NATION

PASSWORD

2015 Canadian Election

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who will you vote for in the federal election?

Conservative (Stephen Harper)
156
30%
Liberal (Justin Trudeau)
117
23%
NDP (Thomas Mulcair)
132
25%
Green Party (Elizabeth May)
25
5%
Bloc Québécois (Gilles Duceppe)
25
5%
Other party please specify
11
2%
Undecided
9
2%
I'm not voting
44
8%
 
Total votes : 519

User avatar
Lovable Alien Overlord
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 123
Founded: Apr 16, 2015
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Lovable Alien Overlord » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:08 pm

Fanosolia wrote:
Nation of Quebec wrote:
Yeah, it's hard to take Harper seriously when he's been leading us into another recession, never balanced a budget, ruined Canada's reputation on the world stage, and left behind a partisan swamp of corruption and scandal. I'm not sure why you'd call that "not breaking anything".

Perhaps the Libertarian party might be a good party for the dissatisfied Conservative if they can't support the NDP or Liberals.


Don't forget about progressive canada.

Actually, I'd like to make my vote count. I'm not going to vote for joke parties.

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:11 pm

Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:
Fanosolia wrote:
Don't forget about progressive canada.

Actually, I'd like to make my vote count. I'm not going to vote for joke parties.


... :rofl: I'm not getting into some kind of flimsy debate, but hey to humor you, they wouldn't called joke parties if it wasn't for our voting system.
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Lovable Alien Overlord
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 123
Founded: Apr 16, 2015
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Lovable Alien Overlord » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:14 pm

Fanosolia wrote:
Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:Actually, I'd like to make my vote count. I'm not going to vote for joke parties.


... :rofl: I'm not getting into some kind of flimsy debate, but hey to humor you, they wouldn't called joke parties if it wasn't for our voting system.

Our voting system is fine and produces stable governments. It keeps the riff-raff far away from the heart of our government.

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:20 pm

Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:
Fanosolia wrote:
... :rofl: I'm not getting into some kind of flimsy debate, but hey to humor you, they wouldn't called joke parties if it wasn't for our voting system.

Our voting system is fine and produces stable governments. It keeps the riff-raff far away from the heart of our government.


so the fact that we don't have proportional representation doesn't bother you? Because it produces supposedly keeps "the riff-raft out"? what does that even mean?
Last edited by Fanosolia on Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:22 pm

Fanosolia wrote:
Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:Our voting system is fine and produces stable governments. It keeps the riff-raff far away from the heart of our government.


so the fact that we don't have proportional representation doesn't bother you? Because it produces supposedly keeps "the riff-raft out"? what does that even mean?

Anyone who uses the word "riff-raff" is an elitist.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Lovable Alien Overlord
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 123
Founded: Apr 16, 2015
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Lovable Alien Overlord » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:23 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Fanosolia wrote:
so the fact that we don't have proportional representation doesn't bother you? Because it produces supposedly keeps "the riff-raft out"? what does that even mean?

Anyone who uses the word "riff-raff" is an elitist.

Really? I'm an elitist? I'm a first time voter who has to go to university soon! I'm just trying to save some money!

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:24 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Fanosolia wrote:
so the fact that we don't have proportional representation doesn't bother you? Because it produces supposedly keeps "the riff-raft out"? what does that even mean?

Anyone who uses the word "riff-raff" is an elitist.

or every old timey. I'd like to believe that, but it's probably wrong. Plus to be fair it's sorta hard, at least to me, to not be elitist in politics.
Last edited by Fanosolia on Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:31 pm

The problem with First Past the Post is that it is not fully representative of the population. Only 39% of eligible voters voted Conservative in the last election. That means that the majority of voters voted for other parties, yet we ended up with a Conservative majority.

I personally favor ranked ballots over PR and I'm pleased that Trudeau has promised reforms to our voting system. In his short time as Liberal leader, he has done more for democratic reform than Harper has in the 9 years he's been in power.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Lovable Alien Overlord
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 123
Founded: Apr 16, 2015
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Lovable Alien Overlord » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:34 pm

Nation of Quebec wrote:The problem with First Past the Post is that it is not fully representative of the population. Only 39% of eligible voters voted Conservative in the last election. That means that the majority of voters voted for other parties, yet we ended up with a Conservative majority.

I personally favor ranked ballots over PR and I'm pleased that Trudeau has promised reforms to our voting system. In his short time as Liberal leader, he has done more for democratic reform than Harper has in the 9 years he's been in power.

Again, I'll never vote for the Liberals because of what happened to my grade 12 year. The strikes in Ontario killed it, and now I'm happy with anything that keeps the Liberals out.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:38 pm

Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Anyone who uses the word "riff-raff" is an elitist.

Really? I'm an elitist? I'm a first time voter who has to go to university soon! I'm just trying to save some money!

Who are the "riff-raff" who have to be discouraged from voting in the first place? FPTP discourages people who support minor parties from participating.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:43 pm

Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:
Nation of Quebec wrote:The problem with First Past the Post is that it is not fully representative of the population. Only 39% of eligible voters voted Conservative in the last election. That means that the majority of voters voted for other parties, yet we ended up with a Conservative majority.

I personally favor ranked ballots over PR and I'm pleased that Trudeau has promised reforms to our voting system. In his short time as Liberal leader, he has done more for democratic reform than Harper has in the 9 years he's been in power.

Again, I'll never vote for the Liberals because of what happened to my grade 12 year. The strikes in Ontario killed it, and now I'm happy with anything that keeps the Liberals out.


So you're admitting you're a partisan who supports an unfair system just to punish a party you have a vendetta against?

Also, the federal Liberals had nothing to do with the teacher's strikes.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:43 pm

Nation of Quebec wrote:The problem with First Past the Post is that it is not fully representative of the population. Only 39% of eligible voters voted Conservative in the last election. That means that the majority of voters voted for other parties, yet we ended up with a Conservative majority.

I personally favor ranked ballots over PR and I'm pleased that Trudeau has promised reforms to our voting system. In his short time as Liberal leader, he has done more for democratic reform than Harper has in the 9 years he's been in power.


I personally like the idea of STV. Depending who gets voted in, you end up helping some of the small parties gain some traction, like the greens, Pirate party, even CAP. That being said, I don't mind PR, I just rather be picking the mp, instead of being appointed one by the party if the party wins seats.
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Lovable Alien Overlord
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 123
Founded: Apr 16, 2015
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Lovable Alien Overlord » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:44 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:Really? I'm an elitist? I'm a first time voter who has to go to university soon! I'm just trying to save some money!

Who are the "riff-raff" who have to be discouraged from voting in the first place? FPTP discourages people who support minor parties from participating.

Discouraged from voting? I never said anything about that. I was talking about political parties that are pointless and should probably be kept out so people who have a chance at winning can get a fair shot. Don't split the vote!

User avatar
Lovable Alien Overlord
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 123
Founded: Apr 16, 2015
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Lovable Alien Overlord » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:46 pm

Nation of Quebec wrote:
Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:Again, I'll never vote for the Liberals because of what happened to my grade 12 year. The strikes in Ontario killed it, and now I'm happy with anything that keeps the Liberals out.


So you're admitting you're a partisan who supports an unfair system just to punish a party you have a vendetta against?

Also, the federal Liberals had nothing to do with the teacher's strikes.

Same party, same ideas. Both are fake and dress up behind the idea of liberalism. At least Harper is clearly a conservative.

If Justin Trudeau is going to pursue policies that are even remotely similar to Kathleen Wynne's, that's good enough for me.

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:49 pm

Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:
Nation of Quebec wrote:
So you're admitting you're a partisan who supports an unfair system just to punish a party you have a vendetta against?

Also, the federal Liberals had nothing to do with the teacher's strikes.

Same party, same ideas. Both are fake and dress up behind the idea of liberalism. At least Harper is clearly a conservative.

If Justin Trudeau is going to pursue policies that are even remotely similar to Kathleen Wynne's, that's good enough for me.


