LOL. So does pretty much anything and everything that gets discussed ad nauseum on the internet.... annoying is par for the course.
Advertisement
by New Jerzylvania » Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:33 pm
by Ashlak » Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:35 pm
Novus America wrote:Democratic Party affiliation drops to an all time low. If it make you feel better Republicans are not doing any better.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politic ... 95453.html
While it is nice to see the parties dying it will make them more extreme.
by AiliailiA » Thu Jan 28, 2016 11:07 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
by Samnoreg » Thu Jan 28, 2016 11:17 pm
Ailiailia wrote:"Bernie Sanders is a socialist. I think Bernie Sanders is a good candidate for President ... of Sweden"
Nice quip Marco. Sweden doesn't have a President tho.
SamnoregDet Norrøne Samveldet
SRK Radio 1 | You're listening to SRK Verldstjenesten | Køpenhavn: ☀/☁ 13˚/3˚ | Oslo: ☂ 16˚/3˚ | Stockholm: ☁ 15˚/9˚
by New Rogernomics » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:29 am
Thanks for dishonestly [mis]-representing my post. I never said I was going to support Trump, rather that other people (as in not me) were considering it.Yumyumsuppertime wrote:New Rogernomics wrote:I've found a new dislike for The Washington Post, Salon, and a few other media sources. Removed my likes and their news from my Facebook feed. It's my way of saying that their journalism is terrible this election cycle.
In regards to the election process, prefer Bernie Sanders, but that doesn't mean I'm not skeptical about a lot of his policies. If Clinton becomes the nominee though, most of the people I know are going to do a write in, not vote, or vote Trump.
The media keep pushing this fantasy general election where all Democrats will blindly vote for Clinton if Bernie Sanders loses. In reality, most Bernie Sanders supporters will stop engaging with the political process, switch party, or even not vote. Same could be the case with Hillary Clinton supporters, who will not be able to deal with voting for Bernie Sanders.
For me it is Sanders, or Jill of Green Party. I don't vote for the 'lesser evil', or the 'greater evil'. The whole process this time around reeks of 'OBEY THE PARTY!' rather than vote with your heart and for who you truly believe would be good for America.
If you're currently supporting Sanders, and are even considering Trump as a vague possibility if he doesn't get the nod, then you do not have a single fucking clue as to what Bernie's campaign is about.
by New Rogernomics » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:38 am
Thanks for dishonestly re-enforcing the mis-representation of my post. I never said I was going to support Trump, I said that people I know were considering it.Geilinor wrote:New Rogernomics wrote:I've found a new dislike for The Washington Post, Salon, and a few other media sources. Removed my likes and their news from my Facebook feed. It's my way of saying that their journalism is terrible this election cycle.
In regards to the election process, prefer Bernie Sanders, but that doesn't mean I'm not skeptical about a lot of his policies. If Clinton becomes the nominee though, most of the people I know are going to do a write in, not vote, or vote Trump.
If Sanders supporters vote Trump just because they didn't get Bernie - and Trump wins - it will be your fault. Luckily, most Bernie supporters aren't that spiteful.
by Khadgar » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:41 am
by Trumpostan » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:55 am
Ailiailia wrote:"Bernie Sanders is a socialist. I think Bernie Sanders is a good candidate for President ... of Sweden"
Nice quip Marco. Sweden doesn't have a President tho.
by Geilinor » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:59 am
New Rogernomics wrote:Thanks for dishonestly re-enforcing the mis-representation of my post. I never said I was going to support Trump, I said that people I know were considering it.Geilinor wrote:If Sanders supporters vote Trump just because they didn't get Bernie - and Trump wins - it will be your fault. Luckily, most Bernie supporters aren't that spiteful.
Is this one of those 'guilt by association' things, where because your neighbor is considering voting Trump, you are declared a Trump supporter?
by Arkinesia » Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:01 am
Ailiailia wrote:"Bernie Sanders is a socialist. I think Bernie Sanders is a good candidate for President ... of Sweden"
Nice quip Marco. Sweden doesn't have a President tho.
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by Geilinor » Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:02 am
Novus America wrote:Democratic Party affiliation drops to an all time low. If it make you feel better Republicans are not doing any better.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politic ... 95453.html
While it is nice to see the parties dying it will make them more extreme.
by New Rogernomics » Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:09 am
What you posted made out like it was 'my fault' if Trump was elected, and that I was 'spiteful'.Geilinor wrote:New Rogernomics wrote:Thanks for dishonestly re-enforcing the mis-representation of my post. I never said I was going to support Trump, I said that people I know were considering it.
