NATION

PASSWORD

Man has consensual sex with '17' year old, now a crime

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Veceria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24832
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Veceria » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:35 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
The Cobalt Sky wrote:Exactly. The same will happen if we ban guns.
http://www.2acheck.com/?attachment_id=1069


Indeed: guns are strictly regulated in Europe, and in ALL the countries roughly comparable to USA there are FAR less homicides per capita (Portugal, Spain, France, UK, Italy, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Sweden and Norway, in example)
I don't even bother to source it: everybody knows.

Thank you for proving my point.

You can't compare any other country to the US though. It's totally different.
And guns aren't as strictly regulated here as most people think.
Last edited by Veceria on Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[FT]|Does not use NS stats.
Zeth Rekia wrote:You making Zeno horny.

DesAnges wrote:People don't deserve respect, they earn it.

10,000,000th post.
FoxTropica wrote:And then Hurdegaryp kissed Thafoo, Meanwhile Fox-Mary-"Sue"-Tropica saved TET from destruction and everyone happily forever.

Then suddenly fights broke out because hey, it's the internet.

Hurd is Hurd is Hurd.
Discord: Fenrisúlfr#3521
(send me a TG before sending me a friend request though)
I'm Austrian, if you need german translations, feel free to send me a TG.

User avatar
New Benian Republic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1930
Founded: Aug 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Benian Republic » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:36 pm

New Benian Republic wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Damn, those are some insane laws if they can phase shit out of existence :p

If anything it will become horrible as those used in black market porn would be sex slaves (Not the kinky thing) who do not have the power to stop doing pornography.
~~~Support Sinn Féinn I guess~~~

~Like all true Irishmen I have no ancestors. I was birthed from Ireland's soil itself, fully formed, like a potato.~
Pro: United Ireland, IRA, Allan Ryan, Palestine, Malvinas, Ukraine, Hamas-Fatah cooperation, legalized Gay marriage, Tibetan Resistance, Basque Separatists, OPM.
Neutral: Bathroom segregation.

Anti: English Imperialism, Nazism, communism, Israel, Zionism, Margret thatcher, Martin McGuinness, good Friday agreement.
I am an Irish Atheist and Republican, Not a Dissident stop saying I am.
RIP Óglach Alan Ryan

~~Proud Gaelige Speaker~~

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53350
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:36 pm

The Cobalt Sky wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
Indeed: guns are strictly regulated in Europe, and in ALL the countries rioughly comparable to USA there are FAR less homicides per capita.
I don't even bother to source it: everybody knows.

Thank you for proving my point.

Oh my God... I suggest you click the source. I think it might give you more clarity as to what my actual opinion is.


Na man she's right, gang activity is illegal and I can already feel myself fading away.

Chessmistress wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Answer my damn question please, I really want to know what you think.


What question?


Do you think porn will just go away if you outlaw it?
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:36 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Answer my damn question please, I really want to know what you think.


What question?

THIS ONE:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:


Indeed, when patriarchy will end, porn will be outlawed.


Okay I've brought this up a thousand times and you've never answered. Are you really naive enough to think porn will just go away when you outlaw it?

Veceria wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
Indeed: guns are strictly regulated in Europe, and in ALL the countries roughly comparable to USA there are FAR less homicides per capita (Portugal, Spain, France, UK, Italy, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Sweden and Norway, in example)
I don't even bother to source it: everybody knows.

Thank you for proving my point.

You can't compare any other country to the US though. It's totally different.
And guns aren't as strictly regulated here as most people think.

She didn't even get that what I said was parody...
Last edited by The Cobalt Sky on Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5161
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:42 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
What question?


Do you think porn will just go away if you outlaw it?


If we will just only outlaw it: no, it'll never go away. But it'll decrease to 20% or even 10% because most people will be afraid to use it.
BUT
If we'll manage to ashame and stigmatise who use porn AND we'll bann it, it'll decrease to 2% or 1%.
When pornography will be decreased at such rate, not anymore bad attitudes towards women.
Last edited by Chessmistress on Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:43 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:


Do you think porn will just go away if you outlaw it?


If we just only outlwa it: no, it'll never go away. But it'll decrease to 20% or even 10% because people will be afraid to use it.
BUT
If we'll manage to ashame and stigmatise who use porn AND we'll bann it, it'll decrease to 2% or 1%.
When pornography will be decreased at such rate, not anymore bad attitudes towards women.

What if the porn contains only males?
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53350
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:43 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:


Do you think porn will just go away if you outlaw it?


If we will just only outlaw it: no, it'll never go away. But it'll decrease to 20% or even 10% because most people will be afraid to use it.
BUT
If we'll manage to ashame and stigmatise who use porn AND we'll bann it, it'll decrease to 2% or 1%.
When pornography will be decreased at such rate, not anymore bad attitudes towards women.


Alright, I'd like to see some sources for those numbers.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
New Benian Republic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1930
Founded: Aug 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Benian Republic » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:44 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:


Do you think porn will just go away if you outlaw it?


If we will just only outlaw it: no, it'll never go away. But it'll decrease to 20% or even 10% because most people will be afraid to use it.
BUT
If we'll manage to ashame and stigmatise who use porn AND we'll bann it, it'll decrease to 2% or 1%.
When pornography will be decreased at such rate, not anymore bad attitudes towards women.

Literally no one would allow such a ban to pass.
~~~Support Sinn Féinn I guess~~~

~Like all true Irishmen I have no ancestors. I was birthed from Ireland's soil itself, fully formed, like a potato.~
Pro: United Ireland, IRA, Allan Ryan, Palestine, Malvinas, Ukraine, Hamas-Fatah cooperation, legalized Gay marriage, Tibetan Resistance, Basque Separatists, OPM.
Neutral: Bathroom segregation.

Anti: English Imperialism, Nazism, communism, Israel, Zionism, Margret thatcher, Martin McGuinness, good Friday agreement.
I am an Irish Atheist and Republican, Not a Dissident stop saying I am.
RIP Óglach Alan Ryan

~~Proud Gaelige Speaker~~

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:44 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:


Do you think porn will just go away if you outlaw it?


If we will just only outlaw it: no, it'll never go away. But it'll decrease to 20% or even 10% because most people will be afraid to use it.
BUT
If we'll manage to ashame and stigmatise who use porn AND we'll bann it, it'll decrease to 2% or 1%.
When pornography will be decreased at such rate, not anymore bad attitudes towards women.

I'm a teenager on the internet, I can't get laid like a normal person.
What the hell am I supposed to do without porn?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72258
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:44 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:


Do you think porn will just go away if you outlaw it?


If we will just only outlaw it: no, it'll never go away. But it'll decrease to 20% or even 10% because most people will be afraid to use it.
BUT
If we'll manage to ashame and stigmatise who use porn AND we'll bann it, it'll decrease to 2% or 1%.
When pornography will be decreased at such rate, not anymore bad attitudes towards women.

You know, if this is parody, it's classicly funny parody. Good for a chuckle.

If it's serious, it's one of the funniest damn things ever.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:44 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:


Do you think porn will just go away if you outlaw it?


If we will just only outlaw it: no, it'll never go away. But it'll decrease to 20% or even 10% because most people will be afraid to use it.
BUT
If we'll manage to ashame and stigmatise who use porn AND we'll bann it, it'll decrease to 2% or 1%.
When pornography will be decreased at such rate, not anymore bad attitudes towards women.


Congratulations on giving organized crime another money-making venture.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53350
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:45 pm

Galloism wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
If we will just only outlaw it: no, it'll never go away. But it'll decrease to 20% or even 10% because most people will be afraid to use it.
BUT
If we'll manage to ashame and stigmatise who use porn AND we'll bann it, it'll decrease to 2% or 1%.
When pornography will be decreased at such rate, not anymore bad attitudes towards women.

You know, if this is parody, it's classicly funny parody. Good for a chuckle.

If it's serious, it's one of the funniest damn things ever.


That's the point I've arrived at, this is just funny either way.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72258
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:45 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
If we will just only outlaw it: no, it'll never go away. But it'll decrease to 20% or even 10% because most people will be afraid to use it.
BUT
If we'll manage to ashame and stigmatise who use porn AND we'll bann it, it'll decrease to 2% or 1%.
When pornography will be decreased at such rate, not anymore bad attitudes towards women.

I'm a teenager on the internet, I can't get laid like a normal person.
What the hell am I supposed to do without porn?

Become a voyeur.

Duh.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72258
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:46 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
If we will just only outlaw it: no, it'll never go away. But it'll decrease to 20% or even 10% because most people will be afraid to use it.
BUT
If we'll manage to ashame and stigmatise who use porn AND we'll bann it, it'll decrease to 2% or 1%.
When pornography will be decreased at such rate, not anymore bad attitudes towards women.


Congratulations on giving organized crime another money-making venture.

And one that can be done digitally without physical distribution.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:47 pm

Galloism wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm a teenager on the internet, I can't get laid like a normal person.
What the hell am I supposed to do without porn?

Become a voyeur.

Duh.

Of course!
It was so obvious!

I also realise I'm a compulsive liar because I reflexively called myself a "teenager". I'm twenty bloody two. Bad Impe.
Last edited by Imperializt Russia on Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111675
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:48 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Galloism wrote:Become a voyeur.

Duh.

Of course!
It was so obvious!

I also realise I'm a compulsive liar because I reflexively called myself a "teenager". I'm twenty bloody two. Bad Impe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-Ray_Specs_(novelty)
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:49 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
If we will just only outlaw it: no, it'll never go away. But it'll decrease to 20% or even 10% because most people will be afraid to use it.
BUT
If we'll manage to ashame and stigmatise who use porn AND we'll bann it, it'll decrease to 2% or 1%.
When pornography will be decreased at such rate, not anymore bad attitudes towards women.

I'm a teenager on the internet, I can't get laid like a normal person.
What the hell am I supposed to do without porn?

Yeah. People did get along okay before it was a thing, but to suddenly remove it (if that's even possible) would definitely cause some ripples. And shaming people further will screw up their confidence and make it even harder for them to do it IRL.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5161
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:49 pm

New Benian Republic wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
If we will just only outlaw it: no, it'll never go away. But it'll decrease to 20% or even 10% because most people will be afraid to use it.
BUT
If we'll manage to ashame and stigmatise who use porn AND we'll bann it, it'll decrease to 2% or 1%.
When pornography will be decreased at such rate, not anymore bad attitudes towards women.

Literally no one would allow such a ban to pass.


Today, it's probably so.
More and more women will have power, more and more society will dislike porn: most women don't like porn, most males like porn.
Just think about affirmative ongoing consent: it was unthinkable just only 20 years ago. Affirmative ongoing consent beginned to spread within colleges and universities...why? It's not a mere case, it's because women are about 60% students (except in STEM, and that's a shame).
The same for anti-sexual harassment policies: more and more women there will be in the workforce, more and more anti-sexual harassment policies will be harsh.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:49 pm

As a convicted sex offender, the terms of Zach’s probation are incredibly strict. For the next five years, he is forbidden from owning a smart phone or using the Internet. He is not allowed to talk to anyone under age 17, other than immediate family. He is banned from going to any establishment that serves alcohol and he has to be home before 8 p.m. every night.

“They make me out to be a monster,” Zach said. “I can't even look at life regularly.”


I'm not even sure what this is supposed to accomplish.

User avatar
New Benian Republic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1930
Founded: Aug 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Benian Republic » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:51 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
New Benian Republic wrote:Literally no one would allow such a ban to pass.


Today, it's probably so.
More and more women will have power, more and more society will dislike porn: most women don't like porn, most males like porn.
Just think about affirmative ongoing consent: it was unthinkable just only 20 years ago. Affirmative ongoing consent beginned to spread within colleges and universities...why? It's not a mere case, it's because women are about 60% students (except in STEM, and that's a shame).
The same for anti-sexual harassment policies: more and more women there will be in the workforce, more and more anti-sexual harassment policies will be harsh.

On campuses it's because feminists basically run them.
~~~Support Sinn Féinn I guess~~~

~Like all true Irishmen I have no ancestors. I was birthed from Ireland's soil itself, fully formed, like a potato.~
Pro: United Ireland, IRA, Allan Ryan, Palestine, Malvinas, Ukraine, Hamas-Fatah cooperation, legalized Gay marriage, Tibetan Resistance, Basque Separatists, OPM.
Neutral: Bathroom segregation.

Anti: English Imperialism, Nazism, communism, Israel, Zionism, Margret thatcher, Martin McGuinness, good Friday agreement.
I am an Irish Atheist and Republican, Not a Dissident stop saying I am.
RIP Óglach Alan Ryan

~~Proud Gaelige Speaker~~

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:52 pm

The Grey Wolf wrote:
As a convicted sex offender, the terms of Zach’s probation are incredibly strict. For the next five years, he is forbidden from owning a smart phone or using the Internet. He is not allowed to talk to anyone under age 17, other than immediate family. He is banned from going to any establishment that serves alcohol and he has to be home before 8 p.m. every night.

“They make me out to be a monster,” Zach said. “I can't even look at life regularly.”


I'm not even sure what this is supposed to accomplish.


It was cooked up with the idea that onerous terms would disincentivize recidivism. In reality, it makes living a normal life so shitty impossible that doing it again or doing worse becomes a very attractive option.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:53 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
New Benian Republic wrote:Literally no one would allow such a ban to pass.


Today, it's probably so.
More and more women will have power, more and more society will dislike porn: most women don't like porn, most males like porn.
Just think about affirmative ongoing consent: it was unthinkable just only 20 years ago. Affirmative ongoing consent beginned to spread within colleges and universities...why? It's not a mere case, it's because women are about 60% students (except in STEM, and that's a shame).
The same for anti-sexual harassment policies: more and more women there will be in the workforce, more and more anti-sexual harassment policies will be harsh.

First off, where's your proof most women don't like porn? And that women in power will decide to ban it, even if they don't like it?
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:54 pm

BK117B2 wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
Ah, I think you're confused - I'm not arguing opinion, I'm saying that - based on precedence I've not seen a case that suggests it would hold up.

If you think there's a case where there is a precedent that it WOULD hold up, feel free to source it.


Maybe there's the disconnect. I was referring to what happened, not the likelihood of a conviction for it. So far as I know, it is still LEGAL to commit rape by deception in some states.


And, in those states, there's no precedent for it to have applied in a case like THIS.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:56 pm

The Cobalt Sky wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
Today, it's probably so.
More and more women will have power, more and more society will dislike porn: most women don't like porn, most males like porn.
Just think about affirmative ongoing consent: it was unthinkable just only 20 years ago. Affirmative ongoing consent beginned to spread within colleges and universities...why? It's not a mere case, it's because women are about 60% students (except in STEM, and that's a shame).
The same for anti-sexual harassment policies: more and more women there will be in the workforce, more and more anti-sexual harassment policies will be harsh.

First off, where's your proof most women don't like porn? And that women in power will decide to ban it, even if they don't like it?

Has Germany banned porn?

The Grey Wolf wrote:
As a convicted sex offender, the terms of Zach’s probation are incredibly strict. For the next five years, he is forbidden from owning a smart phone or using the Internet. He is not allowed to talk to anyone under age 17, other than immediate family. He is banned from going to any establishment that serves alcohol and he has to be home before 8 p.m. every night.

“They make me out to be a monster,” Zach said. “I can't even look at life regularly.”


I'm not even sure what this is supposed to accomplish.

Make somebody depressed?
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:58 pm

Gauthier wrote:
The Grey Wolf wrote:
As a convicted sex offender, the terms of Zach’s probation are incredibly strict. For the next five years, he is forbidden from owning a smart phone or using the Internet. He is not allowed to talk to anyone under age 17, other than immediate family. He is banned from going to any establishment that serves alcohol and he has to be home before 8 p.m. every night.

“They make me out to be a monster,” Zach said. “I can't even look at life regularly.”


I'm not even sure what this is supposed to accomplish.


It was cooked up with the idea that onerous terms would disincentivize recidivism. In reality, it makes living a normal life so shitty impossible that doing it again or doing worse becomes a very attractive option.


Why do I get the feeling that the good old fashioned GOP was responsible for this harebrained scheme?
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:


Indeed, when patriarchy will end, porn will be outlawed.


Okay I've brought this up a thousand times and you've never answered. Are you really naive enough to think porn will just go away when you outlaw it?


Who knew that the only thing protecting our right to wank were the old men in the patriarchy.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Bienenhalde, Carrelie, Cratersti, El Lazaro, Greater Arab State, Ifreann, Kitsuva, Ostroeuropa, Rary, Raskana, Rusticus I Damianus, Shidei, Southland, Tarsonis, The Astral Mandate, The North Polish Union, Unogonduria, Violetist Britannia, You Suffer and I Win

Advertisement

Remove ads