NATION

PASSWORD

To Porn or not To Porn? That is the Question

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
NeuPolska
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9184
Founded: Jun 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby NeuPolska » Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:55 am

I came here for the orgy the OP promised

Please, call me POLSKA
U.S. Army Enlisted
Kar-Esseria wrote:Who is that and are they female because if not then they can go make love to their hand.
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Go home Polska wins NS.
United Mongol Hordes wrote:Polska isn't exactly the nicest guy in the world
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Hurd you miss the point more than Polska misses Poland.
Rhodesialund wrote:when you have Charlie ten feet away or something operating operationally.
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Gayla is living in 1985 but these guys are already in 1916

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5161
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:59 am

The Krogan wrote:
Galloism wrote:More realistically:

So is the United Nations.


Yeah, and the United Nations


...and the United Nations is a little feminist, too :hug:

http://www.heforshe.org

http://www.vulture.com/2014/09/emma-wat ... peech.html
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:01 am

Chessmistress wrote:
The Krogan wrote:
Yeah, and the United Nations


...and the United Nations is a little feminist, too :hug:

http://www.heforshe.org

http://www.vulture.com/2014/09/emma-wat ... peech.html

Emma Watson isn't a radical feminist - she thinks men can be feminists, for one.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The Empire of Pretantia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39273
Founded: Oct 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Empire of Pretantia » Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:01 am

Kisinger wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:An Interesting OFFICIAL document
That's not exactly the guy screaming the sun is about to explode

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/get ... /EN#title1



EU says pornography, ALL forms of pornography, hurts women.

That's the future, get used to it.

Here is the adopted Texts of said Document http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/get ... -2012-0401

Notice how the only mention of Pornography is this(using the Ctrl+F trick) "N. whereas young women and men are most affected by pornography’s new cultural status; whereas the ‘mainstreaming of pornography’, i.e. the current cultural process whereby pornography is slipping into our everyday lives as an evermore universally accepted, often idealised, cultural element, manifests itself particularly clearly within youth culture: from teenage television and lifestyle magazines to music videos and commercials targeted at the young;"

Let's not forget this document is 2 years old....

Sounds less like concern for women and more like moral guardianship.
ywn be as good as this video
Gacha
Trashing other people's waifus
Anti-NN
EA
Douche flutes
Zimbabwe
Putting the toilet paper roll the wrong way
Every single square inch of Asia
Lewding Earth-chan
Pollution
4Chan in all its glory and all its horror
Playing the little Switch controller handheld thing in public
Treading on me
Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and all their cousins and sisters and brothers and wife's sons
Alternate Universe 40K
Nightcore
Comcast
Zimbabwe
Believing the Ottomans were the third Roman Empire
Parodies of the Gadsden flag
The Fate Series
US politics

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:23 am

Chessmistress wrote:An Interesting OFFICIAL document
That's not exactly the guy screaming the sun is about to explode

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/get ... /EN#title1

MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

on eliminating gender stereotypes in the EU

(2012/2116(INI))

O. whereas young women and men are most affected by pornography’s new cultural status; whereas the ‘mainstreaming of pornography’, i.e. the current cultural process whereby pornography is slipping into our everyday lives as an evermore universally accepted, often idealised, cultural element, manifests itself particularly clearly within youth culture: from teenage television and lifestyle magazines to music videos and commercials targeted at the young;

17. Calls on the EU and its Member States to take concrete action on its resolution of 16 September 1997 on discrimination against women in advertising, which called for a ban on all forms of pornography in the media and on the advertising of sex tourism(10);

18. Calls on the EU to conduct research into the links between child pornography and adult pornography and the impacts on girls, women, boys and men, as well as the relationship between pornography and sexual violence;


EU says pornography, ALL forms of pornography, hurts women.

That's the future, get used to it.
That's the result reached by a committee, not the EU itself. Secondly even if it were passed it'd face quite a lot of domestic resistance, law enforcement wouldn't be particularly bothered to enforce it, and it'd still be fucking stupid. It'd probably also turn lots of men and women off of feminism as a whole. Gotta say I dread to think how many you've done that with just by yourself.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:25 am

Napkiraly wrote:It'd probably also turn lots of men and women off of feminism as a whole. Gotta say I dread to think how many you've done that with just by yourself.

