NATION

PASSWORD

Falklands or Malvinas? (And Anglo-Saxon Bias)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Falklands, Malvinas, or Independence?

Falklands (UK)
20
17%
Malvinas (Being a part of Argentina)
68
57%
Independent (Neither)
32
27%
 
Total votes : 120

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:08 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:You mean she should have let the Argentineans take land from the Empire and for Irish nationalists to dictate Ireland's future (to the detriment of the interests of the empire)?

That's not acting like a strong leader.

There is a "Juste Milieu" between letting die of starvation a member of your highest political entity or giving to soldiers "free shots on civilians" and letting nationalists dictate Irland's futur.
Her handling of the situation was even worst than the 4ième's (République) handling of the situation in Algeria. Really worst.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45990
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:08 pm

The Northumbrian Republic wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.

Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.

This is british empire/east anglia anglo-saxon bias at it's finest, blocking the islands from being independent and forcing them under Westminster.
:clap:


Give me some of whatever you're smoking. Shit sounds potent.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54796
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:08 pm

Kouralia wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Because the British Empire was just that ugly.

:'(

Can we not have a unicorn?


Only if you submit to Scotland and become one with the clans.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203930
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:08 pm

The Northumbrian Republic wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.

Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.

This is british empire/east anglia anglo-saxon bias at it's finest, blocking the islands from being independent and forcing them under Westminster.
:clap:


How is that Anglo-Saxon bias? It's fact. The FIs voted to remain British. Self determination.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39287
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:09 pm

United facist States of America wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Empire was never formally dissolved, so technically, it still exists.

Also, the Falkland Islans, Gibraltar, and other islands remain under the control of the British empire.

''The Lion and the Unicorn'' is too long. The Lion has traditionally been the animal that represented the British Empire.

The Roman Empire was also never formally dissolved does this mean we should refer to Italy as Rome.


Their bloodline has been wiped out. The last Roman sovereign died over a thousand years ago...

User avatar
Benian Republic
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9583
Founded: Dec 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Benian Republic » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:09 pm

Ecrotia wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
I've always thought it was

Lion = British Empire
Bear = Russian Empire
Eagle = the USA and Germany

France is supposed to be a rooster but its rarely represented by it.


Don't forget the Scottish Unicorn, Irish Clover and the Welsh Dragon for...never mind

The Irish clover is the only one of those that matters.
Pro: United Ireland, IRA, Allan Ryan, Palestine, Malvinas, Ukraine, Hamas-Fatah cooperation, legalized Gay marriage, Tibetan Resistance, Atheism.
Anti: English Imperialism, Nazism, communism, Israel, Zionism, Margret thatcher, Martin McGuinness, good Friday agreement.
Proud to be Irish, please telegram me I enjoy getting them.
Casualties showing why supporting Israel is morally corrupt: http://www.countthekids.org/

*The People's Republic of Aryan Union of Celts
*Was Aryan Union of Celts

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:09 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Calimera II wrote:
That's why this conflict is taking over 150 years to resolve.

The Argentine government's position is that the will of the Falklanders is irrelevant.

No

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54796
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:10 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
United facist States of America wrote:The Roman Empire was also never formally dissolved does this mean we should refer to Italy as Rome.


Their bloodline has been wiped out. The last Roman sovereign died over a thousand years ago...


More like 650 or so actually.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Benian Republic
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9583
Founded: Dec 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Benian Republic » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:10 pm

Aelex wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:Remember Thatcher?

The bitch who fucked up the entire british economy and made the poor even poorer by destroying the remain of healtcare england still had?
Who won't remember her as the horrible person she was? I mean, if you really wonder if she was "THAT" bad, just look to how people partyed in the street in Irland the day she died and that even in France, who yet had the chance to never subish the tyranny of her or one of her like, they were sales on Brasserie to celebrate her death.

No one likes the old betch.
Pro: United Ireland, IRA, Allan Ryan, Palestine, Malvinas, Ukraine, Hamas-Fatah cooperation, legalized Gay marriage, Tibetan Resistance, Atheism.
Anti: English Imperialism, Nazism, communism, Israel, Zionism, Margret thatcher, Martin McGuinness, good Friday agreement.
Proud to be Irish, please telegram me I enjoy getting them.
Casualties showing why supporting Israel is morally corrupt: http://www.countthekids.org/

*The People's Republic of Aryan Union of Celts
*Was Aryan Union of Celts

User avatar
The Northumbrian Republic
Envoy
 
Posts: 299
Founded: Jan 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Northumbrian Republic » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:10 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The Northumbrian Republic wrote:The Soviet Union didn't have a claim to the Baltics, Ukraine, Belarus, Central Asia, or the Caucasian countries.
Russia doesn't have a legitimate claim of Chechnya either.

It would seem, from your examples, that most of the world did indeed "move on with their lives" over those turns of events.
None of those claims were significantly challenged, except by some insurgency movements and limited diplomatic quarrel.

