Try 3 states southwest.
Advertisement

by Grenartia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:30 pm

by Grand Calvert » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:30 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:30 pm

by Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:31 pm

by Replevion » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:31 pm
Boineburg wrote:Eastfield Lodge wrote:http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/mental%20disorder
Ah, thank you! Exactly the one I used, too.
I made this for an Imgur comment awhile ago: http://i.imgur.com/qpMwOPZ.png

by Chessmistress » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:31 pm
Grenartia wrote:Nature-Spirits wrote:Well, I'm not a woman, actually. I'm non-binary, which means that I am neither a man nor a woman.
However, I also know women who have chosen to keep their penises, probably because they don't feel that owning a vagina is essential to being a woman, and they don't feel any significant discomfort regarding their penis.
Yeah, the idea that a woman HAS to have/want a vagina is inherently sexist and misogynist. It propogates a view of womanhood that holds that women are little more than walking vaginas.

by Grenartia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:32 pm
Gauthier wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Its hardly "liberal standards" to not treat people like shit. Also, seeing as how queerphobia directly counterdicts Christ's message, any church that fails to affirm LGBT people fails to teach people the message of Christ.
Just a matter of time before someone denounces Jesus as a "SJW".

by Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:32 pm
Chessmistress wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Yeah, the idea that a woman HAS to have/want a vagina is inherently sexist and misogynist. It propogates a view of womanhood that holds that women are little more than walking vaginas.
Nothing more than a strawman: I think that if a person really feels "she" is a woman "she" should wish to have a vagina. Otherwise "she" doesn't really feels a woman.

by Geilinor » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:32 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
Yep, because the APA is not above politics.
No, it's not. However, it's up to you to show that this was a political decision, and not one based upon decades worth of research that tended to disprove older theories regarding sexuality, and instead indicated that homosexuality did not meet the definition of mental illness. Hell, even Freud didn't see homosexuality in and of itself as being harmful.

by Grand Calvert » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:33 pm

by Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:34 pm

by Grenartia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:34 pm

by Grand Calvert » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:34 pm

by Boineburg » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:34 pm
Replevion wrote:Boineburg wrote:
Ah, thank you! Exactly the one I used, too.
I made this for an Imgur comment awhile ago: http://i.imgur.com/qpMwOPZ.png
Brilliant. By your arbitrary, uneducated interpretation of what a mental disorder and 'normal psychological function' means, you've made any person who doesn't want kids out to have a mental disorder. Gold fucking star.

by Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:35 pm

by Boineburg » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:35 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:35 pm
Boineburg wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Actually, no, by definition homosexuals do not have a mental disorder any more than people who are left-handed have a physical disorder. Transgendered individuals are a slightly different story, but part of the treatment is to transition to a gender identity that the patient is more comfortable with, at which point there's no real disorder.Boineburg wrote:Now, if you would please, find me the definition of "mental disorder"
A mental illness is a disease that causes mild to severe disturbances in thought and/or behavior, resulting in an inability to cope with life’s ordinary demands and routines.

by Grand Calvert » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:36 pm
Steamtopia wrote:Grand Calvert wrote:
You're really stretching this. That is a crystal clear quote that shows how slaves are to be treated. Treating them fairly would imply that a crime must occur in order for there to be a punishment.
There's nothing in that quote that implies that. You're just drawing your own conclusion to fit your narrative.

by Replevion » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:36 pm

by Grenartia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:36 pm
Thalasus wrote:Ah, Caitlyn Jenner. The King... er... "Queen" of overhyping what really is a small societal issue. The media loves to pretend that being transgender is the same sort of deal as being, say, LBG.
I think transgendered people are... I apologize to use such an offensive term, but they're a little deranged, to be honest. If you are born with a penis, you are a man, regardless of what you want to be. If you are born with a vagina, you are a woman, regardless of how you "view yourself". I simply can not see what the problem is with this.
But that's my opinion, and I recognize I'm losing that battle societally. So, yes, I'll call Caitlyn Jenner a "she", and I'll support those who are oppressed for their gender identification with the rest of the LGBT community. But I will never understand it, and that way of thinking simply shouldn't expect my support.

by Chessmistress » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:36 pm

by Gauthier » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:36 pm

by Terricon » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:37 pm
Sangju wrote:The media is overreacting to this. If Bruce wants to be Caitlyn, I could honestly care less. Don't glorify it, don't shit on him, we should just accept the fact that Bruce wants to be Caitlyn, and collectively move on as a society.

by Grand Calvert » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:37 pm

by Eastfield Lodge » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:37 pm
Boineburg wrote:Replevion wrote:
Brilliant. By your arbitrary, uneducated interpretation of what a mental disorder and 'normal psychological function' means, you've made any person who doesn't want kids out to have a mental disorder. Gold fucking star.
Actually, no. In that case, it become less a survival instinct (for lack of a better word), and moreso a choice. Other, less advanced species, still need to reproduce to keep up. We humans do not.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Achan, Konadd, Northern Seleucia, Primitive Communism, The Rio Grande River Basin, Valentine Z, Valyxias
Advertisement