This round of feminism threads has been a big turnoff for me.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:29 am

Geilinor wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:It'd probably also turn lots of men and women off of feminism as a whole. Gotta say I dread to think how many you've done that with just by yourself.

This round of feminism threads has been a big turnoff for me.

My respite is knowing plenty of women who are for transgender male to female (and also men) being part of the movement. As well as being in support of things like legalization and regulation of prostitution while watching porn or at least not wanting to see it banned.

If it wasn't for that, I'd be sticking one middle finger to the MRA's and the other to the feminist movement.

User avatar
The Krogan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5515
Founded: Sep 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Krogan » Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:38 am

Chessmistress wrote:
The Krogan wrote:
Yeah, and the United Nations


...and the United Nations is a little feminist, too :hug:

http://www.heforshe.org

http://www.vulture.com/2014/09/emma-wat ... peech.html


It's not a radical feminist though, there's a difference.
The perpetual lurker of NS, trudging through the desolate winter.

User avatar
Kalmarium
Minister
 
Posts: 2725
Founded: May 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kalmarium » Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:40 am

The Krogan wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
...and the United Nations is a little feminist, too :hug:

http://www.heforshe.org

http://www.vulture.com/2014/09/emma-wat ... peech.html


It's not a radical feminist though, there's a difference.

Oh I would dread the day they do become radical feminists.
My political and
religious views:
Leftist, somewhat libertarian. Muslim, but I believe in secular systems
religions and enforced atheism should be irrelevant in law.
Voting Bernie because he holds the majority of my interests.
My Deviantart
Alt. hisotry fans
check it out!

Kalmarium does not go by NS stats. Please refer to my nation's factbook, thanks!
Pro: Old schhol RTS/Anti: MLG gaming


User avatar
The Krogan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5515
Founded: Sep 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Krogan » Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:41 am

Kalmarium wrote:
The Krogan wrote:
It's not a radical feminist though, there's a difference.

Oh I would dread the day they do become radical feminists.


I doubt that would happen.
The perpetual lurker of NS, trudging through the desolate winter.

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:00 pm

Porn is something that's fine by me, otherwise I'd be at a lack of flags. But of course, the treatment of men and women, whether they be preforming in kinky or non-kinky or preforming in either hetero or homo porn should be improved upon.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:04 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Geilinor wrote:This round of feminism threads has been a big turnoff for me.

My respite is knowing plenty of women who are for transgender male to female (and also men) being part of the movement. As well as being in support of things like legalization and regulation of prostitution while watching porn or at least not wanting to see it banned.

If it wasn't for that, I'd be sticking one middle finger to the MRA's and the other to the feminist movement.

It wasn't like this on NSG before, the more reasonable feminists ruled the discussion.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Kiruri
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17883
Founded: Dec 26, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kiruri » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:08 pm

Meryuma wrote:Porn is a fact of human existence; policy should be based around enthusiastic consent and respect for workers rather than "moral decency".


I take this stance as well.
I'm BIwinning
CelebrateBisexualityDaySeptember 23rd
Costa Rican
Dirty Paws!
d(^o^)b¸¸♬·¯·♩¸¸♪·¯·♫¸¸
=^..^=

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:11 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:My respite is knowing plenty of women who are for transgender male to female (and also men) being part of the movement. As well as being in support of things like legalization and regulation of prostitution while watching porn or at least not wanting to see it banned.

If it wasn't for that, I'd be sticking one middle finger to the MRA's and the other to the feminist movement.

It wasn't like this on NSG before, the more reasonable feminists ruled the discussion.

I left, and they came in. I am sorry.
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:29 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:My respite is knowing plenty of women who are for transgender male to female (and also men) being part of the movement. As well as being in support of things like legalization and regulation of prostitution while watching porn or at least not wanting to see it banned.

If it wasn't for that, I'd be sticking one middle finger to the MRA's and the other to the feminist movement.

