NATION

PASSWORD

Dating outside of your ethnicity

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:04 pm

Greater Fennoscandia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:I did write it out clearly. It's not my fault you misinterpreted it.

Except I didn't say that. I said probably.

No it wouldn't. Pieces of history don't just up and disappear.
Again, that's bullocks. All you'd get is new types of cultural and ethnic diversity.


One ethnicity is not less than the hundreds or thousands we have right now?

What's with this asinine assumption there'd be only one ethnicity?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Redsection
Minister
 
Posts: 2117
Founded: Jan 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Redsection » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:06 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Redsection wrote:
Oh pish posh my good fellow, I've already had one. :rofl:

That's not the type of DNA test he's referring to.


I know,ive had both. His arrogance makes it all the more sweeter.
[*]National Syndicalist
[*]Soon to join the American Blackshirt Party
[*]Majority European, Native American ancestry, latino heritage
[*]Anti: Globalism , Communism , Nazism, Satanism
[*]Pro: Fascism, Guns Rights, Militias

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:06 pm

Redsection wrote:
Sun Wukong wrote:I'm pretty sure I could clear up that misconception for you with a DNA test.


Oh pish posh my good fellow, I've already had one. :rofl:

Keep in mind that anyone living 3000 years ago was either the the direct ancestor of all humans living in the world today, or none of them.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:06 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:I'm a bigot. I prefer white men.

So that's why you never call.

Yes. You never have white bread.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:07 pm

Redsection wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:That's not the type of DNA test he's referring to.


I know,ive had both. His arrogance makes it all the more sweeter.

"Both" aye? :roll:
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:07 pm

Redsection wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:That's not the type of DNA test he's referring to.


I know,ive had both. His arrogance makes it all the more sweeter.

Arrogance? No, it's more like he has a basic understanding of biology.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Greater Fennoscandia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 141
Founded: Jun 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Fennoscandia » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:09 pm

The Cobalt Sky wrote:EDIT: I have a problem with you saying that having children with someone of another ethnicity somehow makes things less diverse.


The neanderthals are gone as an ethnic group, they have been assimilated. Even though most europeans and asians have a bit of neanderthal dna in them, there are no distinct neanderthals roaming the earth anymore.

User avatar
Redsection
Minister
 
Posts: 2117
Founded: Jan 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Redsection » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:10 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Redsection wrote:
I know,ive had both. His arrogance makes it all the more sweeter.

Arrogance? No, it's more like he has a basic understanding of biology.


Quite wrong, He is implying everyone came from africa, Which every one did not, it is however an blindman's bluff.
[*]National Syndicalist
[*]Soon to join the American Blackshirt Party
[*]Majority European, Native American ancestry, latino heritage
[*]Anti: Globalism , Communism , Nazism, Satanism
[*]Pro: Fascism, Guns Rights, Militias

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:10 pm

Greater Fennoscandia wrote:
The Cobalt Sky wrote:EDIT: I have a problem with you saying that having children with someone of another ethnicity somehow makes things less diverse.


The neanderthals are gone as an ethnic group, they have been assimilated. Even though most europeans and asians have a bit of neanderthal dna in them, there are no distinct neanderthals roaming the earth anymore.

Neanderthals weren't an ethnic group.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:11 pm

Redsection wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Arrogance? No, it's more like he has a basic understanding of biology.


Quite wrong, He is implying everyone came from africa, Which every one did not, it is however an blindman's bluff.

So basically he has a basic understanding of biology and you don't. Got it.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:14 pm

Redsection wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Arrogance? No, it's more like he has a basic understanding of biology.


Quite wrong, He is implying everyone came from africa, Which every one did not, it is however an blindman's bluff.

Well, I wasn't implying that. But everyone did.

You're just digging a hole for yourself at this point.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Greater Fennoscandia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 141
Founded: Jun 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Fennoscandia » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:15 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:
One ethnicity is not less than the hundreds or thousands we have right now?

What's with this asinine assumption there'd be only one ethnicity?


Isn't it quite obvious? Before there were vast geographical and cultural distances that hindered completely free mixing. Removing those, what is there to cause different ethnicities to form at all? It is just a matter of time.

User avatar
Sebtopiaris
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10250
Founded: Jun 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sebtopiaris » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:17 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
I'm not into sheep >:(


Denial is poor form, mister!

He's not Welsh, he's Dutch IIRC
Sebtopiaris is a culturally and ethnically Mediterranean, single-party democratic socialist state in the New Warsaw Pact with a population of 39 million Sebtopiariots. Sebtopiaris and its IC actions do not represent my personal beliefs, and Sebtopiaris's overview page does not represent much at all.

User avatar
Greater Fennoscandia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 141
Founded: Jun 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Fennoscandia » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:18 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:
The neanderthals are gone as an ethnic group, they have been assimilated. Even though most europeans and asians have a bit of neanderthal dna in them, there are no distinct neanderthals roaming the earth anymore.

Neanderthals weren't an ethnic group.


Different species then, or whatever you want to call it, it's semantics. Species in biology is quite a fluid concept, such as are sub-species, races and ethnicities. We all came from a self replicating molecule that evolved to different ecological niches after all.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:19 pm

Greater Fennoscandia wrote:Isn't it quite obvious?

No. It requires a whole host of assumptions that seem more likely to happen in a generic movie about a dystopian future.
Greater Fennoscandia wrote: Before there were vast geographical and cultural distances that hindered completely free mixing.

There was no significant period in which this is true. Migration has been constant and retracing backwards has also been constant as well.
Greater Fennoscandia wrote: Removing those, what is there to cause different ethnicities to form at all? It is just a matter of time.

Again, you sound like you're lifting this stuff from the summary of a bad future sci-fi movie. Do you have any actual evidence based reasoning for this, or should I continue to consider this the equivalent to the ramblings of a random old guy on a street who screams "THE END COMETH!" when you pass by?
Last edited by Mavorpen on Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:20 pm

Greater Fennoscandia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:What's with this asinine assumption there'd be only one ethnicity?


Isn't it quite obvious? Before there were vast geographical and cultural distances that hindered completely free mixing. Removing those, what is there to cause different ethnicities to form at all? It is just a matter of time.

People seem to like distinctions. I imagine they would find things to distinguish themselves no matter how similar they become. And probably there would always be regional tendencies.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:20 pm

Greater Fennoscandia wrote:
Different species then, or whatever you want to call it, it's semantics.

Well, yes. Why do people say that like it's a bad thing?
Greater Fennoscandia wrote: Species in biology is quite a fluid concept,

Not really.
Greater Fennoscandia wrote: such as are sub-species, races and ethnicities.

Lmfao no. Race and ethnicity aren't actual biologic concepts. Race is pseudoscientific garbage and ethnicity is only useful from a cultural and therefore sociological perspective.
Greater Fennoscandia wrote: We all came from a self replicating molecule that evolved to different ecological niches after all.

...K?
Last edited by Mavorpen on Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Redsection
Minister
 
Posts: 2117
Founded: Jan 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Redsection » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:21 pm

Sun Wukong wrote:
Redsection wrote:
Quite wrong, He is implying everyone came from africa, Which every one did not, it is however an blindman's bluff.

Well, I wasn't implying that. But everyone did.

You're just digging a hole for yourself at this point.


Wrong once more, The whole out of africa theroy has been proven wrong,It was a Marxist political doctrine masquerading as science,not to mention it was brought out in the 90's to bring forth the whole were all brothers and sisters. So my dear fellow you are the one that is wrong,i am not the one who believes in psuedo science.
[*]National Syndicalist
[*]Soon to join the American Blackshirt Party
[*]Majority European, Native American ancestry, latino heritage
[*]Anti: Globalism , Communism , Nazism, Satanism
[*]Pro: Fascism, Guns Rights, Militias

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:24 pm

Greater Fennoscandia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Neanderthals weren't an ethnic group.


Different species then, or whatever you want to call it, it's semantics. Species in biology is quite a fluid concept, such as are sub-species, races and ethnicities. We all came from a self replicating molecule that evolved to different ecological niches after all.

No. Species in biology is a defined concept. Sub-species are clearly defined as well. Race does have a scientific meaning, which refers to lineage. Ethnicity is the only vague concept here, and it's really only used to describe likely tendencies in medical science.

Just because people use scientific terms incorrectly doesn't mean that they don't have a correct meaning.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:25 pm

Redsection wrote:Wrong once more, The whole out of africa theroy has been proven wrong,

He says with no evidence.
Redsection wrote:It was a Marxist political doctrine masquerading as science,

You don't know what science is, do you?
Redsection wrote:not to mention it was brought out in the 90's to bring forth the whole were all brothers and sisters.

Do you even grammar?
Redsection wrote: So my dear fellow you are the one that is wrong,i am not the one who believes in psuedo science.

Tell me more about how he believes in pseudoscience that you've yet to refute with actual research.

Image
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:26 pm

Redsection wrote:
Sun Wukong wrote:Well, I wasn't implying that. But everyone did.

You're just digging a hole for yourself at this point.


Wrong once more, The whole out of africa theroy has been proven wrong,It was a Marxist political doctrine masquerading as science,not to mention it was brought out in the 90's to bring forth the whole were all brothers and sisters. So my dear fellow you are the one that is wrong,i am not the one who believes in psuedo science.

No. It hasn't. And whoever told you this was flat-out lying.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Redsection
Minister
 
Posts: 2117
Founded: Jan 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Redsection » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:30 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Redsection wrote:Wrong once more, The whole out of africa theroy has been proven wrong,

He says with no evidence.
Redsection wrote:It was a Marxist political doctrine masquerading as science,

You don't know what science is, do you?
Redsection wrote:not to mention it was brought out in the 90's to bring forth the whole were all brothers and sisters.

Do you even grammar?
Redsection wrote: So my dear fellow you are the one that is wrong,i am not the one who believes in psuedo science.

Tell me more about how he believes in pseudoscience that you've yet to refute with actual research.

Image


Ahh, I see your one of those people who try and deter others when you know that i am right,you point out minor errors and are to lazy to find anything on your own,Like an child who pulls at his mothers apron.

Here you are, There are many others as well from the chineese goverment and from others.
(http://www.dailystormer.com/the-out-of- ... -debunked/)
[*]National Syndicalist
[*]Soon to join the American Blackshirt Party
[*]Majority European, Native American ancestry, latino heritage
[*]Anti: Globalism , Communism , Nazism, Satanism
[*]Pro: Fascism, Guns Rights, Militias

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:34 pm

Redsection wrote:Ahh, I see your one of those people who try and deter others when you know that i am right,you point out minor errors and are to lazy to find anything on your own,

So basically you don't know how debates work.
Redsection wrote:Like an child who pulls at his mothers apron.

At least children know when to correctly use "an" verses "a."
Redsection wrote:Here you are, There are many others as well from the chineese goverment and from others.
(http://www.dailystormer.com/the-out-of- ... -debunked/)

I asked for research, not a blog.

I mean, if you're going to post a blog, post one that doesn't make you an even bigger joke by showing that you take blatantly racist blogs seriously.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:35 pm

Redsection wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:He says with no evidence.

You don't know what science is, do you?

Do you even grammar?

Tell me more about how he believes in pseudoscience that you've yet to refute with actual research.

Image


Ahh, I see your one of those people who try and deter others when you know that i am right,you point out minor errors and are to lazy to find anything on your own,Like an child who pulls at his mothers apron.

Here you are, There are many others as well from the chineese goverment and from others.
(http://www.dailystormer.com/the-out-of- ... -debunked/)

Oh, well if the "dailystormer" said it, it must be true.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Greater Fennoscandia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 141
Founded: Jun 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Fennoscandia » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:42 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:Isn't it quite obvious?

No. It requires a whole host of assumptions that seem more likely to happen in a generic movie about a dystopian future.
Greater Fennoscandia wrote: Before there were vast geographical and cultural distances that hindered completely free mixing.

There was no significant period in which this is true. Migration has been constant and retracing backwards has also been constant as well.
Greater Fennoscandia wrote: Removing those, what is there to cause different ethnicities to form at all? It is just a matter of time.

Again, you sound like you're lifting this stuff from the summary of a bad future sci-fi movie. Do you have any actual evidence based reasoning for this, or should I continue to consider this the equivalent to the ramblings of a random old guy on a street who screams "THE END COMETH!" when you pass by?


I'm only assuming evolution working. The characteristic differences of ethnicities have arisen from the populations being in different environments and adapting to them, for example "as populations migrated away from the tropics between 125,000 and 65,000 years ago into areas of low UV radiation,[8] they developed light skin pigmentation as an evolutionary selection acting against vitamin D depletion."
Getting around the globe in less than 24h hasn't been possible for long, and if everybody starts living in similar urban sprawls, the selection pressures will be similar, leading to one ethnicity.

There has been migrations before, resulting in the assimilation and mixing of the smaller group. It has never been possible on this scale and this speed.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Dogmeat, Harvanite, Tillania, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads