Advertisement

by DnalweN acilbupeR » Thu Jun 04, 2015 6:49 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.
by Souseiseki » Thu Jun 04, 2015 6:52 am

by Ifreann » Thu Jun 04, 2015 6:54 am

by Ifreann » Thu Jun 04, 2015 6:56 am

by Macedom » Thu Jun 04, 2015 6:59 am
Ifreann wrote:Macedom wrote:
source?
I'm sure many have been posted repeatedly throughout this thread. You're welcome to read it and see any argument you might put forth as to the illegitimacy of Caitlyn Jenner's gender identity soundly refuted over and over again.
Honestly, at this point I'm inclined to treat anyone saying that trans people are just sick and delusional like they've said that the Holocaust was a scam by Zionists to get control of Israel.

by Farnhamia » Thu Jun 04, 2015 6:59 am
by Souseiseki » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:15 am
Macedom wrote:http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/bruce-jenner-is-not-a-woman-he-is-a-sick-and-delusional-man/
i agree with this

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:18 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Prezelly » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:19 am

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:19 am
Souseiseki wrote:Macedom wrote:http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/bruce-jenner-is-not-a-woman-he-is-a-sick-and-delusional-man/
i agree with this
oh god, male horomones, like they don't fucking know that everyone has testosterone and estrogen. lactating like they don't know that men have breast tissue and can sometimes lactate even without growing breasts, which is entirely possible. no ovaries like every woman that was born without them, can't have a period or had them removed isn't a real woman. it's too fucking funny.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:21 am
Farnhamia wrote:Ifreann wrote:Most of us can only hope to look so good when we're in our 60s.
True, but a bit of professional make-up wizardry goes a long way. Nevertheless, how a person looks should hardly be the basis on which they're judged. "Oh, sorry, what? You're a transgendered person? No, sorry, according to the Professional Truth Sayers Guidelines For Acceptance, you're far too unattractive to be taken seriously."
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Macedom » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:22 am
Souseiseki wrote:Macedom wrote:http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/bruce-jenner-is-not-a-woman-he-is-a-sick-and-delusional-man/
i agree with this
oh god, male horomones, like they don't fucking know that everyone has testosterone and estrogen. lactating like they don't know that men have breast tissue and can sometimes lactate even without growing breasts, which is entirely possible. no ovaries like every woman that was born without them, can't have a period or had them removed isn't a real woman. it's too fucking funny.
e: it's not a coincidence that most if not all of the arguments seem simple, definitive and obvious at first but immediately all apart under even the slightest of scrutiny
by Herrebrugh » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:25 am
Prezelly wrote:I personally think that people who don't identify with their biological sex are mentally ill.
And the OP's comment was kind of funny to read.
by Souseiseki » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:29 am
Macedom wrote:Souseiseki wrote:
oh god, male horomones, like they don't fucking know that everyone has testosterone and estrogen. lactating like they don't know that men have breast tissue and can sometimes lactate even without growing breasts, which is entirely possible. no ovaries like every woman that was born without them, can't have a period or had them removed isn't a real woman. it's too fucking funny.
e: it's not a coincidence that most if not all of the arguments seem simple, definitive and obvious at first but immediately all apart under even the slightest of scrutiny
Funny cause i could say the same to you
by Herrebrugh » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:36 am

by Ifreann » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:41 am
Macedom wrote:Ifreann wrote:I'm sure many have been posted repeatedly throughout this thread. You're welcome to read it and see any argument you might put forth as to the illegitimacy of Caitlyn Jenner's gender identity soundly refuted over and over again.
Honestly, at this point I'm inclined to treat anyone saying that trans people are just sick and delusional like they've said that the Holocaust was a scam by Zionists to get control of Israel.
Why is that?
Nevertheless, how a person looks should hardly be the basis on which they're judged. "Oh, sorry, what? You're a transgendered person? No, sorry, according to the Professional Truth Sayers Guidelines For Acceptance, you're far too unattractive to be taken seriously."

by Prezelly » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:42 am
Herrebrugh wrote:Prezelly wrote:Why is that?
As far as I've read, mental illnesses "...cause[s] mild to severe disturbances in thought and/or behavior, resulting in an inability to cope with life’s ordinary demands and routines."
While it is true that transgenderism can lead to many problems pre-op, after operation many transgenders can simply live normal lives. By which I mean, transgenderism certainly doesn't have to lead to "an inability to cope with life’s ordinary demands and routines", regardless.

by Grenartia » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:56 am
Anywhere Else But Here wrote:Llamalandia wrote:
Ah, ok, here is the difference I don't subscribe to the notion that offensive is in the eye of the beholder so to speak. I mean, hell you may be offend I wear a blue shirt. So what, screw you, I don't care you choose to be offended. Likewise transgender people choose to be offended when misgendered, that doesn't change the fact that it was my intent.
As, to six like I said, I subscribe to historical accuracy over preserving the feelings of a small minority of people, who at the end of the day, chose to express their true gender identity. If I really wanted to be offensive however, I would just refer to all transgender personas by their assigned sex at birth regardless of where in trasnition they were. But Idon't want to be merely offensive for the sake of beign offensive. I don't mind being offensive for the sake of precision and accuracy however.
I mean, besides, should I refer to jenner as a dead beat mom now? THat doesn't really make much sense no does that carry the same culture connotation which dead beat dad does, and which Bruce Genner was.
I thought I made some points, but apparently not, because they've all been ignored.

by Grenartia » Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:58 am
Killdash wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Its not rocket science to simply say that the difference between men and women is gender identity.
Actually, as a bio-medical engineer specialising in the brain, I can most definitely tell you that gender is also a programmed state in the brain. Females do react differently to males under neural stimuli. This has been known since the 90s, where it was used by schools and stores to counter at that time flawed feminist thinking that gender was determined by social cues alone.

by Grenartia » Thu Jun 04, 2015 8:00 am
Killdash wrote:Dalcaria wrote:As I believe Sargon of Akkad may have said...
"If gender is just a social construct, then women could just all decide to be men and receive equal treatment. Feminism wouldn't even be needed by this point."
I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for 3.5 billion people to choose to be men.
That's my point exactly. Gender is a biological thing, decided through chromosomal interactions and various other chemical reactions.

by Iidoomaan » Thu Jun 04, 2015 8:53 am

by Replevion » Thu Jun 04, 2015 8:56 am

by Ifreann » Thu Jun 04, 2015 8:57 am
Replevion wrote:Iidoomaan wrote:
no it's not. at the current level of sci and tech in today's world. we have almost absolutely no idea how the brain works. and to say every thought in your brain is controlled by genetics, is disengenious.
They were referring to the weasel context of "and various other chemical reactions". Every thought is indeed a metaphysical manifestation of an electro-chemical reaction in the brain.


by Replevion » Thu Jun 04, 2015 9:02 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Al Concerman, El Lazaro, Thepeopl, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement