NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread II: Gladstone's Revenge

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Help choose a title for thread Mk. III

UK Politics Thread III: Disraeli Gears
12
13%
UK Politics Thread III: The Garden of Eden
7
8%
UK Politics Thread III: Lord Palmerston or Pitt the Elder?
12
13%
UK Politics Thread III: Pleidiol Wyf I'm Gwlad
7
8%
UK Politics Thread III: Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
3
3%
UK Politics Thread III: Thready McThreadface
48
53%
Other
2
2%
 
Total votes : 91

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Tue Sep 15, 2015 12:47 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Greater-London wrote:
He's certainly making it more interesting. I have a hope (although I know its EXTREMELY unlikely) he will save the union and campaign for us to leave the EU. More likely that his election as Labour leader will be the biggest political earthquake he causes.

Most of the party doesn't want to leave the EU, Corbyn wouldn't risk it.

Corbyn isn't stupid. (I'd hope) He wouldn't go against a core part of the party just because of his views. Like with Farron and LGBT rights.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Tue Sep 15, 2015 12:53 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:

At my school Debating Society we're debating on whether Corbyn can win the General Election. Might debate in favour of #JezWeCan, just can't find any facts and figures in favour of him. Is there ANY reason why he can win? This isn't reassuring for me :(.

Sunshine.


"Economics are the method; the object is to change the heart and soul."

and what happens when the economics promote/reward greed and selfishness? yeah, someone, not naming names, pretty much deliberately fucked the country with their cohorts. now we need to compete with a biased media to try and convince people that maybe sanctions are bad and human rights are good and that maybe we should in actual fact help people. our only hope is to try and slowly fix things and maybe get someone good in while also hoping people don't just the same arseholes in for another round.
Last edited by Alyakia on Tue Sep 15, 2015 12:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
GreatestBanks
Minister
 
Posts: 3314
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby GreatestBanks » Tue Sep 15, 2015 12:56 pm

Val Halla wrote:
GreatestBanks wrote:Well, my friend, I am that savage white american down the street in a white suburb that all your pals were talking about.

... What?

My main gripe with UKIP is the alarming rate of just... Idk, stupidity in their candidates. I mean, every party has them, but there's such a high rate of UKIP guys claiming gays cause droughts and stuff

I don't like their candidates, I like their ideas.
If you voted labour, did you vote for it because you liked their ideas or because Ed Miliband was their leader and you liked him?
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support capitalism, put this in your signature.
Political Spectrum
Right: 0.63
Authoritarian: 2.62
Foreign Policy: 6.57(Neo-Conservative)
Culture: 7.17 (Conservative)


♂♀Copy and Paste this in your sig if you know there are 2 genders and didn't fail biology♂♀
Notice: I use NS Stats for everything other than population and GDP.

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Tue Sep 15, 2015 12:56 pm

Geilinor wrote:Most of the party doesn't want to leave the EU, Corbyn wouldn't risk it.


I'm inclined to agree, although I think Labour is far more divided on this issue then they let on. Whilst I doubt either Labour or the Torries will campaign for 'out' I think the campaign needs prominent left wingers.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Tue Sep 15, 2015 12:57 pm

GreatestBanks wrote:
Val Halla wrote:... What?

My main gripe with UKIP is the alarming rate of just... Idk, stupidity in their candidates. I mean, every party has them, but there's such a high rate of UKIP guys claiming gays cause droughts and stuff

I don't like their candidates, I like their ideas.
If you voted labour, did you vote for it because you liked their ideas or because Ed Miliband was their leader and you liked him?

You see, there's a line. You're voting for both, not one or the other.

If your candidate is an idiot, and you vote for him, you're trying to put an idiot in parliament.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
GreatestBanks
Minister
 
Posts: 3314
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby GreatestBanks » Tue Sep 15, 2015 12:59 pm

Val Halla wrote:
GreatestBanks wrote:I don't like their candidates, I like their ideas.
If you voted labour, did you vote for it because you liked their ideas or because Ed Miliband was their leader and you liked him?

You see, there's a line. You're voting for both, not one or the other.

If your candidate is an idiot, and you vote for him, you're trying to put an idiot in parliament.