Is this one of those 'guilt by association' things, where because your neighbor is considering voting Trump, you are declared a Trump supporter?
I didn't say that you were a Trump supporter, I was talking about Sanders supporters who think that's a reasonable option.
by New Rogernomics » Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:13 am
Think Bernie supporters will hyperventilate, and need a glass of water perhaps, if that happens. In my case, I was registered Green last election, so I am skeptical as well as curious about him.Khadgar wrote:What Happens if Bernie Wins Iowa, answer, not much, but if he loses Iowa he's probably toast.
by Conserative Morality » Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:25 am
Khadgar wrote:What Happens if Bernie Wins Iowa, answer, not much, but if he loses Iowa he's probably toast.
by Khadgar » Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:31 am
Conserative Morality wrote:Khadgar wrote:What Happens if Bernie Wins Iowa, answer, not much, but if he loses Iowa he's probably toast.
I agree that if he loses Iowa things will be looking pretty bad, but I really hate the drumbeat about white liberals like it's some insurmountable wall, considering that Bernie's favorability rating with minorities is around where Clinton's is.
by Conserative Morality » Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:35 am
Khadgar wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:I agree that if he loses Iowa things will be looking pretty bad, but I really hate the drumbeat about white liberals like it's some insurmountable wall, considering that Bernie's favorability rating with minorities is around where Clinton's is.
Can you link to a relatively recent poll? Be interested in seeing one. I've only heard about him doing rather more poorly with minorities.
by New Chalcedon » Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:36 am
Khadgar wrote:What Happens if Bernie Wins Iowa, answer, not much, but if he loses Iowa he's probably toast.
by Khadgar » Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:44 am
Conserative Morality wrote:Khadgar wrote:
Can you link to a relatively recent poll? Be interested in seeing one. I've only heard about him doing rather more poorly with minorities.
Sure thing. Not a big CNN fan, but it's the 25th and looks pretty in-line with other polls. Pages 45/46 are favorability ratings for Bernie and Hillary. They both have a net favorability rating around +34% with nonwhite voters.
New Chalcedon wrote:Khadgar wrote:What Happens if Bernie Wins Iowa, answer, not much, but if he loses Iowa he's probably toast.
Flip that question - Hillary's campaign has spent virtually all of its money in Iowa and New Hampshire, tens of millions of dollars so far. What if, despite all that, she still loses both States? And she will lose in New Hampshire - that's accepted by virtually everyone as a given at this point.
by Conserative Morality » Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:52 am
Khadgar wrote:Page 33 of the PDF has the important question at the top, which I'd copy/paste here if the formatting wasn't fucking awful. Non-white voters support Clinton 58% to Bernie's 34%
by Northern Davincia » Fri Jan 29, 2016 12:50 pm
Trumpostan wrote:Ailiailia wrote:"Bernie Sanders is a socialist. I think Bernie Sanders is a good candidate for President ... of Sweden"
Nice quip Marco. Sweden doesn't have a President tho.
Especially when nearly all GOP candidates are in my opinion fascists who would make good prime ministers of Italy...
... in 1936.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Yumyumsuppertime » Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:09 pm
New Rogernomics wrote:Thanks for dishonestly [mis]-representing my post. I never said I was going to support Trump, rather that other people (as in not me) were considering it.Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
If you're currently supporting Sanders, and are even considering Trump as a vague possibility if he doesn't get the nod, then you do not have a single fucking clue as to what Bernie's campaign is about.
by Novus America » Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:25 pm
Geilinor wrote:Novus America wrote:Democratic Party affiliation drops to an all time low. If it make you feel better Republicans are not doing any better.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politic ... 95453.html
While it is nice to see the parties dying it will make them more extreme.
"Last gasp of political parties" is a bit extreme. The parties as they are are unpopular but eventually they will realize that they need independents. And most people who identify as independents still have a preference.
by Martean » Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:28 pm
Novus America wrote:Democratic Party affiliation drops to an all time low. If it make you feel better Republicans are not doing any better.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politic ... 95453.html
While it is nice to see the parties dying it will make them more extreme.
by Valrifell » Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:40 pm
Novus America wrote:Geilinor wrote:"Last gasp of political parties" is a bit extreme. The parties as they are are unpopular but eventually they will realize that they need independents. And most people who identify as independents still have a preference.
I hope you are wrong. I do not want the parties to reform. I want them to die.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dumb Ideologies, Ineva, Juristonia, Keltionialang, Kreushia, Libonesia, Plan Neonie, Shrillland, Simonia, Singaporen Empire, The French National Workers State, The Overmind, The Vooperian Union
Advertisement