NATION

PASSWORD

Race and IQ

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66768
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:23 pm

Humo wrote:so are people really trying to reason with a clear racists


Boredom, mainly.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:23 pm

Laerod wrote:
The Cobalt Sky wrote:Or we should correct him. Can't let thinking like this persist.

You're in for some major disappointment if you think swaying racists is generally feasible through strength of argument.

Reason? Oh no, I meant plaster this forum full of our opinions until he can't keep up with responses or just outlast him. That's what I was planning, at least.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:23 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Are you seriously advocating phrenology right now?

Really?


They've been advocating phrenology for the entire thread. Their entire argument is predicated on the idea that "black people have different shaped skulls to white people so clearly black people are stupid".

...wasn't this pseudoscience pretty widely rejected by Western psychiatry by the early twentieth century?

Good fuck, next thing you know, we're going to have people on here advocating for spontaneous generation.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66768
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:24 pm

The Cobalt Sky wrote:
Laerod wrote:You're in for some major disappointment if you think swaying racists is generally feasible through strength of argument.

Reason? Oh no, I meant plaster this forum full of our opinions until he can't keep up with responses or just outlast him. That's what I was planning, at least.


Works for me.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Norepinephrinistania
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:24 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Norepinephrinistania wrote:How can environment be the essential key to why the black-white IQ gap is false, when intelligence is 50-80% genetic?

Because intelligence is not 50-80% genetic.
Aggicificicerous wrote:
Not only that, but the mean starting age of this study was 64. The authors were looking into cognitive abilities and variance as people age. It's almost as though this guy just throws out sources without reading them.

Identical twins—Reared together .86
Identical twins—Reared apart .76
Fraternal twins—Reared together .55
Fraternal twins—Reared apart .35
Biological siblings—Reared together .47
Biological siblings—Reared apart .24
Unrelated children—Reared together—Children .28
Unrelated children—Reared together—Adults .04
Cousins .15
Parent-child—Living together .42
Parent-child—Living apart .22
Adoptive parent–child—Living together .19

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritabil ... man2009-58

Intelligence is clearly more genetic than social.

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:25 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Humo wrote:so are people really trying to reason with a clear racists


Boredom, mainly.

It's enjoyable for me, at least. It's like Eric Cartman. You love to point out how much of a hypocrite he is, but he never becomes aware of it.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:25 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Not for one second, but I do believe in holding people's feet to the fire when they make outrageous claims.

Yeah, me too.

Sometimes just to see them eventually break down with a "i don't have to source shit you idiot," or something along those lines.
Humo wrote:so are people really trying to reason with a clear racists

Welcome to a typical summer day on NSG.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66768
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:26 pm

Vassenor wrote:Also, I'm still waiting for an answer to this one.

Vassenor wrote:OK, let me ask you a specific question, OP.

What qualifications do you hold that make you an authority on this subject?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:26 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Don't pretend you actually expect them to be provided, Yumyum.


Not for one second, but I do believe in holding people's feet to the fire when they make outrageous claims.

This. Definitely this.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Caracasus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7918
Founded: Apr 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Caracasus » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:26 pm

Vassenor wrote:
The Cobalt Sky wrote:Reason? Oh no, I meant plaster this forum full of our opinions until he can't keep up with responses or just outlast him. That's what I was planning, at least.


Works for me.


Sounds like a plan. It's been fun watching y'all baffle this guy with the deviously cunning strategy of asking for basic facts to support his outlandish claims, and you know, that fiendish underhand tactic of backing up your own arguments with actual scientific fact but I'm off to bed.

Bet this thread is locked when I wake up.
As an editor I seam to spend an awful lot of thyme going threw issues and checking that they're no oblivious errars. Its a tough job but someone's got too do it!



Issues editor, not a moderator.

User avatar
Norepinephrinistania
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:26 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Don't pretend you actually expect them to be provided, Yumyum.


Not for one second, but I do believe in holding people's feet to the fire when they make outrageous claims.

IQ tests are inherently not cultural. They aren't even verbal.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:27 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Because when you enter a home, you don't enter a void of space separate from the space-time of the rest of the universe.

How can environment be the essential key to why the black-white IQ gap is false, when intelligence is 50-80% genetic?

That one's been refuted like, four times too.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
The Empire of Pretantia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39273
Founded: Oct 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Empire of Pretantia » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:27 pm

All this talk of skull makes mewant to spill blood in the name of Khorne.
ywn be as good as this video
Gacha
Trashing other people's waifus
Anti-NN
EA
Douche flutes
Zimbabwe
Putting the toilet paper roll the wrong way
Every single square inch of Asia
Lewding Earth-chan
Pollution
4Chan in all its glory and all its horror
Playing the little Switch controller handheld thing in public
Treading on me
Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and all their cousins and sisters and brothers and wife's sons
Alternate Universe 40K
Nightcore
Comcast
Zimbabwe
Believing the Ottomans were the third Roman Empire
Parodies of the Gadsden flag
The Fate Series
US politics

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:28 pm

Caracasus wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Works for me.


Sounds like a plan. It's been fun watching y'all baffle this guy with the deviously cunning strategy of asking for basic facts to support his outlandish claims, and you know, that fiendish underhand tactic of backing up your own arguments with actual scientific fact but I'm off to bed.

Bet this thread is locked when I wake up.

Why? It's not descending into chaos, because I'm pretty sure there's been no name calling by way of flaming.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Tsaraine
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 4033
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsaraine » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:28 pm

Laerod wrote:
The Cobalt Sky wrote:Or we should correct him. Can't let thinking like this persist.

You're in for some major disappointment if you think swaying racists is generally feasible through strength of argument.

Word of Max is that NS should serve as a place where any ideology can be put forth and debated, on the grounds that it is better to defeat the ignorant and wrongheaded in the light of day than allow them to fester in the dark; and that, even if people wedded to ignorance and hate cannot be swayed, there is an invisible audience of readers who can be moved by good argument.

This means that racism, or sexism, or other -isms cannot be defeated once and for all - for one thing, more -ists are always popping up like mushrooms from the night soil, and for another, the process of defeating them is in itself a good to be cherished. So fight the good fight, and be not dismayed - for by the Flynn effect and numerous other statistics we see that society continues to advance, little by little, towards a more perfect state. Some parts and some people may be mired in the past; but time takes them further from us, and bears witness to the elevation of the whole.

User avatar
Norepinephrinistania
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:29 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Norepinephrinistania wrote:How can environment be the essential key to why the black-white IQ gap is false, when intelligence is 50-80% genetic?

That one's been refuted like, four times too.


Identical twins—Reared together .86
Identical twins—Reared apart .76
Fraternal twins—Reared together .55
Fraternal twins—Reared apart .35
Biological siblings—Reared together .47
Biological siblings—Reared apart .24
Unrelated children—Reared together—Children .28
Unrelated children—Reared together—Adults .04
Cousins .15
Parent-child—Living together .42
Parent-child—Living apart .22
Adoptive parent–child—Living together .19

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritabil ... man2009-58

Intelligence is clearly more genetic than social.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:29 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Because intelligence is not 50-80% genetic.

Identical twins—Reared together .86
Identical twins—Reared apart .76
Fraternal twins—Reared together .55
Fraternal twins—Reared apart .35
Biological siblings—Reared together .47
Biological siblings—Reared apart .24
Unrelated children—Reared together—Children .28
Unrelated children—Reared together—Adults .04
Cousins .15
Parent-child—Living together .42
Parent-child—Living apart .22
Adoptive parent–child—Living together .19

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritabil ... man2009-58

Intelligence is clearly more genetic than social.

I like how you just plain ignored the fact you didn't read your own source and then cited some data that doesn't lead to the conclusion you want to peddle to us.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Norepinephrinistania
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:29 pm

Tsaraine wrote:
Laerod wrote:You're in for some major disappointment if you think swaying racists is generally feasible through strength of argument.

Word of Max is that NS should serve as a place where any ideology can be put forth and debated, on the grounds that it is better to defeat the ignorant and wrongheaded in the light of day than allow them to fester in the dark; and that, even if people wedded to ignorance and hate cannot be swayed, there is an invisible audience of readers who can be moved by good argument.

This means that racism, or sexism, or other -isms cannot be defeated once and for all - for one thing, more -ists are always popping up like mushrooms from the night soil, and for another, the process of defeating them is in itself a good to be cherished. So fight the good fight, and be not dismayed - for by the Flynn effect and numerous other statistics we see that society continues to advance, little by little, towards a more perfect state. Some parts and some people may be mired in the past; but time takes them further from us, and bears witness to the elevation of the whole.

Trying to take the moral high ground doesn't make you right. Racialism is on the rise in many parts of Europe. The truth is neither compassionate nor cruel.

User avatar
Nelson R Mandela
Envoy
 
Posts: 254
Founded: Jun 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nelson R Mandela » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:31 pm

Caracasus wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Works for me.


Sounds like a plan. It's been fun watching y'all baffle this guy with the deviously cunning strategy of asking for basic facts to support his outlandish claims, and you know, that fiendish underhand tactic of backing up your own arguments with actual scientific fact but I'm off to bed.

Bet this thread is locked when I wake up.

Nah. I left for like 4-5 hours and when I came back OP was still at it.
Last edited by Nelson R Mandela on Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Don't hesitate to telegram me any questions.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66768
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:31 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:The truth is neither compassionate nor cruel.


So why do you keep ignoring the truth that Black people are equal to White people?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Norepinephrinistania
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:31 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Norepinephrinistania wrote:Identical twins—Reared together .86
Identical twins—Reared apart .76
Fraternal twins—Reared together .55
Fraternal twins—Reared apart .35
Biological siblings—Reared together .47
Biological siblings—Reared apart .24
Unrelated children—Reared together—Children .28
Unrelated children—Reared together—Adults .04
Cousins .15
Parent-child—Living together .42
Parent-child—Living apart .22
Adoptive parent–child—Living together .19

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritabil ... man2009-58

Intelligence is clearly more genetic than social.

I like how you just plain ignored the fact you didn't read your own source and then cited some data that doesn't lead to the conclusion you want to peddle to us.

Then why do unrelated children reared together have much less in common in terms of intelligence than identical twins raised apart?
Dismissive reply.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:31 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Not for one second, but I do believe in holding people's feet to the fire when they make outrageous claims.

IQ tests are inherently not cultural. They aren't even verbal.


....

Have you ever taken one of these tests? You're simply wrong.

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:32 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:Trying to take the moral high ground doesn't make you right. Racialism is on the rise in many parts of Europe. The truth is neither compassionate nor cruel.

This speaks terribly for Europeans.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:32 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:
Tsaraine wrote:Word of Max is that NS should serve as a place where any ideology can be put forth and debated, on the grounds that it is better to defeat the ignorant and wrongheaded in the light of day than allow them to fester in the dark; and that, even if people wedded to ignorance and hate cannot be swayed, there is an invisible audience of readers who can be moved by good argument.

This means that racism, or sexism, or other -isms cannot be defeated once and for all - for one thing, more -ists are always popping up like mushrooms from the night soil, and for another, the process of defeating them is in itself a good to be cherished. So fight the good fight, and be not dismayed - for by the Flynn effect and numerous other statistics we see that society continues to advance, little by little, towards a more perfect state. Some parts and some people may be mired in the past; but time takes them further from us, and bears witness to the elevation of the whole.

Trying to take the moral high ground doesn't make you right. Racialism is on the rise in many parts of Europe. The truth is neither compassionate nor cruel.


Trying to take the moral high ground does not always make you right. That is, regrettably, quite true.

However, intentionally taking the moral low ground will always make you wrong.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:33 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:Then why do unrelated children reared together have much less in common in terms of intelligence than identical twins raised apart?

Hell if I know, and I'm not going to speculate based on nothing. Because that's unscientific.
Norepinephrinistania wrote:Dismissive reply.

Failing to reply at all.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bawkie, Duvniask

Advertisement

Remove ads