I do not vote in the U.K since I do not live there. I have said before I'm a yankee, and even then I'm not eligible to vote. I just enjoy the ideas of UKIP. I'd only vote for a candidate in a constituency if a) I lived there b)I supported their ideas and c)they weren't stupid

Also, if I like the Republican Party in the USA, but say their congressional candidate is stupid, I just won't vote for him, I'll vote for a 3rd party or for ''None of the Above''
Last edited by GreatestBanks on Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support capitalism, put this in your signature.
Political Spectrum
Right: 0.63
Authoritarian: 2.62
Foreign Policy: 6.57(Neo-Conservative)
Culture: 7.17 (Conservative)


♂♀Copy and Paste this in your sig if you know there are 2 genders and didn't fail biology♂♀
Notice: I use NS Stats for everything other than population and GDP.

User avatar
GreatestBanks
Minister
 
Posts: 3314
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby GreatestBanks » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:02 pm

St Wilhelm wrote:
Imperial Valaran wrote:You gave me quite a shock on that last thread, Arch; first time I post on a UK politics thread in months and a mod lock moments later :P

We really should resurrect Gladstone, and make him a real eternal leader.

If we're resurrecting Gladstone, I move to simultaneously resurrect Disraeli too.

That I can agree with.

Gladstone V Disraeli 2020
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support capitalism, put this in your signature.
Political Spectrum
Right: 0.63
Authoritarian: 2.62
Foreign Policy: 6.57(Neo-Conservative)
Culture: 7.17 (Conservative)


♂♀Copy and Paste this in your sig if you know there are 2 genders and didn't fail biology♂♀
Notice: I use NS Stats for everything other than population and GDP.

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:04 pm

GreatestBanks wrote:
Val Halla wrote:You see, there's a line. You're voting for both, not one or the other.

If your candidate is an idiot, and you vote for him, you're trying to put an idiot in parliament.

I do not vote in the U.K since I do not live there. I have said before I'm a yankee, and even then I'm not eligible to vote. I just enjoy the ideas of UKIP.

Also, if I like the Republican Party, but say their congressional candidate is stupid, I just won't vote for him, I'll vote for a 3rd party or for ''None of the Above''

Well, a significant portion of UKIP's candidates are idiots.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
GreatestBanks
Minister
 
Posts: 3314
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby GreatestBanks » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:04 pm

Val Halla wrote:
GreatestBanks wrote:I do not vote in the U.K since I do not live there. I have said before I'm a yankee, and even then I'm not eligible to vote. I just enjoy the ideas of UKIP.

Also, if I like the Republican Party, but say their congressional candidate is stupid, I just won't vote for him, I'll vote for a 3rd party or for ''None of the Above''

Well, a significant portion of UKIP's candidates are idiots.

I did not know that, I just know the party leaders&the party's ideas
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support capitalism, put this in your signature.
Political Spectrum
Right: 0.63
Authoritarian: 2.62
Foreign Policy: 6.57(Neo-Conservative)
Culture: 7.17 (Conservative)


♂♀Copy and Paste this in your sig if you know there are 2 genders and didn't fail biology♂♀
Notice: I use NS Stats for everything other than population and GDP.

User avatar
Minoa
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5404
Founded: Oct 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Minoa » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:10 pm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34263447

Corbyn's actions seems to reflect the opinions of the poor and vulnerable: the welfare cuts by the Conservative government have made a lot of people a lot less proud of being British. And me fleeing alone to Paris on 22-24 July 2015 really says a lot about how exasperated we are.
Last edited by Minoa on Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mme A. d'Oiseau, B.A. (State of Minoa)

User avatar
GreatestBanks
Minister
 
Posts: 3314
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby GreatestBanks » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:12 pm

Minoa wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34263447

Corbyn's actions seems to reflect the opinions of the poor and vulnerable: the welfare cuts by the Conservative government have made a lot of people a lot less proud of being British. And me fleeing alone to Paris on 22-24 July 2015 really says a lot about how exasperated we are.

You are a single person lol. And if anything welfare cuts, at least in the U.S right here, would make most people happy and even more nationalist.
Last edited by GreatestBanks on Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support capitalism, put this in your signature.
Political Spectrum
Right: 0.63
Authoritarian: 2.62
Foreign Policy: 6.57(Neo-Conservative)
Culture: 7.17 (Conservative)


♂♀Copy and Paste this in your sig if you know there are 2 genders and didn't fail biology♂♀
Notice: I use NS Stats for everything other than population and GDP.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:14 pm

Minoa wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34263447

Corbyn's actions seems to reflect the opinions of the poor and vulnerable: the welfare cuts by the Conservative government have made a lot of people a lot less proud of being British. And me fleeing alone to Paris on 22-24 July 2015 really says a lot about how exasperated we are.

