Sociobiology wrote:
No, I mean it would already be taken and still held by dead people. There'd be no habitable territory left for living humans
there isn't it is all transfers from previous claims. and along every string of transfers you can find a claim by conquest.
Except that there IS, since we acknowledge that people dead for thousands of years no longer have any actual claim