NATION

PASSWORD

Falklands or Malvinas? (And Anglo-Saxon Bias)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Falklands, Malvinas, or Independence?

Falklands (UK)
20
17%
Malvinas (Being a part of Argentina)
68
57%
Independent (Neither)
32
27%
 
Total votes : 120

User avatar
Bezombia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29250
Founded: Apr 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bezombia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:47 pm

You people really need to look up what "Anglo-Saxon" actually means before you go around using it in sentences as if you do.
Our weary eyes still stray to the horizon...but down this road we've been so many times...
Please, call me Benomia. Post count +14623, founded Oct. 23, 2012.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
Verdum wrote:Hey girl, is your name Karl Marx? Because your starting an uprising in my lower classes.
Black Hand wrote:New plan is to just make thousands of disposable firearms and dump them out of cargo planes with tiny drag chutes attached.
Spreewerke wrote:The metric system is the only measurement system that truly meters.
Spreewerke wrote:Salt the women, rape the earth.
Equestican wrote:Ben is love, Ben is life.
Sediczja wrote:real eyes realize real lies
I'm a poet. Come read my poems!

User avatar
Ecrotia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 491
Founded: Jun 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ecrotia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:47 pm

The Neo-Hellenic Republic wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
And I presume you can provide evidence of this?

I don't need to its obvious

So lacking any actual evidence seriously makes your belief laughable

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:48 pm

The Neo-Hellenic Republic wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
And I presume you can provide evidence of this?

I don't need to its obvious


Which is why the organisation that led the push for independence thinks it was perfectly fine?
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Ecrotia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 491
Founded: Jun 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ecrotia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:48 pm

Bezombia wrote:You people really need to look up what "Anglo-Saxon" actually means before you go around using it in sentences as if you do.

The Angles and Saxons that inhabited England until the Viking Invasion and Norman Invasion

User avatar
The Greater Ohio Valley
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7077
Founded: Jan 19, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Greater Ohio Valley » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:48 pm

The Neo-Hellenic Republic wrote:The Malvina's are Argentinian, no one should give a shit about what the inhabitants think, besides the UK has a habit of rigging elections.

That's a real stretch there.
Occasionally the Neo-American States
"Choke on the ashes of your hate."
- Free speech
- Weapons rights
- Democracy
- LGBTQ+ rights
- Racial equality
- Gender/sexual equality
- Voting rights
- Universal healthcare
- Workers rights
- Drug decriminalization
- Cannabis legalization
- Due process
- Rehabilitative justice
- Religious freedom
- Choice
- Environmental protections
- Secularism
ANTI
- Fascism/Nazism
- Conservatism
- Nationalism
- Authoritarianism/Totalitarianism
- Traditionalism
- Ethnic/racial supremacy
- Racism
- Sexism
- Transphobia
- Homophobia
- Religious extremism
- Laissez-faire capitalism
- Warmongering
- Accelerationism
- Isolationism
- Theocracy
- Anti-intellectualism
- Climate change denialism

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:48 pm

The Neo-Hellenic Republic wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
And I presume you can provide evidence of this?

I don't need to its obvious


That's not how debating works. If you want to put forward a point, you must also put forward evidence to support your point.

So I ask you again: What evidence do you have that the referendum(s) was/were rigged, beyond the belief that simply not having the outcome you personally desired makes them rigged by default?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:48 pm

Hurdegaryp wrote:
Mefpan wrote:No, that's how you play. You go up against the retired imperialism world champion with your own new imperialism strategy, and then when you can't imperialism him you scream in rage and slap the board aside, then roll around on the floor crying until someone with no idea as to the background takes pity on you out of some misguided sense of justice.

Well, the fascist aggressor routine didn't work, even though the Argentinian stormtroopers initially did occupy the Falklands. Since all those Latin American macho soldiers surrendered to British Gurkhas in the end, this was not exactly a proud moment for Argentina. It did result in the eventual collapse of the junta, so that's a positive thing. Now that the WE TAKE WHAT WE WANT tactic was thorougly proven wrong, Argentinian populists and their sympathizers now try the incessant whining routine. It's going to be as fruitful as the more belligerent attempt to steal the Falklands, but at least less people are going to get killed.


