Advertisement

by New Grestin » Sun Sep 13, 2015 10:11 pm
Let’s not dwell on our corpse strewn past. Let’s celebrate our corpse strewn future!
Head Bartender for The Pub | The Para-Verse | Writing Advice from a Pretentious Jerk | I write stuff | Arbitrary Political Numbers- Best Worldbuilding - 2016 (Community Choice)
- Best Horror/Thriller RP for THE ZONE - 2016 (Community Choice)

by Grenartia » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:41 am
Hurdegaryp wrote:Sane Outcasts wrote:There is no procedure for recalling officials in Kentucky, though it probably works that way in other states since the clerk's office usually handles election organization.
She can be removed through a regular election (next one in 2018), resigning (obviously not happening), or by the Kentucky General Assembly when it meets in regular session in January. There is a statutory offense for elected officials called "willful neglect of duties" that could easily be the basis for removal if she tries to interfere with her office issuing marriage licenses again, but her office is currently issuing marriage licenses so there is no problem for now.
Well, that is just going to take too long. Can't she just be accused of witchcraft in order to see if the social dynamics that worked such grisly wonders in Salem are still slumbering in the hearts of modern Americans?
And no, I'm not serious.

by Dyakovo » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:43 am
Grenartia wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:Well, that is just going to take too long. Can't she just be accused of witchcraft in order to see if the social dynamics that worked such grisly wonders in Salem are still slumbering in the hearts of modern Americans?
And no, I'm not serious.
Well, you'd probably have to pick a different boogeyman. In 17th century Salem, it was witchcraft. In the 50s, it was communism. Not quite sure what the boogeyman would be today. There's a lot of possibilities, but none seem like they'd cause that reaction, short of child molester, but that's one hell of a thing to accuse somebody of, no matter how much of a shithead they are.

by Grenartia » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:48 am
USS Monitor wrote:Italian-Australia wrote:Yes well, she was working for the government before these laws came into effect, so another simple argument is that she never agreed to uphold those laws. And can someone inform this Australian how this law came into place. Was it a simple court decision or a referendum? Anyway, in a democracy, people argue. And in my humble opinion all constitutional decisions should be made by referendum because really, having a couple of judges make a decision isn't really representative of the nation when a nation affecting decision is being made.
It was a court ruling based on a constitutional amendment that was adopted in the 19th century. So technically, gay marriage was legalized in the 19th century and Davis has been doing her job wrong all along. Technically, a lot of people have been doing their jobs wrong for a long time. It warms my rusty old heart to know that they have finally started enforcing the law after all these years, after everything that my generation sacrificed and all the work that we put in to get the 14th amendment added to the constitution.
But if you work for the state and you disagree with a new law that is passed after you take office, you have two options: abide by the new law or resign.

by Grenartia » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:53 am
USS Monitor wrote:Highfort wrote:
Part of it, I think, is that the lack of a state-sponsored religion has meant that in the US people forget what it's like when a state-sponsored religion cracks down on religious minorities in the country. The Church of England, once so dominant a force, is now a fairly tame bleating sheep that occasionally makes the news when one of its bishops says something rather silly. But the English have not forgotten what it's like when the church is strong and has the backing of the government to enforce its orthodoxy upon the people.
The Americans, having fled England in part to escape that horror and thus refusing to enshrine it in their legal system, have been so lucky as to avoid a state church and thus have a rosy view of religion in politics compared to some nations of comparable wealth and education with state churches.
Interestingly enough, the New England states that were settled under Puritan theocracy are now some of the most secular, and they have some very vocal advocates for separation of church and state. After we hanged a bunch of people for witchcraft, we realized it was a stupid thing to do.
Dyakovo wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Well, you'd probably have to pick a different boogeyman. In 17th century Salem, it was witchcraft. In the 50s, it was communism. Not quite sure what the boogeyman would be today. There's a lot of possibilities, but none seem like they'd cause that reaction, short of child molester, but that's one hell of a thing to accuse somebody of, no matter how much of a shithead they are.
Gay, transgender, child-molesting, socialist, gun-grabbing, illegal immigrant, welfare queen, atheist Muslim Satan-worshipping Wiccan.
*nods*

by United Prefectures of Appia » Mon Sep 14, 2015 6:59 am
Grenartia wrote:Gay, transgender, child-molesting, socialist, gun-grabbing, illegal immigrant, welfare queen, atheist Muslim Satan-worshipping Wiccan.
*nods*

by Jute » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:06 am
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Cymrea » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:36 am
Behinaye wrote:Val Halla wrote:Rather, what's wrong with the law?
Whats wrong with being normal and staying as the gender you were biologically born as?

