NATION

PASSWORD

Analyzing a "Feminist thought" quiz

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Is this right? Are these scales anti-sexist or sexist?

The quiz is sorting the categories of feminist well...
17
16%
The quiz misrepresents some types of feminism...
27
25%
Things are complicated on that first question...
4
4%
... the scales describe feminism as anti-sexist.
4
4%
... the scales, except liberal feminism show more sexism than anti-sexism.
34
32%
... all of the scale, including liberal feminism, show more sexism than anti-sexism.
8
7%
... I have a more complicated answer to the second question.
13
12%
 
Total votes : 107

User avatar
Replevion
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1435
Founded: Apr 21, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Replevion » Thu May 28, 2015 1:02 pm

Perspective Score
Liberal feminist 47
Women of Color 34
Cultural feminist 30
Radical feminist 24
Socialist feminist 20
Conservative 14

Not surprised. I'm all about liberty... and being a black woman's partner for a dozen years has probably made me somewhat more sensitive to PoC issues than the average honky.
______ ______ ______ ______
I am TET's extremist libertarian scourge.
The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money. ~Margaret Thatcher

Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others. ~Ayn Rand
I am a polyamorous, pansexual, and transgender woman in an open marriage. My passions include history, politics, booze, culture, firearms, and erotica and I have no shame about any of it. Politically I consider myself to be a radical centrist mincap libertarian. I do volunteer work for TransLAWdc.org (me on the left), transequality.org, and translifeline.org. DC Metro? Date me! My OKC

User avatar
Camicon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14377
Founded: Aug 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Camicon » Thu May 28, 2015 1:04 pm

My results...
Liberal feminist: 48
Women of Color: 32
Socialist feminist: 24
Cultural feminist: 22
Radical feminist: 14
Conservative: 12

I found the quiz to be somewhat ridiculous, quite frankly. It would jump around between questions of morality and ethics that have no clear answer (such as "Given the way that men are, women have a responsibility not to arouse them by their dress and actions") to ones that are very much able to be scientifically quantified and answered (such as "Capitalism forces most women to wear feminine clothes to keep a job").

The entire "agree/disagree" scale is flawed for a great many of the questions asked, for example: "The availability of adequate child care is central to a woman's right to work outside the home". Answering "agree" could mean that you believe in traditional gender roles, hence why women would need child care in order to participate in the work force, or it could mean that you recognize the socially enforced challenges men and women face in bucking said gender roles (stay at homes dads, etc.), and believe that providing adequate child care is one way of breaking down those barriers.

And then there are the questions that just make no sense, like: "Replacing the word God with Goddess will remind people that the deity is not male". What deity? Some deities are decidedly male, and some are decidedly female. Of course, calling a sexless/genderless deity a "goddess" will remind people that it isn't inherently male, but it's also inaccurate, because then you're saying that it is inherently female. So what the fuck is that question supposed to be measuring, and how the fuck are any given answers interpreted?

All-in-all, that's a shitty quiz.
Hey/They
Active since May, 2009
Country of glowing hearts, and patrons of the arts
Help me out
Star spangled madness, united sadness
Count me out
The Trews, Under The Sun
No human is more human than any other. - Lieutenant-General Roméo Antonius Dallaire
Don't shine for swine. - Metric, Soft Rock Star
Love is hell. Hell is love. Hell is asking to be loved. - Emily Haines and the Soft Skeleton, Detective Daughter

Why (Male) Rape Is Hilarious [because it has to be]

User avatar
The Free Democratic Republic of Freedom
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 49
Founded: Dec 31, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Free Democratic Republic of Freedom » Thu May 28, 2015 1:08 pm

Camicon wrote:My results...
Liberal feminist: 48
Women of Color: 32
Socialist feminist: 24
Cultural feminist: 22
Radical feminist: 14
Conservative: 12

I found the quiz to be somewhat ridiculous, quite frankly. It would jump around between questions of morality and ethics that have no clear answer (such as "Given the way that men are, women have a responsibility not to arouse them by their dress and actions") to ones that are very much able to be scientifically quantified and answered (such as "Capitalism forces most women to wear feminine clothes to keep a job").

The entire "agree/disagree" scale is flawed for a great many of the questions asked, for example: "The availability of adequate child care is central to a woman's right to work outside the home". Answering "agree" could mean that you believe in traditional gender roles, hence why women would need child care in order to participate in the work force, or it could mean that you recognize the socially enforced challenges men and women face in bucking said gender roles (stay at homes dads, etc.), and believe that providing adequate child care is one way of breaking down those barriers.

And then there are the questions that just make no sense, like: "Replacing the word God with Goddess will remind people that the deity is not male". What deity? Some deities are decidedly male, and some are decidedly female. Of course, calling a sexless/genderless deity a "goddess" will remind people that it isn't inherently male, but it's also inaccurate, because then you're saying that it is inherently female. So what the fuck is that question supposed to be measuring, and how the fuck are any given answers interpreted?

All-in-all, that's a shitty quiz.

I think that you've basically said every point that I would make, plus some new points that I also agree with.
Additionally, some of the questions present a very clear bias, with some questions being worded in such a way as to make you appear sexist for not answering one way or another.


My score:
Liberal feminist 45
Women of Color 23
Socialist feminist 17
Conservative 15
Cultural feminist 11
Radical feminist 10
Last edited by The Free Democratic Republic of Freedom on Thu May 28, 2015 1:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

PRETTY IN PINK
True Neutral
Score: +27.8% Good, +5.1% Chaotic
Link to alignment test
For: Better RP, Gratuitous Swearing, Nederland, Metric System, Secularism, Equal Rights for All, Science, UK, EU, NATO, Royal Navy, Sensible Gun-control, Pro-Choice, DEAT Everyone 2016
Neutral: Ukraine, Israel, China
Against: Imperial Measurement System, Putin, DPRK, Religious Extremism, SJWs, Pseudoscience, Creationism, Sectarianism, Prejudice, Censorship of Legitimate Criticism, Inherited Guilt
(average of 3)
Economic Left/Right: -4.413
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.333

User avatar
New Werpland
Senator
 
Posts: 4647
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Werpland » Thu May 28, 2015 1:15 pm

I appear to be a woman of color.
Women of Color 33
Liberal feminist 31
Conservative 18
Socialist feminist 17
Radical feminist 15
Cultural feminist 15

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45251
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Thu May 28, 2015 1:15 pm

Assorted sucrose-based lifeforms wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:I totally agreed here. But such question is not just only about Radical Feminism but also about Liberal Feminism: indeed a liberal "feminist" would totally disagree.

Oh, 'feminist' in quotes for 'liberal feminist', huh?
Cute. I bet you're the only true Scotsman too.


If "kilt" is the equivalent of "rekt" then Chessmistress is the finest Scotsman there's ever been.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5161
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Thu May 28, 2015 1:18 pm

Assorted sucrose-based lifeforms wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:I totally agreed here. But such question is not just only about Radical Feminism but also about Liberal Feminism: indeed a liberal "feminist" would totally disagree.

Oh, 'feminist' in quotes for 'liberal feminist', huh?
Cute. I bet you're the only true Scotsman too.


Liberal "feminists" are supporters of pornography and prostitution, do you know?
I think that pornography and prostitution are anti-women.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Camicon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14377
Founded: Aug 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Camicon » Thu May 28, 2015 1:18 pm

The Free Democratic Republic of Freedom wrote:
Camicon wrote:My results...
Liberal feminist: 48
Women of Color: 32
Socialist feminist: 24
Cultural feminist: 22
Radical feminist: 14
Conservative: 12

I found the quiz to be somewhat ridiculous, quite frankly. It would jump around between questions of morality and ethics that have no clear answer (such as "Given the way that men are, women have a responsibility not to arouse them by their dress and actions") to ones that are very much able to be scientifically quantified and answered (such as "Capitalism forces most women to wear feminine clothes to keep a job").

The entire "agree/disagree" scale is flawed for a great many of the questions asked, for example: "The availability of adequate child care is central to a woman's right to work outside the home". Answering "agree" could mean that you believe in traditional gender roles, hence why women would need child care in order to participate in the work force, or it could mean that you recognize the socially enforced challenges men and women face in bucking said gender roles (stay at homes dads, etc.), and believe that providing adequate child care is one way of breaking down those barriers.

And then there are the questions that just make no sense, like: "Replacing the word God with Goddess will remind people that the deity is not male". What deity? Some deities are decidedly male, and some are decidedly female. Of course, calling a sexless/genderless deity a "goddess" will remind people that it isn't inherently male, but it's also inaccurate, because then you're saying that it is inherently female. So what the fuck is that question supposed to be measuring, and how the fuck are any given answers interpreted?

All-in-all, that's a shitty quiz.

I think that you've basically said every point that I would make, plus some new points that I also agree with; all in all, a lot of the questions present a very clear bias, with some questions being worded in such a way as to make you appear sexist for not answering one way or another.

And I forgot to mention the number of questions that I didn't feel comfortable answering, because they were essentially asking about the experience of groups that I don't belong to. Do women of colour face more challenges in the work place than white women? How the fuck do I know? I'm not going to answer either way until I have a helluva lot more information.
Chessmistress wrote:
Assorted sucrose-based lifeforms wrote:Oh, 'feminist' in quotes for 'liberal feminist', huh?
Cute. I bet you're the only true Scotsman too.


Liberal "feminists" are supporters of pornography and prostitution, do you know?
I think that pornography and prostitution are anti-women.

Hence my displeasure with the whole of the feminist movement. They can't come to a consensus on such basic issues, and then ask for my unequivocal support? Fat chance.
Last edited by Camicon on Thu May 28, 2015 1:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Hey/They
Active since May, 2009
Country of glowing hearts, and patrons of the arts
Help me out
Star spangled madness, united sadness
Count me out
The Trews, Under The Sun
No human is more human than any other. - Lieutenant-General Roméo Antonius Dallaire
Don't shine for swine. - Metric, Soft Rock Star
Love is hell. Hell is love. Hell is asking to be loved. - Emily Haines and the Soft Skeleton, Detective Daughter

Why (Male) Rape Is Hilarious [because it has to be]

User avatar
Jute
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13729
Founded: Jan 28, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Jute » Thu May 28, 2015 1:26 pm

What's with all those claims suggesting romances are now something bad? It's not like women can't be the strong, leading figure there...
Liberal feminist 42
Women of Color 33
Cultural feminist 29
Radical feminist 27
Socialist feminist 24
Conservative 20

Nierra wrote:I think the quiz is incredibly biased against traditional conservatives as it only gives then 3 reasonable choices that reinforce what actual conservatives think. The rest are strawman assumptions.

I scored mid 40s in liberal feminist and 18 in conservatism and I'm anti feminism so....

Clearly you're actually a feminist and only against more radical forms of feminism.
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

Check out the Jutean language! Talk to me about anything. Avian air force flag (Source) Definition of atheism Is Religion Dangerous?

User avatar
The Free Democratic Republic of Freedom
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 49
Founded: Dec 31, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Free Democratic Republic of Freedom » Thu May 28, 2015 1:26 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Assorted sucrose-based lifeforms wrote:Oh, 'feminist' in quotes for 'liberal feminist', huh?
Cute. I bet you're the only true Scotsman too.


Liberal "feminists" are supporters of pornography and prostitution, do you know?
I think that pornography and prostitution are anti-women.

[I am ASBL, I forgot to switch accounts before posting my first post there]

I do know, and I also know that you thinking that porn& prostitution are anti-women doesn't make them anti-women.

Personally, I think that preventing women from profiting from their own bodies in a way of their choosing is anti-women, but I'm not going to say that you're not a feminist because that's the ol' 'No True Scotsman' fallacy.
Even though I myself think that you're denying some women their own sexuality due to your own prudishness, I still acknowledge that you are a feminist, albeit a different type of feminist than I would agree with.
Last edited by The Free Democratic Republic of Freedom on Thu May 28, 2015 1:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.

PRETTY IN PINK
True Neutral
Score: +27.8% Good, +5.1% Chaotic
Link to alignment test
For: Better RP, Gratuitous Swearing, Nederland, Metric System, Secularism, Equal Rights for All, Science, UK, EU, NATO, Royal Navy, Sensible Gun-control, Pro-Choice, DEAT Everyone 2016
Neutral: Ukraine, Israel, China
Against: Imperial Measurement System, Putin, DPRK, Religious Extremism, SJWs, Pseudoscience, Creationism, Sectarianism, Prejudice, Censorship of Legitimate Criticism, Inherited Guilt
(average of 3)
Economic Left/Right: -4.413
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.333

User avatar
Nierra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 800
Founded: May 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Nierra » Thu May 28, 2015 1:28 pm

The Free Democratic Republic of Freedom wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
Liberal "feminists" are supporters of pornography and prostitution, do you know?
I think that pornography and prostitution are anti-women.

[I am ASBL, I forgot to switch accounts before posting my first post there]

I do know, and I also know that you thinking that porn& prostitution are anti-women doesn't make them so.

Personally, I think that preventing women from profiting from their own bodies in a way of their choosing is anti-women, but I'm not going to say that you're not a feminist because that's the ol' 'No True Scotsman' fallacy.
Personally, even though I think that you're denying some women their own sexuality due to your own prudishness, I still acknowledge that you are a feminist, albeit a different type of feminist than I would agree with.


First reasonable feminist all year
Pro: Gamer-gate, equality, opportunity, free trade, capitalism, and centrism

Aginst: Feminism, socialism, anarchism, fascism, and progressivism

There is no such thing as corporatism

User avatar
Jute
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13729
Founded: Jan 28, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Jute » Thu May 28, 2015 1:28 pm

Camicon wrote:
The Free Democratic Republic of Freedom wrote:I think that you've basically said every point that I would make, plus some new points that I also agree with; all in all, a lot of the questions present a very clear bias, with some questions being worded in such a way as to make you appear sexist for not answering one way or another.

And I forgot to mention the number of questions that I didn't feel comfortable answering, because they were essentially asking about the experience of groups that I don't belong to. Do women of colour face more challenges in the work place than white women? How the fuck do I know? I'm not going to answer either way until I have a helluva lot more information.
Chessmistress wrote:
Liberal "feminists" are supporters of pornography and prostitution, do you know?
I think that pornography and prostitution are anti-women.

Hence my displeasure with the whole of the feminist movement. They can't come to a consensus on such basic issues, and then ask for my unequivocal support? Fat chance.

Feminists at least have already achieved the right for women to vote, be elected and have it socially be accepted that they take whatever job they please. Widespread acceptance of feminism is mostly because of the achievements of those "liberal" (aka actual, non-radical) feminists.
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

Check out the Jutean language! Talk to me about anything. Avian air force flag (Source) Definition of atheism Is Religion Dangerous?

User avatar
Jute
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13729
Founded: Jan 28, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Jute » Thu May 28, 2015 1:29 pm

Nierra wrote:
The Free Democratic Republic of Freedom wrote:
[I am ASBL, I forgot to switch accounts before posting my first post there]

I do know, and I also know that you thinking that porn& prostitution are anti-women doesn't make them so.

Personally, I think that preventing women from profiting from their own bodies in a way of their choosing is anti-women, but I'm not going to say that you're not a feminist because that's the ol' 'No True Scotsman' fallacy.
Personally, even though I think that you're denying some women their own sexuality due to your own prudishness, I still acknowledge that you are a feminist, albeit a different type of feminist than I would agree with.


First reasonable feminist all year

Part of the silent majority, maybe?
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

Check out the Jutean language! Talk to me about anything. Avian air force flag (Source) Definition of atheism Is Religion Dangerous?

User avatar
Nierra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 800
Founded: May 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Nierra » Thu May 28, 2015 1:30 pm

Jute wrote:
Camicon wrote:And I forgot to mention the number of questions that I didn't feel comfortable answering, because they were essentially asking about the experience of groups that I don't belong to. Do women of colour face more challenges in the work place than white women? How the fuck do I know? I'm not going to answer either way until I have a helluva lot more information.

Hence my displeasure with the whole of the feminist movement. They can't come to a consensus on such basic issues, and then ask for my unequivocal support? Fat chance.

Feminists at least have already achieved the right for women to vote, be elected and have it socially be accepted that they take whatever job they please. Widespread acceptance of feminism is mostly because of the achievements of those "liberal" (aka actual, non-radical) feminists.


Lol what. Feminism is not widely accepted at all
Pro: Gamer-gate, equality, opportunity, free trade, capitalism, and centrism

Aginst: Feminism, socialism, anarchism, fascism, and progressivism

There is no such thing as corporatism

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Thu May 28, 2015 1:32 pm

Camicon wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
Liberal "feminists" are supporters of pornography and prostitution, do you know?
I think that pornography and prostitution are anti-women.

Hence my displeasure with the whole of the feminist movement. They can't come to a consensus on such basic issues, and then ask for my unequivocal support? Fat chance.

Couldn't we say the same of pro v. anti-nuclear environmentalists, and differing libertarian views on intellectual property, and interpretations of Non-aggression principle?
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21292
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Thu May 28, 2015 1:34 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:22. The availability of adequate child care is central to a woman’s right to work outside the home. (Sexist. Men can also have this problem; and not all women choose to have children.)


Nitpick: This is only sexist if you're attaching your own baggage to it. Agreeing to the statement does not mean that it can't also apply to men.

In an environment where feminism is purported to be anti-sexism... this scale sorts out the typology of feminists into one variety of feminism that is more anti-sexist than sexist, one that's more about racism than sexism, and three that are very clearly more sexist than anti-sexist.

Thoughts? Opinions? Scores? Musings?


Different varieties of feminism are different. Some varieties are more common than others, so saying that there is one that is anti-sexist and three that are sexist, based on the way that quiz is set up, does not really tell you how many feminists are egalitarian and how many are anti-male. I doubt that most feminists would buy into the more extreme stereotyping and the "OMG! Romantic love = slavery!" attitudes, cos I consider myself moderately feminist, and there were still questions on that quiz that made me cringe.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Jute
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13729
Founded: Jan 28, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Jute » Thu May 28, 2015 1:35 pm

Fanosolia wrote:
Camicon wrote:
Hence my displeasure with the whole of the feminist movement. They can't come to a consensus on such basic issues, and then ask for my unequivocal support? Fat chance.

Couldn't we say the same of pro v. anti-nuclear environmentalists, and differing libertarian views on intellectual property, and interpretations of Non-aggression principle?

I guess? Being divided on some issues does not discredit an entire movement.
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

Check out the Jutean language! Talk to me about anything. Avian air force flag (Source) Definition of atheism Is Religion Dangerous?

User avatar
Camicon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14377
Founded: Aug 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Camicon » Thu May 28, 2015 1:36 pm

Fanosolia wrote:
Camicon wrote:
Hence my displeasure with the whole of the feminist movement. They can't come to a consensus on such basic issues, and then ask for my unequivocal support? Fat chance.

Couldn't we say the same of pro v. anti-nuclear environmentalists, and differing libertarian views on intellectual property, and interpretations of Non-aggression principle?

None of those groups demand my uncompromising, unquestioning support, like the more hard-line feminist movements do. I can be a libertarian, disagree on certain key policy issues with other libertarians, and not be excluded from the conversation. Meanwhile, there are plenty of feminist that would immediately and wholly discount everything I say, simply because I have a dick. I'm not going to associate myself with a political movement that, at least in part, is hostile towards my involvement at any level.
Hey/They
Active since May, 2009
Country of glowing hearts, and patrons of the arts
Help me out
Star spangled madness, united sadness
Count me out
The Trews, Under The Sun
No human is more human than any other. - Lieutenant-General Roméo Antonius Dallaire
Don't shine for swine. - Metric, Soft Rock Star
Love is hell. Hell is love. Hell is asking to be loved. - Emily Haines and the Soft Skeleton, Detective Daughter

Why (Male) Rape Is Hilarious [because it has to be]

User avatar
Jute
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13729
Founded: Jan 28, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Jute » Thu May 28, 2015 1:36 pm

Nierra wrote:
Jute wrote:Feminists at least have already achieved the right for women to vote, be elected and have it socially be accepted that they take whatever job they please. Widespread acceptance of feminism is mostly because of the achievements of those "liberal" (aka actual, non-radical) feminists.


Lol what. Feminism is not widely accepted at all
If you consider feminism as nothing more than "women should be treated like human beings, just like men", which about sums up most of it according to my knowledge, then I sure hope it is.
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

Check out the Jutean language! Talk to me about anything. Avian air force flag (Source) Definition of atheism Is Religion Dangerous?

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5161
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Thu May 28, 2015 1:37 pm

Who ever said "romantic love = slavery!"??? >:(
When one opposes pornography and prostitution it's exactly the opposite! Pornography and prostitution are exactly the opposite of "romantic love" - and I guess (euphemism) that is because both things are meant for...
Last edited by Chessmistress on Thu May 28, 2015 1:40 pm, edited 3 times in total.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Jute
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13729
Founded: Jan 28, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Jute » Thu May 28, 2015 1:38 pm

Camicon wrote:
Fanosolia wrote:Couldn't we say the same of pro v. anti-nuclear environmentalists, and differing libertarian views on intellectual property, and interpretations of Non-aggression principle?

None of those groups demand my uncompromising, unquestioning support, like the more hard-line feminist movements do. I can be a libertarian, disagree on certain key policy issues with other libertarians, and not be excluded from the conversation. Meanwhile, there are plenty of feminist that would immediately and wholly discount everything I say, simply because I have a dick. I'm not going to associate myself with a political movement that, at least in part, is hostile towards my involvement at any level.

That's just the most radical ones. There are also some in the LGBT+ rights movement, but you wouldn't deny them your support just because some of them make some awful generalizing statements about "cishets" or straight people who are comfortable with their birth gender?
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

Check out the Jutean language! Talk to me about anything. Avian air force flag (Source) Definition of atheism Is Religion Dangerous?

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Thu May 28, 2015 1:38 pm

I never really thought about it that deeply. It seemed to have worked fine for me.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Thu May 28, 2015 1:39 pm

Chessmistress wrote:Who ever said "romantic love = slavery!"??? >:(
When one opposes pornography and prostitution it's exactly the opposite!

Why would you oppose bodily autonomy?
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21292
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Thu May 28, 2015 1:40 pm

Fanosolia wrote:
Camicon wrote:
Hence my displeasure with the whole of the feminist movement. They can't come to a consensus on such basic issues, and then ask for my unequivocal support? Fat chance.

Couldn't we say the same of pro v. anti-nuclear environmentalists, and differing libertarian views on intellectual property, and interpretations of Non-aggression principle?


Yeah, libertarians disagree with each other even more than feminists. Some ideological labels can be applied to a wide assortment of people. Try getting a National Socialist and a Democratic Socialist to agree on anything other than the fact the economy needs to be regulated to prevent abuse by wealthy capitalists.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5161
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Thu May 28, 2015 1:41 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:Who ever said "romantic love = slavery!"??? >:(
When one opposes pornography and prostitution it's exactly the opposite!

Why would you oppose bodily autonomy?


Because being coercied is not bodily autonomy.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21292
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Thu May 28, 2015 1:42 pm

Chessmistress wrote:Who ever said "romantic love = slavery!"??? >:(
When one opposes pornography and prostitution it's exactly the opposite! Pornography and prostitution are exactly the opposite of "romantic love" - and I guess (euphemism) that is because both things are meant for...


I was not talking about pornography or prostitution. The quiz has questions about "romantic love" which imply it is a form of oppression.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Xind

Advertisement

Remove ads