NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread II: Gladstone's Revenge

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Help choose a title for thread Mk. III

UK Politics Thread III: Disraeli Gears
12
13%
UK Politics Thread III: The Garden of Eden
7
8%
UK Politics Thread III: Lord Palmerston or Pitt the Elder?
12
13%
UK Politics Thread III: Pleidiol Wyf I'm Gwlad
7
8%
UK Politics Thread III: Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
3
3%
UK Politics Thread III: Thready McThreadface
48
53%
Other
2
2%
 
Total votes : 91

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:13 pm

Alyakia wrote:no really i am pissed off if we went after footballers for having a high salary for kicking a ball or certain capitalists for being rich for happening to be born into a family that already owned a business using other people's labour while poor people struggle despite working harder (turns out wages do not always correlate to how hard you work) you'd be screaming, don't give me this crap

Government doesn't pay footballers or people's inheritances while they do (at least partially) pay tube drivers. As they are using public's money to pay these salaries, we are certainly allowed to comment on salary levels.

Alyakia wrote:then maybe you should support strong unions for teachers instead of supporting a pretty much just anti-union party? (bonus points for going after those that are successful and trying to drag them down, typical lef- wait a minute)
labour isn't the one actively trying to destroy unions and reduce public sector workers and teachers salaries and benefits.

So you'd have government pay all civil service members in excess of £50,000; how exactly do you plan on funding this?
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
GreatestBanks
Minister
 
Posts: 3314
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby GreatestBanks » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:14 pm

Glasgia wrote:
GreatestBanks wrote:So here is how I picture U.K Politics, please tell me if I am correct (I am a yank btw)

Conservative Party: Centre-right. Typical centre-right european party. (Current Majority Party)
Labour Party: Centre-Left. Although, with the ''New Labour'' Agenda that took place in the 90s, it moved to the centre. Has currently elected a very left-leaning person, probably will move back to the left soon.
UKIP: Right-wing, anti-EU, anti-immigration. Got 13% of the vote last election but no seats for some reason (This is personally my favorite party)
Liberal Democrats: Centrist, has few principles
SNP: Scottish Socialists who want to secede from the U.K
Green Party: Pro-enviroment, centre-left, social democrats?
Democratic Unionist Party: Right-wing pro north Ireland+rest of Ireland unionism
Plaid Cymru: Pro-Welsh independence, social democrats. Left Wing
Sinn Fein; Pro Irish Unionism. Social Democrats. Left Wing
Ulster Unionist Party: Pro unionism with Ireland. Centre-Right.
Social Democratic and Labour Party: Irish Nationalists, Social Democrats. Left-Wing


Pretty much, just bolded a few things. SNP aren't explicitly socialist, though perhaps it could be argued some of their senior members have socialist leanings. Only other thing is "Irish unionism" - What do you mean by that? Sinn Féin are Irish Nationalists, like the SDLP, and want a "united Ireland" - Basically, they want Ireland and the "six counties" (aka Northern Ireland) to come together as one state, independent of the UK. The UUP and DUP are unionists - They want Northern Ireland to remain a part of the UK, separate to the Republic of Ireland.

You seem pretty well informed generally though, which is always good to see. Why do you prefer UKIP to the other parties?

I prefer UKIP because it is closest to my political views. Although, I find some of their comments rather degrading and some even disgusting.
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support capitalism, put this in your signature.
Political Spectrum
Right: 0.63
Authoritarian: 2.62
Foreign Policy: 6.57(Neo-Conservative)
Culture: 7.17 (Conservative)


♂♀Copy and Paste this in your sig if you know there are 2 genders and didn't fail biology♂♀
Notice: I use NS Stats for everything other than population and GDP.

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:16 pm

GreatestBanks wrote:
Glasgia wrote:
Pretty much, just bolded a few things. SNP aren't explicitly socialist, though perhaps it could be argued some of their senior members have socialist leanings. Only other thing is "Irish unionism" - What do you mean by that? Sinn Féin are Irish Nationalists, like the SDLP, and want a "united Ireland" - Basically, they want Ireland and the "six counties" (aka Northern Ireland) to come together as one state, independent of the UK. The UUP and DUP are unionists - They want Northern Ireland to remain a part of the UK, separate to the Republic of Ireland.

You seem pretty well informed generally though, which is always good to see. Why do you prefer UKIP to the other parties?

I prefer UKIP because it is closest to my political views. Although, I find some of their comments rather degrading and some even disgusting.

If a party can't master basic decency, I don't think people should vote for it.

Also, your sig is too long
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm

Great Nepal wrote:So you'd have government pay all civil service members in excess of £50,000; how exactly do you plan on funding this?


I'm sure McDonnell will get his pals at the newly nationalized People's Democratic Bank of England to do him a few favors.