Wat.... ...

User avatar
Abunya
Secretary
 
Posts: 33
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Abunya » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:48 pm



It imposed puppet governments in Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:49 pm

The Neo-Hellenic Republic wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
And I presume you can provide evidence of this?

I don't need to its obvious

If it's so obvious it should be easy for you to provide evidence of this.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Colonial Rhodesia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1339
Founded: Apr 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Colonial Rhodesia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:49 pm

I support Britain against Argentina but not against Rhodesia
"Remember that you are an Englishman, and have consequently won first prize in the lottery of life."-Cecil John Rhodes
Fighting Communism North of the Zambesi since 1965

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55261
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:49 pm

The Neo-Hellenic Republic wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
And I presume you can provide evidence of this?

I don't need to its obvious that I'm pulling it out of my arse

Fixed for truth.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. Egli/Lui.
"Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee. Should I restart the bugger?
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Carriebean7
Diplomat
 
Posts: 771
Founded: Jun 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Carriebean7 » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:49 pm

Ecrotia wrote:
Carriebean7 wrote: I'm serious. also, Africa needs to join into Stronk African union and Israel needs t change name to Palestinian Union. Turkey needs to give up it's peninsula on Europe and give t to Greece, and Bulgaria needs to annex Romania. plus E U needs military and NATO needs to dissolve.

Yep, total sarcasm

I call my theory the " Territorial Proximity and alteration of Boundaries.

i am not kidding, complete serious,s granted I may have crazy views to you but I think mine are very very very slightly shiny with a hint of bronze.
"If it is close to Argentina, it is rightful Argentinian clay! Damn those British for having successfully lived on land that isn't directly connected to their home country!"
-Newne Carriebean, 2/28/2015

If I were god, I would make it rain Æbleskiver's from the sky, everyone would have the best approval rating of Denmark, and everyone would personally get to put a ham sandwich in a evil funeral potato's brain.
But I know the Mormon Jesus wouldn't do that.
We support slavery, but as a nation. I, as a human being refuse to say I even NOD at the though of one man owning another.

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:49 pm

The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:
Abunya wrote:
Rather, an attempt to restore order to rightful Argentine land.

Land that was only claimed by Argentina for less than a decade nearly two centuries ago.

Very, very, very wrong.

User avatar
G-Tech Corporation
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63930
Founded: Feb 03, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby G-Tech Corporation » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:49 pm

Fluvique wrote:
Ecrotia wrote:
By native population, you mean the sheep right?


Imagine that you have a two floor house. You live in the two floors.

Then, suddenly, someone appears with a rifle and kick you out, because he thinks that he need more than you and is more strong and can do whatever he wants

You protest, go to the police, but the police says "ok, you two sit at discuss this".

The years pass by and you have childrens, the guy downstairs has kids and you die and the guy die and the life goes on.

So your grandsons has to give your first floor because was took it and now people live there?


Let's discuss a better example:

Your neighbors moves out, and leave their house with a for-sale sign out front. They were a nice younger couple who didn't always get along, but the duplex accommodated their whims. Over time you don't see anyone else move in, and one day your neighbor across the street asks if his kids can play in the dilapidated house's yard, since you're the person most effected by the decision. You graciously accede.

Over time you begin thinking about expanding your garden there, and actually knock down your wall to get the process underway. The city informs you this is not how one acquires property, and you grudgingly agree, putting up a makeshift fence again. At no time do you consider buying the house.

Then, one day, the young lady who was the previous owner moves back in. You are surprised, because you had kind of thought of the house as yours at that point. She has taken up with a new man, and in a few years small children run about merrily in the house. This makes you grumpy with the sound of their feet trampling what would have been your garden.

So one day you knock your own fence down and drive the children off, wielding a formidable hatchet. The landowner chases you off with a shotgun, and then you begin referring to his backyard as "My East Garden" and take him to court to get it from him.

What is the rational response to this court case?
Quite the unofficial fellow. Former P2TM Mentor specializing in faction and nation RPs, as well as RPGs. Always happy to help.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:50 pm

Abunya wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
And what land, precisely, did the UK take in those wars?


It imposed puppet governments in Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan.


