NATION

PASSWORD

Prostitution=Porn

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Barzan
Minister
 
Posts: 3487
Founded: May 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Barzan » Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:05 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Gravonia wrote:Is prostitution illegal? In Britain prostitution is legal but poncing (i.e. Making money from the proceeds of prostitution isn't. Does it work differently in the US?

I think Pimping is the term for american Poncing but its completely illegal. Except in Nevada alot of things deemed morally wrong are okay in Nevada, it's God's blindspot.

Yet it's illegal in the place where it would be the most lucrative and most sought after: Las Vegas.
NOT affiliated with the Free Masons -- Barzan's flag does not incorporate masonic imagery
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -4.75 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: +1.03
"I have considerably less respect for people who nod and drool as talking heads in a box feed them pre-digested spoonfuls of opinutainment than someone that listens to and discusses with a variety of sources and opinions and then forms their own; regardless of whether I agree with them." - Lunatic Goofballs

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:06 pm

Barzan wrote:What it really boils down to is the absence of a multi-billion dollar lobby in favour of prostitution. Otherwise I'm sure there'd be legal loopholes for it as well.

Well, its legal in parts of Nevada, so I wonder if that will encourage legalization in other states, or, perhaps more likely, those businesses will try to stop that from happening, in order to continue attracting customers from around the country.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
The Olympos Mountains
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Dec 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Olympos Mountains » Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:12 pm

Lackadaisical2 wrote:
Barzan wrote:What it really boils down to is the absence of a multi-billion dollar lobby in favour of prostitution. Otherwise I'm sure there'd be legal loopholes for it as well.

Well, its legal in parts of Nevada, so I wonder if that will encourage legalization in other states, or, perhaps more likely, those businesses will try to stop that from happening, in order to continue attracting customers from around the country.


if they tried to legalize it u'd have all the religious fanatics all over you, and potentially strip clubs wouldnt support it, that or they'd turn to sex clubs

User avatar
Barzan
Minister
 
Posts: 3487
Founded: May 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Barzan » Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:21 pm

The Olympos Mountains wrote:
Lackadaisical2 wrote:
Barzan wrote:What it really boils down to is the absence of a multi-billion dollar lobby in favour of prostitution. Otherwise I'm sure there'd be legal loopholes for it as well.

Well, its legal in parts of Nevada, so I wonder if that will encourage legalization in other states, or, perhaps more likely, those businesses will try to stop that from happening, in order to continue attracting customers from around the country.


if they tried to legalize it u'd have all the religious fanatics all over you, and potentially strip clubs wouldnt support it, that or they'd turn to sex clubs

That's not true at all. We have prostitution here, yet strip clubs are still popular. People who go to a strip club may not fancy the idea of sex with a stranger for money.
NOT affiliated with the Free Masons -- Barzan's flag does not incorporate masonic imagery
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -4.75 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: +1.03
"I have considerably less respect for people who nod and drool as talking heads in a box feed them pre-digested spoonfuls of opinutainment than someone that listens to and discusses with a variety of sources and opinions and then forms their own; regardless of whether I agree with them." - Lunatic Goofballs

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:26 pm

Barzan wrote:
The Olympos Mountains wrote:
Lackadaisical2 wrote:
Barzan wrote:What it really boils down to is the absence of a multi-billion dollar lobby in favour of prostitution. Otherwise I'm sure there'd be legal loopholes for it as well.

Well, its legal in parts of Nevada, so I wonder if that will encourage legalization in other states, or, perhaps more likely, those businesses will try to stop that from happening, in order to continue attracting customers from around the country.


if they tried to legalize it u'd have all the religious fanatics all over you, and potentially strip clubs wouldnt support it, that or they'd turn to sex clubs

That's not true at all. We have prostitution here, yet strip clubs are still popular. People who go to a strip club may not fancy the idea of sex with a stranger for money.

When your wife finds out you went to a strip club you sleep in the dog house, when the wife finds out you went to a sex club you sleep in your car.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Barzan
Minister
 
Posts: 3487
Founded: May 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Barzan » Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:30 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Barzan wrote:
The Olympos Mountains wrote:
Lackadaisical2 wrote:
Barzan wrote:What it really boils down to is the absence of a multi-billion dollar lobby in favour of prostitution. Otherwise I'm sure there'd be legal loopholes for it as well.

Well, its legal in parts of Nevada, so I wonder if that will encourage legalization in other states, or, perhaps more likely, those businesses will try to stop that from happening, in order to continue attracting customers from around the country.


if they tried to legalize it u'd have all the religious fanatics all over you, and potentially strip clubs wouldnt support it, that or they'd turn to sex clubs

That's not true at all. We have prostitution here, yet strip clubs are still popular. People who go to a strip club may not fancy the idea of sex with a stranger for money.

When your wife finds out you went to a strip club you sleep in the dog house, when the wife finds out you went to a sex club you sleep in your car.

True that. But who said that prostitution would mean "sex clubs"? (Those already exist, actually -- they're called "swinger clubs".) I'm pretty sure it would mean that the higher-end call girls who currently exist would continue to exist. Pimps would also probably go by the wayside for the street level ones. Sure there'd be brothels, but no one said that legalising prostitution means allowing those to open up in a residential area -- that's what zoning is for.
NOT affiliated with the Free Masons -- Barzan's flag does not incorporate masonic imagery
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -4.75 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: +1.03
"I have considerably less respect for people who nod and drool as talking heads in a box feed them pre-digested spoonfuls of opinutainment than someone that listens to and discusses with a variety of sources and opinions and then forms their own; regardless of whether I agree with them." - Lunatic Goofballs

User avatar
Zeppy
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10112
Founded: Oct 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeppy » Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:40 pm

Barzan wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
Gravonia wrote:Is prostitution illegal? In Britain prostitution is legal but poncing (i.e. Making money from the proceeds of prostitution isn't. Does it work differently in the US?

I think Pimping is the term for american Poncing but its completely illegal. Except in Nevada alot of things deemed morally wrong are okay in Nevada, it's God's blindspot.

Yet it's illegal in the place where it would be the most lucrative and most sought after: Las Vegas.

New Zealand also. Sheep to women ratio is crazy. :p

User avatar
Barzan
Minister
 
Posts: 3487
Founded: May 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Barzan » Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:43 pm

Zeppy wrote:
Barzan wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
Gravonia wrote:Is prostitution illegal? In Britain prostitution is legal but poncing (i.e. Making money from the proceeds of prostitution isn't. Does it work differently in the US?

I think Pimping is the term for american Poncing but its completely illegal. Except in Nevada alot of things deemed morally wrong are okay in Nevada, it's God's blindspot.

Yet it's illegal in the place where it would be the most lucrative and most sought after: Las Vegas.

New Zealand also. Sheep to women ratio is crazy. :p

I feel sorry for those poor poor sheep. :(
NOT affiliated with the Free Masons -- Barzan's flag does not incorporate masonic imagery
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -4.75 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: +1.03
"I have considerably less respect for people who nod and drool as talking heads in a box feed them pre-digested spoonfuls of opinutainment than someone that listens to and discusses with a variety of sources and opinions and then forms their own; regardless of whether I agree with them." - Lunatic Goofballs

User avatar
New Manvir
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6821
Founded: Jan 06, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Manvir » Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:53 pm

Sol-Kar wrote:both should be illeigal, in my country, it can land you in the work camps for 50 years, or get you fed to the lions, its really quite entertaining to watch (perverts get eaten by lions, i mean) :rofl:


You're country must suck. (pun intended)
Last edited by New Manvir on Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I am from Canada | I'm some kind of Socialist | And also Batman
"Never be deceived that the rich will permit you to vote away their wealth." - Lucy Parsons
Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy. "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these. There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them. They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby SaintB » Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:54 pm

As I said in the last thread.

Pornography being legal creates jobs for people who pay taxes.
Prostitution being legal only creates jobs for prostitutes, however as long as its illegal it provides jobs for many people in law enforcement and medical professions.

One of the foundations of politics is jobs, another is taxes.
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
Barzan
Minister
 
Posts: 3487
Founded: May 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Barzan » Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:13 pm

SaintB wrote:As I said in the last thread.

Pornography being legal creates jobs for people who pay taxes.
Prostitution being legal only creates jobs for prostitutes, however as long as its illegal it provides jobs for many people in law enforcement and medical professions.

One of the foundations of politics is jobs, another is taxes.

But if they regulated and taxed prostitution, then they would actually make more money. They could have police check licences and fine/arrest unlicensed brothels/service providers. You would also need health inspectors and physicians to give weekly STD-screening tests. All this would cost less, as jails and courts would be freer.
NOT affiliated with the Free Masons -- Barzan's flag does not incorporate masonic imagery
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -4.75 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: +1.03
"I have considerably less respect for people who nod and drool as talking heads in a box feed them pre-digested spoonfuls of opinutainment than someone that listens to and discusses with a variety of sources and opinions and then forms their own; regardless of whether I agree with them." - Lunatic Goofballs

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby SaintB » Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:16 pm

Barzan wrote:
SaintB wrote:As I said in the last thread.

Pornography being legal creates jobs for people who pay taxes.
Prostitution being legal only creates jobs for prostitutes, however as long as its illegal it provides jobs for many people in law enforcement and medical professions.

One of the foundations of politics is jobs, another is taxes.

But if they regulated and taxed prostitution, then they would actually make more money. They could have police check licences and fine/arrest unlicensed brothels/service providers. You would also need health inspectors and physicians to give weekly STD-screening tests. All this would cost less, as jails and courts would be freer.

Please go explain logic and common sense to your state and federal legislature, record it, because I bet the reaction will be priceless.
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
Barzan
Minister
 
Posts: 3487
Founded: May 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Barzan » Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:18 pm

SaintB wrote:
Barzan wrote:
SaintB wrote:As I said in the last thread.

Pornography being legal creates jobs for people who pay taxes.
Prostitution being legal only creates jobs for prostitutes, however as long as its illegal it provides jobs for many people in law enforcement and medical professions.

One of the foundations of politics is jobs, another is taxes.

But if they regulated and taxed prostitution, then they would actually make more money. They could have police check licences and fine/arrest unlicensed brothels/service providers. You would also need health inspectors and physicians to give weekly STD-screening tests. All this would cost less, as jails and courts would be freer.

Please go explain logic and common sense to your state and federal legislature, record it, because I bet the reaction will be priceless.

Ah, therein lies the problem. You want to introduce your high-falutin "logic" and your fancy-pants "common sense" into electoral politics.
NOT affiliated with the Free Masons -- Barzan's flag does not incorporate masonic imagery
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -4.75 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: +1.03
"I have considerably less respect for people who nod and drool as talking heads in a box feed them pre-digested spoonfuls of opinutainment than someone that listens to and discusses with a variety of sources and opinions and then forms their own; regardless of whether I agree with them." - Lunatic Goofballs

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby SaintB » Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:19 pm

Barzan wrote:
SaintB wrote:
Barzan wrote:
SaintB wrote:As I said in the last thread.

Pornography being legal creates jobs for people who pay taxes.
Prostitution being legal only creates jobs for prostitutes, however as long as its illegal it provides jobs for many people in law enforcement and medical professions.

One of the foundations of politics is jobs, another is taxes.

But if they regulated and taxed prostitution, then they would actually make more money. They could have police check licences and fine/arrest unlicensed brothels/service providers. You would also need health inspectors and physicians to give weekly STD-screening tests. All this would cost less, as jails and courts would be freer.

Please go explain logic and common sense to your state and federal legislature, record it, because I bet the reaction will be priceless.

Ah, therein lies the problem. You want to introduce your high-falutin "logic" and your fancy-pants "common sense" into electoral politics.

Don't forget Intellectual Elitist.
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
Barzan
Minister
 
Posts: 3487
Founded: May 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Barzan » Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:56 pm

SaintB wrote:
Barzan wrote:
SaintB wrote:
Barzan wrote:
SaintB wrote:As I said in the last thread.

Pornography being legal creates jobs for people who pay taxes.
Prostitution being legal only creates jobs for prostitutes, however as long as its illegal it provides jobs for many people in law enforcement and medical professions.

One of the foundations of politics is jobs, another is taxes.

But if they regulated and taxed prostitution, then they would actually make more money. They could have police check licences and fine/arrest unlicensed brothels/service providers. You would also need health inspectors and physicians to give weekly STD-screening tests. All this would cost less, as jails and courts would be freer.

Please go explain logic and common sense to your state and federal legislature, record it, because I bet the reaction will be priceless.

Ah, therein lies the problem. You want to introduce your high-falutin "logic" and your fancy-pants "common sense" into electoral politics.

Don't forget Intellectual Elitist.

Indeed. Should I throw in a hyperbolic non-sequitur insult like "commie", "Muslim", or "socialist" just for good measure?
NOT affiliated with the Free Masons -- Barzan's flag does not incorporate masonic imagery
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -4.75 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: +1.03
"I have considerably less respect for people who nod and drool as talking heads in a box feed them pre-digested spoonfuls of opinutainment than someone that listens to and discusses with a variety of sources and opinions and then forms their own; regardless of whether I agree with them." - Lunatic Goofballs

User avatar
Dempublicents1
Senator
 
Posts: 3963
Founded: Mar 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Dempublicents1 » Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:03 pm

The Olympos Mountains wrote:if they tried to legalize it u'd have all the religious fanatics all over you, and potentially strip clubs wouldnt support it, that or they'd turn to sex clubs


A lot of them are already fronts for prostitution anyways. This would just mean they wouldn't have to hide it.

Des-Bal wrote:When your wife finds out you went to a strip club you sleep in the dog house, when the wife finds out you went to a sex club you sleep in your car.


My husband would only be in the doghouse for going to a strip club if it wasn't a bachelor party and he still didn't invite me.

Barzan wrote:
SaintB wrote:
Barzan wrote:
SaintB wrote:Please go explain logic and common sense to your state and federal legislature, record it, because I bet the reaction will be priceless.

Ah, therein lies the problem. You want to introduce your high-falutin "logic" and your fancy-pants "common sense" into electoral politics.

Don't forget Intellectual Elitist.

Indeed. Should I throw in a hyperbolic non-sequitur insult like "commie", "Muslim", or "socialist" just for good measure?


Maybe you just need to explain to them that prostitution is a good capitalist venture and that it's socialist to prevent it. *nodnod*
"If I poke you with a needle, you feel pain. If I hit you repeatedly in the testicles with a brick, you feel pain. Ergo, the appropriate response to being vaccinated is to testicle-punch your doctor with a brick. It all makes perfect sense now!" -The Norwegian Blue

"In fact, the post was blended with four delicious flavors of sarcasm, then dipped in an insincerity sauce, breaded with mock seriousness, then deep fried in scalding, trans-fat-free-sarcasm oil." - Flameswroth

User avatar
Mean Feat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 962
Founded: Dec 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Mean Feat » Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:12 pm

SaintB wrote:As I said in the last thread.

Pornography being legal creates jobs for people who pay taxes.
Prostitution being legal only creates jobs for prostitutes, however as long as its illegal it provides jobs for many people in law enforcement and medical professions.


The way this went with Barzan suggests you're not serious about this.

If that is a serious opinion, I would like to argue with it please.
— written by Mean Feat.

Mean Feat wrote:The Latham of the Liberals. Tony Abbott.

Tanya Plibersek Mon 22 Feb 2010 wrote:"Tony is the 'Mark Latham' of the Liberal Party.

She didn't get to explain why.

User avatar
Joskar
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Dec 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Joskar » Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:29 am

In the US (and probably other places as well) they did try to use this reasoning to ban pornography, but ultimately the porn lobby won. If I remember correctly, the defence went along the lines of porn as an art form being protected by freedom of speech, and that if you charge porn stars with prostitution, then taking that logic further would really get you into some murky waters. How do you define sex? How about kissing and simulated sex? Then you would have to prosecute a lot of mainstream actors too. Similarly, why do you call porn prostitution but you don't call a boxing match an assault?

This is as best as I can remember from a documentary about Ron Jeremy I saw recently. So equaling porn to prostitution isn't anything new under the sun, but so far the courts have agreed that sex as a performance enjoys certain privileges. Then again, I don't really see why prostitution should be illegal either, but that's another debate.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:38 am

Because the United States has a long tradition of letting Puritan bastards make the laws...

I see no reason why the world's oldest profession need be illegal...

User avatar
Israslovakahzerbajan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7818
Founded: May 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Israslovakahzerbajan » Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:42 am

Maurepas wrote:Because the United States has a long tradition of letting Puritan bastards make the laws...

I see no reason why the world's oldest profession need be illegal...


I thought that was bashing the heads of people who disagreed with you.
IC name: El Reino Panamericano/El Reino de La Dorada
IC Flag: Follow this link

México-Americano, por nacimiento. Nacionalista de mi país adoptivo: México.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Oh, I bet it counts alright...otaku gets anyone a x50 multiplier on their hell points.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:45 am

Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Because the United States has a long tradition of letting Puritan bastards make the laws...

I see no reason why the world's oldest profession need be illegal...


I thought that was bashing the heads of people who disagreed with you.

The two are not mutually exclusive, :p

User avatar
Mean Feat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 962
Founded: Dec 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Mean Feat » Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:03 am

Maurepas wrote:Because the United States has a long tradition of letting Puritan bastards make the laws...

I see no reason why the world's oldest profession need be illegal...


Nor do I.

Q: Why is porn legal but prostitution not ?
A: The law is right about porn, but wrong about prostitution.
— written by Mean Feat.

Mean Feat wrote:The Latham of the Liberals. Tony Abbott.

Tanya Plibersek Mon 22 Feb 2010 wrote:"Tony is the 'Mark Latham' of the Liberal Party.

She didn't get to explain why.

User avatar
Meoton
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1239
Founded: Mar 10, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Meoton » Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:38 am

Ogonhal wrote:So why in the United States is pornography legal, but prostitution illegal? Prostitution is defined as "the act of engaging in sexual activity in exchange for money or goods." Don't Porn stars do this? They have sex with another person(s) in exchange for money. Home videos are different.

Hypocrisy is the right of every citizen in these good and Blessed United States of America. :clap:
Ignorance is curable. Stupidity is for life.
"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"
"Have some Kool-aid" - Jim Jones
An obsession with guns is often a sign of a small penis. - S. Fraud

User avatar
Dempublicents1
Senator
 
Posts: 3963
Founded: Mar 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Dempublicents1 » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:24 am

Joskar wrote:In the US (and probably other places as well) they did try to use this reasoning to ban pornography, but ultimately the porn lobby won. If I remember correctly, the defence went along the lines of porn as an art form being protected by freedom of speech, and that if you charge porn stars with prostitution, then taking that logic further would really get you into some murky waters. How do you define sex? How about kissing and simulated sex? Then you would have to prosecute a lot of mainstream actors too. Similarly, why do you call porn prostitution but you don't call a boxing match an assault?


I don't think that's a good comparison? A boxing match is not assault because both parties are consenting. It really doesn't have anything to do with whether or not you're filming it.

The reasoning for why porn isn't prostitution is that people, for some reason, draw a large distincition between paying people to have sex and filming it and just paying people to have sex.
"If I poke you with a needle, you feel pain. If I hit you repeatedly in the testicles with a brick, you feel pain. Ergo, the appropriate response to being vaccinated is to testicle-punch your doctor with a brick. It all makes perfect sense now!" -The Norwegian Blue

"In fact, the post was blended with four delicious flavors of sarcasm, then dipped in an insincerity sauce, breaded with mock seriousness, then deep fried in scalding, trans-fat-free-sarcasm oil." - Flameswroth

User avatar
Flameswroth
Senator
 
Posts: 4773
Founded: Sep 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Flameswroth » Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:12 am

You see, children, lawmakers are always hard up for sex. They gotta look PC for the public, but they wanna get their rocks off, too. Problem is, most of them are pudgy, smelly old geriatrics. By relation, their wives are also as such, so they have only a few options. The first option is to woo a younger female, but this is adulterous and viewed as wrong. Similarly, paying a prostitute for sex will get you kicked out of office really fast. But pornography allows them to act on sexual desires without actually doing anything "wrong", and its much more private.

So you see, that's why pornography's legal, but prostitution isn't, children.

EDIT: I'm not using 'children' in a condescending, derogatory sense. I'm doing a Chef impression ;)
Last edited by Flameswroth on Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?

Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.

That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.



PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Anastasica, Likhinia, New haven america, Shrillland, The Holy Therns, The peoples commune, Warvick

Advertisement

Remove ads