I'm not British, but that is not going to work when every other leader has sung it, even Michael Foot.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:17 pm

Minoa wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34263447

Corbyn's actions seems to reflect the opinions of the poor and vulnerable: the welfare cuts by the Conservative government have made a lot of people a lot less proud of being British. And me fleeing alone to Paris on 22-24 July 2015 really says a lot about how exasperated we are.

Or, put it simply, he thought he'd be anti-monarchist for a bit, but didn't take into account the disrespect it would cause due to the context.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:17 pm

I'd like to point out that Corbyn, while he does have some extreme views, doesn't intend to bring in a lot of them
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:19 pm

Val Halla wrote:I'd like to point out that Corbyn, while he does have some extreme views, doesn't intend to bring in a lot of them

It's still extreme enough to put centrists off from voting for him come 5 years over, say, the Lib Dems or the Tories.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
The Ridings of Yorkshire
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 161
Founded: Jul 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Ridings of Yorkshire » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:20 pm

Great Nepal wrote:I think 2020 could go few different ways. Let me start by saying Corbyn won't win, he may attract some voters from the left and some disenfranchised voters but this will be countered by comparatively right wing supporters of Labour defecting to liberal democrats and given his questionable foreign and defence policy he'll get destroyed in the debates. That doesn't mean its time to bury Labour yet, Corbyn has reinvigorated young and left-far left voters and unless he does something really silly they aren't going away so debate will shift to the left (not as far as Labour might want but far enough to make conservative uncomfortable). With more moderate leader who has backing of Corbyn, Labour could possibly take it away although whoever takes over will need to go back on their promise wrt SNP (they aren't going to get enough seats in England without isolating themselves against SNP but they can't form majority without SNP). If conservative goes into election with comparatively left candidate, they could exploit the shift by Corbyn to get the majority (they aren't particularly reliant on Scotland for SNP to bother them).
Now if neither of these happen (ie. Labour go in with Corbyn/ Corbyn-lite or Conservatives go with right wing candidates/ don't move back to the centre), landscape will be prime to be exploited by liberal democrats. If they market themselves as centre-left candidate, they might be able to get back into the game although since they probably won't get enough seats with Labour (again SNP taking the Scotland and Labour + SNP not needing Liberals) and will probably avoid allying with Conservatives for a generation, I can't see them going into government. Maybe giving opposition a serious threat though.

Probably Jeremy Corybn will be able to rally the lower/working class, and I think he is more likely to enter a coalition with my gut instinct.
Hope he has a debating style better than Galloway's (best debater in the world apparently) to rip his opponents apart for a lulzstorm.

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:20 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Val Halla wrote:I'd like to point out that Corbyn, while he does have some extreme views, doesn't intend to bring in a lot of them

It's still extreme enough to put centrists off from voting for him come 5 years over, say, the Lib Dems or the Tories.

Don't know that yet, do we? I'd like to point out that almost every election the voting spectrum changes.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Minoa
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5404
Founded: Oct 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Minoa » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:22 pm

Val Halla wrote:I'd like to point out that Corbyn, while he does have some extreme views, doesn't intend to bring in a lot of them

I think Corbyn intends to sneak them in phases, until there is enough support for a republic. I'm 50/50 on the monarchy/republic debate – albeit overshadowed by whether I'd live in the UK by 2020-2021, let alone even being a citizen at all by the looks of the Conservatives' plans.
Last edited by Minoa on Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mme A. d'Oiseau, B.A. (State of Minoa)

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:24 pm

Val Halla wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:It's still extreme enough to put centrists off from voting for him come 5 years over, say, the Lib Dems or the Tories.

Don't know that yet, do we? I'd like to point out that almost every election the voting spectrum changes.

Yes, we can't say anything that we can consider concrete in five years. But we can look at generalisation and political trend to make rational predictions. Of course, many voters are anything but irrational during elections (i.e. BoJo voters who voted for him because he was funny), so whether it will actually be true or not is a matter of academic debate.

Minoa wrote:
Val Halla wrote:I'd like to point out that Corbyn, while he does have some extreme views, doesn't intend to bring in a lot of them

I think Corbyn intends to sneak them in phases, until there is enough support for a republic. I'm 50/50 on the monarchy/republic debate – albeit overshadowed by whether I'd live in the UK by 2020-2021, let alone even being a citizen at all by the looks of the Conservatives' plans.