Were we discussing the US, you might have some kind of a point. We aren't, however. All that the UK did in any of those cases was to honour international agreements and assist an ally.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Godular
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 13069
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Godular » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:50 pm

The Neo-Hellenic Republic wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
And I presume you can provide evidence of this?

I don't need to its obvious


Yes you do or your words are dismissed just as easily.
Now the moderation team really IS Godmoding.
Step 1: One-Stop Rules Shop. Step 2: ctrl+f. Step 3: Type in what you saw in modbox. Step 4: Don't do it again.
New to F7? Click here!


User avatar
Ecrotia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 491
Founded: Jun 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ecrotia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:50 pm

Calimera II wrote:
Hurdegaryp wrote:Well, the fascist aggressor routine didn't work, even though the Argentinian stormtroopers initially did occupy the Falklands. Since all those Latin American macho soldiers surrendered to British Gurkhas in the end, this was not exactly a proud moment for Argentina. It did result in the eventual collapse of the junta, so that's a positive thing. Now that the WE TAKE WHAT WE WANT tactic was thorougly proven wrong, Argentinian populists and their sympathizers now try the incessant whining routine. It's going to be as fruitful as the more belligerent attempt to steal the Falklands, but at least less people are going to get killed.


Wat.... ...

I agree. One, Gurkhas weren't there, it was the Parachute Regiment (Fuck Yeah!) and the Royal Marines (...meh)

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55261
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:50 pm

Abunya wrote:It imposed puppet governments in Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan.

Pretty sure that no one is actually able to impose ANYTHING in Libya. Not even the Libyans.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. Egli/Lui.
"Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee. Should I restart the bugger?
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Abunya
Secretary
 
Posts: 33
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Abunya » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:50 pm

Ecrotia wrote:
The Neo-Hellenic Republic wrote:The Malvina's are Argentinian, no one should give a shit about what the inhabitants think, besides the UK has a habit of rigging elections.

Please provide proof of this


See: Scotland Vote Rigging

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:51 pm

Abunya wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Argentina's invasion in 1982 can be considered an attempt at imperialism.

Rather, an attempt to restore order to rightful Argentine land.

More like a gamble by the fascist junta that ruled Argentina at the time in order to distract the populace from the piss-poor economy of the nation. For some reason those dastardly Argentinian generals thought the USA would support their adventurism, while they also thought that the decadent United Kingdom, at that time led by a female prime minister and therefore suffering from inferior leadership according to the wildly sexist macho men of the Argentinian junta, would not have the strength and the determination to punish Argentina for its crime. They were wrong. They were dead wrong.

Argentina doesn't deserve the Falklands. Argentina deserves NOTHING
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:51 pm

Abunya wrote:
Ecrotia wrote:Please provide proof of this


See: Scotland Vote Rigging


Provide evidence for such. You know, that evidence that both international observers and the SNP didn't notice.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:51 pm

Abunya wrote:
Ecrotia wrote:Please provide proof of this


See: Scotland Vote Rigging


And what proof do you have that that occurred?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55261
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:51 pm

Carriebean7 wrote:
Ecrotia wrote:Yep, total sarcasm

I call my theory the " Territorial Proximity and alteration of Boundaries.

i am not kidding, complete serious,s granted I may have crazy views to you but I think mine are very very very slightly shiny with a hint of bronze.

Do you want also a slice of lemon wrapped around a gold brick to go with it?
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. Egli/Lui.
"Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee. Should I restart the bugger?
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:51 pm

Abunya wrote:
Ecrotia wrote:Please provide proof of this


See: Scotland Vote Rigging

I don't see any evidence.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Colonial Rhodesia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1339
Founded: Apr 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Colonial Rhodesia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:51 pm

The Neo-Hellenic Republic wrote:MALVINAS SON ARGENTINA , LA MUERTE DE BRETAÑA


NOT A INCH HOME RULE IS ROME RULE GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!
"Remember that you are an Englishman, and have consequently won first prize in the lottery of life."-Cecil John Rhodes
Fighting Communism North of the Zambesi since 1965

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Galactic Powers, Hypron, Ineva, Kastopoli Salegliari, Neanderthaland, Shrillland, Sutalia, The Lone Alliance

Advertisement

Remove ads