by San Lumen » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:04 am

by Tekania » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:06 am
Highfort wrote:Farnhamia wrote:As I understand it, Kentucky law has no provision for recalling an elected official. The state legislature could remove her but they're not in session until January and the Governor is reluctant to call an emergency session. The Rowan County government has issued assurances that the licenses issued by her deputies are valid and will be honored. She's not up for re-election until 2018, unfortunately, so unless the legislature does something, she's in there for the next few years. And who knows, I haven't seen any reports of a huge public backlash against her. She could well be re-elected.
She seemed to have a lot of supporters on her side when she left prison and, let's face it, in a small town like that people are more likely to take issue with the backlash against her from the outside than they are to take issue with her failure to do her job.

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:07 am
San Lumen wrote:Can anyone confirm the rumor she said she will run for governor? I don;t see how as the primaries have already passed unless Kentucky law allows her to run as an independent.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Tekania » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:12 am
Tmutarakhan wrote:Sane Outcasts wrote:There is no procedure for recalling officials in Kentucky, though it probably works that way in other states since the clerk's office usually handles election organization.
She can be removed through a regular election (next one in 2018), resigning (obviously not happening), or by the Kentucky General Assembly when it meets in regular session in January. There is a statutory offense for elected officials called "willful neglect of duties" that could easily be the basis for removal if she tries to interfere with her office issuing marriage licenses again, but her office is currently issuing marriage licenses so there is no problem for now.
The county prosecutor already referred the issue of prosecuting her for neglect of duty to the state AG (a conflict-of-interest statute says the local DA cannot handle cases against local officials but must ask the state AG for a special-prosecutor appointment) but the AG says that as long as the case is in Dunning's court he will not act "at this time" (i.e., he doesn't want to "step on the judge's robes" but such a criminal case is still a live possibility).

by Yedmnrutika Gavr » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:15 am

by Cymrea » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:21 am
Yedmnrutika Gavr wrote::lol: and so the plot thickens.. Warning! Cringworthy
ps sry if someone already posted this

by Ethel mermania » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:26 am
Yedmnrutika Gavr wrote::lol: and so the plot thickens.. Warning! Cringworthy
ps sry if someone already posted this

by Dyakovo » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:52 am
Ethel mermania wrote:Yedmnrutika Gavr wrote::lol: and so the plot thickens.. Warning! Cringworthy
ps sry if someone already posted this
It's a good post thanks.
The licenses n eed to be issued with her name on them, since that is one of the duties of a county clerk. If they are not, I hope she gets sent back to jail for contempt.

by Dread Lady Nathicana » Mon Sep 14, 2015 9:12 am
Cymrea wrote:Yedmnrutika Gavr wrote::lol: and so the plot thickens.. Warning! Cringworthy
ps sry if someone already posted this
Well, she's right about one thing: she's no hero.


by Gauthier » Mon Sep 14, 2015 9:23 am
Dyakovo wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:It's a good post thanks.
The licenses n eed to be issued with her name on them, since that is one of the duties of a county clerk. If they are not, I hope she gets sent back to jail for contempt.
Kentucky has stated that licenses issued without her name on them are valid...
I agree with you though, she has not done what the court told her to do, ergo, she is still in contempt.

by Dyakovo » Mon Sep 14, 2015 9:36 am
Val Halla wrote:I remember what I said two months ago. That some states would bypass it somehow. I wasn't wrong

by Sun Wukong » Mon Sep 14, 2015 9:49 am

by Gauthier » Mon Sep 14, 2015 9:52 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Al-Momenta, Bre zil, Ifreann, Kubra, Restored Alaska, The Jamesian Republic, Urkennalaid, Valyxias, Xin Robloxia, Zurkerx
Advertisement