NATION

PASSWORD

Dating outside of your ethnicity

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:08 pm

Greater Fennoscandia wrote:
You are of course, but you seem to think this matters somehow?

It matters about as much as your ramblings about being free to hold your opinions/beliefs when I haven't seen any significant amount of people say anything otherwise.
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:By the way, never heard of the socratic method I assume if asking questions is somehow bad.

You've never heard of not attacking straw men, have you?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:10 pm

Greater Fennoscandia wrote:
Laerod wrote:Why doesn't anybody think about the poor racists and how this hurts their feelings? ;_;


Nice non sequitur man. You seem to think calling someone a racist is a trump card, after which you don't need to address anything they said in any way. Even the implication of someone being a racist has the same effect and when "racist" basically means anything you want it to mean, this whole exercise becomes even more ridiculous.

Generally speaking, preference for one "race" over the other is racist, though rather mild and hardly intolerable. People have personal preferences regarding whom their attracted to and subconscious, unintentional racism isn't inherently unethical behavior.

Continued whining about how you're the victim because people are calling it for what it is, however, is dipping into the reprehensible part of racism. People that celebrate their "race" and want to "preserve" their culture and ethnicity are typically conscious racists that deserve the condemnation they're complaining about.

User avatar
Greater Fennoscandia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 141
Founded: Jun 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Fennoscandia » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:25 pm

Mavorpen wrote:You've never heard of not attacking straw men, have you?


You never answered the questions, just "probably because I need to ask".
How did I misrepresent you?

Laerod wrote:
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:Generally speaking, preference for one "race" over the other is racist, though rather mild and hardly intolerable. People have personal preferences regarding whom their attracted to and subconscious, unintentional racism isn't inherently unethical behavior.

Continued whining about how you're the victim because people are calling it for what it is, however, is dipping into the reprehensible part of racism. People that celebrate their "race" and want to "preserve" their culture and ethnicity are typically conscious racists that deserve the condemnation they're complaining about.


I never whined about being a victim and you are making a lot of assumptions based on a few simple questions which you refused to answer.
I guess you would prefer a world with one, global mono- ethnicity and culture, which you are free to do.
However if I would prefer to preserve the worlds diversity, I'm somehow a "racist" now?
If you define racist in that way then I don't see anything wrong with it.

Can I ask you what is your definition of racism is? Also why it is bad? It obviously is, but if it is obvious, it should be easy to explain. We might have different reasons why racism is bad.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:28 pm

Greater Fennoscandia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:You've never heard of not attacking straw men, have you?


You never answered the questions, just "probably because I need to ask".
How did I misrepresent you?

You already answered the first question with the second question, and I answered the second question with "probably." The misrepresentation came from your claim that I argued that asking questions is bad. I did no such thing.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Filimons
Diplomat
 
Posts: 573
Founded: May 16, 2015
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Filimons » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:29 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Calimera II wrote:What do you mean?

Subconscious and unintentional racism is still racism.

In that case, I'm a subconscious and unintentional racist. :meh:
Last edited by Filimons on Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Das Publikum beklatscht ein Feuerwerk, aber keinen Sonnenaufgang.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:30 pm

Greater Fennoscandia wrote:However if I would prefer to preserve the worlds diversity, I'm somehow a "racist" now?
If you define racist in that way then I don't see anything wrong with it.

If this is true, then you would be AGAINST exclusion based on race, considering the most diversity is found within race and genetic diversity and variation increases with more reproduction between members of different populations.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Arumdaum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24546
Founded: Oct 21, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Arumdaum » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:31 pm

Filimons wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:Subconscious and unintentional racism is still racism.

In that case, I'm an subconscious and unintentional racist. :meh:

If you're against racism, recognizing racism within yourself is better than ignoring it.
LITERALLY UNLIKE ANY OTHER RP REGION & DON'T REPORT THIS SIG
█████████████████▌TIANDI ____________██____██
_______███▌MAP _______________██_____██_████████
█████████████████▌WIKI _______██______██___██____██
_______████ DISCORD ________██████___██____██______█

____████__████ SIGNUP _________██___████___██____
__████_______████_____________██______██__________██
████____________████_______█████████___███████████

User avatar
Filimons
Diplomat
 
Posts: 573
Founded: May 16, 2015
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Filimons » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:39 pm

Arumdaum wrote:
Filimons wrote:In that case, I'm an subconscious and unintentional racist. :meh:

If you're against racism, recognizing racism within yourself is better than ignoring it.

Fair enough but I don't think the fact that I only find white women attractive is of any importance to anyone else. Even if it is in fact “subconscious” and “unintentional” racism it doesn't harm anybody or at least that's what I think. ;)

Edit: Please excuse my grammatical mistake; I wrote “an subconscious” instead of “a subconscious”.
Last edited by Filimons on Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Das Publikum beklatscht ein Feuerwerk, aber keinen Sonnenaufgang.

User avatar
Joelyria
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 140
Founded: Jan 01, 2015
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Joelyria » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:40 pm

In response to the OP's question, yeah I would date anyone regardless of their ethnicity. Really, I hate it when people push that stupid idea that only people from the same race or community as each other should be together. It's an archaic and very ignorant way of thinking, and if I dare say on the internet, racist.

P.S. Sorry for the ranting. It just hit a nerve with me due to personal experiences.
Last edited by Joelyria on Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10904
Founded: May 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Romulan Republic » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:41 pm

Why not?

There's no reason other than racism.

Azorean Lands wrote:Would you have children with a person who isn't your ethnicity?


I have no particular inclination to have children at all, so probably not. But if you're asking weather I'm worried about keeping my race "pure", fuck no. If anything, I'd consider genetic diversity a good thing.

I personally don't think I would in theory, granted its hard to predict the future, but I'd like to have Portuguese children, hopefully from a Portuguese mother. Not even in racial related theory, I'd have as much trouble as raising half-Spanish children as I would some half-slavic kids.


Why?

For that matter, its interesting that you define children from another race as non-Portuguese. Does Portugal not allow people from racial minorities to be citizens? Because otherwise, you're arbitrarily defining weather someone is really Portuguese based on race, which is racist.

I'd like my children to be of the same heritage as me, having the same cultural group and the same past. I would hope my culture doesn't die out with me, hopefully preserving my lineage.
What about you?


Diversity and change are not inherently bad things. They're how human beings are more than one tribe of hunter-gatherers or something in Africa. For that matter, they're how humans exist at all (see the Theory of Evolution).
"Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we began by declaring that "all men are created equal." We now practically read it "all men are created equal, except negroes" When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read "all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics." When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty -- to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy." - President Abraham Lincoln.

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:46 pm

Mavorpen wrote:You are. And we're free to call you a bigot.

I'm a bigot. I prefer white men.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:47 pm

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:You are. And we're free to call you a bigot.

I'm a bigot. I prefer white men.

So that's why you never call.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:49 pm

Greater Fennoscandia wrote:I never whined about being a victim

This:
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:What is exactly wrong in wanting to preserve your culture and ethnicity?
I am led to believe this is racist now, according to this thread?
Am I not free to associate with anyone I wish?

Sounds pretty whiny, and like you think you're a victim.
I guess you would prefer a world with one, global mono- ethnicity and culture, which you are free to do.

I can't speak for Laerod, but I'm pretty certain that's not his point.
However if I would prefer to preserve the worlds diversity, I'm somehow a "racist" now?

I don't think he's talking about assimilation. I think his point is that people can be multi-racial and multi-ethnic. That's also diversity.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Lleu llaw Gyffes
Diplomat
 
Posts: 758
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Lleu llaw Gyffes » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:49 pm

I would prefer a White woman, but I am so desperate, that I will fuck any woman who wants me.

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:51 pm

Lleu llaw Gyffes wrote:I would prefer a White woman, but I am so desperate, that I will fuck any woman who wants me.

That's the sort of honesty I can somehow find it within myself to respect.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Greater Fennoscandia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 141
Founded: Jun 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Fennoscandia » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:53 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:
You never answered the questions, just "probably because I need to ask".
How did I misrepresent you?

You already answered the first question with the second question, and I answered the second question with "probably." The misrepresentation came from your claim that I argued that asking questions is bad. I did no such thing.


I'm losing you. If you don't write it out clearly, I can only assume what you mean after which you will again accuse me of strawmanning you.
Preserving my ethnicity and culture is racist according to you. Please explain why.

Mavorpen wrote:
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:However if I would prefer to preserve the worlds diversity, I'm somehow a "racist" now?
If you define racist in that way then I don't see anything wrong with it.

If this is true, then you would be AGAINST exclusion based on race, considering the most diversity is found within race and genetic diversity and variation increases with more reproduction between members of different populations.


Yes that is probably true, still would mean that different cultures and ethnicities would disappear even though the genetic diversity within the human species would be higher. So less cultural and ethnic diversity, more species wide diversity on a genetic level.

User avatar
Stadenwick
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1286
Founded: Mar 11, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Stadenwick » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:57 pm

I know this thread probably more focused in European and basically white people society, but if you want my opinion then I and my family didn't really give a flying care, and since I born and live in Southeast Asia this is a big deal sometime (We're Asian version of Balkan afterall, and ethnocentrism still hold strong due tradition).

But yea, who care, people are people after all. There's not really much difference between a Vietnamese and Portuguese. Beside we live in this world just to conceive a child and ensure our species to not go extinct
I'M A MEMBER OF THOUGHT CAFE
WE'RE THE AWESOMEST, COME CHECK US OUT
Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:
Stadenwick wrote:Did you just call me wicky?

Aye.

So yeah, feel free to call me that from now on.
Tracian Empire wrote:
Old Tyrannia wrote:Basically, Stadenwick is RPing as the Russian, Orthodox version of Mormonism and Deseret.

Something in that direction, with some anti-Pope stuff hidden in since he claims to be a new Ecumenical Patriarch.

That's why I don't like heresies. They need to be burned.
Mobile posting is cancer, and i do a lot of it. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:58 pm

Greater Fennoscandia wrote:I'm losing you. If you don't write it out clearly, I can only assume what you mean after which you will again accuse me of strawmanning you.

I did write it out clearly. It's not my fault you misinterpreted it.
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:Preserving my ethnicity and culture is racist according to you. Please explain why.

Except I didn't say that. I said probably.
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:Yes that is probably true, still would mean that different cultures and ethnicities would disappear

No it wouldn't. Pieces of history don't just up and disappear.
Greater Fennoscandia wrote: even though the genetic diversity within the human species would be higher. So less cultural and ethnic diversity, more species wide diversity on a genetic level.
Again, that's bullocks. All you'd get is new types of cultural and ethnic diversity.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Redsection
Minister
 
Posts: 2117
Founded: Jan 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Redsection » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:59 pm

Why further spoil my blood line, I'm already mixed with so many races,although none belong to the subsaharan ethnicities.
[*]National Syndicalist
[*]Soon to join the American Blackshirt Party
[*]Majority European, Native American ancestry, latino heritage
[*]Anti: Globalism , Communism , Nazism, Satanism
[*]Pro: Fascism, Guns Rights, Militias

User avatar
Greater Fennoscandia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 141
Founded: Jun 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Fennoscandia » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:00 pm

The Cobalt Sky wrote:
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:I never whined about being a victim

This:
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:What is exactly wrong in wanting to preserve your culture and ethnicity?
I am led to believe this is racist now, according to this thread?
Am I not free to associate with anyone I wish?

Sounds pretty whiny, and like you think you're a victim.
I guess you would prefer a world with one, global mono- ethnicity and culture, which you are free to do.

I can't speak for Laerod, but I'm pretty certain that's not his point.
However if I would prefer to preserve the worlds diversity, I'm somehow a "racist" now?

I don't think he's talking about assimilation. I think his point is that people can be multi-racial and multi-ethnic. That's also diversity.


I'm not really against other people having children with whomever they like, but if we did this on a large enough scale for long enough, a global monoethnicity would be inevitable. I just don't see why people would have a problem for me not to have children outside my ethnicity? Because people here clearly seem to have a problem with it.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:01 pm

Redsection wrote:Why further spoil my blood line, I'm already mixed with so many races,although none belong to the subsaharan ethnicities.

I'm pretty sure I could clear up that misconception for you with a DNA test.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Redsection
Minister
 
Posts: 2117
Founded: Jan 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Redsection » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:02 pm

Sun Wukong wrote:
Redsection wrote:Why further spoil my blood line, I'm already mixed with so many races,although none belong to the subsaharan ethnicities.

I'm pretty sure I could clear up that misconception for you with a DNA test.


Oh pish posh my good fellow, I've already had one. :rofl:
[*]National Syndicalist
[*]Soon to join the American Blackshirt Party
[*]Majority European, Native American ancestry, latino heritage
[*]Anti: Globalism , Communism , Nazism, Satanism
[*]Pro: Fascism, Guns Rights, Militias

User avatar
Greater Fennoscandia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 141
Founded: Jun 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Fennoscandia » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:03 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:I'm losing you. If you don't write it out clearly, I can only assume what you mean after which you will again accuse me of strawmanning you.

I did write it out clearly. It's not my fault you misinterpreted it.
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:Preserving my ethnicity and culture is racist according to you. Please explain why.

Except I didn't say that. I said probably.
Greater Fennoscandia wrote:Yes that is probably true, still would mean that different cultures and ethnicities would disappear

No it wouldn't. Pieces of history don't just up and disappear.
Greater Fennoscandia wrote: even though the genetic diversity within the human species would be higher. So less cultural and ethnic diversity, more species wide diversity on a genetic level.
Again, that's bullocks. All you'd get is new types of cultural and ethnic diversity.


One ethnicity is not less than the hundreds or thousands we have right now?

User avatar
The Cobalt Sky
Minister
 
Posts: 2009
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cobalt Sky » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:03 pm

Greater Fennoscandia wrote:I'm not really against other people having children with whomever they like, but if we did this on a large enough scale for long enough, a global monoethnicity would be inevitable.

No, it wouldn't. People can be multi-ethnic.
I just don't see why people would have a problem for me not to have children outside my ethnicity?

I don't have a problem with that, and I never said I did.

EDIT: I have a problem with you saying that having children with someone of another ethnicity somehow makes things less diverse.
Last edited by The Cobalt Sky on Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I TRY TO KEEP MY WILD ASSERTIONS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO HOLD OFF POSTING WITH THIS NATION UNTIL 2016

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:03 pm

Redsection wrote:
Sun Wukong wrote:I'm pretty sure I could clear up that misconception for you with a DNA test.


Oh pish posh my good fellow, I've already had one. :rofl:

That's not the type of DNA test he's referring to.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, American Legionaries, Atlantic Isles, Baja Calivada, Bovad, Breizh-Veur, Celritannia, Diarcesia, EuroStralia, Greater Miami Shores 3, In-dia, Jydara, Kerwa, Necroghastia, Pizza Friday Forever91, Shrillland, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Jamesian Republic, TheKeyToJoy, Transsibiria, Washington Resistance Army, Z-Zone 3

Advertisement

Remove ads