NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread II: Gladstone's Revenge

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Help choose a title for thread Mk. III

UK Politics Thread III: Disraeli Gears
12
13%
UK Politics Thread III: The Garden of Eden
7
8%
UK Politics Thread III: Lord Palmerston or Pitt the Elder?
12
13%
UK Politics Thread III: Pleidiol Wyf I'm Gwlad
7
8%
UK Politics Thread III: Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
3
3%
UK Politics Thread III: Thready McThreadface
48
53%
Other
2
2%
 
Total votes : 91

User avatar
Knokkeheist
Diplomat
 
Posts: 716
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Knokkeheist » Wed Sep 16, 2015 3:11 am

Alyakia wrote:comrade corbyn:

hates britain
loves the IRA
loves hamas
hates the queen
wants to disband the army
wants humanity to be destroyed by an asteroid

premature ejaculation is a serious issue folks

If this is true , he is a traitor.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Sep 16, 2015 3:12 am




Stops me having to take it out my glass when despite all my efforts the bloody stuff slips in anyway.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Wed Sep 16, 2015 3:15 am

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... ur-reasons

Good article on why Jeremy Corbyn needs a spin doctor.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Wed Sep 16, 2015 3:16 am

Napkiraly wrote:
SD_Film Artists wrote:
I think the Daily Mail and their ilk are only harming themselves by crying wolf with those sensationalist claims. If Corbyn's real views are some degrees better than what the Daily Mail claims, he'd still have terrible views.

You'd be surprised how many people end up believing claims printed in the Daily Mail.


The sad part is that I'm now considering that having the Daily Mail get its way is still better than Corbyn. I do wish there was a more centrist voice in British politics (apart from 8 Lib Dems).
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Sep 16, 2015 3:17 am

Knokkeheist wrote:
Alyakia wrote:comrade corbyn:

hates britain
loves the IRA
loves hamas
hates the queen
wants to disband the army
wants humanity to be destroyed by an asteroid

premature ejaculation is a serious issue folks

If this is true , he is a traitor.


Well being a republican is technically illegal so...........
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Sep 16, 2015 3:41 am

Olivaero wrote:The following scenario has just dawned on me, in the next 5 years the Queen could die and we all know who would take over from her and how (un)popular he is... with a republican Labour leader possibly still there... shit could get extremely real for the Monarchy/Republic debate. Nobody is dethroning Queen Elizabeth the 2nd I think that is pretty damn certain but king Charles the 3rd? He might just prompt republicans (Corbyn) into making a debate of it. I still think he would ultimately lose that debate and it would severely hurt his election chances if he ever made that a real issue even with Charles instead of Elizabeth but it would bring the issue into the limelight.


Given Prince Charles has a rating much higher than any politician, double most there is zero chance of any debate. Any attempt to start one would be quickly laughed out the room. He would have to cause a constitutional crisis of epic proportions for that to change. Nobody even cared about the letters outside of hardline republicans and they might have made some people approve of him more given the content of them.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29265
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:04 am

Alex Salmond's 'victory speech' - more accurately, the speech he would have given had the independence referendum resulted in a 'yes' vote - has been published in full.

The text can be found here:

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/1375 ... h_in_full/

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:10 am

The Archregimancy wrote:Alex Salmond's 'victory speech' - more accurately, the speech he would have given had the independence referendum resulted in a 'yes' vote - has been published in full.

The text can be found here:

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/1375 ... h_in_full/


I see he's following General Eisenhower's example ;)
Last edited by SD_Film Artists on Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:18 am

Atlanticatia wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/15/eremy-corbyn-needs-spin-doctor-media-four-reasons

Good article on why Jeremy Corbyn needs a spin doctor.


I think it completely misunderstands Corbyn's appeal for a lot of people.
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:20 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:Given Prince Charles has a rating much higher than any politician, double most there is zero chance of any debate. Any attempt to start one would be quickly laughed out the room. He would have to cause a constitutional crisis of epic proportions for that to change. Nobody even cared about the letters outside of hardline republicans and they might have made some people approve of him more given the content of them.


If approval ratings affected anything the next king would be William.
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:21 am

The Archregimancy wrote:Alex Salmond's 'victory speech' - more accurately, the speech he would have given had the independence referendum resulted in a 'yes' vote - has been published in full.

The text can be found here:

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/1375 ... h_in_full/

I'd have just gone "Yeaaaaah let's party!"
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10010
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:28 am

So, the Tories opened PMQ's with an implicit slam against Corbyn's not singing the national anthem.
Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:31 am

Eastfield Lodge wrote:So, the Tories opened PMQ's with an implicit slam against Corbyn's not singing the national anthem.


Nobody likes the national anthem though, it's kind of shit.

They might like it on a meta-level, because it's kind of shit and our country is kind of shit in a lot of ways. Therein lies the smugness of british superiority.
We KNOW we're kind of shit. It's a big part of our identity. All those other countries suffer from the delusion they are great. (Even when they don't.)

Even our comedy revolves around this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8k2AbqTBxao
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:33 am, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Chartist Socialist Republics
Envoy
 
Posts: 224
Founded: Nov 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Chartist Socialist Republics » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:35 am

Corbyn's new PMQ format will probably go down well with the public. However he needs to be more combative and prepared to counter Cameron's answers to prevent the PM from peddling his own political arguments.
Male, British, English, Communist
Socialism, Communism, Marxism, Revolutionary Politics, Luxemburgism, "Left" Communism
Capitalism, Liberalism, Reformism, Leninism, Fascism, Theism

INTJ Personality Type, Orthodox Marxist

User avatar
Hirota
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7326
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:36 am

Eastfield Lodge wrote:So, the Tories opened PMQ's with an implicit slam against Corbyn's not singing the national anthem.
Everything the tories or press tries to do to sling shit at Corbyn makes me like him more.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:39 am

Hirota wrote:
Eastfield Lodge wrote:So, the Tories opened PMQ's with an implicit slam against Corbyn's not singing the national anthem.
Everything the tories or press tries to do to sling shit at Corbyn makes me like him more.

It's embarrassing that our mainstream media looks like satire
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:39 am

Val Halla wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:Alex Salmond's 'victory speech' - more accurately, the speech he would have given had the independence referendum resulted in a 'yes' vote - has been published in full.

The text can be found here:

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/1375 ... h_in_full/

I'd have just gone "Yeaaaaah let's party!"

I would have just launched Operation Drink Myself to Oblivion In Despair

User avatar
The Serbian Empire
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58107
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Serbian Empire » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:40 am

Val Halla wrote:
Hirota wrote:Everything the tories or press tries to do to sling shit at Corbyn makes me like him more.

It's embarrassing that our mainstream media looks like satire

Then the US is a farce comedy.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~ WOMAN
Level 12 Myrmidon, Level ⑨ Tsundere, Level ✿ Hold My Flower
Bad Idea Purveyor
8 Values: https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.1&d=70.2&g=86.5&s=91.9
Political Compass: Economic -10.00 Authoritarian: -9.13
TG for Facebook if you want to friend me
Marissa, Goddess of Stratospheric Reach
preferred pronouns: Female ones
Primarily lesbian, but pansexual in nature

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:40 am

Hirota wrote:
Eastfield Lodge wrote:So, the Tories opened PMQ's with an implicit slam against Corbyn's not singing the national anthem.
Everything the tories or press tries to do to sling shit at Corbyn makes me like him more.


It's not a question of what Corbyn's opponents say, it's what he does (or the lack of it) which matters. Or to quote Mitchell and Webb-

Nazi 1: "Oh you haven't been listening to Allied propaganda, of course they're going to say we're the bad guys."

Nazi 2: "But they didn't get to design our uniforms.."


Yes NSG, we've just hit Godwin's Law.
Last edited by SD_Film Artists on Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:43 am, edited 4 times in total.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:44 am

The Serbian Empire wrote:
Val Halla wrote:It's embarrassing that our mainstream media looks like satire

Then the US is a farce comedy.

It's been that way for at least the past 15-20 years.

User avatar
Hirota
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7326
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:45 am

SD_Film Artists wrote:It's not a question of what Corbyn's opponents say,
It matters because it proves they are panicking. They don't know how to engage him and the groundswell of public opinion, so they sling shit.

it's what he does (or the lack of it) which matters.
In the longer term when policies and manifestos are published. Him not singing the anthem means absolutely nothing. If anything, it demonstrates a desire to stick to his principles in the face of tory shit slinging, which I admire.
Last edited by Hirota on Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:47 am

Hirota wrote:Him not singing the anthem means absolutely nothing.


If only that was the worst of it.

It matters because it proves they are panicking. They don't know how to engage him and the groundswell of public opinion, so they sling shit.


And if Labour came out with the old "Tories love bankers" etc etc, would you say that's a sign of panic too?
Last edited by SD_Film Artists on Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10010
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:49 am

Chartist Socialist Republics wrote:Corbyn's new PMQ format will probably go down well with the public. However he needs to be more combative and prepared to counter Cameron's answers to prevent the PM from peddling his own political arguments.

Literally every answer Cameron gave to Corbyn came with the caveat of 'this can only happen as long as our economy remains strong'. It was almost pitiful.
Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:51 am

L Ron Cupboard wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:Given Prince Charles has a rating much higher than any politician, double most there is zero chance of any debate. Any attempt to start one would be quickly laughed out the room. He would have to cause a constitutional crisis of epic proportions for that to change. Nobody even cared about the letters outside of hardline republicans and they might have made some people approve of him more given the content of them.


If approval ratings affected anything the next king would be William.


They are a reflection of how people feel which is how I was using it. Not sure why you posted that.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Hirota
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7326
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:54 am

SD_Film Artists wrote:And if Labour came out with the old "Tories love bankers" etc etc, would you say that's a sign of panic too?
Panic is the act of responding through unthinking behaviour. By definition if labour came out with the same old speil it wouldn't necessarily be panic.

I'd agree both are born from varying degrees of desperation though.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Khardsland, Spirit of Hope, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads