Purple?
Advertisement

by Jute » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:25 am
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Jute » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:26 am
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Furry Alairia and Algeria » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:26 am

by Jute » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:27 am

Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Kiruri » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:27 am


by Gallade » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:28 am

by Ava Ire » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:28 am
"Down to Gehenna or up to the Throne, he travels the fastest who travels alone." ~

by Jute » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:28 am
Forsher wrote:Jute wrote:Huh, I never thought about it that way.
Imagine that for several months (in fact, I believe, the better part of a year) the same half or dozen or so posters spend page after page after page on largely the same emotive topic that tends to attract trolls that adopt extreme views from both ends of the continuum (if such a word makes sense) and this same core of posters experiences very little in terms of the stance that they take. Now, do you think, in those circumstances, that views on why things are done and how they are done will develop? They sort of have to. Even once you start making things way too personal you run out of rationales pretty quickly and half the argument is how it's posted. Things got messy. And pretty much only stopped when one of the ideological positions left the site en masse for unrelated reasons.
The point is, you spend enough time doing something, you either stop doing it or get a lot more philosophical about what is going on. Lurkers is what struck me because I am unwilling to let go of the sides mentality. That approach works for other people.
My views on lurkers also overlap substantially with my views on the nature of the forum itself (see earlier tonight when we were discussing NS's trans community a few pages back) which is why you get: "Today's lurker is tomorrow's poster."
Another way of looking at it that I came across when I was trying to find an approximate genesis/better expression of the idea is this:SuperHappySmileyWorld wrote:Speaking as someone who learned the basis of debate from the movie 'Thank you for smoking', I believe this relative has a more juvenile form of the argument style perfected in that movie.
Namely, 'I don't have to be right, you have to be wrong, and if you are wrong, then I am right'
Who does the judging is not explained in this way of thinking about things (I believe we accepted that was the audience in that thread, which I'd equate to lurkers) but it's a neat idea.
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Furry Alairia and Algeria » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:28 am
Gallade wrote:Is there a colour for "this is F7 material"?

by Gallade » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:31 am
Kiruri wrote:Gallade wrote:I got mixed up for a second there, too. Xe is he/her, xir is his/hers/him/her. Still, those who identify as they seem content with they; that's all that matters.
My brain hurts now :S
I just use he or she and await correction if I've made any mistake. After that I use whichever term the person has indicated. It works out for me though I usually get corrected after I've know the person for a little while, usually not when we first meet. I would prefer to get corrected right away though :p

by Italios » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:31 am
Gallade wrote:Is there a colour for "this is F7 material"?

by Charlia » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:32 am

by Gallade » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:32 am

by Italios » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:32 am
Gallade wrote:Kiruri wrote:
My brain hurts now :S
I just use he or she and await correction if I've made any mistake. After that I use whichever term the person has indicated. It works out for me though I usually get corrected after I've know the person for a little while, usually not when we first meet. I would prefer to get corrected right away though
I start with they and wait for clarification, myself. Removes potential butthurt scenarios. Mostly "I'M A GIRL OMFGGGGGGGGGGGG"

by The Lendol Archipelago » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:33 am
Charlia wrote:Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:Maroon Your Honor.
Objection!
Your honor, the defendant clearly has no idea what he's talking about. The 'this is F7 material' color would obviously be a bizarre amalgamation of neon colors that should never have been put together but somehow manage to look interesting, liberally sprinkled with glitter.

by Jute » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:33 am
Gallade wrote:Kiruri wrote:
My brain hurts now :S
I just use he or she and await correction if I've made any mistake. After that I use whichever term the person has indicated. It works out for me though I usually get corrected after I've know the person for a little while, usually not when we first meet. I would prefer to get corrected right away though
I start with they and wait for clarification, myself. Removes potential butthurt scenarios. Mostly "I'M A GIRL OMFGGGGGGGGGGGG"
)Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Furry Alairia and Algeria » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:34 am

by Kiruri » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:34 am
Gallade wrote:Kiruri wrote:
My brain hurts now :S
I just use he or she and await correction if I've made any mistake. After that I use whichever term the person has indicated. It works out for me though I usually get corrected after I've know the person for a little while, usually not when we first meet. I would prefer to get corrected right away though
I start with they and wait for clarification, myself. Removes potential butthurt scenarios. Mostly "I'M A GIRL OMFGGGGGGGGGGGG"


by The Serbian Empire » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:34 am
Gallade wrote:Is there a colour for "this is F7 material"?

by Lordieth » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:36 am

by Furry Alairia and Algeria » Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:36 am
Charlia wrote:Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:Maroon Your Honor.
Objection!
Your honor, the defendant clearly has no idea what he's talking about. The 'this is F7 material' color would obviously be a bizarre amalgamation of neon colors that should never have been put together but somehow manage to look interesting, liberally sprinkled with glitter.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arikea, EuroStralia, Ifreann, Jahnusy, Oisungur, Rary, Safiloa, United Jahnusy, Unitria, Vassenor, Wingdings
Advertisement