NATION

PASSWORD

Marriage Now Fabulous, SCOTUS Rules for Same Sex Marriage

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Jul 04, 2015 12:04 am

May Mays wrote:But guess what?

God is a fraud. A big fraud!

Oops cat's out of the bag.

Even if God existed, the Bible would still be bullshit because the only people that wrote it were just that - normal people.

Oh yeah? Explain bananas, then.

Christians: 1 banana
Atheists: 0 banana
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Sat Jul 04, 2015 12:06 am

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
May Mays wrote:But guess what?

God is a fraud. A big fraud!

Oops cat's out of the bag.

Even if God existed, the Bible would still be bullshit because the only people that wrote it were just that - normal people.

Oh yeah? Explain bananas, then.

Christians: 1 banana
Atheists: 0 banana

The Monkey King demands Christians forfeit their banana!
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Jul 04, 2015 12:07 am

Sun Wukong wrote:The Monkey King demands Christians forfeit their banana!

But the angels take the banana back, for GOD!
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Sat Jul 04, 2015 12:08 am

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Sun Wukong wrote:The Monkey King demands Christians forfeit their banana!

But the angels take the banana back, for GOD!

Oh it's on now!

Havoc in Heaven II: The Havocing
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72160
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sat Jul 04, 2015 12:49 am

I'm just waiting for Texas or Louisiana to raise the bar, and require fertility testing and proof of reproductive capability before they'll issue a marriage license to shortcut those arguments about other nonfertile people they allow to marry.

Then the follow up court ruling which begins "Are you daft? NO."
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Maineiacs
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7316
Founded: May 26, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Maineiacs » Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:10 am

May Mays wrote:But guess what?

God is a fraud. A big fraud!

Oops cat's out of the bag.

Even if God existed, the Bible would still be bullshit because the only people that wrote it were just that - normal people.



Worse than that, they were people with an agenda.
Economic:-8.12 Social:-7.59 Moral Rules:5 Moral Order:-5
Muravyets: Maineiacs, you are brilliant, too! I stand in delighted awe.
Sane Outcasts:When your best case scenario is five kilometers of nuclear contamination, you know someone fucked up.
Geniasis: Christian values are incompatible with Conservative ideals. I cannot both follow the teachings of Christ and be a Republican. Therefore, I choose to not be a Republican.
Galloism: If someone will build a wall around Donald Trump, I'll pay for it.
Bottle tells it like it is
add 6,928 to post count

User avatar
New Jordslag
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10463
Founded: Sep 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Jordslag » Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:23 am

Sun Wukong wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:But the angels take the banana back, for GOD!

Oh it's on now!

Havoc in Heaven II: The Havocing

God vs the Monkey King, fighting over the glorious Christian Banana. Who will win?

Sun Wukong wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Who did, then? Was God's plan... *gasp* flawed?

He was going through a weird phase when he made the Hyenas.

He had another weird phase later in which he made Bonobos.
My favorite games are the Pokemon Games. Shoot me a TG if you want to talk about them.
Don't worry! It's all just a tall tale, okay?
Favorite Ecchi Fan of Lith and Self-Proclaimed Pokemon King of NS.
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
New Jordslag wrote:Then we can have another New York. No such thing as too many New Yorks.


And somewhere in New York, Big Jim P gets a cold shudder down his spine.

User avatar
Maineiacs
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7316
Founded: May 26, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Maineiacs » Sat Jul 04, 2015 6:23 pm

New Jordslag wrote:He had another weird phase later in which he made Bonobos.



"You know, I really didn't make chimps horny enough..."
Economic:-8.12 Social:-7.59 Moral Rules:5 Moral Order:-5
Muravyets: Maineiacs, you are brilliant, too! I stand in delighted awe.
Sane Outcasts:When your best case scenario is five kilometers of nuclear contamination, you know someone fucked up.
Geniasis: Christian values are incompatible with Conservative ideals. I cannot both follow the teachings of Christ and be a Republican. Therefore, I choose to not be a Republican.
Galloism: If someone will build a wall around Donald Trump, I'll pay for it.
Bottle tells it like it is
add 6,928 to post count

User avatar
Seno Zhou Varada
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6027
Founded: Feb 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Seno Zhou Varada » Sat Jul 04, 2015 8:13 pm

I just noticed this thread. My inside feelings were... uhm... how do I explain this... F*CK YEAH! Along with a tingly sensation of warmth.

Seriously this is amazing. Congrats to those able to marry due to this!
Political Compass: Economic: -8.88 Social: -9.54
Libertarian Socialist with Anarcho-Communist Leanings
Still dirty commie, shower is currently being collectivised.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jul 04, 2015 8:30 pm

Larthinia wrote:
New Jordslag wrote:That's absolute bullshit. Homosexual behavior among Animals has been observed in nature, even among the Chimps we are descended from. Homosexuality is a natural thing, so the next time anybody wants to say 'Oh, Homosexuals weren't born that way!', no. They were. It is an irreplaceable part of them. It is their nature. So if we're going by the God, thing, it would very much seem that God did, in fact, place Homosexuality into Nature on purpose.

God didn't create us to live our lives in Black and White lines. Not all men have to be men, and not all girls have to be Girls. God loves them the same no matter what they do. God is accepting, and if He were to walk on this earth, he would be very much accepting of his Trans and Gay followers. He would love and accept them for who they are, for he is God, and God is kind to all.

And, you know, there have been so many Homophobes here saying "Oh, I'm fine with Homosexuals, but they just can't get married, or adopt kids, or display their affection, or any of that other live stuff that Heterosexual Couples are certainly entitled to!" It's enough. Do you not want the gays to display affection in Public? Well, the Heterosexuals might as well be forced to do so as well. Can't get married? Well, it would be only fair if we banned Homosexuals from getting married too. Can't adopt Children? Well, we might as well apply the same to Heterosexuals, and let the Orphans rot. Yep. How much would you like it, if you're unable to even show your love for the person you love? You cannot say you support Gay equal rights and oppose Gay public affection and be intellectually honest in doing so.


God did NOT place homosexuality in nature. Read the Bible if you are so informed.

Ah I've found your problem.
You get your information from fairytale stories instead of the real world.
I'd prescribe READING A FUCKING SCIENCE BOOK.
Call me if your problem persists.
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
Seno Zhou Varada
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6027
Founded: Feb 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Seno Zhou Varada » Sat Jul 04, 2015 8:43 pm

Larthinia wrote:
New Jordslag wrote:That's absolute bullshit. Homosexual behavior among Animals has been observed in nature, even among the Chimps we are descended from. Homosexuality is a natural thing, so the next time anybody wants to say 'Oh, Homosexuals weren't born that way!', no. They were. It is an irreplaceable part of them. It is their nature. So if we're going by the God, thing, it would very much seem that God did, in fact, place Homosexuality into Nature on purpose.

God didn't create us to live our lives in Black and White lines. Not all men have to be men, and not all girls have to be Girls. God loves them the same no matter what they do. God is accepting, and if He were to walk on this earth, he would be very much accepting of his Trans and Gay followers. He would love and accept them for who they are, for he is God, and God is kind to all.

And, you know, there have been so many Homophobes here saying "Oh, I'm fine with Homosexuals, but they just can't get married, or adopt kids, or display their affection, or any of that other live stuff that Heterosexual Couples are certainly entitled to!" It's enough. Do you not want the gays to display affection in Public? Well, the Heterosexuals might as well be forced to do so as well. Can't get married? Well, it would be only fair if we banned Homosexuals from getting married too. Can't adopt Children? Well, we might as well apply the same to Heterosexuals, and let the Orphans rot. Yep. How much would you like it, if you're unable to even show your love for the person you love? You cannot say you support Gay equal rights and oppose Gay public affection and be intellectually honest in doing so.


God did NOT place homosexuality in nature. Read the Bible if you are so informed.

Then tell me one thing if YOUR so informed. Why does it exist?
Political Compass: Economic: -8.88 Social: -9.54
Libertarian Socialist with Anarcho-Communist Leanings
Still dirty commie, shower is currently being collectivised.

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Sat Jul 04, 2015 8:49 pm

Larthinia wrote:
New Jordslag wrote:That's absolute bullshit. Homosexual behavior among Animals has been observed in nature, even among the Chimps we are descended from. Homosexuality is a natural thing, so the next time anybody wants to say 'Oh, Homosexuals weren't born that way!', no. They were. It is an irreplaceable part of them. It is their nature. So if we're going by the God, thing, it would very much seem that God did, in fact, place Homosexuality into Nature on purpose.

God didn't create us to live our lives in Black and White lines. Not all men have to be men, and not all girls have to be Girls. God loves them the same no matter what they do. God is accepting, and if He were to walk on this earth, he would be very much accepting of his Trans and Gay followers. He would love and accept them for who they are, for he is God, and God is kind to all.

And, you know, there have been so many Homophobes here saying "Oh, I'm fine with Homosexuals, but they just can't get married, or adopt kids, or display their affection, or any of that other live stuff that Heterosexual Couples are certainly entitled to!" It's enough. Do you not want the gays to display affection in Public? Well, the Heterosexuals might as well be forced to do so as well. Can't get married? Well, it would be only fair if we banned Homosexuals from getting married too. Can't adopt Children? Well, we might as well apply the same to Heterosexuals, and let the Orphans rot. Yep. How much would you like it, if you're unable to even show your love for the person you love? You cannot say you support Gay equal rights and oppose Gay public affection and be intellectually honest in doing so.


God did NOT place homosexuality in nature. Read the Bible if you are so informed.


The bible is not meant to be taken sacrosanct. The bible is a long book, written over the course of many centuries, written by many different people. The book spans the history of Ancient Israel, fabricated stories that are meant to teach us metaphors for life, and any book such as the Bible will inevitably contain old, middle aged morals. These morals are not to be taken literally, and I guarantee that you yourself do not take these morals taught in the bible literally. To do so would be insane, a book which really teaches lessons, stories, and lays the foundation for a religion is not something to be taken literally.

I've taken bible classes, scripture classes, and talked with rabbis and priests alike. I think they can agree with the consensus that the bible is a book, not a rulebook.

I'm down with christianity, for the most part. But, when fundamentalists act as if they have to shove their own flawed moral compass down the throats of others, I just hang my head in disappointment.
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202532
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Jul 04, 2015 8:58 pm

Galloism wrote:I'm just waiting for Texas or Louisiana to raise the bar, and require fertility testing and proof of reproductive capability before they'll issue a marriage license to shortcut those arguments about other nonfertile people they allow to marry.

Then the follow up court ruling which begins "Are you daft? NO."


That's something I never get. When the question of reproduction is used to justify discrimination against a group. Being gay or lesbian doesn't mean you're incapable of reproducing or unwilling to. Being gay doesn't make you automatically infertile/sterile.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Sat Jul 04, 2015 8:59 pm

Galloism wrote:I'm just waiting for Texas or Louisiana to raise the bar, and require fertility testing and proof of reproductive capability before they'll issue a marriage license to shortcut those arguments about other nonfertile people they allow to marry.

Then the follow up court ruling which begins "Are you daft? NO."

They'll ban IVF too, I suppose.

User avatar
The Orson Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31400
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Orson Empire » Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:05 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Galloism wrote:I'm just waiting for Texas or Louisiana to raise the bar, and require fertility testing and proof of reproductive capability before they'll issue a marriage license to shortcut those arguments about other nonfertile people they allow to marry.

Then the follow up court ruling which begins "Are you daft? NO."


That's something I never get. When the question of reproduction is used to justify discrimination against a group. Being gay or lesbian doesn't mean you're incapable of reproducing or unwilling to. Being gay doesn't make you automatically infertile/sterile.

It never ceases to amaze me at how far people will go to discriminate against a minority group.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202532
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:06 pm

The Orson Empire wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
That's something I never get. When the question of reproduction is used to justify discrimination against a group. Being gay or lesbian doesn't mean you're incapable of reproducing or unwilling to. Being gay doesn't make you automatically infertile/sterile.

It never ceases to amaze me at how far people will go to discriminate against a minority group.


I know, right?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:09 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
The Orson Empire wrote:It never ceases to amaze me at how far people will go to discriminate against a minority group.

I know, right?

The enthusiasm some put into it is a bit disturbing at times.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
The Orson Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31400
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Orson Empire » Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:09 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
The Orson Empire wrote:It never ceases to amaze me at how far people will go to discriminate against a minority group.


I know, right?

I just don't understand the mindset of these people. Why the hell do they even care if someone is gay or not? It's not affecting your life.

I guess it has to do with the fact that they have lost power over a minority group. Religion is unfortunately being used to justify this control.
Last edited by The Orson Empire on Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41580
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:10 pm

Seno Zhou Varada wrote:
Larthinia wrote:
God did NOT place homosexuality in nature. Read the Bible if you are so informed.

Then tell me one thing if YOUR so informed. Why does it exist?

What happens when you ask these questions to someone in a lab coat instead of a robe:
If a certain trait or behavior is detrimental to the reproductive success, or fitness, of an organism, you wouldn’t expect it to persist in the population as natural selection should get rid of it. After all, the aim of the reproductive game is to keep your genes going. Why, then, do members of the same sex cop off with each other in so many species? And we’re not just talking about homosexual behaviors (observed in more than 1,500 species, since you asked); we mean the whole shebang.

Scientists have long pondered this and have struggled to come to any consensus. Although there are a few different ideas, two prevailing hypotheses that resulted from theoretical work suggest that same-sex sexual behaviors (SSB) could persist for two reasons: overdominance and sexual antagonism. The former proposes that SSB could persist in the population if genes for this behavior confer a harmonizing reproductive advantage in individuals only possessing one copy of the gene, or heterozygotes, as opposed to those in possession of two (homozygotes). The latter suggests that a gene that is detrimental to fitness in one sex could be maintained so long as it is beneficial to the other sex.
...
The final stage of the investigation involved performing experimental crosses of flies from both of these identified lines and examining the resulting offspring. More specifically, they wanted to see whether coming from a genetic background associated with high levels of SSB affected reproductive rates in female offspring.

The researchers found that while their data lent more weight to the overdominance hypothesis, their results did not exclusively support one over the other. In fact, they think that both could be contributing to the maintenance of SSB in the gene pool. But that wasn’t the most interesting find of the study: Males with a genetic makeup associated with high levels of SSB produced female offspring with higher rates of reproduction, or fecundity. This suggests that genes associated with SSB could be persisting in the population because they actually confer a fitness advantage in females, despite being reproductively harmful to males.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202532
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:10 pm

The Orson Empire wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
I know, right?

I just don't understand the mindset of these people. Why the hell do they even care if someone is gay or not? It's not affecting your life.

I guess it has to do with the fact that they have lost power over a minority group. Religion is unfortunately being used to justify this control.


That may be a big part of it. Also, to be a bigot, many do not need much of an incentive.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202532
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:13 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:I know, right?

The enthusiasm some put into it is a bit disturbing at times.


Enthusiastically hating, that's what I call it.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
The Orson Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31400
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Orson Empire » Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:17 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
The Orson Empire wrote:I just don't understand the mindset of these people. Why the hell do they even care if someone is gay or not? It's not affecting your life.

I guess it has to do with the fact that they have lost power over a minority group. Religion is unfortunately being used to justify this control.


That may be a big part of it. Also, to be a bigot, many do not need much of an incentive.

Indeed. Also, religion has been used to justify some of the most atrocious acts committed in human history. This doesn't mean religion is inherently bad- religion is, unfortunately, easy to use to justify these horrific acts, as religion is something that the masses can agree on. Political ideology can also have similar effects.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202532
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:18 pm

The Orson Empire wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
That may be a big part of it. Also, to be a bigot, many do not need much of an incentive.

Indeed. Also, religion has been used to justify some of the most atrocious acts committed in human history. This doesn't mean religion is inherently bad- religion is, unfortunately, easy to use to justify these horrific acts, as religion is something that the masses can agree on. Political ideology can also have similar effects.


Can't disagree there.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:20 pm

The Orson Empire wrote:Indeed. Also, religion has been used to justify some of the most atrocious acts committed in human history. This doesn't mean religion is inherently bad...

No, but it is inherently illogical/irrational.

But that isn't the topic.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
The Orson Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31400
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Orson Empire » Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:23 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
The Orson Empire wrote:Indeed. Also, religion has been used to justify some of the most atrocious acts committed in human history. This doesn't mean religion is inherently bad- religion is, unfortunately, easy to use to justify these horrific acts, as religion is something that the masses can agree on. Political ideology can also have similar effects.


Can't disagree there.

Furthermore, certain doctrines of Christianity (particularly Fundamentalism) have convinced their followers that homosexuality is an abomination, and this has translated into homosexuals themselves not being viewed as equals to heterosexuals. Essentially, they are de-humanizing homosexuals and making it seem like homosexuals are some kind of subhuman vermin.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Kitsuva, The Grand Duchy of Muscovy, Ubecc, Washington Resistance Army, Yets New

Advertisement

Remove ads