Librica wrote:I could of taken those beaches without a single casualty.
Wat are you doing on NationStates rambo
Advertisement

by The balkens » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:30 pm
Librica wrote:I could of taken those beaches without a single casualty.

by Imperializt Russia » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:34 pm
Librica wrote:I could of taken those beaches without a single casualty.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by United Kingdom of Poland » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:42 pm

by The balkens » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:43 pm
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:you know the more I learn about Churchill during the war the more he seems a lot like hitler in the "I'll try planning ops without having the knowledge to do so" department.

by The Two Jerseys » Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:28 pm
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:you know the more I learn about Churchill during the war the more he seems a lot like hitler in the "I'll try planning ops without having the knowledge to do so" department.

by Redsection » Wed Sep 16, 2015 6:17 pm

by The balkens » Wed Sep 16, 2015 6:35 pm
The Two Jerseys wrote:United Kingdom of Poland wrote:you know the more I learn about Churchill during the war the more he seems a lot like hitler in the "I'll try planning ops without having the knowledge to do so" department.
Churchill graduated 8th in his class at Sandhurst and had experience commanding troops at up to battalion level, he's still way more qualified to plan operations than an Austrian corporal is.

by United Kingdom of Poland » Wed Sep 16, 2015 7:03 pm
The Two Jerseys wrote:United Kingdom of Poland wrote:you know the more I learn about Churchill during the war the more he seems a lot like hitler in the "I'll try planning ops without having the knowledge to do so" department.
Churchill graduated 8th in his class at Sandhurst and had experience commanding troops at up to battalion level, he's still way more qualified to plan operations than an Austrian corporal is.

by The Two Jerseys » Wed Sep 16, 2015 7:56 pm

by Imperializt Russia » Thu Sep 17, 2015 12:37 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by The Huskar Social Union » Thu Sep 17, 2015 12:39 am
Librica wrote:I could of taken those beaches without a single casualty.

by United Kingdom of Poland » Thu Sep 17, 2015 4:05 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:United Kingdom of Poland wrote:then explain all his actions in the med.
What about them? The Allies won in North Africa, Sicily and Italy. The Axis were put in a strangehold by the Royal Navy, particularly submarine operations that, amongst other factors, basically gelded the Afrika Korps.

by Imperializt Russia » Thu Sep 17, 2015 4:13 am
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:What about them? The Allies won in North Africa, Sicily and Italy. The Axis were put in a strangehold by the Royal Navy, particularly submarine operations that, amongst other factors, basically gelded the Afrika Korps.
but we could have won it in 1940-41 (before Rommel even got there) if Churchill hadn't forced Wavell to halt the advance and hold his reserves in preparation for Greece (an expedition that more or less wasted those forces and equipment)

Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Thu Sep 17, 2015 4:50 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:United Kingdom of Poland wrote:but we could have won it in 1940-41 (before Rommel even got there) if Churchill hadn't forced Wavell to halt the advance and hold his reserves in preparation for Greece (an expedition that more or less wasted those forces and equipment)
Doubtful what-if scenario is doubtful.
If we'd done a better job of enforcing the Treaty of Versailles, maybe we could have stopped WWII in about 1920

by Eol Sha » Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:59 am

by Imperializt Russia » Thu Sep 17, 2015 10:02 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Eol Sha » Thu Sep 17, 2015 10:06 am

by The Tiger Kingdom » Thu Sep 17, 2015 10:08 am

by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Thu Sep 17, 2015 10:15 am
Eol Sha wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:"It's exactly what they'd suspect! Therefore, it's what they will least expect!"
Better plan! A three-pronged invasion across the Straits, at Rotterdam, and at Cherbourg. The Germans will have to divide up their forces and therefore be weaker when they fight back.

by Eol Sha » Thu Sep 17, 2015 10:16 am
Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:Eol Sha wrote:Better plan! A three-pronged invasion across the Straits, at Rotterdam, and at Cherbourg. The Germans will have to divide up their forces and therefore be weaker when they fight back.
Have you seen the beaches of Rotterdam? Those things are hundreds of meters long, filled with barbed wire and tank traps. Not the short beaches of Normandy. Any troops going in there will be cut to pieces. Besides, a three-pronged attack could not resist counter attacks, and might have convinced the army staff to deploy panzer SS units.

by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Thu Sep 17, 2015 10:18 am
Eol Sha wrote:Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:Have you seen the beaches of Rotterdam? Those things are hundreds of meters long, filled with barbed wire and tank traps. Not the short beaches of Normandy. Any troops going in there will be cut to pieces. Besides, a three-pronged attack could not resist counter attacks, and might have convinced the army staff to deploy panzer SS units.
I'm speaking sarcastically.

by United Kingdom of Poland » Thu Sep 17, 2015 12:57 pm
The Tiger Kingdom wrote:The Two Jerseys wrote:I didn't say that he should be planning operations, I'm just saying that he's more qualified to do so than Hitler was.
Churchill was a singularly great Defense Minister (IE British military supremo) because he was smart enough, even at his whiniest points, to not force his will on people and to not overrule his commanders when they got stuck in. The Mediterranean campaign was his baby, but they weren't "his" actions - his grand strategies were shared and implemented by a host of Generals. I think Gallipoli had taught him the importance of not trying to carry everything yourself and bullying/forcing people to do what you want.
Hitler, on the other hand, went the other way, which obviously had huge negative impacts as the war went on.

by Imperializt Russia » Thu Sep 17, 2015 1:05 pm
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:The Tiger Kingdom wrote:Churchill was a singularly great Defense Minister (IE British military supremo) because he was smart enough, even at his whiniest points, to not force his will on people and to not overrule his commanders when they got stuck in. The Mediterranean campaign was his baby, but they weren't "his" actions - his grand strategies were shared and implemented by a host of Generals. I think Gallipoli had taught him the importance of not trying to carry everything yourself and bullying/forcing people to do what you want.
Hitler, on the other hand, went the other way, which obviously had huge negative impacts as the war went on.
ok so everyone between him and Wavell were morons then.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Des-Bal, Insaanistan, Pangurstan, Pizza Friday Forever91, Tarsonis, Umeria, Upper Ireland, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement