NATION

PASSWORD

Abortion: Pro-Choice or Pro-Life?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Pro-Choice or Pro-Life?

Pro-Choice
1110
64%
Pro-Life
638
36%
 
Total votes : 1748

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:11 pm

Godular wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
It's not a strawman, it's a very reasonable deduction. You're saying that it's essentially impossible to prove whether or not someone is telling the truth when they say they've been raped.

That inherently means you think most, if not all cases of rape ultimately come down to hearsay.


Words.

Mouth.

Spit.

Face.


Then explain how this isn't the case.

You made a claim that my system wouldn't work since most rape allegations would be hearsay. If that's what you think, then how is this not currently applicable to most rape cases?

User avatar
Camelza
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12604
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Camelza » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:12 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Godular wrote:
First error: Abortion is not murder.

Primary mistake: Your opinion does not constitute sufficient basis to deny the rights of others to control their own body.



Because it is, as self-defense laws agree, and my position does not involve denying others the right to control their own body on the basis of an opinion.



Again, high horse.


Murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another

The only thing abortion is missing is the "unlawful" part, and even that varies by country.

And in case you didn't notice, your belief that the rights of the fetus should be denied is also an opinion.

Once more, impasse.

You may ignore my post, but I insist:
Camelza wrote:Biology, medicine, law, philosophy, and theology have no consensus on the issue, and neither does society as a whole. There will never be a consensus because of the subjective and unscientific nature of the claim, so we must give the benefit of the doubt to women, who are indisputable human beings with rights.
Fetuses are uniquely different from born human beings in major ways, which casts doubt on the claim that they can be classified as human beings. The most fundamental difference is that a fetus is totally dependent on a woman's body to survive. Soemeone might argue that born human beings can be entirely dependent on other people too, but the crucial difference is that they are not dependent on one, specific person to the exclusion of all others. Anybody can take care of a newborn infant (or disabled person), but only that pregnant woman can nurture her fetus. She can’t hire someone else to do it. Furthermore, a fetus doesn't just depend on a woman's body for survival, it actually resides inside her body. Human beings must, by definition, be separate individuals. They do not gain the status of human being by virtue of living inside the body of another human being

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:12 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Geilinor wrote:A rape exception would only take effect when the rapist was convicted. Right?


No, it would be granted immediately, upon request. If the investigation uncovers that she lied, then there are consequences.

Then a lot of people will lie to get past your unjust law, which would be unconstitutional in both of our countries.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:14 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Godular wrote:
Words.

Mouth.

Spit.

Face.


Then explain how this isn't the case.

You made a claim that my system wouldn't work since most rape allegations would be hearsay. If that's what you think, then how is this not currently applicable to most rape cases?


today women have no big incentive to make up rape allegations. if a woman says she was raped the police take it seriously.

if crying rape is the only way to be allowed to get an abortion then EVERY woman who wants an abortion is going to cry rape. that not only messes up the lives of countless men who had innocent sex with a woman who got pregnant but it would also mess up the cases of all those women who really were raped.
whatever

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:15 pm

Camelza wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another

The only thing abortion is missing is the "unlawful" part, and even that varies by country.

And in case you didn't notice, your belief that the rights of the fetus should be denied is also an opinion.

Once more, impasse.

You may ignore my post, but I insist:
Camelza wrote:Biology, medicine, law, philosophy, and theology have no consensus on the issue, and neither does society as a whole. There will never be a consensus because of the subjective and unscientific nature of the claim, so we must give the benefit of the doubt to women, who are indisputable human beings with rights.
Fetuses are uniquely different from born human beings in major ways, which casts doubt on the claim that they can be classified as human beings. The most fundamental difference is that a fetus is totally dependent on a woman's body to survive. Soemeone might argue that born human beings can be entirely dependent on other people too, but the crucial difference is that they are not dependent on one, specific person to the exclusion of all others. Anybody can take care of a newborn infant (or disabled person), but only that pregnant woman can nurture her fetus. She can’t hire someone else to do it. Furthermore, a fetus doesn't just depend on a woman's body for survival, it actually resides inside her body. Human beings must, by definition, be separate individuals. They do not gain the status of human being by virtue of living inside the body of another human being


I'm trying to respond to about 5 people at once, so sorry if it seems like I'm ignoring you.

Science is on my side when it comes to a fetus' classification as a living human being. The "being" part might be subjective, but there is no speculation whatsoever in terms of whether it is alive and human. This much is fact. As for its dependency on the mother, well, with all due respect I've gone over that several times already within the past couple of hours. I'd rather not do so again.

User avatar
Godular
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 13188
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Godular » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:15 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Godular wrote:
First error: Abortion is not murder.

Primary mistake: Your opinion does not constitute sufficient basis to deny the rights of others to control their own body.



Because it is, as self-defense laws agree, and my position does not involve denying others the right to control their own body on the basis of an opinion.



Again, high horse.


Murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another

The only thing abortion is missing is the "unlawful" part, and even that varies by country.


Indeed... let us hear more of these countries that you hold in such esteem. Are they pillars of liberty and equality? Are they paragons of enlightenment and rational thought?

And in case you didn't notice, your belief that the rights of the fetus should be denied is also an opinion.


It is not a denial of the rights of the fetus to prevent it from using another person's body against their will. This is attested to by self-defense laws. My position has actual basis to it. Yours, not so.

Once more, impasse.


High horse.
Now the moderation team really IS Godmoding.
Step 1: One-Stop Rules Shop. Step 2: ctrl+f. Step 3: Type in what you saw in modbox. Step 4: Don't do it again.
New to F7? Click here!


User avatar
Godular
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 13188
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Godular » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:16 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Then explain how this isn't the case.

You made a claim that my system wouldn't work since most rape allegations would be hearsay. If that's what you think, then how is this not currently applicable to most rape cases?


today women have no big incentive to make up rape allegations. if a woman says she was raped the police take it seriously.

if crying rape is the only way to be allowed to get an abortion then EVERY woman who wants an abortion is going to cry rape. that not only messes up the lives of countless men who had innocent sex with a woman who got pregnant but it would also mess up the cases of all those women who really were raped.


Exactly. I THOUGHT that point to be obvious.
Now the moderation team really IS Godmoding.
Step 1: One-Stop Rules Shop. Step 2: ctrl+f. Step 3: Type in what you saw in modbox. Step 4: Don't do it again.
New to F7? Click here!


User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:17 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Then explain how this isn't the case.

You made a claim that my system wouldn't work since most rape allegations would be hearsay. If that's what you think, then how is this not currently applicable to most rape cases?


today women have no big incentive to make up rape allegations. if a woman says she was raped the police take it seriously.

if crying rape is the only way to be allowed to get an abortion then EVERY woman who wants an abortion is going to cry rape. that not only messes up the lives of countless men who had innocent sex with a woman who got pregnant but it would also mess up the cases of all those women who really were raped.


Then we punish it very severely when it's provable that the woman did lie. Create a deterrent.

User avatar
Godular
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 13188
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Godular » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:18 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
today women have no big incentive to make up rape allegations. if a woman says she was raped the police take it seriously.

if crying rape is the only way to be allowed to get an abortion then EVERY woman who wants an abortion is going to cry rape. that not only messes up the lives of countless men who had innocent sex with a woman who got pregnant but it would also mess up the cases of all those women who really were raped.


Then we punish it very severely when it's provable that the woman did lie. Create a deterrent.


Holy shit, you just don't get the concept of unenforceable, do you?
Now the moderation team really IS Godmoding.
Step 1: One-Stop Rules Shop. Step 2: ctrl+f. Step 3: Type in what you saw in modbox. Step 4: Don't do it again.
New to F7? Click here!


User avatar
Kauthar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1535
Founded: Oct 21, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kauthar » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:20 pm

notice how all abortion supporters are alive, is there any unborn abortion supporters??? No, there isn't.
Pronouns: Deus/Vult
☩Fight Islam, Fight Degeneracy, and Defend Europa, the Fatherland☩
SMASH CULTURAL MARXISM, KEEP EUROPE EUROPEAN
Resources on Islam
I am a Clerical Fascist and European Nationalist
Trump and Palin 2016!
Favourite Politicians: Wilders, Sturgeon, Mussolini, Putin, Franco, Orban
Pro: Fascism, Nationalism, Ethnic Pride, Traditionalism, Distributism, Third Positionism, Militarism, Dominionism, Scotland, White Nationalism, Conservatism, Bionationalism
Anti: Capitalism, Socialists, Communism, Cultural Marxism, Feminism, Islam, Zionism, Islamization of Europa, Progressivism, Unionism, Tories, Labour, the EUSSR, Skinheads, Pan-Africanism
The Blaatschapen wrote:We're not marxists.

We're maxists.

User avatar
Camelza
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12604
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Camelza » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:20 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Camelza wrote:You may ignore my post, but I insist:


I'm trying to respond to about 5 people at once, so sorry if it seems like I'm ignoring you.

Science is on my side when it comes to a fetus' classification as a living human being. The "being" part might be subjective, but there is no speculation whatsoever in terms of whether it is alive and human. This much is fact. As for its dependency on the mother, well, with all due respect I've gone over that several times already within the past couple of hours. I'd rather not do so again.

The "being" part is quite important. Hair is human and is alive, yet we do not call haircuts "mass murder".
You also seem to ignore the whole point of being completely dependent and living specifically off the mother and none other.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:21 pm

Kauthar wrote:notice how all abortion supporters are alive, is there any unborn abortion supporters??? No, there isn't.

Are there any unborn supporters or opponents of anything?
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:21 pm

Godular wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another

The only thing abortion is missing is the "unlawful" part, and even that varies by country.


Indeed... let us hear more of these countries that you hold in such esteem. Are they pillars of liberty and equality? Are they paragons of enlightenment and rational thought?

And in case you didn't notice, your belief that the rights of the fetus should be denied is also an opinion.


It is not a denial of the rights of the fetus to prevent it from using another person's body against their will. This is attested to by self-defense laws. My position has actual basis to it. Yours, not so.

Once more, impasse.


High horse.


How the hell does this have anything to do with self-defense? Is the fetus some kind of "aggressor"?

Abortion's mostly illegal in Poland and Japan, and is on semi-legal in the UK, Iceland, Finland, Taiwan and South Korea. Those countries aren't all that bad.

Impasse.

User avatar
Godular
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 13188
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Godular » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:22 pm

Kauthar wrote:notice how all abortion supporters are alive, is there any unborn abortion supporters??? No, there isn't.


I'm sure this sounded profound when you were typing it out.
Now the moderation team really IS Godmoding.
Step 1: One-Stop Rules Shop. Step 2: ctrl+f. Step 3: Type in what you saw in modbox. Step 4: Don't do it again.
New to F7? Click here!


User avatar
Kauthar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1535
Founded: Oct 21, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kauthar » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:22 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Kauthar wrote:notice how all abortion supporters are alive, is there any unborn abortion supporters??? No, there isn't.

Are there any unborn supporters or opponents of anything?

no, but my point still stands
also if you didn't know it's a ronald reagan quote
Pronouns: Deus/Vult
☩Fight Islam, Fight Degeneracy, and Defend Europa, the Fatherland☩
SMASH CULTURAL MARXISM, KEEP EUROPE EUROPEAN
Resources on Islam
I am a Clerical Fascist and European Nationalist
Trump and Palin 2016!
Favourite Politicians: Wilders, Sturgeon, Mussolini, Putin, Franco, Orban
Pro: Fascism, Nationalism, Ethnic Pride, Traditionalism, Distributism, Third Positionism, Militarism, Dominionism, Scotland, White Nationalism, Conservatism, Bionationalism
Anti: Capitalism, Socialists, Communism, Cultural Marxism, Feminism, Islam, Zionism, Islamization of Europa, Progressivism, Unionism, Tories, Labour, the EUSSR, Skinheads, Pan-Africanism
The Blaatschapen wrote:We're not marxists.

We're maxists.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:22 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Abortion's mostly illegal in Poland and Japan, and is on semi-legal in the UK, Iceland, Finland, Taiwan and South Korea. Those countries aren't all that bad.

Impasse.

You don't want abortion to be semi-legal. You oppose it in all situations but rape.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22879
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:22 pm

Kauthar wrote:notice how all abortion supporters are alive, is there any unborn abortion supporters??? No, there isn't.

Reagan died a while ago, and I doubt his Alzheimer's did wonders for his thought process.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:22 pm

Kauthar wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Are there any unborn supporters or opponents of anything?

no, but my point still stands
also if you didn't know it's a ronald reagan quote

The Ronald Reagan who signed a bill legalizing abortion in California.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Kauthar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1535
Founded: Oct 21, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kauthar » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:23 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Abortion's mostly illegal in Poland and Japan, and is on semi-legal in the UK, Iceland, Finland, Taiwan and South Korea. Those countries aren't all that bad.

Impasse.

You don't want abortion to be semi-legal. You oppose it in all situations but rape.

it should be illegal no matter what. it's like going into the town and shooting someone because they walked too close to you.
Pronouns: Deus/Vult
☩Fight Islam, Fight Degeneracy, and Defend Europa, the Fatherland☩
SMASH CULTURAL MARXISM, KEEP EUROPE EUROPEAN
Resources on Islam
I am a Clerical Fascist and European Nationalist
Trump and Palin 2016!
Favourite Politicians: Wilders, Sturgeon, Mussolini, Putin, Franco, Orban
Pro: Fascism, Nationalism, Ethnic Pride, Traditionalism, Distributism, Third Positionism, Militarism, Dominionism, Scotland, White Nationalism, Conservatism, Bionationalism
Anti: Capitalism, Socialists, Communism, Cultural Marxism, Feminism, Islam, Zionism, Islamization of Europa, Progressivism, Unionism, Tories, Labour, the EUSSR, Skinheads, Pan-Africanism
The Blaatschapen wrote:We're not marxists.

We're maxists.

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:23 pm

Godular wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Then we punish it very severely when it's provable that the woman did lie. Create a deterrent.


Holy shit, you just don't get the concept of unenforceable, do you?


It's quite enforceable, that's what an investigation is all about.

Hell, even a lie detector could give a pretty good hint as to whether or not they're telling the truth.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:23 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
today women have no big incentive to make up rape allegations. if a woman says she was raped the police take it seriously.

if crying rape is the only way to be allowed to get an abortion then EVERY woman who wants an abortion is going to cry rape. that not only messes up the lives of countless men who had innocent sex with a woman who got pregnant but it would also mess up the cases of all those women who really were raped.


Then we punish it very severely when it's provable that the woman did lie. Create a deterrent.


no

women don't get abortions lightly. women have gotten abortions throughout human history. they risk their lives. they risk prison time. they risk leaving their children orphans. a little lie about rape would never deter a women who wants an abortion.

back in the old days when some states had an exception for the life of the mother that included suicide, women would routinely say they would kill themselves if they had to continue their pregnancies.
whatever

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:23 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Abortion's mostly illegal in Poland and Japan, and is on semi-legal in the UK, Iceland, Finland, Taiwan and South Korea. Those countries aren't all that bad.

Impasse.

You don't want abortion to be semi-legal. You oppose it in all situations but rape.


Rape and life endangerment, yes.

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:24 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Then we punish it very severely when it's provable that the woman did lie. Create a deterrent.


no

women don't get abortions lightly. women have gotten abortions throughout human history. they risk their lives. they risk prison time. they risk leaving their children orphans. a little lie about rape would never deter a women who wants an abortion.

back in the old days when some states had an exception for the life of the mother that included suicide, women would routinely say they would kill themselves if they had to continue their pregnancies.


I find it hard to believe that the majority of women desiring an abortion would go to such lengths.

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22879
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:25 pm

Kauthar wrote:
Geilinor wrote:You don't want abortion to be semi-legal. You oppose it in all situations but rape.

it should be illegal no matter what. it's like going into the town and shooting someone because they walked too close to you.

It isn't anything like that and you know it. It is more like someone walking into town and demanding to have your kidneys, and you saying no. Or you shooting someone because they are raping you."
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:26 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
no

women don't get abortions lightly. women have gotten abortions throughout human history. they risk their lives. they risk prison time. they risk leaving their children orphans. a little lie about rape would never deter a women who wants an abortion.

back in the old days when some states had an exception for the life of the mother that included suicide, women would routinely say they would kill themselves if they had to continue their pregnancies.


I find it hard to believe that the majority of women desiring an abortion would go to such lengths.

The majority won't, but it will happen and you won't be able to stop it. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/africas-deadly-backroom-abortions/article4353134/
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Diarcesia, Eahland, Google [Bot], Ifreann, New haven america, New Westmore, Nordengrund, Shrillland, Tungstan, Uiiop, Valrifall

Advertisement

Remove ads