It wasn't like this on NSG before, the more reasonable feminists ruled the discussion.

For over a thousand threads, the Moderate Feminists were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old NSG. Before the dark times. Before the Rad Fems.

User avatar
The Krogan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5515
Founded: Sep 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Krogan » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:30 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Geilinor wrote:It wasn't like this on NSG before, the more reasonable feminists ruled the discussion.

For over a thousand threads, the Moderate Feminists were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old NSG. Before the dark times. Before the Rad Fems.


:clap:
The perpetual lurker of NS, trudging through the desolate winter.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57896
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:36 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Geilinor wrote:This round of feminism threads has been a big turnoff for me.

My respite is knowing plenty of women who are for transgender male to female (and also men) being part of the movement. As well as being in support of things like legalization and regulation of prostitution while watching porn or at least not wanting to see it banned.

If it wasn't for that, I'd be sticking one middle finger to the MRA's and the other to the feminist movement.


What's wrong with the MRM?

They also support legalization and regulation of prostitution. As well as porn.

They're social liberals by a huge margin. Libertarians and "Liberals" according to the surveys.

Geilinor wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:My respite is knowing plenty of women who are for transgender male to female (and also men) being part of the movement. As well as being in support of things like legalization and regulation of prostitution while watching porn or at least not wanting to see it banned.

If it wasn't for that, I'd be sticking one middle finger to the MRA's and the other to the feminist movement.

It wasn't like this on NSG before, the more reasonable feminists ruled the discussion.



I'm not convinced they were more reasonable. I think they just hid it better. The reason you're seeing them as being unreasonable now is that mens rights activists have pointed it out to you by bringing up mens issues for those feminists to go weird over. If those "Reasonable feminists" came back, we'd do the same to them, and I bet you they'd react the same. The difference isn't the feminists. It's the mens issues being brought up so you can see feminists for what they really are.
Their sexism is subtle, but it's almost always there, and when pointed out to them, they double-down and refuse to change.

The REALLY reasonable feminists?
They're MRAs now.
Or the type to align so much with the MRM as makes no substantial difference.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:39 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:50 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:My respite is knowing plenty of women who are for transgender male to female (and also men) being part of the movement. As well as being in support of things like legalization and regulation of prostitution while watching porn or at least not wanting to see it banned.

If it wasn't for that, I'd be sticking one middle finger to the MRA's and the other to the feminist movement.


What's wrong with the MRM?

My experience with them has been the equivalent with my experience with the Radical Feminists (especially SWERFs and TERFs).

I don't doubt that there are more reasonable ones, but their voice definitely isn't the loudest.

User avatar
United facist States of America
Diplomat
 
Posts: 564
Founded: Oct 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby United facist States of America » Fri Jul 10, 2015 1:00 pm

Chessmistress wrote:An Interesting OFFICIAL document
That's not exactly the guy screaming the sun is about to explode

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/get ... /EN#title1

MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

on eliminating gender stereotypes in the EU

(2012/2116(INI))

O. whereas young women and men are most affected by pornography’s new cultural status; whereas the ‘mainstreaming of pornography’, i.e. the current cultural process whereby pornography is slipping into our everyday lives as an evermore universally accepted, often idealised, cultural element, manifests itself particularly clearly within youth culture: from teenage television and lifestyle magazines to music videos and commercials targeted at the young;

17. Calls on the EU and its Member States to take concrete action on its resolution of 16 September 1997 on discrimination against women in advertising, which called for a ban on all forms of pornography in the media and on the advertising of sex tourism(10);

18. Calls on the EU to conduct research into the links between child pornography and adult pornography and the impacts on girls, women, boys and men, as well as the relationship between pornography and sexual violence;


EU says pornography, ALL forms of pornography, hurts women.

That's the future, get used to it.

This does not ban pornography it bans pornography in media. Also if all forms of pornography hurt women how does Gay porn, Ancient papyri, Ancient Pottery, Cave Paintings and pornography not involving humans harm women.
Pro: Atheism, Unified Nordic Countries, Universal Healthcare, Maternity Leave, Paternity Leave, Free Education, LGBT Rights, Same Sex Marriage, Pro-choice, Scientific Advancement, Evolution in schools, Egalitarianism, Scandinavian prison system, Kurdish independence, Pan-Germanism, Restoration of German Monarchy, Imperial German style Monarchy, Classical Liberalism, Capitalism, Brexit, Swexit
Neutral: Religion, USA, Anarchism, Socialism, Putin, Assad, Libertarianism, Trump
Anti: Fascism, Authoritarianism, North Korea, ISIS, Religious Fundamentalism, Creationism in schools, Young Earth Creationism, Pseudoscience, Private prisons, Corporatism, Feminism, US prison system, uncontrolled immigration, Communism, Republicanism, Regressive Left, uncontrolled Capitalism, European Union

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36764
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Fri Jul 10, 2015 1:14 pm

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
Geilinor wrote:It wasn't like this on NSG before, the more reasonable feminists ruled the discussion.

I left, and they came in. I am sorry.

Yes with your absence the veil protecting the worlds of reasonable, and radical was torn apart in a furious spectacle.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36764
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Fri Jul 10, 2015 1:16 pm

United facist States of America wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:An Interesting OFFICIAL document
That's not exactly the guy screaming the sun is about to explode

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/get ... /EN#title1



EU says pornography, ALL forms of pornography, hurts women.

That's the future, get used to it.

This does not ban pornography it bans pornography in media. Also if all forms of pornography hurt women how does Gay porn, Ancient papyri, Ancient Pottery, Cave Paintings and pornography not involving humans harm women.


It seems they may be avoiding the whole question about gay porn. The only "answer" I got that it doesn't directly affect women which leads me to believe they assume it indirectly affects women. As for how it is possible I have no real idea.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Fri Jul 10, 2015 1:19 pm

Benuty wrote:
United facist States of America wrote:This does not ban pornography it bans pornography in media. Also if all forms of pornography hurt women how does Gay porn, Ancient papyri, Ancient Pottery, Cave Paintings and pornography not involving humans harm women.


It seems they may be avoiding the whole question about gay porn. The only "answer" I got that it doesn't directly affect women which leads me to believe they assume it indirectly affects women. As for how it is possible I have no real idea.

Gay sex is oppressive or something. I dunno, SWERFs and TERFs have already allied with the religious right thus far might as well go the full mile.

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Fri Jul 10, 2015 1:24 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Benuty wrote:
It seems they may be avoiding the whole question about gay porn. The only "answer" I got that it doesn't directly affect women which leads me to believe they assume it indirectly affects women. As for how it is possible I have no real idea.

Gay sex is oppressive or something. I dunno, SWERFs and TERFs have already allied with the religious right thus far might as well go the full mile.

If you swap women for men in their Handy Dandy Guidebook To Alternation Of Oppression, they just turn into Joel Osteen.
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36764
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Fri Jul 10, 2015 1:26 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Benuty wrote:
It seems they may be avoiding the whole question about gay porn. The only "answer" I got that it doesn't directly affect women which leads me to believe they assume it indirectly affects women. As for how it is possible I have no real idea.

Gay sex is oppressive or something. I dunno, SWERFs and TERFs have already allied with the religious right thus far might as well go the full mile.

It's pretty bad when your groups name sounds like surf & turf.

Of-course reading up on their ideology they clearly have no understanding of psychology let alone what sex is outside of their self sustaining, and ultimately destructive narrative.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Serconas
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 356
Founded: Jul 30, 2014
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Serconas » Sat Jul 11, 2015 7:27 am

I´d like to see the document where the EU says they want to ban porn in their 28 member countries.

And as almost everyone on here I think a ban on porn is stupid/bad etc.
The last time I heard something about the porn industry from the mainstream media, there was something about regisseurs trying to make smut for women. But don´t quote me on that.
A wild Owl appeared from the tall grass!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Duvniask, Eden Ultima, Grinning Dragon, Kubra, Mutualist Chaos, Stellar Colonies, Super Pakistan, The Corparation, The Jamesian Republic, The Union of Galaxies, Uiiop, Umeria

Advertisement

Remove ads