by Infected Mushroom » Sun May 31, 2015 5:02 am
by Aelex » Sun May 31, 2015 5:18 am
by Infected Mushroom » Sun May 31, 2015 5:23 am
Aelex wrote:Ordalie was already considered as bullshit in Middle Age so why should it be viewed as more logical now?
And, please, stop the constants A.S.O.I.A.F references, it's becoming boring as shit.
by Arcturus Novus » Sun May 31, 2015 5:26 am
Nilokeras wrote:there is of course an interesting thread to pull on [...]
Unfortunately we're all forced to participate in whatever baroque humiliation kink the OP has going on instead.
by Jute » Sun May 31, 2015 5:27 am
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...
The notion that science and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
"Boys and girls so happy, young and gay / Don't let false worldly joy carry your hearts away."
by Aelex » Sun May 31, 2015 5:27 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:so what would you do in such a situation?
by The Huskar Social Union » Sun May 31, 2015 5:28 am
by Infected Mushroom » Sun May 31, 2015 5:29 am
Arcturus Novus wrote:Saw this in the Latest Topics column and instantly knew that Kefka wrote it.
Anyways, I'd just go on with the trial. No point in killing someone to prove my innocencce.
by Arcturus Novus » Sun May 31, 2015 5:30 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Arcturus Novus wrote:Saw this in the Latest Topics column and instantly knew that Kefka wrote it.
Anyways, I'd just go on with the trial. No point in killing someone to prove my innocencce.
That's an interesting way to view it.
Though keep in mind that that person volunteered to fight against you (to kill you or your fighter) to prove your guilt once you moved to trial by combat. They knew you could be innocent, but they were willing to kill you/your representative to prove your supposed guilt.
I think that makes them fair game.
Nilokeras wrote:there is of course an interesting thread to pull on [...]
Unfortunately we're all forced to participate in whatever baroque humiliation kink the OP has going on instead.
by Infected Mushroom » Sun May 31, 2015 5:31 am
Arcturus Novus wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
That's an interesting way to view it.
Though keep in mind that that person volunteered to fight against you (to kill you or your fighter) to prove your guilt once you moved to trial by combat. They knew you could be innocent, but they were willing to kill you/your representative to prove your supposed guilt.
I think that makes them fair game.
I don't enjoy killing people.
by The Holy Therns » Sun May 31, 2015 5:31 am
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by HYDRA-Russian Empire » Sun May 31, 2015 5:31 am
by Infected Mushroom » Sun May 31, 2015 5:32 am
HYDRA-Russian Empire wrote:Even though I can afford the best of lawyers, even they can fail.
So I would spend the money I was going to spend on a lawyer(s) on hiring the best fencing/duelling champion I can afford (he is going to be world class probably). That way I have a higher chance of being proven innocent.
I myself am not good with a sword, so I would not use myself in the sword fight. If it was a gun fight, I would chose myself as I am a very good marksman.
In conclusion, I would chose Trial by Combat, and would hire a world-class swordsman to represent me, as I can afford this.
by HYDRA-Russian Empire » Sun May 31, 2015 5:34 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:HYDRA-Russian Empire wrote:Even though I can afford the best of lawyers, even they can fail.
So I would spend the money I was going to spend on a lawyer(s) on hiring the best fencing/duelling champion I can afford (he is going to be world class probably). That way I have a higher chance of being proven innocent.
I myself am not good with a sword, so I would not use myself in the sword fight. If it was a gun fight, I would chose myself as I am a very good marksman.
In conclusion, I would chose Trial by Combat, and would hire a world-class swordsman to represent me, as I can afford this.
I see...
but if it were a Western style high noon duel you would fight personally?
by Infected Mushroom » Sun May 31, 2015 5:34 am
by HYDRA-Russian Empire » Sun May 31, 2015 5:35 am
by Aethrys » Sun May 31, 2015 5:35 am
by Infected Mushroom » Sun May 31, 2015 5:36 am
by Infected Mushroom » Sun May 31, 2015 5:36 am
by Infected Mushroom » Sun May 31, 2015 5:37 am
Aethrys wrote:No to trial by combat. Aside from that being a really stupid system in the first place, I'm not going to win, especially not if either party can choose/hire stand-in gladiators. Mostly because I couldn't afford that and I don't know any psychopaths willing to face down death for me. Seriously, how shitty would that be though? Say you DO have some professional fighter for a close friend/family member, and the guy getting paid a few million to represent the prosecution turns out to be a little bit better. Now your friend or relative is dead and you're still getting executed.
by HYDRA-Russian Empire » Sun May 31, 2015 5:37 am
by Infected Mushroom » Sun May 31, 2015 5:39 am
Jute wrote:How did I know this was a thread by Infected Mushroom just by reading the title?
Seriously, of course the first option. Rule of Law over rule of power, violence solves nothing, that is the job of the courts etc...
by Aethrys » Sun May 31, 2015 5:43 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Aethrys wrote:No to trial by combat. Aside from that being a really stupid system in the first place, I'm not going to win, especially not if either party can choose/hire stand-in gladiators. Mostly because I couldn't afford that and I don't know any psychopaths willing to face down death for me. Seriously, how shitty would that be though? Say you DO have some professional fighter for a close friend/family member, and the guy getting paid a few million to represent the prosecution turns out to be a little bit better. Now your friend or relative is dead and you're still getting executed.
You don't trust Coster-Waldau?
by Aelex » Sun May 31, 2015 5:48 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:I'm thinking of getting into it someday. I'm also looking at jousting.
Still, this is a real duel to the death with a gladius. Its going to be a bit different. I've heard that modern fencing is geared towards risky offensive attacks to score points since the hits are non-lethal while medieval fencing is more defensive.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 00-ARIA, Czechostan, Einaro, Fauzjhia, Infected Mushroom, Kerwa, Kostane, Likhinia, Luziyca, Maximum Imperium Rex, New Palau, Singaporen Empire, Spirit of Hope, Statesburg, Stellar Colonies, The Black Forrest, Tiami, Togsland
Advertisement