14 million people in 2009 alone.
Advertisement


by Llamalandia » Sun Jun 07, 2015 3:14 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Llamalandia wrote:Ok so wait why not, cause I don't get it.
Suggesting there is a sliding scale at which point certain levels of violence become acceptable (or "more" acceptable) legitimises the use of those levels of violence.
I'm sure you're going to tell me that spousal homicide or domestic abuse are neither acceptable nor "partly acceptable".
So why put them on a sliding scale of understandable violent reactions?
They should not feature on that scale. From a logical perspective, they don't.

by Sociobiology » Sun Jun 07, 2015 6:35 pm
Grinning Dragon wrote:The other issue to his proposal and implementation would the be elimination/repeal of the 2nd Amendment and every state that has a 2nd Amendment equivalent in their state constitutions, just to even get the ball rolling on implementing his idea.
Just recently D.C. has had their bullshit stipulations on firearms struck down. State by state, city by city these types of 2nd Amendment Right delay tactics are being struck down and rightfully so.

by Sociobiology » Sun Jun 07, 2015 6:38 pm
Spirit of Hope wrote:Tule wrote:
1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deer%E2%80 ... collisions
I've already linked to the FBI for statistics for 2013 that show the number of burglary related deaths.
2) I don't have a problem with people owning guns for hunting. I have a problem with average middle-class people owning guns for protection, because it's an oxymoron. You aren't protecting yourself, you're arming the people most likely to murder you.
The BJS puts defensive gun uses at 338,700. It isn't an oxymoron if you consider more situations than just home invasion.

by Spirit of Hope » Sun Jun 07, 2015 6:58 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Grinning Dragon » Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:22 am
Sociobiology wrote:Grinning Dragon wrote:The other issue to his proposal and implementation would the be elimination/repeal of the 2nd Amendment and every state that has a 2nd Amendment equivalent in their state constitutions, just to even get the ball rolling on implementing his idea.
Just recently D.C. has had their bullshit stipulations on firearms struck down. State by state, city by city these types of 2nd Amendment Right delay tactics are being struck down and rightfully so.
several states already require permits for handgun purchases, and in many cases those permits are a lot harder to get than mine.
As long as the general permit is shall issue, it does not violate the constitution.

by Sociobiology » Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:37 am
Grinning Dragon wrote:Sociobiology wrote:several states already require permits for handgun purchases, and in many cases those permits are a lot harder to get than mine.
As long as the general permit is shall issue, it does not violate the constitution.
My home state of Minnesota required a permit to purchase a handgun from an FFL, between two private individuals it wasn't required. Now mind you the last time I was in Minnesota and purchased a handgun was in the 1990's and the law may have been changed since then. Minnesota has always been a bit nanny state-ish, glad I moved away from that fucking state.

by Llamalandia » Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:36 pm
Sociobiology wrote:Grinning Dragon wrote:
My home state of Minnesota required a permit to purchase a handgun from an FFL, between two private individuals it wasn't required. Now mind you the last time I was in Minnesota and purchased a handgun was in the 1990's and the law may have been changed since then. Minnesota has always been a bit nanny state-ish, glad I moved away from that fucking state.
almost no states truly regulate private sales, which would be the problem.

by Imperializt Russia » Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:41 pm
Llamalandia wrote:Sociobiology wrote:almost no states truly regulate private sales, which would be the problem.
Iwonder how large o a problem problem private sales actually are though. I mean, aside from people who are already in illegal possession of a weapon selling it to someone else. I mean how many legal guns are illegally diverted this way, vs criminals just using straw purchases or the like to obtain otherwise legal firearms.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Spirit of Hope » Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:49 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Llamalandia wrote:
Iwonder how large o a problem problem private sales actually are though. I mean, aside from people who are already in illegal possession of a weapon selling it to someone else. I mean how many legal guns are illegally diverted this way, vs criminals just using straw purchases or the like to obtain otherwise legal firearms.
In 1991, participants of the BJS Inmate Survey stated where they had acquired firearms from. 27% bought from a retail outlet, so a commercial purchase. 9% of inmates who had used or carried a firearm reported having stolen that firearm personally.
Meanwhile, 31% of inmates reported they "got" their firearm from a family member or a friend. 28% acquired it from the black market, from a drug dealer, or from a fence.
5% described it as "other".
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Imperializt Russia » Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:58 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Spirit of Hope » Thu Jun 11, 2015 3:37 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Something I've just spotted for the first time, 1% of survey respondents in the 1991 study (approximately 2100 respondents comprise this 1%) report using a "military style weapon" in a crime. Military-style weapon being classified as, for example, Uzi, AK, AR-15/M16.
The AWB targeted weapons that accounted for 1% of crime.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Patridam » Thu Jun 11, 2015 3:52 pm

by Spirit of Hope » Thu Jun 11, 2015 3:55 pm
Patridam wrote:My question is, do those 'bought from family or friends' statistics also include staw sales by means of said family/friends? Or are those sorted under retail sales as well?
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Llamalandia » Thu Jun 11, 2015 3:57 pm
Spirit of Hope wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:In 1991, participants of the BJS Inmate Survey stated where they had acquired firearms from. 27% bought from a retail outlet, so a commercial purchase. 9% of inmates who had used or carried a firearm reported having stolen that firearm personally.
Meanwhile, 31% of inmates reported they "got" their firearm from a family member or a friend. 28% acquired it from the black market, from a drug dealer, or from a fence.
5% described it as "other".
BJS Study 2001
Based on 1997 and 1991 surveys of inmates.
Retail Store: 8.3 (1997) 14.7 (1991)
Pawnshop: 3.8 (1997) 4.2 (1991)
Gun show 0.7 (1997) 0.6 (1991)
Street/illegal source 39.2 (1997) 40.8 (1991)
Friends or family 39.6 (1997) 33.8 (1991)
I'm not disputing IR's numbers, his have details mine don't I'm just including some other ones to be looked at. Overall though it doesn't look like that many firearms go from legal owners to illegal owners/users through "clean" private sales.
EDIT: I apparently linked to the wrong study. Here is the right one.

by Patridam » Thu Jun 11, 2015 3:58 pm
Spirit of Hope wrote:Patridam wrote:My question is, do those 'bought from family or friends' statistics also include staw sales by means of said family/friends? Or are those sorted under retail sales as well?
I would imagine they include straw purchases in "family and friends." Retail likely means they purchased it themselves directly from the retailer.

by Diopolis » Thu Jun 11, 2015 4:00 pm
Sociobiology wrote:Grinning Dragon wrote:The other issue to his proposal and implementation would the be elimination/repeal of the 2nd Amendment and every state that has a 2nd Amendment equivalent in their state constitutions, just to even get the ball rolling on implementing his idea.
Just recently D.C. has had their bullshit stipulations on firearms struck down. State by state, city by city these types of 2nd Amendment Right delay tactics are being struck down and rightfully so.
several states already require permits for handgun purchases, and in many cases those permits are a lot harder to get than mine.
As long as the general permit is shall issue, it does not violate the constitution.

by Spirit of Hope » Thu Jun 11, 2015 4:03 pm
Llamalandia wrote:Spirit of Hope wrote:BJS Study 2001
Based on 1997 and 1991 surveys of inmates.
Retail Store: 8.3 (1997) 14.7 (1991)
Pawnshop: 3.8 (1997) 4.2 (1991)
Gun show 0.7 (1997) 0.6 (1991)
Street/illegal source 39.2 (1997) 40.8 (1991)
Friends or family 39.6 (1997) 33.8 (1991)
I'm not disputing IR's numbers, his have details mine don't I'm just including some other ones to be looked at. Overall though it doesn't look like that many firearms go from legal owners to illegal owners/users through "clean" private sales.
EDIT: I apparently linked to the wrong study. Here is the right one.
Well what we really need to know anyway is did the peoe have a felony on record before they obtained the gun from a friend relative via private sale? That is the relevant number here as a permit system even if applied to all private sales wouldn't do anything to prevent someone with a clean record from buying a gun from their brother and then killing someone.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Llamalandia » Thu Jun 11, 2015 4:04 pm
Diopolis wrote:Sociobiology wrote:several states already require permits for handgun purchases, and in many cases those permits are a lot harder to get than mine.
As long as the general permit is shall issue, it does not violate the constitution.
The permits he's talking about are not shall-issue, however. And you seem to be unique among serious GCA's in that you acknowledge the need for a shall-issue system, rather than running away screaming from one and then making up or taking out of context "facts" to make it look bad.

by Diopolis » Thu Jun 11, 2015 4:08 pm
Llamalandia wrote:Diopolis wrote:The permits he's talking about are not shall-issue, however. And you seem to be unique among serious GCA's in that you acknowledge the need for a shall-issue system, rather than running away screaming from one and then making up or taking out of context "facts" to make it look bad.
Yeah I mean I don't a hundred percent agree with how sociobiology system would be implemented but you have to admit he is for a gca a rather remarkable And reasonable person with whom pro 2nd amendment folks can dialogue with in a constructive. Now if only people like him weren't so rare among gca maybe something could actually get done to make America safer without infringing gun owner rights and liberties.

by Gun Manufacturers » Thu Jun 11, 2015 4:41 pm
Diopolis wrote:Llamalandia wrote:
Yeah I mean I don't a hundred percent agree with how sociobiology system would be implemented but you have to admit he is for a gca a rather remarkable And reasonable person with whom pro 2nd amendment folks can dialogue with in a constructive. Now if only people like him weren't so rare among gca maybe something could actually get done to make America safer without infringing gun owner rights and liberties.
Like I said, before having a conversation about guns, spend an hour at the shooting range. You don't even have to buy a gun; most will let you rent one as long as you don't take it off their property. Maybe if people bothered to do that, we could have a conversation instead of trying to do useless things. Part of that is the fault of the gun rights lobby, of course, as relatively moderate gun rights groups kick out the moderates and refuse to have any conversation either. Still, it behooves GCA's to at least try to learn what they're regulating.
Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...
Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo
Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.
Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

by Haktiva » Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:49 pm

by Gautlund » Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:54 pm


by Haktiva » Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:56 pm
Gautlund wrote:
Het
Is actually Romanian WASR, so not technically an AK or Russian.....but that's a little pet peeve I have when it comes to AK-patterned rifle. But 922r laws basically make it half-American. Once I get the new Magpul stock and handguard, it will be all American parts and thus a naturalized American
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Enaia, Lurinsk, Sarolandia, Valrifall, Valyxias, Vivida Vis Animi
Advertisement