Alyakia wrote:comrade corbyn:
hates britain
loves the IRA
loves hamas
hates the queen
wants to disband the army
wants humanity to be destroyed by an asteroid
premature ejaculation is a serious issue folks
If this is true , he is a traitor.
Advertisement

by Knokkeheist » Wed Sep 16, 2015 3:11 am
Alyakia wrote:comrade corbyn:
hates britain
loves the IRA
loves hamas
hates the queen
wants to disband the army
wants humanity to be destroyed by an asteroid
premature ejaculation is a serious issue folks

by The Nihilistic view » Wed Sep 16, 2015 3:12 am
Merizoc wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/sep/16/hospital-in-cambridge-denies-ice-to-patients-to-save-money
Maybe if we have more cuts we can get the ice back.

by Atlanticatia » Wed Sep 16, 2015 3:15 am

by SD_Film Artists » Wed Sep 16, 2015 3:16 am
Napkiraly wrote:SD_Film Artists wrote:
I think the Daily Mail and their ilk are only harming themselves by crying wolf with those sensationalist claims. If Corbyn's real views are some degrees better than what the Daily Mail claims, he'd still have terrible views.
You'd be surprised how many people end up believing claims printed in the Daily Mail.

by The Nihilistic view » Wed Sep 16, 2015 3:17 am

by The Nihilistic view » Wed Sep 16, 2015 3:41 am
Olivaero wrote:The following scenario has just dawned on me, in the next 5 years the Queen could die and we all know who would take over from her and how (un)popular he is... with a republican Labour leader possibly still there... shit could get extremely real for the Monarchy/Republic debate. Nobody is dethroning Queen Elizabeth the 2nd I think that is pretty damn certain but king Charles the 3rd? He might just prompt republicans (Corbyn) into making a debate of it. I still think he would ultimately lose that debate and it would severely hurt his election chances if he ever made that a real issue even with Charles instead of Elizabeth but it would bring the issue into the limelight.

by The Archregimancy » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:04 am

by SD_Film Artists » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:10 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Alex Salmond's 'victory speech' - more accurately, the speech he would have given had the independence referendum resulted in a 'yes' vote - has been published in full.
The text can be found here:
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/1375 ... h_in_full/


by L Ron Cupboard » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:18 am
Atlanticatia wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/15/eremy-corbyn-needs-spin-doctor-media-four-reasons
Good article on why Jeremy Corbyn needs a spin doctor.

by L Ron Cupboard » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:20 am
The Nihilistic view wrote:Given Prince Charles has a rating much higher than any politician, double most there is zero chance of any debate. Any attempt to start one would be quickly laughed out the room. He would have to cause a constitutional crisis of epic proportions for that to change. Nobody even cared about the letters outside of hardline republicans and they might have made some people approve of him more given the content of them.

by Val Halla » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:21 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Alex Salmond's 'victory speech' - more accurately, the speech he would have given had the independence referendum resulted in a 'yes' vote - has been published in full.
The text can be found here:
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/1375 ... h_in_full/

by Eastfield Lodge » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:28 am

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:31 am
Eastfield Lodge wrote:So, the Tories opened PMQ's with an implicit slam against Corbyn's not singing the national anthem.

by Chartist Socialist Republics » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:35 am

by Hirota » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:36 am
Everything the tories or press tries to do to sling shit at Corbyn makes me like him more.Eastfield Lodge wrote:So, the Tories opened PMQ's with an implicit slam against Corbyn's not singing the national anthem.

by Napkiraly » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:39 am
Val Halla wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:Alex Salmond's 'victory speech' - more accurately, the speech he would have given had the independence referendum resulted in a 'yes' vote - has been published in full.
The text can be found here:
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/1375 ... h_in_full/
I'd have just gone "Yeaaaaah let's party!"

by The Serbian Empire » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:40 am

by SD_Film Artists » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:40 am

by Hirota » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:45 am
It matters because it proves they are panicking. They don't know how to engage him and the groundswell of public opinion, so they sling shit.SD_Film Artists wrote:It's not a question of what Corbyn's opponents say,
In the longer term when policies and manifestos are published. Him not singing the anthem means absolutely nothing. If anything, it demonstrates a desire to stick to his principles in the face of tory shit slinging, which I admire.it's what he does (or the lack of it) which matters.

by SD_Film Artists » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:47 am
Hirota wrote:Him not singing the anthem means absolutely nothing.
It matters because it proves they are panicking. They don't know how to engage him and the groundswell of public opinion, so they sling shit.

by Eastfield Lodge » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:49 am
Chartist Socialist Republics wrote:Corbyn's new PMQ format will probably go down well with the public. However he needs to be more combative and prepared to counter Cameron's answers to prevent the PM from peddling his own political arguments.

by The Nihilistic view » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:51 am
L Ron Cupboard wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:Given Prince Charles has a rating much higher than any politician, double most there is zero chance of any debate. Any attempt to start one would be quickly laughed out the room. He would have to cause a constitutional crisis of epic proportions for that to change. Nobody even cared about the letters outside of hardline republicans and they might have made some people approve of him more given the content of them.
If approval ratings affected anything the next king would be William.

by Hirota » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:54 am
Panic is the act of responding through unthinking behaviour. By definition if labour came out with the same old speil it wouldn't necessarily be panic.SD_Film Artists wrote:And if Labour came out with the old "Tories love bankers" etc etc, would you say that's a sign of panic too?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Khardsland, Spirit of Hope, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement