You despise waffles, too?
Advertisement


by L Ron Cupboard » Tue May 19, 2015 12:14 am

by Prussia-Steinbach » Tue May 19, 2015 12:26 am

by Naushantiya » Tue May 19, 2015 12:48 am

by Ethel mermania » Tue May 19, 2015 3:38 am

by Ethel mermania » Tue May 19, 2015 3:39 am

by The United Remnants of America » Tue May 19, 2015 3:51 am
Naushantiya wrote:Thank god Biker gangs over here just want to ride to Bhutan, Nepal and Khardung la or just ride rough himalayan roads. I am a part of a biker gang and almost everybody here is either a software engineer with a bullet or just some random dude who owns a bullet, I never can possibly correlate biking with criminality as many people here are doing. This is just fucking silly
I don't even think that Biker gangs will allow you drive if your drunk, most people are either retd serving army officers, software engineers, students, sometimes we have tourists ( altough we have adopted a no foreigner policy but the nice foreigners are allowed). So basically as usual Nsg has got it all wrong, it is nothing surprising. If a criminal rides a motorcycle then it is a biker gang, would the same logic apply to a group of people driving in cars ? Would you call them a car gang ? this has just taken stupid to the newest possible level


by Ethel mermania » Tue May 19, 2015 3:58 am

by The United Remnants of America » Tue May 19, 2015 4:01 am
Ethel mermania wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/19/us/texas-biker-gang-brawl/
Tdlr, the gang fight will continue and grow in size and scope.
While I usually don't support the militarization of the police, as this situation gets worse, I understand the reason it happens.

by Imperializt Russia » Tue May 19, 2015 4:05 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Imperializt Russia » Tue May 19, 2015 4:08 am
The United Remnants of America wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/19/us/texas-biker-gang-brawl/
Tdlr, the gang fight will continue and grow in size and scope.
While I usually don't support the militarization of the police, as this situation gets worse, I understand the reason it happens.
Odd balance isn't it?
We see the rationality on why the police needs to be more powerful, but then we see things like Ferguson happen because the police is too powerful.
Where do we strike the balance between a police strong enough to keep people safe from organized crime and gang violence, but safe enough so that they don't kill unarmed innocent people?
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Ethel mermania » Tue May 19, 2015 4:08 am
The United Remnants of America wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/19/us/texas-biker-gang-brawl/
Tdlr, the gang fight will continue and grow in size and scope.
While I usually don't support the militarization of the police, as this situation gets worse, I understand the reason it happens.
Odd balance isn't it?
We see the rationality on why the police needs to be more powerful, but then we see things like Ferguson happen because the police is too powerful.
Where do we strike the balance between a police strong enough to keep people safe from organized crime and gang violence, but safe enough so that they don't kill unarmed innocent people?

by The United Remnants of America » Tue May 19, 2015 4:08 am

by Napkiraly » Tue May 19, 2015 4:08 am
Ethel mermania wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/19/us/texas-biker-gang-brawl/
Tdlr, the gang fight will continue and grow in size and scope.
While I usually don't support the militarization of the police, as this situation gets worse, I understand the reason it happens.

by Ethel mermania » Tue May 19, 2015 4:09 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:The United Remnants of America wrote:Odd balance isn't it?
We see the rationality on why the police needs to be more powerful, but then we see things like Ferguson happen because the police is too powerful.
Where do we strike the balance between a police strong enough to keep people safe from organized crime and gang violence, but safe enough so that they don't kill unarmed innocent people?
Ferguson wasn't the result of militarised police, it just inflamed tensions once the initial event occurred.
Of course, it officers were better trained and didn't think to solely rely on their firearms for compliance and control, then the issues of militarised police in the Ferguson demonstrations would never have been apparent.

by Imperializt Russia » Tue May 19, 2015 4:13 am
Ethel mermania wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Ferguson wasn't the result of militarised police, it just inflamed tensions once the initial event occurred.
Of course, it officers were better trained and didn't think to solely rely on their firearms for compliance and control, then the issues of militarised police in the Ferguson demonstrations would never have been apparent.
Monumental claptrap.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Ethel mermania » Tue May 19, 2015 4:22 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:Monumental claptrap.
Cute.
You see, when you challenge "there is no obligation to provide certain elements in company health insurance", that is claptrap because federal law says otherwise. The religious exemption law apparently does validate your statement, but the law makes no sense.
Now, I'd like you to point out what, if anything, I just said was "monumental claptrap" or are you just trying to be cutesy?

by Imperializt Russia » Tue May 19, 2015 4:24 am
Ethel mermania wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Cute.
You see, when you challenge "there is no obligation to provide certain elements in company health insurance", that is claptrap because federal law says otherwise. The religious exemption law apparently does validate your statement, but the law makes no sense.
Now, I'd like you to point out what, if anything, I just said was "monumental claptrap" or are you just trying to be cutesy?
All of it.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Naushantiya » Tue May 19, 2015 5:07 am
The United Remnants of America wrote:Naushantiya wrote:Thank god Biker gangs over here just want to ride to Bhutan, Nepal and Khardung la or just ride rough himalayan roads. I am a part of a biker gang and almost everybody here is either a software engineer with a bullet or just some random dude who owns a bullet, I never can possibly correlate biking with criminality as many people here are doing. This is just fucking silly
I don't even think that Biker gangs will allow you drive if your drunk, most people are either retd serving army officers, software engineers, students, sometimes we have tourists ( altough we have adopted a no foreigner policy but the nice foreigners are allowed). So basically as usual Nsg has got it all wrong, it is nothing surprising. If a criminal rides a motorcycle then it is a biker gang, would the same logic apply to a group of people driving in cars ? Would you call them a car gang ? this has just taken stupid to the newest possible level
They ride bikes.
They're a gang.
Biker... gang. Biker gang.
See, over here in the land of 'Murica, we have to come up with some way to differentiate your average run-of-the-mill street gang thugs with your Harley-riding thugs. Hence why they're called a biker gang. Your "biker gang" is a motorcycle club. An actual motorcycle club, too, since biker gangs here try to legitimize themselves by saying they're motorcycle clubs.
And yes. If a group of criminals got organized, became a gang, and became known for driving cars. They'd become a car gangs. The Japanese actually have car gangs. They're called Bozozoku(Spelling may be off), which is, I'm guessing,r Japanese for "Car Gang."
So I'm not seeing your point here with any of this.

by The United Remnants of America » Tue May 19, 2015 5:09 am
Naushantiya wrote:The United Remnants of America wrote:They ride bikes.
They're a gang.
Biker... gang. Biker gang.
See, over here in the land of 'Murica, we have to come up with some way to differentiate your average run-of-the-mill street gang thugs with your Harley-riding thugs. Hence why they're called a biker gang. Your "biker gang" is a motorcycle club. An actual motorcycle club, too, since biker gangs here try to legitimize themselves by saying they're motorcycle clubs.
And yes. If a group of criminals got organized, became a gang, and became known for driving cars. They'd become a car gangs. The Japanese actually have car gangs. They're called Bozozoku(Spelling may be off), which is, I'm guessing,r Japanese for "Car Gang."
So I'm not seeing your point here with any of this.
This is just ridiculous, why would any smart criminal ever identify himself with a motorcycle and make his criminality obvious ? There is something bizzare about this

by Imperializt Russia » Tue May 19, 2015 5:13 am
Naushantiya wrote:The United Remnants of America wrote:They ride bikes.
They're a gang.
Biker... gang. Biker gang.
See, over here in the land of 'Murica, we have to come up with some way to differentiate your average run-of-the-mill street gang thugs with your Harley-riding thugs. Hence why they're called a biker gang. Your "biker gang" is a motorcycle club. An actual motorcycle club, too, since biker gangs here try to legitimize themselves by saying they're motorcycle clubs.
And yes. If a group of criminals got organized, became a gang, and became known for driving cars. They'd become a car gangs. The Japanese actually have car gangs. They're called Bozozoku(Spelling may be off), which is, I'm guessing,r Japanese for "Car Gang."
So I'm not seeing your point here with any of this.
This is just ridiculous, why would any smart criminal ever identify himself with a motorcycle and make his criminality obvious ? There is something bizzare about this
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Napkiraly » Tue May 19, 2015 5:16 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Naushantiya wrote:
This is just ridiculous, why would any smart criminal ever identify himself with a motorcycle and make his criminality obvious ? There is something bizzare about this
Why did the SA run around in uniforms before the Nazis got into power?
Why do the Crips and the Bloods wear gang colours?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, BJMShawington, El Lazaro, Greater Miami Shores 3, Hwiteard, Juansonia, La Xinga, Mushet, Port Caverton, Seythland, Stellar Colonies, Sum Tash, The Grand Fifth Imperium, Urmanian, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement