What would you change about history?

[Nationes Pii Redivivi]

I doubt Abraham was real too.

Plot twist

Abraham is Ibrahim.

He prefers to be called Abe.

[Salus Maior]

Noah is a myth but Ibraham is real?

Why wouldn't he be real? The only really arguable things about his life is if he truly was a prophet of God. Him not existing would really create doubts as to the validity of all Abrahamic religions, as well as who founded Judaism.

Moses founded Judaism. Abraham was kinda the precursor to Judaism.

[Nationes Pii Redivivi]

Why wouldn't he be real? The only really arguable things about his life is if he truly was a prophet of God. Him not existing would really create doubts as to the validity of all Abrahamic religions, as well as who founded Judaism.

Moses founded Judaism. Abraham was kinda the precursor to Judaism.

Neither of whom can be definitively said to have actually existed.

[The Hobbesian Metaphysician]

Why wouldn't he be real? The only really arguable things about his life is if he truly was a prophet of God. Him not existing would really create doubts as to the validity of all Abrahamic religions, as well as who founded Judaism.

Moses founded Judaism. Abraham was kinda the precursor to Judaism.

Founder to Yahwism, and Precursor of Yahwism actually.

The captivity of Judah allowed the foundation of Judaism.

[The Hobbesian Metaphysician]

Moses founded Judaism. Abraham was kinda the precursor to Judaism.

Neither of whom can be definitively said to have actually existed.

Neither of whom could have the definitive outcome the destruction of the First Temple, and Yahwism's transcendence to an international faith under Judaism more so than the Neo-Babylonian empire did.

[Sun Wukong]

Neither of whom can be definitively said to have actually existed.

Neither of whom could have the definitive outcome the destruction of the First Temple, and Yahwism's transcendence to an international faith under Judaism more so than the Neo-Babylonian empire did.

I've read this over several times, and I'm not convinced that this is actually a coherent thought.

[Gim]

McArthur's over-advancement into Amrok River during Korean War.
Had he rested and settled boundaries just below the river, South Korea would have received a much larger territory, thus more resources.
Thanks to him, North Korea exists with considerable territory and is currently a threat around the globe.

[Sun Wukong]

McArthur's over-advancement into Amrok River during Korean War.
Had he rested and settled boundaries just below the river, South Korea would have received a much larger territory, thus more resources.
Thanks to him, North Korea exists with considerable territory and is currently a threat around the globe.

I find it baffling that, of all the things you could do that could conceivably alter the course of that war in South Korea's favor, you pick this.

I mean, you realize you could stop the Chinese from intervening here, right? End the war with the North's certain crushing defeat. Ah, but I suppose that option doesn't allow you to be an armchair general, does it?

[The Wolven League]

McArthur's over-advancement into Amrok River during Korean War.
Had he rested and settled boundaries just below the river, South Korea would have received a much larger territory, thus more resources.
Thanks to him, North Korea exists with considerable territory and is currently a threat around the globe.

How is North Korea a global threat?

[Apollinis]

Neither of whom could have the definitive outcome the destruction of the First Temple, and Yahwism's transcendence to an international faith under Judaism more so than the Neo-Babylonian empire did.

I've read this over several times, and I'm not convinced that this is actually a coherent thought.

It's an entirely coherent thought, whether or not you actually agree with it. It is, in slightly less convoluted syntax, "The Neo-Bablyonian Empire's destruction of the First Temple [if the First Temple existed] and deportation of the Jews to Babylon was a more definitive and important event/outcome, having as its consequence the emergence of Judaism from Yahwism, than the impact of two men who might well not have actually existed".

[Walang]

That there wasn't any effective anti-propaganda against the concept of wealth during the neolithic and chalcolithic.
We could have said communism could work.

[The Hobbesian Metaphysician]

Neither of whom could have the definitive outcome the destruction of the First Temple, and Yahwism's transcendence to an international faith under Judaism more so than the Neo-Babylonian empire did.

I've read this over several times, and I'm not convinced that this is actually a coherent thought.

How exactly?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panbabylonism

[Gigaverse]

McArthur's over-advancement into Amrok River during Korean War.
Had he rested and settled boundaries just below the river, South Korea would have received a much larger territory, thus more resources.
Thanks to him, North Korea exists with considerable territory and is currently a threat around the globe.

> You could have just overlooked the pro-Korean language and call it "Yalu" so everyone can understand without Google.

[The Hoplitian People]

The Protestant movement; I would protest The Catholic Church, but not break away.

[Nationes Pii Redivivi]

The Protestant movement; I would protest The Catholic Church, but not break away.

Then Western Europe can be united in its religious hatred of those pesky Orthodox in the East, those menacing Mahometan Moors, Turks, and Saracens in the South and South East, the Cathars, and whatever other heresy props up that needs a good lickin'.

[Renewed Dissonance]

I'd go all the way back and re-bury that damned monolith before it was too late.

[Meryuma]

The Protestant movement; I would protest The Catholic Church, but not break away.

Then Western Europe can be united in its religious hatred of those pesky Orthodox in the East, those menacing Mahometan Moors, Turks, and Saracens in the South and South East, the Cathars, and whatever other heresy props up that needs a good lickin'.

If you wanna go back further, you could stop the Great Schism.

Or you could kill Paul of Tarsus, hehehehe...

[The Hobbesian Metaphysician]

Then Western Europe can be united in its religious hatred of those pesky Orthodox in the East, those menacing Mahometan Moors, Turks, and Saracens in the South and South East, the Cathars, and whatever other heresy props up that needs a good lickin'.

If you wanna go back further, you could stop the Great Schism.

Or you could kill Paul of Tarsus, hehehehe...

Better yet just prevent the formation of Rome, and Constantinople as two opposing patriarchs in order to preserve the unity of Chalcedonian Christianity.

*It worked for me on Crusader Kings 2 (Ck2plus).

[Meryuma]

If you wanna go back further, you could stop the Great Schism.

Or you could kill Paul of Tarsus, hehehehe...

Better yet just prevent the formation of Rome, and Constantinople as two opposing patriarchs in order to preserve the unity of Chalcedonian Christianity.

*It worked for me on Crusader Kings 2 (Ck2plus).

b-but then Christianity still becomes an imperialist religion under Paul and later assimilated Romans :-/

[The Hobbesian Metaphysician]

Better yet just prevent the formation of Rome, and Constantinople as two opposing patriarchs in order to preserve the unity of Chalcedonian Christianity.

*It worked for me on Crusader Kings 2 (Ck2plus).

b-but then Christianity still becomes an imperialist religion under Paul and later assimilated Romans :-/

You could always make the heresies much more successful since many of them had legitimate complaints.

The Waldensians, and Fraticelli being prime examples.

[New Rogernomics]

Beg John Rawls to write things more concisely rather than write long-winded tomes.

[Salus Maior]

Better yet just prevent the formation of Rome, and Constantinople as two opposing patriarchs in order to preserve the unity of Chalcedonian Christianity.

*It worked for me on Crusader Kings 2 (Ck2plus).

b-but then Christianity still becomes an imperialist religion under Paul and later assimilated Romans :-/

Lol, "imperialist religion"....How is Christianity peacefully becoming popular in Rome imperialist? (accepting that Christianity would later have violent clashes with polytheists in Theodosius's rule, but then again, the polytheists also unfairly persecuted Christians as well before it was protected by Constantine) And frankly, Christianity improved Roman culture. Banned blood sports, stated the inherent equality of slaves and non-slaves.... Christianity actually did a lot of good, surprisingly enough.

[Dumb Ideologies]

I'd make it so that the Nationstates Feminist Thread wasn't ever created.

[Gim]

The Protestant movement; I would protest The Catholic Church, but not break away.

I think if you somehow eliminate Martin Luther, your wish would come to fruition.

[The Hobbesian Metaphysician]

I'd make it so that the Nationstates Feminist Thread wasn't ever created.

Can you prove the Feminist Thread historically even existed first?