But Think of the Children!

[Derscon]

The only crimes I can see here are two stupid brats, at least 4 weak willed parents, and a over-reactionary system... Also, I wonder if the girl will face statutory laws.

Seriously what's next? Must we say good bye to the classic photos of new born babies naked on a bear-skin rug? If so, then maybe I should report my mom to the police.

Apparently, Foley attempted to introduce a bill that would basically make any photography of a kid illegal, by the wording of the bill.

Silly protectionism.

[Lackadaisical2]

The only crimes I can see here are two stupid brats, at least 4 weak willed parents, and a over-reactionary system... Also, I wonder if the girl will face statutory laws.

Seriously what's next? Must we say good bye to the classic photos of new born babies naked on a bear-skin rug? If so, then maybe I should report my mom to the police.

OMG, pedo!!!

*gets his pitch fork*

[Vedrenheim]

Facedesk.

Times a thousand.

[Tokos]

Facedesk.

Times a thousand.

Facepalm is still inflating like the Weimar Mark, I see…

[Blitzkrenia]

The only crimes I can see here are two stupid brats, at least 4 weak willed parents, and a over-reactionary system... Also, I wonder if the girl will face statutory laws.

Seriously what's next? Must we say good bye to the classic photos of new born babies naked on a bear-skin rug? If so, then maybe I should report my mom to the police.

OMG, pedo!!!

*gets his pitch fork*

No no. *wags finger*


Infanto.

*Also grabs his fitchfork*

[Vedrenheim]

Facedesk.

Times a thousand.

Facepalm is still inflating like the Weimar Mark, I see…

No, see, this is the Facedesk.

It's like the Reichsmark.

[Mean Feat]

The only crimes I can see here are two stupid brats, at least 4 weak willed parents, and a over-reactionary system... Also, I wonder if the girl will face statutory laws.

Seriously what's next? Must we say good bye to the classic photos of new born babies naked on a bear-skin rug? If so, then maybe I should report my mom to the police.

Apparently, Foley attempted to introduce a bill that would basically make any photography of a kid illegal, by the wording of the bill.

Silly protectionism.

Protectionism is a perfectly good word, referring to such simple economic policy that anyone who is unfamiliar with it should be considered incompetent to vote.

To use it in the sense you just did suggests you've been watching a lot of Fox News, or some similar den of illiteracy, instead of doing your duty and posting on NSG!

(Actually, a search shows you posting plenty, but for some reason I haven't seen your name in like a year!)

[Mean Feat]

Facedesk.

Times a thousand.

Facepalm is still inflating like the Weimar Mark, I see…

No, see, this is the Facedesk.

It's like the Reichsmark.

How many Facedesks do I get for the wheel-barrow full of almost-worthless Facepalms, then ?

[Vedrenheim]

Facedesk.

Times a thousand.

Facepalm is still inflating like the Weimar Mark, I see…

No, see, this is the Facedesk.

It's like the Reichsmark.

How many Facedesks do I get for the wheel-barrow full of almost-worthless Facepalms, then ?

That depends on if you're a member of the Faceist Party, of course.

[Derscon]

The only crimes I can see here are two stupid brats, at least 4 weak willed parents, and a over-reactionary system... Also, I wonder if the girl will face statutory laws.

Seriously what's next? Must we say good bye to the classic photos of new born babies naked on a bear-skin rug? If so, then maybe I should report my mom to the police.

Apparently, Foley attempted to introduce a bill that would basically make any photography of a kid illegal, by the wording of the bill.

Silly protectionism.

Protectionism is a perfectly good word, referring to such simple economic policy that anyone who is unfamiliar with it should be considered incompetent to vote.

To use it in the sense you just did suggests you've been watching a lot of Fox News, or some similar den of illiteracy, instead of doing your duty and posting on NSG!

(Actually, a search shows you posting plenty, but for some reason I haven't seen your name in like a year!)

You know damn well I wasn't using protectionism to refer to the economic policies, nor was there any way to actually confuse the usage of that term. In the case of what we're talking about - attempting to protect children - "protectionism" in a generic sense is a perfectly valid word. lern2context

And you haven't seen my name around because I don't typically post in NSG. The RP forums are my home.

[The Scandinvans]

While, I believe they are still too young for such events, I do not feel however that they deserved to be punished by the legal system nor should this be something that the school involve itself in.

[Lackadaisical2]

While, I believe they are still too young for such events, I do not feel however that they deserved to be punished by the legal system nor should this be something that the school involve itself in.

It ought to be pretty easy to hand them over to their parents for a stern talking to...

I don't understand making such a big deal out of it at all.

[Derscon]

While, I believe they are still too young for such events, I do not feel however that they deserved to be punished by the legal system nor should this be something that the school involve itself in.

It ought to be pretty easy to hand them over to their parents for a stern talking to...

I don't understand making such a big deal out of it at all.

Because they're paedophiles and trafficking in child porn, and we have to protect the children, you sick fuck.

[The Scandinvans]

While, I believe they are still too young for such events, I do not feel however that they deserved to be punished by the legal system nor should this be something that the school involve itself in.

It ought to be pretty easy to hand them over to their parents for a stern talking to...

I don't understand making such a big deal out of it at all.

I have a question for the authorities? Was there some creepy fifty year old guy involved?

[Lackadaisical2]

While, I believe they are still too young for such events, I do not feel however that they deserved to be punished by the legal system nor should this be something that the school involve itself in.

It ought to be pretty easy to hand them over to their parents for a stern talking to...

I don't understand making such a big deal out of it at all.

Because they're paedophiles and trafficking in child porn, and we have to protect the children, you sick fuck.

Gotta hate those child pedophiles.

[Derscon]

While, I believe they are still too young for such events, I do not feel however that they deserved to be punished by the legal system nor should this be something that the school involve itself in.

It ought to be pretty easy to hand them over to their parents for a stern talking to...

I don't understand making such a big deal out of it at all.

I have a question for the authorities? Was there some creepy fifty year old guy involved?

None at all. It's just the kids.

[Lackadaisical2]

While, I believe they are still too young for such events, I do not feel however that they deserved to be punished by the legal system nor should this be something that the school involve itself in.

It ought to be pretty easy to hand them over to their parents for a stern talking to...

I don't understand making such a big deal out of it at all.

I have a question for the authorities? Was there some creepy fifty year old guy involved?

None at all. It's just the kids.

I imagine in those cases the kids aren't charged with a felony...

If only a slightly older person had been exploiting them, they'd have got off Scot free.

[Tunizcha]

It's like they've completely abandoned all logic and rationality in favor of strict interpretation of laws. Idiots.

[Mean Feat]

Facedesk.

Times a thousand.

Facepalm is still inflating like the Weimar Mark, I see…

No, see, this is the Facedesk.

It's like the Reichsmark.

How many Facedesks do I get for the wheel-barrow full of almost-worthless Facepalms, then ?

That depends on if you're a member of the Faceist Party, of course.

*jaw drops*

:headbang:

[Mean Feat]

While, I believe they are still too young for such events *snip*

Nonsense. "I'll show you mine if you show me yours" is a good way of establishing trust, between children who are told from a young age not to show their “private” parts to anyone. They're very rarely given a good reason (in fact, I can't think of a good reason) and thus, breaking that rule together is a legitimate method of bonding ("me kid, you kid, let's fight the oppression!")

Long, long before the ages of 12 or 13. Pretty much, from the day they're taught "modesty". Which would be 4 or 5 in most cases.

[Mean Feat]

The only crimes I can see here are two stupid brats, at least 4 weak willed parents, and a over-reactionary system... Also, I wonder if the girl will face statutory laws.

Seriously what's next? Must we say good bye to the classic photos of new born babies naked on a bear-skin rug? If so, then maybe I should report my mom to the police.

Apparently, Foley attempted to introduce a bill that would basically make any photography of a kid illegal, by the wording of the bill.

Silly protectionism.

Protectionism is a perfectly good word, referring to such simple economic policy that anyone who is unfamiliar with it should be considered incompetent to vote.

To use it in the sense you just did suggests you've been watching a lot of Fox News, or some similar den of illiteracy, instead of doing your duty and posting on NSG!

(Actually, a search shows you posting plenty, but for some reason I haven't seen your name in like a year!)

You know damn well I wasn't using protectionism to refer to the economic policies, nor was there any way to actually confuse the usage of that term. In the case of what we're talking about - attempting to protect children - "protectionism" in a generic sense is a perfectly valid word. lern2context

And you haven't seen my name around because I don't typically post in NSG. The RP forums are my home.

"Paternalism" is a better word, which doesn't have any other meaning. You could also try "nanny state policy".

I do context. A word whose meaning relies on context is always inferior to one which is unambiguous.

I hope my persistent grammar-nannying reminds you of who I was before I was Mean Feat. Shh! I've always liked your posts, and thanks for this thread.

[The Scandinvans]

While, I believe they are still too young for such events *snip*

Nonsense. "I'll show you mine if you show me yours" is a good way of establishing trust, between children who are told from a young age not to show their “private” parts to anyone. They're very rarely given a good reason (in fact, I can't think of a good reason) and thus, breaking that rule together is a legitimate method of bonding ("me kid, you kid, let's fight the oppression!")

Long, long before the ages of 12 or 13. Pretty much, from the day they're taught "modesty". Which would be 4 or 5 in most cases.

I have my opinions and I will keep them. Though if I learned of my hypothetical child playing 'doctor' I would not punish, though if they were trading dirty pics over the phone they would lose it, or scold them. Instead, I will merely attempt to give them a refined birds and the bees conversation.

[Karsol]

I'd only be mad if they gave the pics to a third and illegal party.
Then it's butt whoopin' time

[Christmahanikwanzikah]

Seriously, government, what the fuck.

[Them There]

You'd think they or the principal could have a slip of the finger and delete the silly thing.

That requires a mind. You expect too much.

It also requires the willingness to make a decision. That is something that has been decidedly curtailed in RL.