Humo wrote:so are people really trying to reason with a clear racists
Boredom, mainly.
Advertisement

by Vassenor » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:23 pm

by The Cobalt Sky » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:23 pm

by Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:23 pm
Vassenor wrote:
They've been advocating phrenology for the entire thread. Their entire argument is predicated on the idea that "black people have different shaped skulls to white people so clearly black people are stupid".

by Vassenor » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:24 pm
The Cobalt Sky wrote:Laerod wrote:You're in for some major disappointment if you think swaying racists is generally feasible through strength of argument.
Reason? Oh no, I meant plaster this forum full of our opinions until he can't keep up with responses or just outlast him. That's what I was planning, at least.

by Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:24 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Norepinephrinistania wrote:How can environment be the essential key to why the black-white IQ gap is false, when intelligence is 50-80% genetic?
Because intelligence is not 50-80% genetic.Aggicificicerous wrote:
Not only that, but the mean starting age of this study was 64. The authors were looking into cognitive abilities and variance as people age. It's almost as though this guy just throws out sources without reading them.

by The Cobalt Sky » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:25 pm

by Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:25 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Not for one second, but I do believe in holding people's feet to the fire when they make outrageous claims.
Humo wrote:so are people really trying to reason with a clear racists

by Vassenor » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:26 pm

by The Cobalt Sky » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:26 pm

by Caracasus » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:26 pm

by Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:26 pm

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:27 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by The Empire of Pretantia » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:27 pm

by The Cobalt Sky » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:28 pm
Caracasus wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Works for me.
Sounds like a plan. It's been fun watching y'all baffle this guy with the deviously cunning strategy of asking for basic facts to support his outlandish claims, and you know, that fiendish underhand tactic of backing up your own arguments with actual scientific fact but I'm off to bed.
Bet this thread is locked when I wake up.

by Tsaraine » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:28 pm

by Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:29 pm

by Mavorpen » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:29 pm
Norepinephrinistania wrote:Mavorpen wrote:Because intelligence is not 50-80% genetic.
Identical twins—Reared together .86
Identical twins—Reared apart .76
Fraternal twins—Reared together .55
Fraternal twins—Reared apart .35
Biological siblings—Reared together .47
Biological siblings—Reared apart .24
Unrelated children—Reared together—Children .28
Unrelated children—Reared together—Adults .04
Cousins .15
Parent-child—Living together .42
Parent-child—Living apart .22
Adoptive parent–child—Living together .19
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritabil ... man2009-58
Intelligence is clearly more genetic than social.

by Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:29 pm
Tsaraine wrote:Laerod wrote:You're in for some major disappointment if you think swaying racists is generally feasible through strength of argument.
Word of Max is that NS should serve as a place where any ideology can be put forth and debated, on the grounds that it is better to defeat the ignorant and wrongheaded in the light of day than allow them to fester in the dark; and that, even if people wedded to ignorance and hate cannot be swayed, there is an invisible audience of readers who can be moved by good argument.
This means that racism, or sexism, or other -isms cannot be defeated once and for all - for one thing, more -ists are always popping up like mushrooms from the night soil, and for another, the process of defeating them is in itself a good to be cherished. So fight the good fight, and be not dismayed - for by the Flynn effect and numerous other statistics we see that society continues to advance, little by little, towards a more perfect state. Some parts and some people may be mired in the past; but time takes them further from us, and bears witness to the elevation of the whole.

by Nelson R Mandela » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:31 pm
Caracasus wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Works for me.
Sounds like a plan. It's been fun watching y'all baffle this guy with the deviously cunning strategy of asking for basic facts to support his outlandish claims, and you know, that fiendish underhand tactic of backing up your own arguments with actual scientific fact but I'm off to bed.
Bet this thread is locked when I wake up.

by Vassenor » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:31 pm
Norepinephrinistania wrote:The truth is neither compassionate nor cruel.

by Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:31 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Norepinephrinistania wrote:Identical twins—Reared together .86
Identical twins—Reared apart .76
Fraternal twins—Reared together .55
Fraternal twins—Reared apart .35
Biological siblings—Reared together .47
Biological siblings—Reared apart .24
Unrelated children—Reared together—Children .28
Unrelated children—Reared together—Adults .04
Cousins .15
Parent-child—Living together .42
Parent-child—Living apart .22
Adoptive parent–child—Living together .19
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritabil ... man2009-58
Intelligence is clearly more genetic than social.
I like how you just plain ignored the fact you didn't read your own source and then cited some data that doesn't lead to the conclusion you want to peddle to us.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:31 pm

by Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:32 pm
Norepinephrinistania wrote:Trying to take the moral high ground doesn't make you right. Racialism is on the rise in many parts of Europe. The truth is neither compassionate nor cruel.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:32 pm
Norepinephrinistania wrote:Tsaraine wrote:Word of Max is that NS should serve as a place where any ideology can be put forth and debated, on the grounds that it is better to defeat the ignorant and wrongheaded in the light of day than allow them to fester in the dark; and that, even if people wedded to ignorance and hate cannot be swayed, there is an invisible audience of readers who can be moved by good argument.
This means that racism, or sexism, or other -isms cannot be defeated once and for all - for one thing, more -ists are always popping up like mushrooms from the night soil, and for another, the process of defeating them is in itself a good to be cherished. So fight the good fight, and be not dismayed - for by the Flynn effect and numerous other statistics we see that society continues to advance, little by little, towards a more perfect state. Some parts and some people may be mired in the past; but time takes them further from us, and bears witness to the elevation of the whole.
Trying to take the moral high ground doesn't make you right. Racialism is on the rise in many parts of Europe. The truth is neither compassionate nor cruel.

by Mavorpen » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:33 pm
Norepinephrinistania wrote:Then why do unrelated children reared together have much less in common in terms of intelligence than identical twins raised apart?
Norepinephrinistania wrote:Dismissive reply.
Advertisement
Advertisement