Harper a conservative? Don't make me laugh. He may be a social conservative, but he has lost the right to call himself a fiscal conservative with the way he's been spending lately.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Lovable Alien Overlord
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 123
Founded: Apr 16, 2015
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Lovable Alien Overlord » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:52 pm

Nation of Quebec wrote:
Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:Same party, same ideas. Both are fake and dress up behind the idea of liberalism. At least Harper is clearly a conservative.

If Justin Trudeau is going to pursue policies that are even remotely similar to Kathleen Wynne's, that's good enough for me.


Harper a conservative? Don't make me laugh. He may be a social conservative, but he has lost the right to call himself a fiscal conservative with the way he's been spending lately.

He's a sensible conservative, and the budget deficit has continuously declined since 2008.

If anything, the fake Liberals are more conservative than him, but they aren't open about it. Remember that Jean Chretien balanced the budget on the backs of ordinary people, while Harper has been sensible and not overzealous. He is a conservative I can believe in, and not someone who pretends to be something he's not.
Last edited by Lovable Alien Overlord on Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:53 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:59 pm

Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:
Nation of Quebec wrote:
Harper a conservative? Don't make me laugh. He may be a social conservative, but he has lost the right to call himself a fiscal conservative with the way he's been spending lately.

He's a sensible conservative, and the budget deficit has continuously declined since 2008.

If anything, the fake Liberals are more conservative than him, but they aren't open about it. Remember that Jean Chretien balanced the budget on the backs of ordinary people, while Harper has been sensible and not overzealous. He is a conservative I can believe in, and not someone who pretends to be something he's not.


Where are you getting your facts from? Harper hasn't balanced the budget since he came into power and has increased the national debt. Sensible is one thing Harper isn't. He took the surplus from Chretien and Martin and turned it into a deficit.

The billions he's planning on giving away on vote-buying policies like income splitting (which even the late Jim Flaherty spoke out against), the UCCB, and other boutique tax credits won't help to bring down the deficit either. If anything they'll be adding to it.
Last edited by Nation of Quebec on Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Lovable Alien Overlord
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 123
Founded: Apr 16, 2015
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Lovable Alien Overlord » Thu Aug 27, 2015 4:01 pm

Nation of Quebec wrote:
Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:He's a sensible conservative, and the budget deficit has continuously declined since 2008.

If anything, the fake Liberals are more conservative than him, but they aren't open about it. Remember that Jean Chretien balanced the budget on the backs of ordinary people, while Harper has been sensible and not overzealous. He is a conservative I can believe in, and not someone who pretends to be something he's not.


Where are you getting your facts from? Harper hasn't balanced the budget since he came into power and has increased the national debt. Sensible is one thing Harper isn't. He took the surplus from Chretien and Martin and turned it into a deficit.

The billions he's planning on giving away on vote-buying policies like income splitting (which even the late Jim Flaherty spoke out against), the UCCB, and other boutique tax credits won't help to bring down the deficit either. If anything they'll be adding to it.

The bottom line is that I will vote for the Conservatives because all the other parties have ruled themselves out. By process of elimination, I feel compelled to vote for them. Rest assured that I will.

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Thu Aug 27, 2015 4:10 pm

Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:
Nation of Quebec wrote:
Where are you getting your facts from? Harper hasn't balanced the budget since he came into power and has increased the national debt. Sensible is one thing Harper isn't. He took the surplus from Chretien and Martin and turned it into a deficit.

The billions he's planning on giving away on vote-buying policies like income splitting (which even the late Jim Flaherty spoke out against), the UCCB, and other boutique tax credits won't help to bring down the deficit either. If anything they'll be adding to it.

The bottom line is that I will vote for the Conservatives because all the other parties have ruled themselves out. By process of elimination, I feel compelled to vote for them. Rest assured that I will.


That is your right and rest assured that I will be voting against the Conservatives because of their corruption, dishonesty, and failed policies.

If these had been the respectable Progressive Conservatives of old I would have considered voting for them, but sadly there are few of the original PCs left. What we are left with is the corrupt shell of a once proud party.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Thu Aug 27, 2015 4:24 pm

Marcurix wrote:It's not BC'S call, given cross provincial infrastructure is federal jurisdiction.

Provinces don't have final authority on approval, but they can throw insurmountable regulatory hurdles into their construction.

Northern Gateway is pretty much dead. The BC government is adamantly opposed and Alberta has all but given up. Enbridge has shelved the project. Energy East might end up with the same fate because of opposition from the government of Quebec and extremely strict environmental regulation in the lower Saint Lawrence.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16371
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kubra » Thu Aug 27, 2015 4:28 pm

Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Anyone who uses the word "riff-raff" is an elitist.

Really? I'm an elitist? I'm a first time voter who has to go to university soon! I'm just trying to save some money!
oh gosh, they give first year riff-raff suffrage? This country has gone to the dogs. We could have a dominant whig party, were it not for such nonsense.
Last edited by Kubra on Thu Aug 27, 2015 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:21 pm

Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:
Nation of Quebec wrote:
Harper a conservative? Don't make me laugh. He may be a social conservative, but he has lost the right to call himself a fiscal conservative with the way he's been spending lately.

He's a sensible conservative, and the budget deficit has continuously declined since 2008.

If anything, the fake Liberals are more conservative than him, but they aren't open about it. Remember that Jean Chretien balanced the budget on the backs of ordinary people, while Harper has been sensible and not overzealous. He is a conservative I can believe in, and not someone who pretends to be something he's not.

The Liberals aren't more conservative than Harper. They've shown themselves to support funding for beneficial social programs and can grow an economy.
Last edited by Geilinor on Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Bogdanov Vishniac
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1958
Founded: May 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Bogdanov Vishniac » Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:22 pm

Kubra wrote:
Lovable Alien Overlord wrote:Really? I'm an elitist? I'm a first time voter who has to go to university soon! I'm just trying to save some money!
oh gosh, they give first year riff-raff suffrage? This country has gone to the dogs. We could have a dominant whig party, were it not for such nonsense.


Did you see how he admitted he was not coming for the Liberals purely out of spite? Yet further proof that the youth are far too emotionally unstable to vote. Why, imagine what sort of chaos would reign if all those hormonal teenagers were to influence our sober politicians!
"To make a thief, make an owner; to create crime, create laws." ~ Laia Asieo Odo, The Social Organism

anarchist communist | deep ecologist | aspiring Cynic | gay | [insert other adjectives here]

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16371
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kubra » Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:27 pm

Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
Kubra wrote: oh gosh, they give first year riff-raff suffrage? This country has gone to the dogs. We could have a dominant whig party, were it not for such nonsense.


Did you see how he admitted he was not coming for the Liberals purely out of spite? Yet further proof that the youth are far too emotionally unstable to vote. Why, imagine what sort of chaos would reign if all those hormonal teenagers were to influence our sober politicians!
indeed. All that could come of such is anarchy and rights for the irish!
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Democratic Socialist States of Africa
Envoy
 
Posts: 319
Founded: Aug 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Democratic Socialist States of Africa » Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:54 pm

Nation of Quebec wrote:The problem with First Past the Post is that it is not fully representative of the population. Only 39% of eligible voters voted Conservative in the last election. That means that the majority of voters voted for other parties, yet we ended up with a Conservative majority.

I personally favor ranked ballots over PR and I'm pleased that Trudeau has promised reforms to our voting system. In his short time as Liberal leader, he has done more for democratic reform than Harper has in the 9 years he's been in power.

:clap:

I liked the Liberal Party till I found out that they were supporting Bill C-51. I really don't mind them but that made me go for the NDP.

I support Pan Africanism. For those who say Africa cannot change, you are wrong.

I am a Pan Africanist, Democratic Socialist person who supports socialism.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Aureumterra III, Cachard Calia, Ellese, Emotional Support Crocodile, Enormous Gentiles, Foehn Paramilitary Regions, Frattastan IV, Gravlen, GuessTheAltAccount, Howell High School, Juansonia, Northern Seleucia, Shrillland, The Crimson Isles, The Grand Imperium 320, The Loved, Trump Almighty

Advertisement

Remove ads