For that matter if a church would perform a marriage ceremony without the government papers and all that, then as far as the government is concerned no marriage has taken place.
Advertisement

by Neutraligon » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:26 pm

by Geilinor » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:26 pm
Vaikneland wrote:Neu California wrote:
Or a government official in the right capacity. I don't know why you think you need a priest to get married, because, legally, you don't
Well you clearly need to get through Christianity somehow. Also, I noticed you're a communist, and I can see why your vision is so clouded

by Mondoncon » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:26 pm
Vaikneland wrote:Neu California wrote:
Or a government official in the right capacity. I don't know why you think you need a priest to get married, because, legally, you don't
Well you clearly need to get through Christianity somehow. Also, I noticed you're a communist, and I can see why your vision is so clouded

by Vaikneland » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:26 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Vaikneland wrote:Kim Davis is the connection if the Christian church. Forcing her to marry someone does not follow the constitution. And yet people complain about how we have no freedom anymore.
Kim Davis has nothing to do with the Christian church while she is in the office. She might have a connection outside office, but while she is in the office she is solely a county clerk.


by Highfort » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:26 pm
Vaikneland wrote:Well you clearly need to get through Christianity somehow. Also, I noticed you're a communist, and I can see why your vision is so clouded

by Furry Alairia and Algeria » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:26 pm

by Vaikneland » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:27 pm

by Furry Alairia and Algeria » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:27 pm

by Dyakovo » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:27 pm
Where do you go for marriages, and who marries you?
What do those things involve, sir?

by Geilinor » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:27 pm

by Vaikneland » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:28 pm
Highfort wrote:Vaikneland wrote:Well you clearly need to get through Christianity somehow. Also, I noticed you're a communist, and I can see why your vision is so clouded
Marriage is not a Christian-exclusive institution. Romans were getting married long before the pathetic figure that is Jesus Christ was nailed to a cross.

by Highfort » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:28 pm

by Grenartia » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:29 pm
Vaikneland wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
Kim Davis has nothing to do with the Christian church while she is in the office. She might have a connection outside office, but while she is in the office she is solely a county clerk.
Wow her whole identity changes when she walks through the doors at the cout house! Please tell me how she does that, I wish I could do the same.

by Vaikneland » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:29 pm

by Highfort » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:29 pm
Vaikneland wrote:If you aren't Christian, and you wish to get married through Davis, you obviously had to get some form of Christian values connected to you at that point

by Neutraligon » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:29 pm
Vaikneland wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
Kim Davis has nothing to do with the Christian church while she is in the office. She might have a connection outside office, but while she is in the office she is solely a county clerk.
Wow her whole identity changes when she walks through the doors at the cout house! Please tell me how she does that, I wish I could do the same.

by Mondoncon » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:30 pm
Vaikneland wrote:Highfort wrote:
Marriage is not a Christian-exclusive institution. Romans were getting married long before the pathetic figure that is Jesus Christ was nailed to a cross.
If you aren't Christian, and you wish to get married through Davis, you obviously had to get some form of Christian values connected to you at that point

by Grenartia » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:30 pm

by Geilinor » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:30 pm
Vaikneland wrote:Mondoncon wrote:Which makes her incapable of serving in her position, which means she must resign or face the legal consequences. She has options which preserve her rights, and she refused to take them.
Yes, so you fire her. Not throw her in jail with no bail. If anyone should be thrown in jail, it should be Hillary Clinton or Obama. But no they're above the law because they're in office and they're Liberal.

by Highfort » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:30 pm
Vaikneland wrote:Yes, so you fire her. Not throw her in jail with no bail.

by Dyakovo » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:30 pm
Yes, it is.Stellonia wrote:Dyakovo wrote:He's demonstrated far greater uunderstanding of the constitution than you have.
Not only was she violating the fourteenth amendment, she was alsoviolating the first.
As a court clerk, she's an agent of the government. Her choosing to use her government position to enforce her religious valuesupon others violates the separation of church and state proscribed in the first amendment.
The separation of church and state is not established by the First Amendment.

by Vaikneland » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:30 pm
Highfort wrote:Vaikneland wrote:If you aren't Christian, and you wish to get married through Davis, you obviously had to get some form of Christian values connected to you at that point
Nope. Davis is supposed to issue licenses for any marriage, and if she wasn't then she would be violating the Establishment Clause by having the government she was representing favor certain religions when it came to marriage. If a Muslim, Jewish, atheist, Buddhist, or gay couple wants to get a government marriage license, it is her job to provide one.

by Grenartia » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:31 pm
Vaikneland wrote:Highfort wrote:
Marriage is not a Christian-exclusive institution. Romans were getting married long before the pathetic figure that is Jesus Christ was nailed to a cross.
If you aren't Christian, and you wish to get married through Davis, you obviously had to get some form of Christian values connected to you at that point

by Mondoncon » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:31 pm
Vaikneland wrote:Mondoncon wrote:Which makes her incapable of serving in her position, which means she must resign or face the legal consequences. She has options which preserve her rights, and she refused to take them.
Yes, so you fire her. Not throw her in jail with no bail. If anyone should be thrown in jail, it should be Hillary Clinton or Obama. But no they're above the law because they're in office and they're Liberal.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Greater Cesnica, Ifreann, Raskana, Sklobia, Techocracy101010
Advertisement