Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Fucking thank you.
Good that an actual black person could speak on the issue.
Of course, such a thing is hard to tell on a website unless someone mentions it

Advertisement

by Salus Maior » Tue Jul 28, 2015 9:10 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Fucking thank you.
Good that an actual black person could speak on the issue.


by United States Kingdom » Tue Jul 28, 2015 9:12 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:United States Kingdom wrote:
Your notion that black pride is related to some supremacist group, or a gang is wrong. Firstly, as a black person, let me state that black pride is a movement used to encourage people who are black that it their is nothing wrong with being black. Black people are heavily discriminated, especially in the USA( where the KKK, Bloods, and Black Panthers are located). In addition to that, Black Pride s used to celebrate the heritage of black people, and to celebrate the culture we have. Numerous things such as slavery, genocide, colonialism have affected us significantly. Black pride is a movement that basically states "we will not be brought down". Therefor, your notion that black pride is related to supremacist groups is wrong.
Now to address the Black Panthers. You may or may not know this, but there was a Black Panther party before the current Black Panthers. While there are numerous things that I think the Black Panthers Party did wrong, I must recognize that there were a group that advocated for anti racism. Furthermore, the group was involved in numerous things such as Free Breakfast for Children Program among other community social programs ,as well as community health clinics. That is something that is not bad. In addition to that, there were a group that was created in order to fight off police brutality and racism in Oakland.
Also, I just want to note that while African Americans make the majority of the gang known as The Bloods, according to Wikipidea "The Bloods are a primarily, though not exclusively, African American street gang founded in Los Angeles, California. ". Therefore, your belief that the Bloods are simply African American is wrong.
Fucking thank you.
Good that an actual black person could speak on the issue.


by United States Kingdom » Tue Jul 28, 2015 9:13 pm

by The Rich Port » Tue Jul 28, 2015 9:25 pm

by The Cobalt Sky » Tue Jul 28, 2015 9:36 pm
Domenic and friends wrote:I think its fine this is coming from someone who is mixed race. If your white & proud or black & proud good for you. But any Black, White, Brown, Yellow or red supremacists are stupid.

by Ayothaya » Tue Jul 28, 2015 9:37 pm
The Rich Port wrote:I get the feeling NAR would be less swayed by a black person than a white person.

by Salus Maior » Tue Jul 28, 2015 9:42 pm


by Cannabis Islands » Wed Jul 29, 2015 12:02 am

by Laerod » Wed Jul 29, 2015 12:06 am

by Cannabis Islands » Wed Jul 29, 2015 12:10 am
Laerod wrote:Cannabis Islands wrote: Technically, they are two different things....
Technically, so are Intelligent Design and Creationism. Practically there is no difference and this thread is the Kitzmiller v. Dover equivalent that underlines that White Pride is White Power with a slightly different combination of letters.

by Imperialisium » Wed Jul 29, 2015 12:16 am

by Laerod » Wed Jul 29, 2015 12:17 am
Cannabis Islands wrote:Laerod wrote:Technically, so are Intelligent Design and Creationism. Practically there is no difference and this thread is the Kitzmiller v. Dover equivalent that underlines that White Pride is White Power with a slightly different combination of letters.
Speaking as a person that is only 35% white, I see no bigotry just because someone says "white pride". As a gay person, I see no bigotry behind the statement of "straight pride"

by Prussia-Steinbach » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:08 am
Cannabis Islands wrote:Laerod wrote:Technically, so are Intelligent Design and Creationism. Practically there is no difference and this thread is the Kitzmiller v. Dover equivalent that underlines that White Pride is White Power with a slightly different combination of letters.
Speaking as a person that is only 35% white, I see no bigotry just because someone says "white pride". As a gay person, I see no bigotry behind the statement of "straight pride"

by Cannabis Islands » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:11 am

by Prussia-Steinbach » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:16 am

by The Cobalt Sky » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:19 am

by Adnan Nawaz And Bureacrats Elsewhere » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:38 am

by The Republic of Pantalleria » Wed Jul 29, 2015 3:36 am
)
by Laerod » Wed Jul 29, 2015 4:17 am
The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:Meh, if there are gay pride marches, black pride, native pride and all sorts of prides, then why shouldn't those whites who want one get one? I mean, it's not like it's against the law in the States (or any other Western country with a Caucasian population), as long as they don't neglect their sworn duty to their "neighbour" in the eyes of the law to maintain a duty of care towards them. (I follow Common Law from the Commonwealth so I'm not exactly sure how the rebellious American colonies run their territories :p )




by Ifreann » Wed Jul 29, 2015 5:51 am
Ifreann wrote:Well why don't you tell me about white culture. I mean, I'm white, and I've lived in a majority white country for my entire life, in a town that has probably had more pubs than non-white people for most of that time, but please, tell me about something that I should logically be intimately familiar with. Unless, of course, it doesn't actually exist.
Laerod wrote:The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:Meh, if there are gay pride marches, black pride, native pride and all sorts of prides, then why shouldn't those whites who want one get one? I mean, it's not like it's against the law in the States (or any other Western country with a Caucasian population), as long as they don't neglect their sworn duty to their "neighbour" in the eyes of the law to maintain a duty of care towards them. (I follow Common Law from the Commonwealth so I'm not exactly sure how the rebellious American colonies run their territories)
But they do get their pride parades:
(I'd link to the site where I found it, but it's a White Pride Worldwide site and thus counts as a hate site and is probably not acceptable on this forum.)Link to a picture of people celebrating White Pride World Wide Day, because the image is too large.
(taken from the site of a white supremacist party, so no direct links to that, sorry.)
Granted, it appears to be somewhat against the law to display the White Pride symbol in Germany. For some reason it's on the same list of banned symbols as the swastika and SS runes. I wonder why...

by New Jordslag » Wed Jul 29, 2015 6:47 am
The NAR wrote:The Empire of Pretantia wrote:You fear for the future of your race? Why?
Well because the White Race is now the smallest of the world's races. We're being outproduced, pure White blood is disappearing with all the mixed babies and shit. And not only as a white man, but as an American, America is quickly becoming a black and Hispanic country

by Terminus Alpha » Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:20 am
The NAR wrote:The Empire of Pretantia wrote:You fear for the future of your race? Why?
Well because the White Race is now the smallest of the world's races. We're being outproduced, pure White blood is disappearing with all the mixed babies and shit. And not only as a white man, but as an American, America is quickly becoming a black and Hispanic country
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Belogorod, Corporate Collective Salvation, Eurocom, Likhinia, Mediterrainia, Peacetime, Port Caverton, Rhodevus, San Lumen, Shrillland, Spirit of Hope, Subi Bumeen, The Jamesian Republic, Thermodolia, Unitarian Universalism, Vassenor
Advertisement