NATION

PASSWORD

Falklands or Malvinas? (And Anglo-Saxon Bias)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Falklands, Malvinas, or Independence?

Falklands (UK)
20
17%
Malvinas (Being a part of Argentina)
68
57%
Independent (Neither)
32
27%
 
Total votes : 120

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:02 pm

Calimera II wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:This thing a-fucking-gain? Christ. Falklands. Argentina doesn't have even a single legitimate claim.


That's why this conflict is taking over 150 years to resolve.

The Argentine government's position is that the will of the Falklanders is irrelevant.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Parhe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8305
Founded: May 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Falklands or Malvinas?

Postby Parhe » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:02 pm

The Northumbrian Republic wrote:I think there might be anglo-saxon bias approaching. :rofl:

Surprising when you asked whether a group that believe themselves to be Anglo-Saxons should remain part of the United Kingdom as they voted to.
Hey, it is Parhe :D I am always open to telegrams.
I know it is a Work-In-Progress, but I would love it if y'all looked at my new factbook and gave me some feedback!

BRING BACK THE ICE CLIMBERS

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164094
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:02 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Kouralia wrote:Why are you euphemistically referring to Britain as 'the Lion'? You should really refer to it as 'the Lion and Unicorn', as the Scots Guards were deployed, and the national animal of Scotland is the Unicorn.

ALso, why are you continually using the term 'Empire', even in relation to 21st century disputes/arguments? The British Empire no longer exists.


The Empire was never formally dissolved, so technically, it still exists.

Also, the Falkland Islans, Gibraltar, and other islands remain under the control of the British empire.

''The Lion and the Unicorn'' is too long. The Lion has traditionally been the animal that represented the British Empire.

That's a bulldog, not a lion.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45999
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:02 pm

Calimera II wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:This thing a-fucking-gain? Christ. Falklands. Argentina doesn't have even a single legitimate claim.


That's why this conflict is taking over 150 years to resolve.


Most people's reaction to not having a legitimate claim is to move on with their lives. You should try it.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39292
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:03 pm

Aelex wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:I completely understand Thatcher's decision for war. She had to call the troops. The honour and reputation of Britain was at stake. It couldn't be seen as a crumbling structure.

No. Her handling of the situation was catastrophic. Not as bad as her handling of northern irland (for which she honestly should have been put on a war trial) but still showing off U.K's weakness to the whole world.


You mean she should have let the Argentineans take land from the Empire and for Irish nationalists to dictate Ireland's future (to the detriment of the interests of the empire)?

That's not acting like a strong leader.

User avatar
Ecrotia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 491
Founded: Jun 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ecrotia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:03 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Empire was never formally dissolved, so technically, it still exists.

Also, the Falkland Islans, Gibraltar, and other islands remain under the control of the British empire.

''The Lion and the Unicorn'' is too long. The Lion has traditionally been the animal that represented the British Empire.

That's a bulldog, not a lion.

Well, both.

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:03 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:Her economic policies may not be the best, but she managed to ensure Britain's continued domination over the Falkland Islands.

Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah, so an island inhabited by less than 2000 people is somewhat more valuable than the collapse of British's economy and of the horrible degradation of the situation for the poor in U.K? Best logic ever.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54805
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:03 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Empire was never formally dissolved, so technically, it still exists.

Also, the Falkland Islans, Gibraltar, and other islands remain under the control of the British empire.

''The Lion and the Unicorn'' is too long. The Lion has traditionally been the animal that represented the British Empire.

That's a bulldog, not a lion.


Because the British Empire was just that ugly.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39292
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:04 pm

Ecrotia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:That's a bulldog, not a lion.

Well, both.


I've always thought it was

Lion = British Empire
Bear = Russian Empire
Eagle = the USA and Germany

France is supposed to be a rooster but its rarely represented by it.

