Race and IQ

[Laerod]

Would you recognise the proof even if you did see it? You've already demonstrated that you aren't reading your own sources.

Why do you think natural selection stopped for the hundreds of thousands of years after humans left Africa? They're two different continents with a very small border and little reason to travel back and forth. Little evidence of African-Eurasian paleolithic contact also.

Why would anyone in their right mind think that natural selection stopped?

[Mavorpen]

Are you saying that every single race has undergone strict inbreeding for thousands of years?

Not every breed of dog has undergone strict inbreeding. What?

Yes they have. That's how the breeds were made. It's the ONLY way they could have been made.

[Norepinephrinistania]

Not every breed of dog has undergone strict inbreeding. What?

Yes they have. That's how the breeds were made. It's the ONLY way they could have been made.

Source? You're basically saying that you're a creationist at this point.

[The United Remnants of America]

Yes they have. That's how the breeds were made. It's the ONLY way they could have been made.

Source? You're basically saying that you're a creationist at this point.

> Dogs interbred in order to create specific breeds
> Obviously a creationist

....

[MERIZoC]

Would you recognise the proof even if you did see it? You've already demonstrated that you aren't reading your own sources.

Why do you think natural selection stopped for the hundreds of thousands of years after humans left Africa? They're two different continents with a very small border and little reason to travel back and forth. Little evidence of African-Eurasian paleolithic contact also.

Now you're just dodging the question.

[Ifreann]

Would you recognise the proof even if you did see it? You've already demonstrated that you aren't reading your own sources.

Why do you think natural selection stopped for the hundreds of thousands of years after humans left Africa? They're two different continents with a very small border and little reason to travel back and forth. Little evidence of African-Eurasian paleolithic contact also.

Now you aren't even reading the posts you quote.

[Norepinephrinistania]

Why do you think natural selection stopped for the hundreds of thousands of years after humans left Africa? They're two different continents with a very small border and little reason to travel back and forth. Little evidence of African-Eurasian paleolithic contact also.

Why would anyone in their right mind think that natural selection stopped?

To further the egalitarianism myth. Different evolutionary pressures regarding intelligence, related to climate and geography, caused different levels of intelligence among humans. One continent of people must be smarter than the other, it's not possible to have 100% equality. Which is it?

[Terminus Alpha]

Oh hi, racist.

Here are some links for you:

http://www.nature.com/news/poverty-shrinks-brains-from-birth-1.17227?WT.mc_id=TWT_NatureNews
https://apa.org/pi/families/resources/newsletter/2012/07/neurocognitive-impacts.aspx
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/268066.php
http://www.urbanchildinstitute.org/articles/research-to-policy/research/children-raised-in-poverty-are-at-greater-risk-for-developing
http://www.princeton.edu/futureofchildren/publications/journals/article/index.xml?journalid=53&articleid=287&sectionid=1889


In case you think that black people are inferior to you because your ancestors evolved harder:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730125/

And because you think black people are inferior because genes:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1893020/

Now, mr. stormfront, please leave.

(Bonus: Africa had a lot of advanced civilizations, even outside of the totes-not-african-even-though-its-literally-on-the same-continent Egypt.)

OP, what do you think of these?

[Norepinephrinistania]

Source? You're basically saying that you're a creationist at this point.

> Dogs interbred in order to create specific breeds
> Obviously a creationist

....

It's denial of natural selection playing any role on modern history. Silly and naive to the extreme.

[Norepinephrinistania]

Oh hi, racist.

Here are some links for you:

http://www.nature.com/news/poverty-shrinks-brains-from-birth-1.17227?WT.mc_id=TWT_NatureNews
https://apa.org/pi/families/resources/newsletter/2012/07/neurocognitive-impacts.aspx
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/268066.php
http://www.urbanchildinstitute.org/articles/research-to-policy/research/children-raised-in-poverty-are-at-greater-risk-for-developing
http://www.princeton.edu/futureofchildren/publications/journals/article/index.xml?journalid=53&articleid=287&sectionid=1889


In case you think that black people are inferior to you because your ancestors evolved harder:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730125/

And because you think black people are inferior because genes:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1893020/

Now, mr. stormfront, please leave.

(Bonus: Africa had a lot of advanced civilizations, even outside of the totes-not-african-even-though-its-literally-on-the same-continent Egypt.)

OP, what do you think of these?

I think link spamming is silly.

[Mavorpen]

Yes they have. That's how the breeds were made. It's the ONLY way they could have been made.

Source? You're basically saying that you're a creationist at this point.

You don't know what a creationist is, do you?

[Flyover]

OP, what do you think of these?

I think link spamming is silly.

You mean that reading is silly, I presume.

[Mavorpen]

Why do you think natural selection stopped for the hundreds of thousands of years after humans left Africa? They're two different continents with a very small border and little reason to travel back and forth. Little evidence of African-Eurasian paleolithic contact also.

Now you aren't even reading the posts you quote.

When did he start?

[The United Remnants of America]

> Dogs interbred in order to create specific breeds
> Obviously a creationist

....

It's denial of natural selection playing any role on modern history. Silly and naive to the extreme.

Wait. How do humans forcing interbreeding in order to create varied dog breeds and natural selection of canis familiaris have anything in the same vein?

Oh right. They don't.

[Imperializt Russia]

The fuck? The "food obtaining strategies" are virtually identical for Eurasians as they are for Africans. The only difference is the actual foods themselves.

Also, you're not getting away.

They are not. Seasonal climates require different strategies, for example.

Stop selectively snipping out (shittily, at that) parts of posts you don't want to reply to because you'll lose.

It's dishonest, childish, shitty and frankly insulting tact, especially for someone so utterly self-convinced of how "science" backs his God-damned arguments.

[Norepinephrinistania]

Source? You're basically saying that you're a creationist at this point.

You don't know what a creationist is, do you?

Not every single breed of dog was created by strict selective breeding, and you're link doesn't even say that.
A creationist is someone who denies the obvious reality of natural selection. Basically you.

[Terminus Alpha]

OP, what do you think of these?

I think link spamming is silly.

Well, I think your position is stupid and dangerous.

Also, you've offered explanations to everyone else, so why not me?

(Something else cool: Some of the first instances of the making of carbon steel were found in Tanzania.)

[Imperializt Russia]

The fuck? The "food obtaining strategies" are virtually identical for Eurasians as they are for Africans. The only difference is the actual foods themselves.

Also, you're not getting away.

If there are clear physical differences between races, why no intellectual differences? You have evaded how cultural differences cause over a standard deviation in IQ differences between whites and blacks, and why that's more likely than biological factors.

You're doing it. Again.
And leaving in hilariously telltale signs that you're doing it.

Fucking respond.

[Norepinephrinistania]

I think link spamming is silly.

Well, I think your position is stupid and dangerous.

Also, you've offered explanations to everyone else, so why not me?

Because your opinions are not your own. You parrot disproven egalitarian orthodoxy on race and the clear realities of natural selection.

[Flyover]

I think link spamming is silly.

Well, I think your position is stupid and dangerous.

Also, you've offered explanations to everyone else, so why not me?

Evidence is scary, dontcha know?

Well, I think your position is stupid and dangerous.

Also, you've offered explanations to everyone else, so why not me?

Because your opinions are not your own. You parrot disproven egalitarian orthodoxy on race and the clear realities of natural selection.

lololololol
And you and you alone have this nonsensical racist ideology based on the perceived fact that the melanin in someone's skin makes them dumber?
If only.

[Norepinephrinistania]

If there are clear physical differences between races, why no intellectual differences? You have evaded how cultural differences cause over a standard deviation in IQ differences between whites and blacks, and why that's more likely than biological factors.

You're doing it. Again.
And leaving in hilariously telltale signs that you're doing it.

Fucking respond.

Tell me how environmental factors can account for all racial IQ differences.

[The United Remnants of America]

You don't know what a creationist is, do you?

Not every single breed of dog was created by strict selective breeding, and you're link doesn't even say that.
A creationist is someone who denies the obvious reality of natural selection. Basically you.

No. That's not what that is at all. Creationism states that life exists by divine acts and rejects the idea of evolution.

[Laerod]

Why would anyone in their right mind think that natural selection stopped?

To further the egalitarianism myth. Different evolutionary pressures regarding intelligence, related to climate and geography, caused different levels of intelligence among humans. One continent of people must be smarter than the other, it's not possible to have 100% equality. Which is it?

That sounds oddly like Lamarckism. Intelligence is hardly a major factor in natural selection with the advent of civilization; people of a lower intelligence are unlikely to die off before procreating or fail to find a mate.

[Mavorpen]

You don't know what a creationist is, do you?

Not every single breed of dog was created by strict selective breeding, and you're link doesn't even say that.

Yes they were. My link doesn't NEED to say that, because it's obvious to any damn person actually capable of reading the link. Please name a breed that wasn't created by strict selective breeding and then give a source for that. I'll wait.

A creationist is someone who denies the obvious reality of natural selection. Basically you.

Please. For the love of all that is righteous, study this.

They are not. Seasonal climates require different strategies, for example.

Stop selectively snipping out (shittily, at that) parts of posts you don't want to reply to because you'll lose.

It's dishonest, childish, shitty and frankly insulting tact, especially for someone so utterly self-convinced of how "science" backs his God-damned arguments.

Speaking of which:

Please put your money where your mouth is.

Still waiting on these genetic differences. Here, I'll give you a place to start. Point to me the genetic differences that are inherent and exclusive to each race.

[Laerod]

You're doing it. Again.
And leaving in hilariously telltale signs that you're doing it.

Fucking respond.

Tell me how environmental factors can account for all racial IQ differences.

Schools. Parents that have time to teach their children. Children that have time to do homework rather than working to support their family.