And, I feel, only possible if she sold her soul to Satan and/or rigged something.
Advertisement

by Galloism » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:11 pm

by Mike the Progressive » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:12 pm
Galloism wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:
Well I have some reservations about online voting. But I do agree with your first proposal. Especially automatic registration and paid postage.
I mean, we complain and complain and complain we can't get people to show up and vote.
If it was as simple as marking a box, signing your name, and putting it in the envelope and putting it out for the mailman, you'd probably get at least 80% participation. And the rest? Well, you'd probably only get em to vote if you paid em to.

by The Romulan Republic » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:12 pm

by Galloism » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:13 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Galloism wrote:I mean, we complain and complain and complain we can't get people to show up and vote.
If it was as simple as marking a box, signing your name, and putting it in the envelope and putting it out for the mailman, you'd probably get at least 80% participation. And the rest? Well, you'd probably only get em to vote if you paid em to.
I doubt it would be that high, tbh. But it would be more convenient and very much cheaper than making election day a holiday.

by Corrian » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:13 pm

by Mike the Progressive » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:14 pm

by The Romulan Republic » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:14 pm
Corrian wrote:14% lead for Sanders
Welp
Of course Trump has a huge lead this time around as well...The last one was a lot closer for him.

by Mike the Progressive » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:16 pm

by Corrian » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:16 pm

by The Romulan Republic » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:16 pm

by Mike the Progressive » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:17 pm

by Faustian Fantasies » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:17 pm

by Mike the Progressive » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:18 pm
The Romulan Republic wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:
Sorry? You didn't like that bern?
And no, I honestly view both as being pretty dumb.
I don't like partisan misrepresentation and dishonesty, no.
One is interested in helping all people.
The other is an obvious sexist who panders to and stirs up xenophobes and white supremacists while promoting the interests of the rich.

by Faustian Fantasies » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:18 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/live/new-hampshire-primary-2016-election/most-democrats-do-not-want-more-liberal-policies

by Valrifell » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:19 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/live/new-hampshire-primary-2016-election/most-democrats-do-not-want-more-liberal-policies

by Galloism » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:19 pm

by Mike the Progressive » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:19 pm

by Mike the Progressive » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:21 pm

by Faustian Fantasies » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:21 pm

by The Republic of American Freedom » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:21 pm
Galloism wrote:Ok, so O'Malley has 0.3% of the vote.
Who the fuck is out there voting for a guy that's not running anymore?

by Angry Young Men For Bernie » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:21 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:The Romulan Republic wrote:
I don't like partisan misrepresentation and dishonesty, no.
One is interested in helping all people.
The other is an obvious sexist who panders to and stirs up xenophobes and white supremacists while promoting the interests of the rich.
Dude stop talking about Sanders that way. Don't worry when SC primary comes, 50% of the Democratic voters are black, so we'll give Hillary the victory she needs and deserves.

by Galloism » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:22 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Adaure, American Legionaries, Based Illinois, Bradfordville, Dakran, Dimetrodon Empire, Empire of Xerx, Insaanistan, Lord Dominator, Rusozak, The marxist plains, Valyxias
Advertisement