User avatar
United facist States of America
Diplomat
 
Posts: 564
Founded: Oct 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby United facist States of America » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:04 pm

It's the Falklands obviously.
Pro: Atheism, Unified Nordic Countries, Universal Healthcare, Maternity Leave, Paternity Leave, Free Education, LGBT Rights, Same Sex Marriage, Pro-choice, Scientific Advancement, Evolution in schools, Egalitarianism, Scandinavian prison system, Kurdish independence, Pan-Germanism, Restoration of German Monarchy, Imperial German style Monarchy, Classical Liberalism, Capitalism, Brexit, Swexit
Neutral: Religion, USA, Anarchism, Socialism, Putin, Assad, Libertarianism, Trump
Anti: Fascism, Authoritarianism, North Korea, ISIS, Religious Fundamentalism, Creationism in schools, Young Earth Creationism, Pseudoscience, Private prisons, Corporatism, Feminism, US prison system, uncontrolled immigration, Communism, Republicanism, Regressive Left, uncontrolled Capitalism, European Union

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54855
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Corporate Police State

Postby Imperializt Russia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:04 pm

The Northumbrian Republic wrote:Many of you may of remembered the Falklands referendum in 2013, where 99.2% of Falklanders Voted to say British and not be transferred to Argentinian control.

No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.

Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Saint Kitten
Senator
 
Posts: 4436
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saint Kitten » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:04 pm

Calimera II wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Argentina is the rightful territory of Spain, m8.


K. So that's why Spain recognized Argentina's independence.

Especially as of right now, the idea of Spain being able to maintain control of any other country other than itself is laughable.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
"In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second hand, and without examination."
-Mark Twain
I Side With
Political Compass
Dear Future Generations

User avatar
The Northumbrian Republic
Envoy
 
Posts: 299
Founded: Jan 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Northumbrian Republic » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:04 pm

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Calimera II wrote:
That's why this conflict is taking over 150 years to resolve.


Most people's reaction to not having a legitimate claim is to move on with their lives. You should try it.

The Soviet Union didn't have a claim to the Baltics, Ukraine, Belarus, Central Asia, or the Caucasian countries.
Russia doesn't have a legitimate claim of Chechnya either.

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15140
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:05 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Ifreann wrote:That's a bulldog, not a lion.


Because the British Empire was just that ugly.

:'(

Can we not have a unicorn?
Kouralia:

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54855
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Corporate Police State

Postby Imperializt Russia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:05 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Ifreann wrote:That's a bulldog, not a lion.


Because the British Empire was just that ugly.

And? Nine times out of ten, you're still not going to fuck with it.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39292
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:05 pm

Aelex wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:Her economic policies may not be the best, but she managed to ensure Britain's continued domination over the Falkland Islands.

Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah, so an island inhabited by less than 2000 people is somewhat more valuable than the collapse of British's economy and of the horrible degradation of the situation for the poor in U.K? Best logic ever.


if a foreign nation can seize one of Britain's possessions with impunity, then Britain is no longer a nation to be feared.

And if that happens, you'll have a lot more problems.
Last edited by Infected Mushroom on Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15140
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:06 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Aelex wrote:Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah, so an island inhabited by less than 2000 people is somewhat more valuable than the collapse of British's economy and of the horrible degradation of the situation for the poor in U.K? Best logic ever.


if a foreign nation can seize one of Britain's possessions with impunity, then Britain is no longer a nation to be feared.

And if that happens, you'll have a lot more problems.

Image
Kouralia:

User avatar
The Northumbrian Republic
Envoy
 
Posts: 299
Founded: Jan 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Northumbrian Republic » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:06 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The Northumbrian Republic wrote:Many of you may of remembered the Falklands referendum in 2013, where 99.2% of Falklanders Voted to say British and not be transferred to Argentinian control.

No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.

Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.

This is british empire/east anglia anglo-saxon bias at it's finest, blocking the islands from being independent and forcing them under Westminster.
:clap:

User avatar
Zrhajan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 952
Founded: Nov 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Zrhajan » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:07 pm

Compromise solution. everybody leaves, and everybody leaves it alone, just as it was before the British colonized it. That way, nobody but the penguins get what they want.

In all seriousness though, the British have a stronger claim, not to mention, the referendum did have an overwhelming majority of people supporting remaining a British Overseas territory.
5D Political Test: Communist Pro-Government World-Federalist Bleeding-Heart Libertine
Collectivism score: 83%
Authoritarianism score: 33%
Internationalism score: 83%
Tribalism score: -100%

User avatar
Ecrotia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 491
Founded: Jun 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ecrotia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:07 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Ecrotia wrote:Well, both.


I've always thought it was

Lion = British Empire
Bear = Russian Empire
Eagle = the USA and Germany

France is supposed to be a rooster but its rarely represented by it.


Don't forget the Scottish Unicorn, Irish Clover and the Welsh Dragon for...never mind

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:07 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The Northumbrian Republic wrote:Many of you may of remembered the Falklands referendum in 2013, where 99.2% of Falklanders Voted to say British and not be transferred to Argentinian control.

No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.

Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.

They can't become part of Argentina if they want the status quo.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
United facist States of America
Diplomat
 
Posts: 564
Founded: Oct 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby United facist States of America » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:08 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Kouralia wrote:Why are you euphemistically referring to Britain as 'the Lion'? You should really refer to it as 'the Lion and Unicorn', as the Scots Guards were deployed, and the national animal of Scotland is the Unicorn.

ALso, why are you continually using the term 'Empire', even in relation to 21st century disputes/arguments? The British Empire no longer exists.


The Empire was never formally dissolved, so technically, it still exists.

Also, the Falkland Islans, Gibraltar, and other islands remain under the control of the British empire.

''The Lion and the Unicorn'' is too long. The Lion has traditionally been the animal that represented the British Empire.

The Roman Empire was also never formally dissolved does this mean we should refer to Italy as Rome.
Pro: Atheism, Unified Nordic Countries, Universal Healthcare, Maternity Leave, Paternity Leave, Free Education, LGBT Rights, Same Sex Marriage, Pro-choice, Scientific Advancement, Evolution in schools, Egalitarianism, Scandinavian prison system, Kurdish independence, Pan-Germanism, Restoration of German Monarchy, Imperial German style Monarchy, Classical Liberalism, Capitalism, Brexit, Swexit
Neutral: Religion, USA, Anarchism, Socialism, Putin, Assad, Libertarianism, Trump
Anti: Fascism, Authoritarianism, North Korea, ISIS, Religious Fundamentalism, Creationism in schools, Young Earth Creationism, Pseudoscience, Private prisons, Corporatism, Feminism, US prison system, uncontrolled immigration, Communism, Republicanism, Regressive Left, uncontrolled Capitalism, European Union

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:08 pm

The Northumbrian Republic wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.

Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.

This is british empire/east anglia anglo-saxon bias at it's finest, blocking the islands from being independent and forcing them under Westminster.
:clap:

People voting nearly unanimously to stay a part of a country now equals that country actually oppressing those people. *vigorous nodding*
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164094
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:08 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Ifreann wrote:That's a bulldog, not a lion.


Because the British Empire was just that ugly.

They might piss on your carpet, but on the other hand, they're great for chewing off Hitler's leg.


Infected Mushroom wrote:
Ecrotia wrote:Well, both.


I've always thought it was

Lion = British Empire
Bear = Russian Empire
Eagle = the USA and Germany

France is supposed to be a rooster but its rarely represented by it.

This is because you're obsessed with Game of Thrones and want real life countries to mirror its use of animal motifs. Lannisters might be lions, but Britons aren't.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54855
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Corporate Police State

Postby Imperializt Russia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:08 pm

The Northumbrian Republic wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Most people's reaction to not having a legitimate claim is to move on with their lives. You should try it.

The Soviet Union didn't have a claim to the Baltics, Ukraine, Belarus, Central Asia, or the Caucasian countries.
Russia doesn't have a legitimate claim of Chechnya either.

It would seem, from your examples, that most of the world did indeed "move on with their lives" over those turns of events.
None of those claims were significantly challenged, except by some insurgency movements and limited diplomatic quarrel.

Until it collapsed, the Soviet Union's claim on the Baltics, Ukraine, Belarus, Central Asia and the Caucasus (pardon my ignorance, but isn't most of the Caucasus in Russia anyway?), and Russia's continued claim on Chechnya, have run largely unopposed.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Celritannia, Europa Undivided, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Opluentia, Raskana, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads

cron