You ever hear that old proverb about beggars and choosers?
Advertisement

by Wisconsin9 » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:50 pm

by The Grim Reaper » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:51 pm

by Ardoki » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:51 pm
Gauthier wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
If the local populace is violently homophobic, that is their problem. Violent homophobes should not be accommodated.
So if there is violence and LGBTs are injured or killed, it's exclusively the fault of the attackers and the people who organized the parade in hopes that such a thing would happen to use as anti-immigration propaganda are absolved of all culpability. Classy.

by The Grim Reaper » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:52 pm
Cannabis Islands wrote:The Grim Reaper wrote:
My argument is that this isn't a fucking pride parade. I've repeated that very sentence multiple times. The SD does not care about LGBT people.
For three pages I've been saying that the SD is marginalizing LGBT rights as a discourse within their own hierarchical organization to support the key tenet of anti-immigration, and I am /opposed/ to that.
And? Even if it's a fucking anti-immigrant march, they have every right to hold one.

by Cannabis Islands » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:52 pm

by Gauthier » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:52 pm
Ardoki wrote:Gauthier wrote:
So if there is violence and LGBTs are injured or killed, it's exclusively the fault of the attackers and the people who organized the parade in hopes that such a thing would happen to use as anti-immigration propaganda are absolved of all culpability. Classy.
If they attack innocent LGBTQ+ people, of course it is their fault.

by Cannabis Islands » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:52 pm

by Olivaero » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:53 pm

by Ardoki » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:53 pm

by Gauthier » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:53 pm

by The Grim Reaper » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:54 pm


by Revanchism » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:55 pm
Cannabis Islands wrote:Revanchism wrote:Alright. Now I know that you completely missed what I was saying, which was a commentary on your inability to realize the real situation here in favor of a reckless disregard for anyone but yourself disguised as socialist ideology, something George Orwell himself and his apologists would practice.
Somehow we've gone full circle. This is fucking meta.
Nope, because the "progressive stack" is central to your arguments. You are stating since refugee Muslim immigrants are more "oppressed" than "White LGBT people", the latter should censor themselves for the former.
Norstal wrote:You ever watched a bad movie that is so bad, that it's enlightening? Like, you start asking yourself, "why did I watched this movie. What is the meaning of life after I watched this movie."
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Excuse me, I believe that the proper term is Satanic-American.
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Does Queen Elsa have a partnership with the Rothschild family in the film?

by Gauthier » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:55 pm

by Cannabis Islands » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:55 pm

by Revanchism » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:57 pm
Gauthier wrote:Ardoki wrote:Do you also believe that women who wear mini-skirts are to blame if they are raped.
Because you are sounding just like those people.
Oh this old horseshit again. How many times is the Rape Victim Dress Code going to be disingenuously brought up as a defense of blatant anti-immigration trolling?
Norstal wrote:You ever watched a bad movie that is so bad, that it's enlightening? Like, you start asking yourself, "why did I watched this movie. What is the meaning of life after I watched this movie."
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Excuse me, I believe that the proper term is Satanic-American.
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Does Queen Elsa have a partnership with the Rothschild family in the film?

by Cannabis Islands » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:57 pm
Revanchism wrote:Cannabis Islands wrote:Nope, because the "progressive stack" is central to your arguments. You are stating since refugee Muslim immigrants are more "oppressed" than "White LGBT people", the latter should censor themselves for the former.
At long last, you finally show the extent of your misunderstanding.
That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying that this holds no benefit to white LGBT people and the inevitable backlash will almost certainly adversely effect LGBT people within the Muslim immigrant community. This is not a Pride Parade made for the benefit of gay people. It's a childish middle finger of spite, and much like whenever someone attempts to act childish in the real world, it will have some very adult, very real consequences for others.
And yet, here you are, the only person pulling oppression into it in a cheap(And amateurish, if I may say) attempt at playing "Oppression Olympics".

by Ardoki » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:58 pm
Gauthier wrote:Ardoki wrote:Do you also believe that women who wear mini-skirts are to blame if they are raped.
Because you are sounding just like those people.
Oh this old horseshit again. How many times is the Rape Victim Dress Code going to be disingenuously brought up as a defense of blatant anti-immigration trolling?

by Revanchism » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:59 pm
Cannabis Islands wrote:Gauthier wrote:
Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz are the sons of immigrants and they're railing against immigration. You'd fit right in.
I know, asking immigrants to accept the progressive and secular nation that they moved to is being "anti-immigrant". Damn, I better "check my privilege".
Norstal wrote:You ever watched a bad movie that is so bad, that it's enlightening? Like, you start asking yourself, "why did I watched this movie. What is the meaning of life after I watched this movie."
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Excuse me, I believe that the proper term is Satanic-American.
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Does Queen Elsa have a partnership with the Rothschild family in the film?

by Gauthier » Sat Jul 25, 2015 11:59 pm

by Gauthier » Sun Jul 26, 2015 12:00 am
Ardoki wrote:Gauthier wrote:
Oh this old horseshit again. How many times is the Rape Victim Dress Code going to be disingenuously brought up as a defense of blatant anti-immigration trolling?
You claimed that if LGBTQ+ people go near muslims, it would be there fault if they are injured or killed.
That is just like blaming women for being raped if they dress somewhat exposed.

by Revanchism » Sun Jul 26, 2015 12:01 am
Cannabis Islands wrote:Revanchism wrote:At long last, you finally show the extent of your misunderstanding.
That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying that this holds no benefit to white LGBT people and the inevitable backlash will almost certainly adversely effect LGBT people within the Muslim immigrant community. This is not a Pride Parade made for the benefit of gay people. It's a childish middle finger of spite, and much like whenever someone attempts to act childish in the real world, it will have some very adult, very real consequences for others.
And yet, here you are, the only person pulling oppression into it in a cheap(And amateurish, if I may say) attempt at playing "Oppression Olympics".
And even if it a "childish middle finger", they have a right to hold that parade. LGBT SD supporters wish to have to hold a parade, and that is their right.
Norstal wrote:You ever watched a bad movie that is so bad, that it's enlightening? Like, you start asking yourself, "why did I watched this movie. What is the meaning of life after I watched this movie."
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Excuse me, I believe that the proper term is Satanic-American.
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Does Queen Elsa have a partnership with the Rothschild family in the film?

by Atlanticatia » Sun Jul 26, 2015 12:01 am
Gauthier wrote:women do not go around flaunting themselves to provoke reaction from men.

by Cannabis Islands » Sun Jul 26, 2015 12:01 am
Revanchism wrote:Cannabis Islands wrote:And even if it a "childish middle finger", they have a right to hold that parade. LGBT SD supporters wish to have to hold a parade, and that is their right.
You know what, yes, they have that right, provided they obtain the proper permits and the government lets them.

by Ardoki » Sun Jul 26, 2015 12:02 am
Gauthier wrote:Ardoki wrote:You claimed that if LGBTQ+ people go near muslims, it would be there fault if they are injured or killed.
That is just like blaming women for being raped if they dress somewhat exposed.
Unlike the obvious purpose of this "parade," women do not go around flaunting themselves to provoke reaction from men. Please cut this horseshit out. It's nauseating. The SD is hoping to use LGBTs as literal baits for reactionaries in the refugee community and you're defending them by comparing to rape victim blaming.

by Ardoki » Sun Jul 26, 2015 12:03 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Deamonopolis, Democratic Poopland, Dimetrodon Empire, Ethel mermania, Fartsniffage, Godular, Ivartixi, LFPD Soveriegn, Point Blob, Techocracy101010, Valyxias
Advertisement