I'm not the biggest fan of the monarchy, in that I don't blindly fetishise over them like a lot of self-proclaimed monarchists. But for as long as they bring in more money than we spend on them, I support Liz being our Head Event Attender along with the rest of the parasites.
Last edited by Wolfmanne2 on Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:26 pm

Minoa wrote:
Val Halla wrote:I'd like to point out that Corbyn, while he does have some extreme views, doesn't intend to bring in a lot of them

I think Corbyn intends to sneak them in phases, until there is enough support for a republic. I'm 50/50 on the monarchy/republic debate – albeit overshadowed by whether I'd live in the UK by 2020-2021, let alone even being a citizen at all by the looks of the Conservatives' plans.

I don't wanna stay >.<

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Val Halla wrote:Don't know that yet, do we? I'd like to point out that almost every election the voting spectrum changes.

Yes, we can't say anything that we can consider concrete in five years. But we can look at generalisation and political trend to make rational predictions. Of course, many voters are anything but irrational during elections (i.e. BoJo voters who voted for him because he was funny), so whether it will actually be true or not is a matter of academic debate.

Nobody expecting the Tories to crush it. But they did.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:39 pm

The following scenario has just dawned on me, in the next 5 years the Queen could die and we all know who would take over from her and how (un)popular he is... with a republican Labour leader possibly still there... shit could get extremely real for the Monarchy/Republic debate. Nobody is dethroning Queen Elizabeth the 2nd I think that is pretty damn certain but king Charles the 3rd? He might just prompt republicans (Corbyn) into making a debate of it. I still think he would ultimately lose that debate and it would severely hurt his election chances if he ever made that a real issue even with Charles instead of Elizabeth but it would bring the issue into the limelight.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57896
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:41 pm

Olivaero wrote:The following scenario has just dawned on me, in the next 5 years the Queen could die and we all know who would take over from her and how (un)popular he is... with a republican Labour leader possibly still there... shit could get extremely real for the Monarchy/Republic debate. Nobody is dethroning Queen Elizabeth the 2nd I think that is pretty damn certain but king Charles the 3rd? He might just prompt republicans (Corbyn) into making a debate of it. I still think he would ultimately lose that debate and it would severely hurt his election chances if he ever made that a real issue even with Charles instead of Elizabeth but it would bring the issue into the limelight.


Depends on the calibre of the republicans they trot out.
With Hitchens still alive... but he's not. So I can't really think of any powerful orators on the subject.

Reasoned analysts yes, but both sides have those.
And the monarchists have both the status quo, and emotion on their side. And quite a few orators.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:44 pm

United Kingdom of self-declared Nations,
haphaza'dly welded 'til Scotland gets mad.
We've no constitution, sucked at revolution,
But we get four FIFA teams (all of them bad)!


shamelessly stolen from another forum. this is our new anthem.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6739
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:44 pm

Minoa wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34263447

Corbyn's actions seems to reflect the opinions of the poor and vulnerable: the welfare cuts by the Conservative government have made a lot of people a lot less proud of being British. And me fleeing alone to Paris on 22-24 July 2015 really says a lot about how exasperated we are.

Gonna go out a limb here but I'm going to put my money on it not being about that at all.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Marcurix
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5235
Founded: Nov 01, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Marcurix » Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:06 pm

The Matthew Islands wrote:
Minoa wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34263447

Corbyn's actions seems to reflect the opinions of the poor and vulnerable: the welfare cuts by the Conservative government have made a lot of people a lot less proud of being British. And me fleeing alone to Paris on 22-24 July 2015 really says a lot about how exasperated we are.

Gonna go out a limb here but I'm going to put my money on it not being about that at all.


Perish the thought that this not be a major statement on the state of a country.

Why, I once neglected to sing the theme of Only Fools and Horses in protest of a closing of a local bakery.
I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.
-Voltaire

A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
-Winston Churchill

Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.
-Winston Churchill

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Denoidumbutoniurucwivobrs, Des-Bal, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Greater Cashlandia, Greater Cesnica, Gun Manufacturers, Haganham, Hidrandia, Hispida, Kerwa, Koranz, Rusozak, Tarsonis, The Archregimancy, The Huskar Social Union, The North Polish Union, Valyxias, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads