If they get the relevant paperwork together ahead of time, of course it does.
Advertisement

by Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:00 am

by Conserative Morality » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:00 am
Thessalonaik wrote:Two slavs living in Indonesia does not an Indonesian baby make

by Laerod » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:02 am
Thessalonaik wrote:Laerod wrote:That's... it? You're saying that population growth being nearly dead even between Brits and migrants is going to lead to Brits being whiped from existence. That's pretty foolish.
Gods know I'd rather be a wrong fool in this case but that birth parity is part of a trend - 92% of the country is responsible for less than half of all births whilst 8% is responsible for that 52%. This is going to get worse and worse as more immigrants arrive and set up more families ad infinitum; it's too much.
Migrationwatch is an independent and non-political thinktank; your trusted German newspaper is trusted by Krauts and left wingers. It's not quite guardian, bbc or independent.Laerod wrote:A far right lobby group on par with a trusted German newspaper? No.
Laerod wrote:Your statements about London though... not actually relevant. Particularly not when you attempt to extrapolate from a major metropolis to the UK as a whole.
So you got people warning that Yuros will go the way of dodos through mechanisms of mass immigration. The English are minorities as a result of mass immigration in their own capital city... This is irrelevant why? Because you say so? When you extrapolate from the juggernaut urban cityscape of London to all the other cities of the UK the same is happening.

by Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:02 am
by Wallenburg » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:08 am

by Russels Orbiting Teapot » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:11 am
Thessalonaik wrote:Only you can deny your children a Portuguese heritage by ensuring they're not Portuguese.

by Replevion » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:13 am
United West Afrika wrote:Replevion wrote:
This is the lie of the white devil, who has stolen our culture from us. You took us, changed our names, forced your religion upon us, your Western education, and now force your inferior white genetics upon us. Who is a person who abandons their culture? If you aren't owned by your culture, then you own no culture. You are a lonely phantom, without a history or a people, searching for a vessel to possess.
I mean, what you're basically saying is that it's acceptable for a white to date a black, so long as that black person acts like a white person. How preposterously chauvinistic! We are not your dolls, to be dressed up and played with! We are proud people with a history of our own, and we will not have it diluted and trivialized!

by Sierra Fraternity » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:13 am

by Replevion » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:13 am

by Imperializt Russia » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:14 am
Thessalonaik wrote:Laerod wrote:Your statements about London though... not actually relevant. Particularly not when you attempt to extrapolate from a major metropolis to the UK as a whole.
So you got people warning that Yuros will go the way of dodos through mechanisms of mass immigration. The English are minorities as a result of mass immigration in their own capital city... This is irrelevant why? Because you say so? When you extrapolate from the juggernaut urban cityscape of London to all the other cities of the UK the same is happening.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by The Krogan » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:16 am

by Laerod » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:16 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Thessalonaik wrote:So you got people warning that Yuros will go the way of dodos through mechanisms of mass immigration. The English are minorities as a result of mass immigration in their own capital city... This is irrelevant why? Because you say so? When you extrapolate from the juggernaut urban cityscape of London to all the other cities of the UK the same is happening.
Given that 59.5% of London (all) is White British, you're evidently incorrect.
http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablo ... land-wales
crtl+F for London, otherwise it's table line 247.

by Saiwania » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:23 am
The Cobalt Sky wrote:It seems you're uncomfortable with the term, then. You think than simply saying 'segregation is good,' is better than outright admitting you think all other races are awful.

by Thessalonaik » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:26 am
Laerod wrote:Congratulations on getting your wish? You've just completely misread that statistic. It's population increase, not births.
Nah it's fine sauerkraut is delicious and krauts are good engineersLaerod wrote:Ooh, pejoratives. I don't recall giving you K-word privileges.
Laerod wrote:Utterly different population dynamics and delusional misrepresentation of statistics for political purposes come to mind. And that's not even accounting for London being a megacity, which means its population dynamics aren't a sound basis for extrapolation to other metropolises.

by Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:29 am
Thessalonaik wrote:They'd be Indonesian in the sovereign sense, but not ethnic

by Russels Orbiting Teapot » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:30 am
Saiwania wrote:You'll never understand so there is no point in discussing this with you anymore. If I fathered a child with a woman outside of my race, my child would clearly have darker skin and I can't accept this. If I have a child from within my racial group, there is at least an overwhelming chance that they'll be the same race as me when born. You come across as telling me that every instance of same race pairings are bad because they must not think other races are good enough for them, when the alternative is having specific racial traits such as White skin go extinct or become so recessive that it almost never happens anymore.

by Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:32 am
Saiwania wrote:The Cobalt Sky wrote:It seems you're uncomfortable with the term, then. You think than simply saying 'segregation is good,' is better than outright admitting you think all other races are awful.
You'll never understand so there is no point in discussing this with you anymore. If I fathered a child with a woman outside of my race, my child would clearly have darker skin and I can't accept this. If I have a child from within my racial group, there is at least an overwhelming chance that they'll be the same race as me when born. You come across as telling me that every instance of same race pairings are bad because they must not think other races are good enough for them, when the alternative is having specific racial traits such as White skin go extinct or become so recessive that it almost never happens anymore.

by St Salvador » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:32 am

by Thessalonaik » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:34 am
Mavorpen wrote:Thessalonaik wrote:They'd be Indonesian in the sovereign sense, but not ethnic
Well, of course not. Newborns don't have an ethnicity, as that depends on culture. All they need to do is simply raise them within the culture.
Also, I'm not sure what you're reading, but I never said ethnicities don't exist. I was referring to race, which was the specific point being discussed.

by Anywhere Else But Here » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:35 am
Saiwania wrote:The Cobalt Sky wrote:It seems you're uncomfortable with the term, then. You think than simply saying 'segregation is good,' is better than outright admitting you think all other races are awful.
You'll never understand so there is no point in discussing this with you anymore. If I fathered a child with a woman outside of my race, my child would clearly have darker skin and I can't accept this. If I have a child from within my racial group, there is at least an overwhelming chance that they'll be the same race as me when born. You come across as telling me that every instance of same race pairings are bad because they must not think other races are good enough for them, when the alternative is having specific racial traits such as White skin go extinct or become so recessive that it almost never happens anymore.

by Mavorpen » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:35 am
Thessalonaik wrote:Culture does not change skin, skull, eye shape, eye colour, hair colour, skin colour, muscle composition or the presence of mongolian eye folds

by Thessalonaik » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:39 am

by Ashmoria » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:39 am
Azorean Lands wrote:Would you have children with a person who isn't your ethnicity?
I personally don't think I would in theory, granted its hard to predict the future, but I'd like to have Portuguese children, hopefully from a Portuguese mother. Not even in racial related theory, I'd have as much trouble as raising half-Spanish children as I would some half-slavic kids.
I'd like my children to be of the same heritage as me, having the same cultural group and the same past. I would hope my culture doesn't die out with me, hopefully preserving my lineage.
What about you?

by United West Afrika » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:41 am
Conserative Morality wrote:United West Afrika wrote:This is the lie of the white devil, who has stolen our culture from us. You took us, changed our names, forced your religion upon us, your Western education, and now force your inferior white genetics upon us. Who is a person who abandons their culture? If you aren't owned by your culture, then you own no culture. You are a lonely phantom, without a history or a people, searching for a vessel to possess.
That can go fuck off. This is the modern world - people have independent agency with which to make choices without social approval.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Dogmeat, Harvanite, The Huskar Social Union, Tillania, Yasuragi
Advertisement