NATION

PASSWORD

Race and IQ

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Norepinephrinistania
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 1:57 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Norepinephrinistania wrote:That's essentially a viewpoint descended from Marxism.


No, it's a viewpoint descended from the realization that while not all cultures may be "equal", the IQ test as presented today represents knowledge of a particular sort gained in a specific sort of environment, and that intelligence will express itself in different ways depending upon one's particular cultural standards and one's environment. That's not Marxism. That's Cultural Anthropology 101.

General brain functionality is not subjective and not tied to culture.

User avatar
Russels Orbiting Teapot
Senator
 
Posts: 4024
Founded: Jan 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Russels Orbiting Teapot » Mon Aug 03, 2015 1:58 pm

Even if this were true, and I'm by no means accepting that it is, what does that actually mean in regard to what policies we should pursue regarding race and education?

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Aug 03, 2015 1:58 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
No, it's a viewpoint descended from the realization that while not all cultures may be "equal", the IQ test as presented today represents knowledge of a particular sort gained in a specific sort of environment, and that intelligence will express itself in different ways depending upon one's particular cultural standards and one's environment. That's not Marxism. That's Cultural Anthropology 101.

General brain functionality is not subjective and not tied to culture.

Well then it's a good thing that IQ tests don't measure that, then.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Norepinephrinistania
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 1:59 pm

Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:Even if this were true, and I'm by no means accepting that it is, what does that actually mean in regard to what policies we should pursue regarding race and education?

1. End affirmative action.
2, Put tracking back in schools. It is banned in many school districts because too few minorities got into the gifted programs.
3. Acknowledge that we can't fix lower black achievement without genetic intervention.

At the very least.

User avatar
Norepinephrinistania
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:00 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Norepinephrinistania wrote:General brain functionality is not subjective and not tied to culture.

Well then it's a good thing that IQ tests don't measure that, then.

How does it not?

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:00 pm

The Conez Imperium wrote:Are you seriously suggesting brain size correlates to intelligence?

Edit: This thread should die.

Or we should correct him. Can't let thinking like this persist.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Norepinephrinistania
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:01 pm

The Cobalt Sky wrote:
The Conez Imperium wrote:Are you seriously suggesting brain size correlates to intelligence?

Edit: This thread should die.

Or we should correct him. Can't let thinking like this persist.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 9604001357

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66773
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:01 pm

The Cobalt Sky wrote:
The Conez Imperium wrote:Are you seriously suggesting brain size correlates to intelligence?

Edit: This thread should die.

Or we should correct him. Can't let thinking like this persist.


We're arguing with a brick wall here. That's not going to achieve anything.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Unholy Byzantium
Attaché
 
Posts: 86
Founded: Jan 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Unholy Byzantium » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:01 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:
Unholy Byzantium wrote:
Ok that doesn't answer my question. You stated that early onset puberty is a sign of decreased intelligence. You then stated that Black people go through puberty first with a study that suggests BMI also plays a heavy role. Now you are saying that BMI is caused by estrogen.
So if early puberty actually is linked to decreased intelligence, then why are only black people considered less intelligent rather than people with high BMIs and/or increased estrogen?

Also where is the evidence that animals with smaller skulls develop faster. Horses have bigger heads and they are fully mature at five years old.

No, the fat itself produces estrogen.
Once more, commonly known if you have half an education.


Oh look, name calling and insults.
Where is the pyramid when you need it.
The White Sun will never be extinguished

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:01 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Well then it's a good thing that IQ tests don't measure that, then.

How does it not?

It would help that you, you know, actually read.

Maybe the answer will come to you then.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:01 pm

Vassenor wrote:
The Cobalt Sky wrote:Or we should correct him. Can't let thinking like this persist.


We're arguing with a brick wall here. That's not going to achieve anything.

Let's not give up too quickly.
Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:Even if this were true, and I'm by no means accepting that it is, what does that actually mean in regard to what policies we should pursue regarding race and education?

I'm assuming some sort of camps. To help the slow ones concentrate.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:01 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Well then it's a good thing that IQ tests don't measure that, then.

How does it not?


I already sourced that for you.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:02 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:
Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:Even if this were true, and I'm by no means accepting that it is, what does that actually mean in regard to what policies we should pursue regarding race and education?

1. End affirmative action.
2, Put tracking back in schools. It is banned in many school districts because too few minorities got into the gifted programs.
3. Acknowledge that we can't fix lower black achievement without genetic intervention.

At the very least.

Affirmative action is not preferential treatment for minorities.
Because even with it, they are still woefully underrepresented.

This is not "preferential".
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:02 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:
The Cobalt Sky wrote:Or we should correct him. Can't let thinking like this persist.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 9604001357

An abstract?
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66773
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:02 pm

The Cobalt Sky wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
We're arguing with a brick wall here. That's not going to achieve anything.

Let's not give up too quickly.
Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:Even if this were true, and I'm by no means accepting that it is, what does that actually mean in regard to what policies we should pursue regarding race and education?

I'm assuming some sort of camps. To help the slow ones concentrate.


We've been at this for ten hours. At what point does it stop being "too quickly"?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Norepinephrinistania
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:03 pm

Vassenor wrote:
The Cobalt Sky wrote:Or we should correct him. Can't let thinking like this persist.


We're arguing with a brick wall here. That's not going to achieve anything.

I can never understand how liberals think the very size of your brain has no influence on your IQ, and that genetics mean nothing in regard to IQ. It shows the influence of Marxism and SJW junk on modern American liberalism.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66773
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:03 pm

The Cobalt Sky wrote:

An abstract?


An abstract that vaguely supports his argument, even though the full article's actually very poorly written.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:03 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
We're arguing with a brick wall here. That's not going to achieve anything.

I can never understand how liberals think the very size of your brain has no influence on your IQ, and that genetics mean nothing in regard to IQ. It shows the influence of Marxism and SJW junk on modern American liberalism.

"EWWW COOTIES!"
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66773
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:04 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
We're arguing with a brick wall here. That's not going to achieve anything.

I can never understand how liberals think the very size of your brain has no influence on your IQ, and that genetics mean nothing in regard to IQ. It shows the influence of Marxism and SJW junk on modern American liberalism.


I can never understand why some people will not accept that Phrenology has been deprecated for decades.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:04 pm

Vassenor wrote:
The Cobalt Sky wrote:Let's not give up too quickly.

I'm assuming some sort of camps. To help the slow ones concentrate.


We've been at this for ten hours. At what point does it stop being "too quickly"?

I don't know. I feel like I can have fun with this. I haven't figured out quite how yet, but it's gonna be a good time. Trust me.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Nikolausstadt
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 171
Founded: Jul 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Nikolausstadt » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:04 pm

Even if there's a difference... What's the big issue?
Owner of Braberland and San Eulogio.

User avatar
Norepinephrinistania
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:05 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Norepinephrinistania wrote:1. End affirmative action.
2, Put tracking back in schools. It is banned in many school districts because too few minorities got into the gifted programs.
3. Acknowledge that we can't fix lower black achievement without genetic intervention.

At the very least.

Affirmative action is not preferential treatment for minorities.
Because even with it, they are still woefully underrepresented.

This is not "preferential".

This is ridiculous.
Hypothetical:
Blacks are 13% of the population.
Blacks are 5% of college students.
We make the standards of admission half for black students. 10% are now black.
We didn't give them any preferential treatment because they're still underrepresented.

User avatar
Bogdanov Vishniac
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1958
Founded: May 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Bogdanov Vishniac » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:05 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
We're arguing with a brick wall here. That's not going to achieve anything.

I can never understand how liberals think the very size of your brain has no influence on your IQ, and that genetics mean nothing in regard to IQ. It shows the influence of Marxism and SJW junk on modern American liberalism.


So you agree with the idea that Neanderthals were smarter than us? And that blue whales are twice as intelligent as we are?
Last edited by Bogdanov Vishniac on Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"To make a thief, make an owner; to create crime, create laws." ~ Laia Asieo Odo, The Social Organism

anarchist communist | deep ecologist | aspiring Cynic | gay | [insert other adjectives here]

User avatar
Norepinephrinistania
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Norepinephrinistania » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:06 pm

Nikolausstadt wrote:Even if there's a difference... What's the big issue?

The decline of Western Civilization.

User avatar
Russels Orbiting Teapot
Senator
 
Posts: 4024
Founded: Jan 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Russels Orbiting Teapot » Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:06 pm

Norepinephrinistania wrote:1. End affirmative action.

From what I understand about how Affirmative Action is handled today, it applies only to candidates of roughly equal qualifications. Do you have any data that a black person and a white person with the same qualifications will still have a significant IQ gap?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Amenson, Ariwa, Atrito, Bahrimontagn, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Eternal Algerstonia, Google [Bot], Grinning Dragon, Kuvanda, Lativs, Norse Inuit Union, Reich of the New World Order, Rusticus I Damianus, Sheizou, Stellar Colonies, The North Polish Union, Untecna, Valentine Z, Zapato

Advertisement

Remove ads