NATION

PASSWORD

Feminism in decline

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57902
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jul 03, 2015 1:55 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:This kind of misandry is fucking endemic to your movement. It cripples your ability to be useful to society. That post there is another example of feminism routinely being unable to fix womens problems, and just shouting at men for them.


I love how both you and ChessMistress think I'm a misandrist. Do you both also share an interest in equestrian fantasy based on my little pony?


viewtopic.php?p=18650622#p18650622

Dunno about Chessmistress.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5161
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Fri Jul 03, 2015 2:34 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:You're a cultural feminist, a matriarchist, like my partner.


Are you hitting on me? Sorry I'm married. No not to Des-Bal.


No :)
My partner is jealous :)
And also I don't know you enough :)
Married to a male or a woman? Just a curiosity...

Natapoc wrote:If it was not so immoral I'd make a "roleplay" account and talk about male rape the way you and others talk about rape against women. But I can't even bring myself to satirize your viewpoint because I would think myself a horrible person.


It's not a matter of "morality": it's a matter of personal coherency and fairness towards other users. OOC is OOC.
If one wish roleplay, there's the game: you can found a custom nation or region for these things (or joining an existing region :p I know a region where there's even an agency that promotes abuses against males, human sacrifices and satanic rituals on the ground that "Satan is a Woman" :p )
Last edited by Chessmistress on Fri Jul 03, 2015 2:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Fri Jul 03, 2015 2:47 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
Are you hitting on me? Sorry I'm married. No not to Des-Bal.


No :)
My partner is jealous :)
And also I don't know you enough :)
Married to a male or a woman? Just a curiosity...

Natapoc wrote:If it was not so immoral I'd make a "roleplay" account and talk about male rape the way you and others talk about rape against women. But I can't even bring myself to satirize your viewpoint because I would think myself a horrible person.


It's not a matter of "morality": it's a matter of personal coherency and fairness towards other users. OOC is OOC.
If one wish roleplay, there's the game: you can found a custom nation or region for these things (or joining an existing region :p I know a region where there's even an agency that promotes abuses against males, human sacrifices and satanic rituals on the ground that "Satan is a Woman" :p )


Oh really? What region would that be? An agency that promotes abuse against males?

I think our MRA friends here would call that the justice department.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32085
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Fri Jul 03, 2015 3:14 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Oh really? What region would that be? An agency that promotes abuse against males?

I think our MRA friends here would call that the justice department.


Lol, the justice department doesn't consider it rape to fuck men against their will. What humor.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Fri Jul 03, 2015 5:19 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Natapoc wrote:
Why would it be Cognitive dissonance?

If one believes that females are on average more intelligent than males than they may very well be anti feminist on the grounds that equality would simply bring society down to the level of men. People who believe that men are biologically inferior to women are often anti feminist.


If one believe that women are on average more intelligent than males than she cannot also say that feminism - a movement created by women and for women - is a flawed ideology. Otherwise that would be very conflicting with the first affirmation, that women are more intelligent: very intelligent people aren't likely to create a flawed ideology.

I'm just curious: examples of declared anti-feminists believing men are biologically inferior to women? I never find something similar, it would be interesting to see it.


"You're smarter than me" does not, in any way, imply "you're right about everything".
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Fri Jul 03, 2015 11:05 pm

Some basic and funny(IMO) breakdown on the Tim Hunt thing.

Image
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
The New World Oceania
Minister
 
Posts: 2525
Founded: May 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The New World Oceania » Sun Jul 05, 2015 10:53 pm

This delusional thread based on a false reading of two studies methodology in absentia is still ongoing. And, unless this is the MRA mirrormaze masturbation thread, I'm going to assume that means people have been debating here. And on those grounds, I'm going to conclude that it's not declining if there are still people willing daily to work up the excruciating amount of energy needed to come back here and debate that women do in fact deserve rights.
Woman-made-woman.
Formerly Not a Bang but a Whimper.
Mario Cerce, Member of the Red - Green Alliance, Fighting for your Fernão!
Elizia
Joyce Wu, Eternal President of Elizia
Wen Lin, Governor of Jinyu
Ahmed Alef, Member for South Hutnegeri
Dagmar
Elise Marlowe, Member for Varland
Calaverde
Alsafyr Njil, Minister of Justice
Vienna Eliot et. al, Poets
Dick Njil, Journalist
Assad Hazouri, Mayor of Masalbhumi
Baltonia
Clint Webb, Member of the Seima
Ment-Al Li, United Nations Agent
Aurentina
Clint Webb, Senator

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Sun Jul 05, 2015 10:54 pm

The New World Oceania wrote:This delusional thread based on a false reading of two studies methodology in absentia is still ongoing. And, unless this is the MRA mirrormaze masturbation thread, I'm going to assume that means people have been debating here. And on those grounds, I'm going to conclude that it's not declining if there are still people willing daily to work up the excruciating amount of energy needed to come back here and debate that women do in fact deserve rights.

through government fiat?
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Sun Jul 05, 2015 10:58 pm

Haktiva wrote:Some basic and funny(IMO) breakdown on the Tim Hunt thing.


You don't find his comments the least bit objectionable?

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Sun Jul 05, 2015 11:02 pm

Kelinfort wrote:
Haktiva wrote:Some basic and funny(IMO) breakdown on the Tim Hunt thing.


You don't find his comments the least bit objectionable?

no, I don't take offense to generalizations or stereotypes, I usually just find them funny. clearly the man didn't know his audience. I actually do like the idea of labs separated by gender, as it would be an interesting social experiment.
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32085
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Mon Jul 06, 2015 8:13 am

The New World Oceania wrote:This delusional thread based on a false reading of two studies methodology in absentia is still ongoing. And, unless this is the MRA mirrormaze masturbation thread, I'm going to assume that means people have been debating here. And on those grounds, I'm going to conclude that it's not declining if there are still people willing daily to work up the excruciating amount of energy needed to come back here and debate that women do in fact deserve rights.


If feminism was just about women having rights there would be no issue. I've seen exceedingly few people suggest that women should not have rights. Objections to feminism take the form of questioning theories, proposals, and policies. If you'd look through the thread I'm sure you'd find a few fine examples of why a lot of people don't want their fingerprints on feminism.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Pyravia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Feb 21, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Pyravia » Mon Jul 06, 2015 8:17 am

I think it's good, the word has become toxic and there's no saving it now. Egalitarians still good for now.

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tahar Joblis » Mon Jul 06, 2015 8:37 am

Haktiva wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:You don't find his comments the least bit objectionable?

no, I don't take offense to generalizations or stereotypes, I usually just find them funny. clearly the man didn't know his audience. I actually do like the idea of labs separated by gender, as it would be an interesting social experiment.

His actual audience at the talk received it just fine. It is instead the online Twitterati who blew their tops. They weren't the audience he was talking to.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32085
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Mon Jul 06, 2015 8:45 am

Tahar Joblis wrote:His actual audience at the talk received it just fine. It is instead the online Twitterati who blew their tops. They weren't the audience he was talking to.


I'm feeling Shirley Sherrod parallels (except I don't think feminist groups are humble enough to apologize in the end). Someone makes a speech in favor of treating people equally and it's trimmed in such a way that it seems hateful. The problem isn't that people in positions to act don't understand it's that people have chosen to be upset. They don't care about Tim Hunt but they've heard scientists hate women so Tim Hunt is now the symbol of science's hatred for women and defending him is defending misogyny.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
United American South
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: Jul 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby United American South » Mon Jul 06, 2015 8:52 am

I am glad that left-wing feminism is in decline. Left-wing feminism shames men and promotes abortion. Tumblr feminism is also annoying. The left has not been doing a good job of promoting feminism if it is in decline.
I am not racist.

User avatar
Rostogovia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1188
Founded: Nov 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rostogovia » Mon Jul 06, 2015 8:53 am

There is no such thing as a "man hating feminist." (Or if they do exist they're a minute group.) As a man (an a feminist as well.), I can say that there is no misandry whatsoever in our society.
NS's Resident PETA Nut
Feminist
Up The IRA! Proud Irish Republican Socialist
☭☭☭Trotskyist.☭☭☭
Bernie Sanders 2016, the worlds only honest statesman.
Real name: Garret
Age: 14
Gender - Male
Location: New York USA
Religious beliefs: On the corner of atheism and agnosticism.

★Comrade of the Commonwealth of Socialist States (CSS)★

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32085
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Mon Jul 06, 2015 8:55 am

Rostogovia wrote:There is no such thing as a "man hating feminist." (Or if they do exist they're a minute group.) As a man (an a feminist as well.), I can say that there is no misandry whatsoever in our society.


I think Misandry and Misogyny are simple ways at looking at complicated things. Feminism ignores and diminishes men's problems and is in part responsible for society not taking them seriously. Call that what you want.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
The New World Oceania
Minister
 
Posts: 2525
Founded: May 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The New World Oceania » Mon Jul 06, 2015 8:57 am

Des-Bal wrote:
The New World Oceania wrote:This delusional thread based on a false reading of two studies methodology in absentia is still ongoing. And, unless this is the MRA mirrormaze masturbation thread, I'm going to assume that means people have been debating here. And on those grounds, I'm going to conclude that it's not declining if there are still people willing daily to work up the excruciating amount of energy needed to come back here and debate that women do in fact deserve rights.


If feminism was just about women having rights there would be no issue. I've seen exceedingly few people suggest that women should not have rights. Objections to feminism take the form of questioning theories, proposals, and policies. If you'd look through the thread I'm sure you'd find a few fine examples of why a lot of people don't want their fingerprints on feminism.

Yeah, it's about taking over all the government institutions. You caught us.
Woman-made-woman.
Formerly Not a Bang but a Whimper.
Mario Cerce, Member of the Red - Green Alliance, Fighting for your Fernão!
Elizia
Joyce Wu, Eternal President of Elizia
Wen Lin, Governor of Jinyu
Ahmed Alef, Member for South Hutnegeri
Dagmar
Elise Marlowe, Member for Varland
Calaverde
Alsafyr Njil, Minister of Justice
Vienna Eliot et. al, Poets
Dick Njil, Journalist
Assad Hazouri, Mayor of Masalbhumi
Baltonia
Clint Webb, Member of the Seima
Ment-Al Li, United Nations Agent
Aurentina
Clint Webb, Senator

User avatar
Rostogovia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1188
Founded: Nov 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rostogovia » Mon Jul 06, 2015 8:59 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Rostogovia wrote:There is no such thing as a "man hating feminist." (Or if they do exist they're a minute group.) As a man (and a feminist as well.), I can say that there is no misandry whatsoever in our society.


I think Misandry and Misogyny are simple ways at looking at complicated things. Feminism ignores and diminishes men's problems and is in part responsible for society not taking them seriously. Call that what you want.


Of course men face problems, but unlike women, they face no significant discrimination in society. Nobody's denying that men do face some challenges, but I think we can all agree that being a woman is MUCH harder.
NS's Resident PETA Nut
Feminist
Up The IRA! Proud Irish Republican Socialist
☭☭☭Trotskyist.☭☭☭
Bernie Sanders 2016, the worlds only honest statesman.
Real name: Garret
Age: 14
Gender - Male
Location: New York USA
Religious beliefs: On the corner of atheism and agnosticism.

★Comrade of the Commonwealth of Socialist States (CSS)★

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5161
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Mon Jul 06, 2015 9:01 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Rostogovia wrote:There is no such thing as a "man hating feminist." (Or if they do exist they're a minute group.) As a man (an a feminist as well.), I can say that there is no misandry whatsoever in our society.


I think Misandry and Misogyny are simple ways at looking at complicated things. Feminism ignores and diminishes men's problems and is in part responsible for society not taking them seriously. Call that what you want.


Feminism ignores but NOT diminishes males' problems.
Would you prefer that women would keep care of males' problems? Really? And why we should waste our energy?
Males have dominated the world for so long, and are still dominating it.
Why the oppressed gender should keep care of the problems of the dominant gender? That's ludicrous!
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32085
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Mon Jul 06, 2015 9:01 am

The New World Oceania wrote:Yeah, it's about taking over all the government institutions. You caught us.


You're fighting strawmen, it's a common reactionary tactic that you see a lot in feminists. Feminism isn't prepared for substantive critique, it expects to be accepted without question or rejected out of hand. The problem with feminism is that it's about advancing women, not to the point of equality, not bringing them closer to men in terms of privileges- just advancing women full stop. That's a problem because it dismisses the problems that men face.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5161
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Mon Jul 06, 2015 9:02 am

Rostogovia wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
I think Misandry and Misogyny are simple ways at looking at complicated things. Feminism ignores and diminishes men's problems and is in part responsible for society not taking them seriously. Call that what you want.


Of course men face problems, but unlike women, they face no significant discrimination in society. Nobody's denying that men do face some challenges, but I think we can all agree that being a woman is MUCH harder.


Thank you for saying it.
You're a good ally.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Mon Jul 06, 2015 9:05 am

Tahar Joblis wrote:
Haktiva wrote:no, I don't take offense to generalizations or stereotypes, I usually just find them funny. clearly the man didn't know his audience. I actually do like the idea of labs separated by gender, as it would be an interesting social experiment.

His actual audience at the talk received it just fine. It is instead the online Twitterati who blew their tops. They weren't the audience he was talking to.

go figure.
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32085
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Mon Jul 06, 2015 9:05 am

Rostogovia wrote:Of course men face problems, but unlike women, they face no significant discrimination in society. Nobody's denying that men do face some challenges, but I think we can all agree that being a woman is MUCH harder.

That's not true. Boys and men preform worse in schools due to discrimination, have exceedingly few societal or legal protections against rape and domestic violence, are treated much more severely by the justice system, are more likely to be the victims of almost any crime, and are sent to die en masse. I don't think of having problems as a competition and I don't trouble myself with who has it worse but as I recall the woman who lived as a man for a year was firmly of the opinion that it was easier being a woman.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Mon Jul 06, 2015 9:06 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Rostogovia wrote:Of course men face problems, but unlike women, they face no significant discrimination in society. Nobody's denying that men do face some challenges, but I think we can all agree that being a woman is MUCH harder.

That's not true. Boys and men preform worse in schools due to discrimination, have exceedingly few societal or legal protections against rape and domestic violence, are treated much more severely by the justice system, are more likely to be the victims of almost any crime, and are sent to die en masse. I don't think of having problems as a competition and I don't trouble myself with who has it worse but as I recall the woman who lived as a man for a year was firmly of the opinion that it was easier being a woman.

equality is a zero-sum game to these people
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Adamede, Dimetrodon Empire, Enormous Gentiles, Ethel mermania, Gavia Penguis, Jebslund, Narland, Qihein, The Jamesian Republic, The Two Jerseys, Tinhampton

Advertisement

Remove ads