The Argentine government's position is that the will of the Falklanders is irrelevant.
Advertisement
by Geilinor » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:02 pm
by Parhe » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:02 pm
The Northumbrian Republic wrote:I think there might be anglo-saxon bias approaching.
by Ifreann » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:02 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Kouralia wrote:Why are you euphemistically referring to Britain as 'the Lion'? You should really refer to it as 'the Lion and Unicorn', as the Scots Guards were deployed, and the national animal of Scotland is the Unicorn.
ALso, why are you continually using the term 'Empire', even in relation to 21st century disputes/arguments? The British Empire no longer exists.
The Empire was never formally dissolved, so technically, it still exists.
Also, the Falkland Islans, Gibraltar, and other islands remain under the control of the British empire.
''The Lion and the Unicorn'' is too long. The Lion has traditionally been the animal that represented the British Empire.
by Dumb Ideologies » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:02 pm
by Infected Mushroom » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:03 pm
Aelex wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:I completely understand Thatcher's decision for war. She had to call the troops. The honour and reputation of Britain was at stake. It couldn't be seen as a crumbling structure.
No. Her handling of the situation was catastrophic. Not as bad as her handling of northern irland (for which she honestly should have been put on a war trial) but still showing off U.K's weakness to the whole world.
by Ecrotia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:03 pm
Ifreann wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Empire was never formally dissolved, so technically, it still exists.
Also, the Falkland Islans, Gibraltar, and other islands remain under the control of the British empire.
''The Lion and the Unicorn'' is too long. The Lion has traditionally been the animal that represented the British Empire.
That's a bulldog, not a lion.
by Aelex » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:03 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Her economic policies may not be the best, but she managed to ensure Britain's continued domination over the Falkland Islands.
by Washington Resistance Army » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:03 pm
Ifreann wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Empire was never formally dissolved, so technically, it still exists.
Also, the Falkland Islans, Gibraltar, and other islands remain under the control of the British empire.
''The Lion and the Unicorn'' is too long. The Lion has traditionally been the animal that represented the British Empire.
That's a bulldog, not a lion.
by Infected Mushroom » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:04 pm
by United facist States of America » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:04 pm
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:04 pm
The Northumbrian Republic wrote:Many of you may of remembered the Falklands referendum in 2013, where 99.2% of Falklanders Voted to say British and not be transferred to Argentinian control.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Saint Kitten » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:04 pm
by The Northumbrian Republic » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:04 pm
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:05 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Infected Mushroom » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:05 pm
Aelex wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:Her economic policies may not be the best, but she managed to ensure Britain's continued domination over the Falkland Islands.
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah, so an island inhabited by less than 2000 people is somewhat more valuable than the collapse of British's economy and of the horrible degradation of the situation for the poor in U.K? Best logic ever.
by Kouralia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:06 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Aelex wrote:Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah, so an island inhabited by less than 2000 people is somewhat more valuable than the collapse of British's economy and of the horrible degradation of the situation for the poor in U.K? Best logic ever.
if a foreign nation can seize one of Britain's possessions with impunity, then Britain is no longer a nation to be feared.
And if that happens, you'll have a lot more problems.
by The Northumbrian Republic » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:06 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:The Northumbrian Republic wrote:Many of you may of remembered the Falklands referendum in 2013, where 99.2% of Falklanders Voted to say British and not be transferred to Argentinian control.
No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.
Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.
by Zrhajan » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:07 pm
by Geilinor » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:07 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:The Northumbrian Republic wrote:Many of you may of remembered the Falklands referendum in 2013, where 99.2% of Falklanders Voted to say British and not be transferred to Argentinian control.
No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.
Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.
by United facist States of America » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:08 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Kouralia wrote:Why are you euphemistically referring to Britain as 'the Lion'? You should really refer to it as 'the Lion and Unicorn', as the Scots Guards were deployed, and the national animal of Scotland is the Unicorn.
ALso, why are you continually using the term 'Empire', even in relation to 21st century disputes/arguments? The British Empire no longer exists.
The Empire was never formally dissolved, so technically, it still exists.
Also, the Falkland Islans, Gibraltar, and other islands remain under the control of the British empire.
''The Lion and the Unicorn'' is too long. The Lion has traditionally been the animal that represented the British Empire.
by Wisconsin9 » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:08 pm
The Northumbrian Republic wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:No, 99%+ of Falklanders voted to remain in the status quo. They didn't vote against being transferred to Argentina, they voted against becoming independent of Britain.
Therefore, the entire premise of your OP is factually unsupported.
This is british empire/east anglia anglo-saxon bias at it's finest, blocking the islands from being independent and forcing them under Westminster.
by Ifreann » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:08 pm
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:08 pm
The Northumbrian Republic wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Most people's reaction to not having a legitimate claim is to move on with their lives. You should try it.
The Soviet Union didn't have a claim to the Baltics, Ukraine, Belarus, Central Asia, or the Caucasian countries.
Russia doesn't have a legitimate claim of Chechnya either.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Celritannia, Europa Undivided, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Opluentia, Raskana, Vassenor
Advertisement