Advertisement
by Yootopia » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:42 pm
by Yootopia » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:43 pm
Tokyoni wrote:-shrugs-
If you're going to troll like this, you could have at least brought up David Duke or something.
(-despises both pro-bourgeoisie parties-)
by Tokyoni » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:43 pm
Yootopia wrote:Tokyoni wrote:-shrugs-
If you're going to troll like this, you could have at least brought up David Duke or something.
(-despises both pro-bourgeoisie parties-)
What's wrong with the bourgeoisie -_-
Saurisia wrote:People's Empire of the Rising Juche Sun
by Yootopia » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:44 pm
Tokyoni wrote:Nothing. They make great target practice for revolutionaries. xD
by You-Gi-Owe » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:44 pm
Tokyoni wrote:-shrugs-
If you're going to troll like this, you could have at least brought up David Duke or something.
(-despises both pro-bourgeoisie parties-)
by Tokyoni » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:45 pm
Yootopia wrote:Tokyoni wrote:Nothing. They make great target practice for revolutionaries. xD
Still live with yer parents by any chance?
Saurisia wrote:People's Empire of the Rising Juche Sun
by The Romulan Republic » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:45 pm
by Korintar » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:46 pm
Barringtonia wrote:Seriously, what happened to this guy..Phelps took cases on behalf of African American clients alleging discrimination by school systems, and a predominately black American Legion post which had been raided by police, alleging racially-based police abuse. Phelps' law firm obtained settlements for some clients.[20] Phelps also sued then-President Ronald Reagan over Reagan's appointment of a U.S. ambassador to the Vatican, alleging this violated separation of church and state. The case was dismissed by the U.S. district court.[20][21] Phelps' law firm, staffed by himself and family members also represented non-white Kansans in discrimination actions against Kansas Power and Light, Southwestern Bell, and the Topeka City Attorney, and represented two female professors alleging discrimination in Kansas universities.[19]
In the 1980s Phelps received awards from the Greater Kansas City Chapter of Blacks in Government and the Bonner Springs branch of the NAACP for his work on behalf of black clients.[22]
by Yootopia » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:46 pm
Tokyoni wrote:In the summer, yeah, 'cause I'm only 19. Don't see the particular relevance though.
by Tokyoni » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:47 pm
The Romulan Republic wrote:So if I understand correctly, the point of this thread is to show that one homophobic nutbag is a memeber of the Democratic Party, and therefor the entire party is guilty by association?
Well, how about I play that game with the Republicans? You wouldn't want that now would you?
Saurisia wrote:People's Empire of the Rising Juche Sun
by TannerFrankLand » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:47 pm
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:And Pat Robertson is a Republican.
Security Council FanaticWA Security Council:
SC #3 ~ Condemn Nazi Europe [SORRY!]
SC #12 ~ Commend Todd McCloud
SC #18 ~ Commend Sedgistan
SC #27 ~ Condemn Unknown
SC #36 ~ Liberate Eastern Europe
SC #51 ~ Commend Fudgetopia
SC #67 ~ Commend Naivetry
SC #71 ~ Repeal Condemn Unknown.
WA General Assembly:
GA #81 ~ Disaster Preparedness Act
GA #105 ~ Preparing For Disasters
GA #164 ~ Consular Rights
GA #278 ~ Repeal "Right to Privacy"
by Tokyoni » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:48 pm
Yootopia wrote:Tokyoni wrote:In the summer, yeah, 'cause I'm only 19. Don't see the particular relevance though.
You will when you have to pay Real Bills For Real Life. Then all talk of revolution goes out of the window, and the slow acceptance that you will die feeding The Machine sets in.
Saurisia wrote:People's Empire of the Rising Juche Sun
by Yootopia » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:49 pm
Tokyoni wrote:Yootopia wrote:Tokyoni wrote:In the summer, yeah, 'cause I'm only 19. Don't see the particular relevance though.
You will when you have to pay Real Bills For Real Life. Then all talk of revolution goes out of the window, and the slow acceptance that you will die feeding The Machine sets in.
I don't particularly see how facing capitalist oppression more firsthand would make me more enamored to it.
by The Romulan Republic » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:49 pm
Tokyoni wrote:Lulz at someone actually taking the troll seriously.
by Iron Chariots » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:49 pm
Yootopia wrote:Tokyoni wrote:In the summer, yeah, 'cause I'm only 19. Don't see the particular relevance though.
You will when you have to pay Real Bills For Real Life. Then all talk of revolution goes out of the window, and the slow acceptance that you will die feeding The Machine sets in.
by Milks Empire » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:50 pm
Tokyoni wrote:-shrugs-
If you're going to troll like this, you could have at least brought up David Duke or something.
(-despises both pro-bourgeoisie parties-)
by Blouman Empire » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:51 pm
Jimanistan wrote:Naturally. The GOP is full of various scumbags. It's of greater suprise when the scumbag is a Democrat.
Tokyoni wrote:Nothing. They make great target practice for revolutionaries. xD
by Lunatic Goofballs » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:51 pm
Milks Empire wrote:Tokyoni wrote:-shrugs-
If you're going to troll like this, you could have at least brought up David Duke or something.
(-despises both pro-bourgeoisie parties-)
Didn't he switch to the Republicans about 20 years ago?
by Iron Chariots » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:52 pm
The Romulan Republic wrote:Tokyoni wrote:Lulz at someone actually taking the troll seriously.
Quite frankly, I've seen enough stupidity from the right since the '08 election started not to presume that something isn't meant seriously, however stupid it sounds.
by Iron Chariots » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:54 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Jimanistan wrote:Naturally. The GOP is full of various scumbags. It's of greater suprise when the scumbag is a Democrat.
Well not really, I was more talking about people dismissing it and such he isn't the democratic party.Tokyoni wrote:Nothing. They make great target practice for revolutionaries. xD
Andras? Have you returned?
by New Khadgar » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:55 pm
Lancaster of Wessex wrote:You-Gi-Owe, this serves NO purpose but to flame or bait Democrats and the Democratic Party.
by Blouman Empire » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:58 pm
Iron Chariots wrote:The difference is that Democratic leaders do not listen to him.
We bitch about Robertson et al because the leadership of the Republican party listen to them and take their opinions very seriously. Robertson, as I recall, had a weekly telephone meeting with the previous president.
by Gauthier » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:01 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Iron Chariots wrote:The difference is that Democratic leaders do not listen to him.
We bitch about Robertson et al because the leadership of the Republican party listen to them and take their opinions very seriously. Robertson, as I recall, had a weekly telephone meeting with the previous president.
And yet not all republicans still don't have the same views. I still stand by my statement that the responses on this forum have a different tone then if the title said "Fred Phelps: Republic Party Member"
(Yes I know it is the Republican party but I am continuing the way the OP wrote the title)
by Iron Chariots » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:03 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Iron Chariots wrote:The difference is that Democratic leaders do not listen to him.
We bitch about Robertson et al because the leadership of the Republican party listen to them and take their opinions very seriously. Robertson, as I recall, had a weekly telephone meeting with the previous president.
And yet not all republicans still don't have the same views. I still stand by my statement that the responses on this forum have a different tone then if the title said "Fred Phelps: Republic Party Member"
(Yes I know it is the Republican party but I am continuing the way the OP wrote the title)
by Iron Chariots » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:03 pm
Gauthier wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:Iron Chariots wrote:The difference is that Democratic leaders do not listen to him.
We bitch about Robertson et al because the leadership of the Republican party listen to them and take their opinions very seriously. Robertson, as I recall, had a weekly telephone meeting with the previous president.
And yet not all republicans still don't have the same views. I still stand by my statement that the responses on this forum have a different tone then if the title said "Fred Phelps: Republic Party Member"
(Yes I know it is the Republican party but I am continuing the way the OP wrote the title)
If it was Fred Phelps: Republican, this wouldn't even be a thread since it would fall under "Gee, No Shit Sherlock".
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Omphalos, Pale Dawn, Pasong Tirad, Terra Magnifica Gloria, The Xenopolis Confederation, Turenia, UMi-NazKapp Group
Advertisement