Until it collapsed, the Soviet Union's claim on the Baltics, Ukraine, Belarus, Central Asia and the Caucasus (pardon my ignorance, but isn't most of the Caucasus in Russia anyway?), and Russia's continued claim on Chechnya, have run largely unopposed.

I think this is extremely bigoted towards Chechens as this sounds like Ramzan Kadyrov ghost writed this.
Personally, I think your arguments would be well agreed in the
Last edited by The Northumbrian Republic on Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39287
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:10 pm

Aelex wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:You mean she should have let the Argentineans take land from the Empire and for Irish nationalists to dictate Ireland's future (to the detriment of the interests of the empire)?

That's not acting like a strong leader.

There is a "Juste Milieu" between letting die of starvation a member of your highest political entity or giving to soldiers "free shots on civilians" and letting nationalists dictate Irland's futur.
Her handling of the situation was even worst than the 4ième's (République) handling of the situation in Algeria. Really worst.


I thought her handling of foreign affairs in general, to be reasonable and in line with realpolitiks.

She knew first and foremost that Britain had to be feared and respected. As soon as that wasn't the case any more, they'll be no end to countries seperating from the Empire and other countries challenging the claims of the Lion.

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15140
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:10 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
The Northumbrian Republic wrote:This is british empire/east anglia anglo-saxon bias at it's finest, blocking the islands from being independent and forcing them under Westminster.
:clap:


How is that Anglo-Saxon bias? It's fact. The FIs voted to remain British. Self determination.

Why am people forget the non-Anglo Brits? Like, can we not get some loving for the Normano-Asian, Afro-Celtic, Nordic-Caribbean Oppression-meisters?
Kouralia:

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39287
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:11 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Their bloodline has been wiped out. The last Roman sovereign died over a thousand years ago...


More like 650 or so actually.


Okay.

User avatar
Gun Manufacturers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10141
Founded: Jan 23, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gun Manufacturers » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:11 pm

The Northumbrian Republic wrote:Many of you may of remembered the Falklands referendum in 2013, where 99.2% of Falklanders Voted to say British and not be transferred to Argentinian control.
Recently the Argentinian government has been increasing its efforts to 'recover' the islands and that has sparked tensions.

Sources from old thread:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21750909
http://www.falklands.gov.fk/self-govern ... argentina/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... ister.html

Personally, I think the Falklands needs to be a neutral, independent country and not subjected to Anglo-Saxon remnant empire bias.

So, what do you think? Tell us in this thread!


FFS, WHY?!? Why do we need yet ANOTHER Falklands thread?

BTW, as an American, I feel that the will of the people that live on the island should be respected. They want the Falklands to remain British, then they should remain British.
Gun control is like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.

Any accident you can walk away from is one I can laugh at.

DOJ's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi ... -p0126.pdf

Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...


Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo


Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.


Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:11 pm

The Northumbrian Republic wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.

Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.

This is british empire/east anglia anglo-saxon bias at it's finest, blocking the islands from being independent and forcing them under Westminster.
:clap:

...

All but three people who voted, voted to remain a British Protectorate. 99.2% of the island's eligible voting population voted.

The fuck are you even talking about?
Geilinor wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.

Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.

They can't become part of Argentina if they want the status quo.

Which ignores the fact that they weren't voting on whether or not to become part of Argentina, they were voting on whether or not to remain a British protectorate. The "not" in this instance leading to some form of independence.

Nothing to do with the Argies until they make it about them.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Old Tyrannia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 16673
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby Old Tyrannia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:11 pm

The Northumbrian Republic wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.

Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.

This is british empire/east anglia anglo-saxon bias at it's finest, blocking the islands from being independent and forcing them under Westminster.
:clap:

Indeed. The bias of the islanders is clearly preventing them from seeing how things would magically be so much better if they were to form their own tiny country and lose all of the economic and defensive benefits of being a British Overseas Territory. Oh woe are they.
"Classicist in literature, royalist in politics, and Anglo-Catholic in religion" (T.S. Eliot). Still, unaccountably, a NationStates Moderator.
"Have I done something for the general interest? Well then, I have had my reward. Let this always be present to thy mind, and never stop doing such good." - Marcus Aurelius, Meditations (Book XI, IV)
⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163903
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:11 pm

Kouralia wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Because the British Empire was just that ugly.

:'(

Can we not have a unicorn?

You can put a plastic horn on your doggy if you can get him to sit still.


Benian Republic wrote:
Ecrotia wrote:
Don't forget the Scottish Unicorn, Irish Clover and the Welsh Dragon for...never mind

The Irish clover is the only one of those that matters.

Not really, though.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
The Northumbrian Republic
Envoy
 
Posts: 299
Founded: Jan 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Northumbrian Republic » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:11 pm

Benian Republic wrote:
Aelex wrote:The bitch who fucked up the entire british economy and made the poor even poorer by destroying the remain of healtcare england still had?
Who won't remember her as the horrible person she was? I mean, if you really wonder if she was "THAT" bad, just look to how people partyed in the street in Irland the day she died and that even in France, who yet had the chance to never subish the tyranny of her or one of her like, they were sales on Brasserie to celebrate her death.

No one likes the old betch.

Not even she privatised the public transport system of the UK.
John Major did. >:(

User avatar
Saint Kitten
Senator
 
Posts: 4436
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saint Kitten » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:11 pm

The Northumbrian Republic wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.

Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.

This is british empire/east anglia anglo-saxon bias at it's finest, blocking the islands from being independent and forcing them under Westminster.
:clap:

I have to wonder if you even looked at the polling results
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
"In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second hand, and without examination."
-Mark Twain
I Side With
Political Compass
Dear Future Generations

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:11 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:if a foreign nation can seize one of Britain's possessions with impunity, then Britain is no longer a nation to be feared.

And if that happens, you'll have a lot more problems.

Well, Britain's ain't a nation to be feared since it forfeited it's own independance to become willingly the U.S's puppet.
But I disgress and this is a very biaised view of the situation so let's get back to our point.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Benian Republic
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9583
Founded: Dec 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Benian Republic » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:11 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Aelex wrote:No. Her handling of the situation was catastrophic. Not as bad as her handling of northern irland (for which she honestly should have been put on a war trial) but still showing off U.K's weakness to the whole world.


You mean she should have let the Argentineans take land from the Empire and for Irish nationalists to dictate Ireland's future (to the detriment of the interests of the empire)?

That's not acting like a strong leader.

The Irish nationalists care more about Ireland than thatcher did.
Pro: United Ireland, IRA, Allan Ryan, Palestine, Malvinas, Ukraine, Hamas-Fatah cooperation, legalized Gay marriage, Tibetan Resistance, Atheism.
Anti: English Imperialism, Nazism, communism, Israel, Zionism, Margret thatcher, Martin McGuinness, good Friday agreement.
Proud to be Irish, please telegram me I enjoy getting them.
Casualties showing why supporting Israel is morally corrupt: http://www.countthekids.org/

*The People's Republic of Aryan Union of Celts
*Was Aryan Union of Celts

User avatar
Parhe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8305
Founded: May 10, 2011
Anarchy

Falklands or Malvinas? (And Anglo-Saxon Bias)

Postby Parhe » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:12 pm

The Northumbrian Republic wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.

Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.

This is british empire/east anglia anglo-saxon bias at it's finest, blocking the islands from being independent and forcing them under Westminster.
:clap:

Not everyone here is speaking from a "Anglo-Saxon bias," I'm just sick of Argentina's claim by principle. Argentina's claim is no different from Japan's modern day imperialistic claims against the Korean islands of Dokdo and me supporting Argentina in this would mean to me giving credence to the same type of "logic" used by other nations to oppose self-determination for the status quo.
Hey, it is Parhe :D I am always open to telegrams.
I know it is a Work-In-Progress, but I would love it if y'all looked at my new factbook and gave me some feedback!

BRING BACK THE ICE CLIMBERS

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:12 pm

The Northumbrian Republic wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:It would seem, from your examples, that most of the world did indeed "move on with their lives" over those turns of events.
None of those claims were significantly challenged, except by some insurgency movements and limited diplomatic quarrel.

Until it collapsed, the Soviet Union's claim on the Baltics, Ukraine, Belarus, Central Asia and the Caucasus (pardon my ignorance, but isn't most of the Caucasus in Russia anyway?), and Russia's continued claim on Chechnya, have run largely unopposed.

I think this is extremely bigoted towards Chechens as this sounds like Ramzan Kadyrov ghost writed this.
Personally, I think your arguments would be well agreed in the

Put down the crack pipe and come back in twenty minutes when you're a bit more calm.
I'm not certain even you know what you're talking about at this point. I certainly don't.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15140
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:12 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Kouralia wrote::'(

Can we not have a unicorn?

You can put a plastic horn on your doggy if you can get him to sit still.

You meanie: I'm still on holiday, else I would totally go and do that and post the picture here. :<
Kouralia:

User avatar
Ecrotia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 491
Founded: Jun 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ecrotia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:13 pm

Benian Republic wrote:
Aelex wrote:The bitch who fucked up the entire british economy and made the poor even poorer by destroying the remain of healtcare england still had?
Who won't remember her as the horrible person she was? I mean, if you really wonder if she was "THAT" bad, just look to how people partyed in the street in Irland the day she died and that even in France, who yet had the chance to never subish the tyranny of her or one of her like, they were sales on Brasserie to celebrate her death.

No one likes the old betch.

Are you sure? Or is that some sort of bias

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: East Leaf Republic, Ineva, Shrillland, The Black Forrest

Advertisement

Remove ads