Alyakia wrote:no really i am pissed off if we went after footballers for having a high salary for kicking a ball or certain capitalists for being rich for happening to be born into a family that already owned a business using other people's labour while poor people struggle despite working harder (turns out wages do not always correlate to how hard you work) you'd be screaming, don't give me this crap
Government doesn't pay footballers or people's inheritances while they do (at least partially) pay tube drivers. As they are using public's money to pay these salaries, we are certainly allowed to comment on salary levels.
Alyakia wrote:then maybe you should support strong unions for teachers instead of supporting a pretty much just anti-union party? (bonus points for going after those that are successful and trying to drag them down, typical lef- wait a minute)
labour isn't the one actively trying to destroy unions and reduce public sector workers and teachers salaries and benefits.
So you'd have government pay all civil service members in excess of £50,000; how exactly do you plan on funding this?



Oh, Cameron. Why?