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:29 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyNI7wm ... e=youtu.be

Havent seen one of these in a while ...
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:47 pm

Image
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:48 pm

Greater-London wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyNI7wmjS6s&feature=youtu.be

Havent seen one of these in a while ...

Saw Brian Cox share that on his FB page. God the reactions from some people are hilarious.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:48 pm

Alyakia wrote:

:rofl: Oh, Cameron. Why?
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Apollinis
Diplomat
 
Posts: 741
Founded: May 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Apollinis » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:55 pm

Alyakia wrote:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/COyiIE7WgAAjg5b. png

11/10

That's genuinely brilliant
Basilîa Abolinis - a Greco-Germanic, federal, semi-stratocratic, socially libertarian, left-wing Orthodox absolute monarchy of around 568,267,000 people.
|IIWiki|Map|Language|

Economic left: -9.88
Social libertarian: -8.82
OOC - 19, Northern English, Uni student (History)
Pro: Environmentalism, self-determination, democratic socialism, social libertarianism, reform of drug laws, European federalism, LGBTQ, social equality
Anti: Imperialism, reaction, authoritarianism, sexism, racism, LGBTQ-phobia, religious fundamentalism, New Classical architecture

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58257
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:56 pm

Alyakia wrote:(Image)

Brilliant.

Just brilliant.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Zeinbrad
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29535
Founded: Jun 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeinbrad » Mon Sep 14, 2015 4:19 pm

Alyakia wrote:(Image)

My suspicious of Queen Elizabeth being Emperor Paplatine is confirmed.
“There are three ways to ultimate success:
The first way is to be kind.
The second way is to be kind.
The third way is to be kind.”
― Fred Rogers
Currently looking for an artist for a Star Wars fan comic I want to make.

User avatar
GreatestBanks
Minister
 
Posts: 3314
Founded: Mar 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby GreatestBanks » Mon Sep 14, 2015 4:21 pm

Val Halla wrote:
GreatestBanks wrote:I prefer UKIP because it is closest to my political views. Although, I find some of their comments rather degrading and some even disgusting.

If a party can't master basic decency, I don't think people should vote for it.

Also, your sig is too long

Well, my friend, I am that savage white american down the street in a white suburb that all your pals were talking about.
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support capitalism, put this in your signature.
Political Spectrum
Right: 0.63
Authoritarian: 2.62
Foreign Policy: 6.57(Neo-Conservative)
Culture: 7.17 (Conservative)


♂♀Copy and Paste this in your sig if you know there are 2 genders and didn't fail biology♂♀
Notice: I use NS Stats for everything other than population and GDP.

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Mon Sep 14, 2015 5:00 pm

GreatestBanks wrote:
Val Halla wrote:If a party can't master basic decency, I don't think people should vote for it.

Also, your sig is too long

Well, my friend, I am that savage white american down the street in a white suburb that all your pals were talking about.

... What?

My main gripe with UKIP is the alarming rate of just... Idk, stupidity in their candidates. I mean, every party has them, but there's such a high rate of UKIP guys claiming gays cause droughts and stuff
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon Sep 14, 2015 5:19 pm

Val Halla wrote:
GreatestBanks wrote:Well, my friend, I am that savage white american down the street in a white suburb that all your pals were talking about.

... What?

My main gripe with UKIP is the alarming rate of just... Idk, stupidity in their candidates. I mean, every party has them, but there's such a high rate of UKIP guys claiming gays cause droughts and stuff

They also have a problem attracting racists as a self-proclaimed non-racist party.

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Mon Sep 14, 2015 5:31 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Val Halla wrote:... What?

My main gripe with UKIP is the alarming rate of just... Idk, stupidity in their candidates. I mean, every party has them, but there's such a high rate of UKIP guys claiming gays cause droughts and stuff

They also have a problem attracting racists as a self-proclaimed non-racist party.

There's being right, and there's just being wrong. UKIP are wrong.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
New Luckyland
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 148
Founded: Aug 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Luckyland » Mon Sep 14, 2015 5:37 pm

Next time you meet a UKIP candidate ask them to say "bottle of beer".
I have only two social filters; low self esteem and sobriety.

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6739
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Mon Sep 14, 2015 10:32 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:When legal aid solicitors, teachers and civil servants get paid fuck all but train drivers have strong unions to justify their excessively high pay, I can't really be sympathetic to unions in this country. Granted the Tories aren't doing much to aid the first three. But wouldn't Labour do so too?

So, why do you feel that train drivers are "excessively highly paid"?
What makes you qualified to make that assertion?
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/20 ... lism-works

1 minor point about that article, it doesn't take into context that drivers are so hard to replace not because of a outside market force like lack of candidates, but because the Unions have effectively banned anyone from outside from applying to be a tube driver.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:10 am

The Matthew Islands wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:So, why do you feel that train drivers are "excessively highly paid"?
What makes you qualified to make that assertion?
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/20 ... lism-works

1 minor point about that article, it doesn't take into context that drivers are so hard to replace not because of a outside market force like lack of candidates, but because the Unions have effectively banned anyone from outside from applying to be a tube driver.

Not that there's anything catastrophically wrong about that - it prevents some kind of mass outsourcing and drastic cuts, and as the article points out, you start at the bottom rung in TFL as platform staff. So you have to work up to tube driver.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:30 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The Matthew Islands wrote:1 minor point about that article, it doesn't take into context that drivers are so hard to replace not because of a outside market force like lack of candidates, but because the Unions have effectively banned anyone from outside from applying to be a tube driver.

Not that there's anything catastrophically wrong about that - it prevents some kind of mass outsourcing and drastic cuts, and as the article points out, you start at the bottom rung in TFL as platform staff. So you have to work up to tube driver.


I also don't understand why people are up in arms about a tube driver earning a decent salary - but likely don't care that CEOs earn millions and millions and bankers get huge bonuses every year - or the £100bn in tax reliefs each year. Attack someone who is rich, not working or middle class.
Last edited by Atlanticatia on Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Tue Sep 15, 2015 1:45 am

Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Rhodesia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 439
Founded: Oct 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesia » Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:10 am

I'll take cover now but...

Labour will not win in 2020. The young and radicals may well flock to the party but the older generation of voters (who vote in droves) will not. The dispossessed and disenfranchised won't vote just because an old party elected an old-style leader. It's not whether Labour wins in Scotland that decides elections, it's weather Labour wins in Middle England and, since the realignment of the socio-economic landscape in the Western World in the late-70s/early-80s, every time - every time - Middle England has been offered the choice of centrist Conservative or far-left Labour, the Conservatives have won. (Say what you like, but Thatcher whilst in office was by the political dictionary definition a centrist.)

2020 success story: Corbyn increases Labour vote share in its heartlands and maybe wins a few more seats in the Central Scotland. But he'll distinctly turn off Middle England.

2020 disaster story: Corbyn leads Labour to 1983 2.0 and the Tories increase their majority.

I'm not grandstanding or Labour-bashing. The history is all there and, yes, it does repeat itself. I realise that the informed yoof of NSG will no doubt pull out their crystal balls and tell me how I'm wrong with the proof of Twitter (forgive my sarcastic pessimism) but seriously, check back here in 2020. I won't gloat. Promise.
How to start an argument on NationStates:
1. Express an opinion.
2. Wait.
If you're not in Political Compass' green square, NSG won't like you.

User avatar
Rhodesia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 439
Founded: Oct 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesia » Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:11 am

Atlanticatia wrote:https://twitter.com/RussianEmbassy/status/643440355606700032 oh shit, russia went there tho

Has a point. :roll:
How to start an argument on NationStates:
1. Express an opinion.
2. Wait.
If you're not in Political Compass' green square, NSG won't like you.

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:14 am

Rhodesia wrote: (Say what you like, but Thatcher whilst in office was by the political dictionary definition a centrist.)


Could you elaborate? Examples?
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Rhodesia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 439
Founded: Oct 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesia » Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:31 am

Atlanticatia wrote:
Rhodesia wrote: (Say what you like, but Thatcher whilst in office was by the political dictionary definition a centrist.)


Could you elaborate? Examples?

Perhaps I ought to have said "liberal", but I felt her social conservatism really doesn't warrant the use of the term for her economic liberalism.

Alas: whilst she supported socially conservative values (such as emphasising a lot on the need for "strong families") and religious institutions, she also adopted radical ideas such as Rogernomics. Despite the economic liberalisation, she also increased public spending in the first half of her premiership. Imagine that, a Tory spending their way out of recession. Unheard of, eh. She was essentially big state in society, little (or no) state in business; for it's time, it was the defition of centrism.

Today, we consider centrism a (un)healthy mix of social progressivism, economic liberalism and state intervention in society/economics; the centre point in the 1980s was more to the right of what we know it to be today.
How to start an argument on NationStates:
1. Express an opinion.
2. Wait.
If you're not in Political Compass' green square, NSG won't like you.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:33 am

Labour will not win in 2020. The young and radicals may well flock to the party but the older generation of voters (who vote in droves) will not. The dispossessed and disenfranchised won't vote just because an old party elected an old-style leader. It's not whether Labour wins in Scotland that decides elections, it's weather Labour wins in Middle England and, since the realignment of the socio-economic landscape in the Western World in the late-70s/early-80s, every time - every time - Middle England has been offered the choice of centrist Conservative or far-left Labour, the Conservatives have won. (Say what you like, but Thatcher whilst in office was by the political dictionary definition a centrist.)


have you tried "get rid of middle england"
Last edited by Alyakia on Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:39 am, edited 3 times in total.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads