NATION

PASSWORD

The limits of choice

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45991
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:50 pm

Celseon wrote:
The Serbian Empire wrote:Her sig on the other hand for the longest time mentioned holding Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist views. And then you'd run into the gatekeeper role for both cisgender and transgender women seeking breast implants. Gatekeepers? Some of them will demand years of therapy just to approve or deny treatment.


I saw her acknowledge that she knew relatively little about trans* issues, and the designation has been removed. So perhaps she's abandoned TERF after learning more about those issues, and now is only a SWERF? Mind you, I'm against SWERF as much as I am TERF, but we're concerned here with the TERF. Maybe she's changed her tune and would now object to gatekeeping? I can understand that there's plenty of cause for sincere doubt, but maybe? Possibly?


No, I'm pretty sure I can see it right there in her signature... :eyebrow:
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Mysterious Stranger 2
Diplomat
 
Posts: 941
Founded: Jun 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Mysterious Stranger 2 » Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:52 pm

Yep, consistent with your usual habit of advocating supposedly "feminist" ideologies that are plainly adversarial to women.

User avatar
The Serbian Empire
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58107
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Serbian Empire » Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:53 pm

Mysterious Stranger 2 wrote:Yep, consistent with your usual habit of advocating supposedly "feminist" ideologies that are plainly adversarial to women.

That's why radical feminists are viewed as radicals.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~ WOMAN
Level 12 Myrmidon, Level ⑨ Tsundere, Level ✿ Hold My Flower
Bad Idea Purveyor
8 Values: https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.1&d=70.2&g=86.5&s=91.9
Political Compass: Economic -10.00 Authoritarian: -9.13
TG for Facebook if you want to friend me
Marissa, Goddess of Stratospheric Reach
preferred pronouns: Female ones
Primarily lesbian, but pansexual in nature

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45991
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:54 pm

Mysterious Stranger 2 wrote:Yep, consistent with your usual habit of advocating supposedly "feminist" ideologies that are plainly adversarial to women.


For some it can be very hard to get used to driving without shtick.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Celseon
Envoy
 
Posts: 275
Founded: Aug 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Celseon » Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:58 pm

Dumb Ideologies wrote:No, I'm pretty sure I can see it right there in her signature... :eyebrow:


That's my fault for not opening the spoilers. It says it plainly: "moderately TERF".

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45991
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:59 pm

Celseon wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:No, I'm pretty sure I can see it right there in her signature... :eyebrow:


That's my fault for not opening the spoilers. It says it plainly: "moderately TERF".


It's not too bad a character trait to sometimes choose hope when there's only nope :p
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Celseon
Envoy
 
Posts: 275
Founded: Aug 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Celseon » Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:05 pm

Dumb Ideologies wrote:Oi, oi. You campaign and try to change society's attitudes through progressive education, not target vulnerable people and try to shame them scared of doing what they want to do.

:palm:


Or worse yet, punish their exercise of ownership of their own bodies in a way you consider to be inherently unhealthy. You're right on point.
Last edited by Celseon on Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Yedmnrutika Gavr
Diplomat
 
Posts: 671
Founded: Jul 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Yedmnrutika Gavr » Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:06 pm

beauty is perspective and as a whole society should stop unquestionably accepting one commercial standard of beauty. i think any cosmetic surgery is a harsh step to take to be happy but many see it as necessary despite possible infection, deformity or even other psychological complications. letting others decide for them about their own body including the male-dominated society is a disgrace to their own sovereignty. the dove campaign for love your skin seems to be having a very positive impact though and maybe thats a good starting point for a similar campaign on love your breasts.

Donut section
 
Founded:

Postby Donut section » Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:08 pm

The limits of choice is when it directly or foreseeably causes physical harm to someone else.

We are not the keepers of others emotional states.

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5269
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:26 pm

Celseon wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:No, I'm pretty sure I can see it right there in her signature... :eyebrow:


That's my fault for not opening the spoilers. It says it plainly: "moderately TERF".

My position about transexualism is always the same: FREE surgeries, as long these surgeries are FULL transitions (otherwise I perceive it like a scam, sorry), coupled with massive fight to erase the whole concept of gender: by doing so, a day they'll no need surgeries anymore.
How many "inclusive" feminists are advocating for free surgeries for transpeople?

Above all I'm extremely SWERF.
Next Autumn in France there will be the introduction of Nordic Model, criminalisation of purchasers of sex. Another victory.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5269
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:30 pm

Yedmnrutika Gavr wrote:beauty is perspective and as a whole society should stop unquestionably accepting one commercial standard of beauty. i think any cosmetic surgery is a harsh step to take to be happy but many see it as necessary despite possible infection, deformity or even other psychological complications. letting others decide for them about their own body including the male-dominated society is a disgrace to their own sovereignty. the dove campaign for love your skin seems to be having a very positive impact though and maybe thats a good starting point for a similar campaign on love your breasts.


It affects even males, you know?
It's called "steroids", and in Sweden is already forbidden, not just only for athletes.
Patriarchy hurts even males.
But it hurts them much less: how many males use steroids compared to women performing surgeries in order to have inflated lips and breast implants?
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Shamhnan Insir
Minister
 
Posts: 2842
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Shamhnan Insir » Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:30 pm

Chessmistress wrote:Next Autumn in France there will be the introduction of Nordic Model, criminalisation of purchasers of sex. Another victory.


As noble as this may be I unfortunately don't see there ever being an end to prostitution. People trafficking will get worse, not better.
Call me Sham

-"Governments may think and say as they like, but force cannot be eliminated, and it is the only real and unanswerable power. We are told that the pen is mightier than the sword, but I know which of these weapons I would choose." Sir Adrian Paul Ghislain Carton de Wiart VC, KBE, CB, CMG, DSO.

Nationalism is an infantile disease, it is the measles of humanity.
Darwinish Brentsylvania wrote:Shamhnan Insir started this wonderful tranquility, ALL PRAISE THE SHEPHERD KING

User avatar
Eol Sha
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14708
Founded: Aug 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Eol Sha » Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:33 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Yedmnrutika Gavr wrote:beauty is perspective and as a whole society should stop unquestionably accepting one commercial standard of beauty. i think any cosmetic surgery is a harsh step to take to be happy but many see it as necessary despite possible infection, deformity or even other psychological complications. letting others decide for them about their own body including the male-dominated society is a disgrace to their own sovereignty. the dove campaign for love your skin seems to be having a very positive impact though and maybe thats a good starting point for a similar campaign on love your breasts.


It affects even males, you know?
It's called "steroids", and in Sweden is already forbidden, not just only for athletes.
Patriarchy hurts even males.
But it hurts them much less: how many males use steroids compared to women performing surgeries in order to have inflated lips and breast implants?

This is just a wild-ass guess, but probably way more. Steroids, I'd bet, are a ways cheaper and more accessible than plastic surgery.
You'd better believe I'm a bitter Bernie Sanders supporter. The Dems fucked up and fucked up hard. Hopefully they'll learn that neoliberalism and maintaining the status quo isn't the way to win this election or any other one. I doubt they will, though.

"What's the number one method of achieving civil rights in America? Don't scare the white folks." ~ Eol Sha

Praise be to C-SPAN - Democrats Should Listen to Sanders - How I Voted on November 8, 2016 - Trump's Foreign Policy: Do Stupid Shit - Trump's Clock is Ticking

User avatar
Yedmnrutika Gavr
Diplomat
 
Posts: 671
Founded: Jul 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Yedmnrutika Gavr » Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:34 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Yedmnrutika Gavr wrote:beauty is perspective and as a whole society should stop unquestionably accepting one commercial standard of beauty. i think any cosmetic surgery is a harsh step to take to be happy but many see it as necessary despite possible infection, deformity or even other psychological complications. letting others decide for them about their own body including the male-dominated society is a disgrace to their own sovereignty. the dove campaign for love your skin seems to be having a very positive impact though and maybe thats a good starting point for a similar campaign on love your breasts.


It affects even males, you know?
It's called "steroids", and in Sweden is already forbidden, not just only for athletes.
Patriarchy hurts even males.
But it hurts them much less: how many males use steroids compared to women performing surgeries in order to have inflated lips and breast implants?


yes of course im not saying it doesnt affect males just that was the thought that came to my mind about breast implants. it undoubtedly affects more females than males because its a male dominated society after all.

EDIT; i grew up in a matriarchal household so im sure my views are a bit skewed by this
Last edited by Yedmnrutika Gavr on Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5269
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:34 pm

Eol Sha wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
It affects even males, you know?
It's called "steroids", and in Sweden is already forbidden, not just only for athletes.
Patriarchy hurts even males.
But it hurts them much less: how many males use steroids compared to women performing surgeries in order to have inflated lips and breast implants?

This is just a wild-ass guess, but probably way more. Steroids, I'd bet, are a ways cheaper and more accessible than plastic surgery.


I don't know, but I know that steroids are very unhealthy, too.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Cymrea
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8694
Founded: Feb 10, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Cymrea » Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:37 pm

Galloism wrote:
USS Monitor wrote:
In my opinion, they are. It's an opinion, not a fact. You don't get to tell me what my opinion is.

Since we're talking about breast implants being "gross", I'll throw my hat in the ring. I don't think they're gross, but having had sex with a woman who had breast implants a number of years ago, it made her breasts feel weird.

like, distractingly weird.

So, I generally have a preference personally against breast implants. However, that's a woman's personal choice, and I see no reason to restrict it based on my feelings.

Fake boobs taste funny.
Pronounced: KIM-ree-ah. Formerly the Empire of Thakandar, founded December 2002. IIWiki | Factbook | Royal Cymrean Forces
Proud patron of: Halcyon Arms and of their Cymrea-class drone carrier
Storefronts: Ravendyne Defence Industries | Bank of Cymrea | Pork Place BBQ
Puppets: Persica Prime (W40K), Winter Bastion (SW), Atramentar
✎ Member - ℘ædagog | Cheese Sandwich is best Pony | 1870 (2.0) United Kingdom of Cambria
SEATTLE SEAHAWKS OREGON DUCKS

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45991
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:43 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Celseon wrote:
That's my fault for not opening the spoilers. It says it plainly: "moderately TERF".

My position about transexualism is always the same: FREE surgeries, as long these surgeries are FULL transitions (otherwise I perceive it like a scam, sorry), coupled with massive fight to erase the whole concept of gender: by doing so, a day they'll no need surgeries anymore.
How many "inclusive" feminists are advocating for free surgeries for transpeople?


Ruh-roh. Someone's still not getting the distinction between gender roles and gender identity.

Please also enlighten us on the nature of this "scam" in which those who do not wish to pursue full transition are engaging. And on why, if you're so "accepting", you feel that transwomen can be neither "true" feminists, nor be allowed to attend "women-only" events.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Trumptasric America
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Aug 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Trumptasric America » Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:57 pm

So you can't liberate people by limiting choice. Good that we have established that. Now if only you commies could see that its the same thing with the minimum wage: let workers think for themselves. Nobody is making them take jobs that would pay below the current minimal wage. If that's what they want then the state has no business forcing them to be unemployed. True liberation would be the elimination of minimum wage laws.
Trump is not a racist. He did not call all Mexicans or Mexicans in general rapists nor say that being Mexican causes one to rape. If you think he is that is because you are projecting your baggage on him. You are the problem not Donald Trump.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42345
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Thu Aug 13, 2015 2:05 pm

You are aware that some breast surgery is medically helpful? For instance there are women with very different size breasts. Getting a bra can be highly difficult. There are others who's breasts are too large, to the point it causes harm.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Non Conformists
Attaché
 
Posts: 97
Founded: Aug 11, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Non Conformists » Thu Aug 13, 2015 2:06 pm

Cymrea wrote:Fake boobs taste funny.

Try them with some fava beans and a nice chianti.
"I am not sorry for believing that everything in life should be earned, and I am not about to raise two sons to be men by making them believe they are entitled to something just because they tried their best" - James Harrison

User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Thu Aug 13, 2015 2:22 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Celseon wrote:
That's my fault for not opening the spoilers. It says it plainly: "moderately TERF".

My position about transexualism is always the same: FREE surgeries, as long these surgeries are FULL transitions (otherwise I perceive it like a scam, sorry), coupled with massive fight to erase the whole concept of gender: by doing so, a day they'll no need surgeries anymore.
How many "inclusive" feminists are advocating for free surgeries for transpeople?

Above all I'm extremely SWERF.
Next Autumn in France there will be the introduction of Nordic Model, criminalisation of purchasers of sex. Another victory.

You know, people like you make it tempting to go on HRT and forgoe the sex-reassignment surgery.

If someone wants to have a female body and keep male genitalia, that's frankly none of your business.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

User avatar
Adnan Nawaz And Bureacrats Elsewhere
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 475
Founded: Jun 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Adnan Nawaz And Bureacrats Elsewhere » Thu Aug 13, 2015 2:25 pm

You're a gender fascist.

You are such a gender fascist that it's unbelievable. The *limits* of choice? This is not about limits. It's about having no choice at all. What, so women can't get breast implants now? What the fuck CAN they do in your proposed system? Be militant, dick-mutilating sheep under the command of a matriarchal queendom?
A sort-of conservative, more likely centrist nation with a belief in the free market to deliver us from evil. Former worshiper of own religion, Edgwarianism, but now an atheist, Laveyan Satanist and happy go lucky homosexual. I like capitalism and private enterprise, but not so much of communism or feminism. Fundamental religious nutjobs are not excused from their idiocies.

Pro: Capitalism, atheism, rational thought, centrism, Laveyan satanism (specifically Lesser Magic), LGBT rights
Anti: Communism, religion, feminism, conformity

User avatar
Eol Sha
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14708
Founded: Aug 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Eol Sha » Thu Aug 13, 2015 2:31 pm

Adnan Nawaz And Bureacrats Elsewhere wrote:You're a gender fascist.

You are such a gender fascist that it's unbelievable. The *limits* of choice? This is not about limits. It's about having no choice at all. What, so women can't get breast implants now? What the fuck CAN they do in your proposed system? Be militant, dick-mutilating sheep under the command of a matriarchal queendom?

To be fair, Chess wants awareness campaigns. Not bans.
You'd better believe I'm a bitter Bernie Sanders supporter. The Dems fucked up and fucked up hard. Hopefully they'll learn that neoliberalism and maintaining the status quo isn't the way to win this election or any other one. I doubt they will, though.

"What's the number one method of achieving civil rights in America? Don't scare the white folks." ~ Eol Sha

Praise be to C-SPAN - Democrats Should Listen to Sanders - How I Voted on November 8, 2016 - Trump's Foreign Policy: Do Stupid Shit - Trump's Clock is Ticking

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Thu Aug 13, 2015 3:29 pm

ah, what a gem. OP, you've really outdone yourself
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5269
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Thu Aug 13, 2015 5:00 pm

Eol Sha wrote:
Adnan Nawaz And Bureacrats Elsewhere wrote:You're a gender fascist.

You are such a gender fascist that it's unbelievable. The *limits* of choice? This is not about limits. It's about having no choice at all. What, so women can't get breast implants now? What the fuck CAN they do in your proposed system? Be militant, dick-mutilating sheep under the command of a matriarchal queendom?

To be fair, Chess wants awareness campaigns. Not bans.


Exactly.
And more taxation on such unhealthy things, mainly meant to fund awareness campaigns.
Thank you for your fairness.
Last edited by Chessmistress on Thu Aug 13, 2015 5:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Bronzite, Hidrandia, Ineva, Naui Tu, Neanderthaland, Pridelantic people

Advertisement

Remove ads