NATION

PASSWORD

Hasbro Toy Erases Black Widow From Her Own Scene

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Mon May 11, 2015 6:18 pm

Zeinbrad wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
Hawkeye doesn't have his own movie either.

Because no one cares about Hawkeye. :p


unfortunately that's not far from the truth. like he has some good lines but I don't feel as drawn to him as I should be. :p
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Mon May 11, 2015 6:23 pm

Salus Maior wrote:
Kaboomlandia wrote:Captain America: 2, another coming 2016
Thor: 2, another coming 2017
Iron Man: 3
Hulk: 1

Black Widow: Iron Man 2, Avengers (both), Captain America: Civil War


Hawkeye doesn't have his own movie either.


You know can I pitch this idea...? black widow. Hawkeye. Buddy cop movie set in shield :rofl:
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Mon May 11, 2015 6:33 pm

Zeinbrad wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
Ok, first off you called her a "good guy" second, yeah, but how many parent how many grandparents know that? I mean keep in mind the toy buyers are not always the same as the movie goers. It is especially complicated as children generally aren't buying the toys directly, teens maybe but not like 8 year olds usually. they are usually bought by parents or given as presents.

Yes, I did, sue me.

This is meant for the Black Widow from the movie, not from the comics or other media. I'm pretty sure they have made action figures for alternate universe characters with no problem. Why is Black Widow different?


Sorry that first point wasn't meant to be very serious. Secondly I don't exactly. I don't think that is the issue though. I am just talking about consumer with zero or nearly zero marvel universe knowledge, who maybe" like oh my "black widow" that must be the villain, I want to by my grandson the hero of the movie. Hmm, well capt america now that is a name it sounds like a hero would have, Ill buy little billy that one." it is about minimizing uniformed consumer confusion.

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tahar Joblis » Mon May 11, 2015 6:34 pm

Empire of Narnia wrote:I think this has more to do with the fact that Hawkeye and Black Widow....kinda suck. I mean they don't have any superpowers and their uniforms are boring, generic military style suits. Hawkeye uses a bow and arrow in a world of machine guns and missiles. Black Widow is just an "action girl" we've all seen a million times in so many spy and action movies. Her most interesting weapon is a pistol.

In the movie? I disagree.

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Mon May 11, 2015 6:36 pm

Kaboomlandia wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
I don't know hawkeye seems to be the most parodied character though that may have been from before the movies came out. I think Black widow is probably more popular than him but certainly not nearly as popular as captain american. She does seem to have a bit of that generic action girl vibe, but honestly I am just not familiar enough with her character. Has she had a movie of here own. I know what Capt. America has a couple I think? The hulk as one recently plus the old tv show. Iron man had like 3 movies and thor had what a couple? I know hawkeye doesn't have any specifically centered on him and I am not aware of any black widow movies.

Captain America: 2, another coming 2016
Thor: 2, another coming 2017
Iron Man: 3
Hulk: 1

Black Widow: Iron Man 2, Avengers (both), Captain America: Civil War


Exactly, black widow is in 4 movies and the lead star in exactly zero of them. Like people said they excluded hawkeye too, soooo... maybe it has something to do with prominence of the character?

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tahar Joblis » Mon May 11, 2015 6:40 pm

Llamalandia wrote:
Kaboomlandia wrote:Captain America: 2, another coming 2016
Thor: 2, another coming 2017
Iron Man: 3
Hulk: 1

Black Widow: Iron Man 2, Avengers (both), Captain America: Civil War


Exactly, black widow is in 4 movies and the lead star in exactly zero of them. Like people said they excluded hawkeye too, soooo... maybe it has something to do with prominence of the character?

IDK, she had a lot of air time and lines in this movie. It was much more about Hawkeye and Black Widow than anyone else.

That said, I have no trouble finding a bucketload of Black Widow merch related to the Avengers: Ultron movie on Amazon.com. It's not like they're ignoring her in the toy line, they just didn't package her in with that particular Quinjet action figure set.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Mon May 11, 2015 7:07 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Captain America wasn't the most interesting character from the scene.

What conspiracy have I implied? They've blatantly decided that there's no market for girls when it comes to action figures. That's not a conspiracy, it's business. The fact that it's a self-fulfilling prophecy is what interests me, since with a dearth of women action figures, there will obviously be less of an opportunity for girls to collect figures that they can relate to, which in turn means that they get to go back and say "See? Girls don't like action figures." It's the same reason that we're not getting a Black Widow movie despite the enormous popularity of the character.


Captain America is a household name and has been so well before the Avengers movie franchise, or even the comic movie thing that spider man sort of kicked off. He is a super powered man-flag that has a fucking shield. I'm sort of a nerd and I hadn't even heard of black widow before she was Scarlet Johansson. She's not a great character.

You're not much of a nerd then, are you?

I mean, I'm not much of a nerd as far as comic books go, but I'd heard of the Black Widow long before the Avengers movies came out.

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Mon May 11, 2015 7:21 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
Exactly, black widow is in 4 movies and the lead star in exactly zero of them. Like people said they excluded hawkeye too, soooo... maybe it has something to do with prominence of the character?

IDK, she had a lot of air time and lines in this movie. It was much more about Hawkeye and Black Widow than anyone else.

That said, I have no trouble finding a bucketload of Black Widow merch related to the Avengers: Ultron movie on Amazon.com. It's not like they're ignoring her in the toy line, they just didn't package her in with that particular Quinjet action figure set.


Yeah pretty much. I think the premise of the OP was this was a major feminist battle for justice or something. I mean I know it was personal as well wrt the daughter but really? Yeah, it is basically a nonissue, which is what a lot of this thread has been arguing about, whether or not this is even an issue to begin with. The consensus seems to be leaning to it being fairly insignificant.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 7:23 pm

Llamalandia wrote:
Tahar Joblis wrote:IDK, she had a lot of air time and lines in this movie. It was much more about Hawkeye and Black Widow than anyone else.

That said, I have no trouble finding a bucketload of Black Widow merch related to the Avengers: Ultron movie on Amazon.com. It's not like they're ignoring her in the toy line, they just didn't package her in with that particular Quinjet action figure set.


Yeah pretty much. I think the premise of the OP was this was a major feminist battle for justice or something. I mean I know it was personal as well wrt the daughter but really? Yeah, it is basically a nonissue, which is what a lot of this thread has been arguing about, whether or not this is even an issue to begin with. The consensus seems to be leaning to it being fairly insignificant.


Never stated that it was any such thing, only an annoying aspect of a larger trend.

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Mon May 11, 2015 7:36 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
Yeah pretty much. I think the premise of the OP was this was a major feminist battle for justice or something. I mean I know it was personal as well wrt the daughter but really? Yeah, it is basically a nonissue, which is what a lot of this thread has been arguing about, whether or not this is even an issue to begin with. The consensus seems to be leaning to it being fairly insignificant.


Never stated that it was any such thing, only an annoying aspect of a larger trend.


You said in the link text that you were "angry about this" and have subsequently given a number of feminist sounding arguments in support of your position. I may be paraphrasing a bit I don't think I am that far off the mark of characterizing your position am I? I mean that is why I said, or something. I acknowledge it wasn't especially explicit in the OP specifically, though certainly in the quote and the second to last paragraph the feminist premise comes out. I mean you have alink to disney and princresses and what not. And then the final paragraph is about how you want your daughter to have strong female role models. I am not saying that is a bad thing I am just saying it sounds as though you are putting this perhaps not on par with say the wage gap but certainly just by discussing here are elevating pretty darn close to it.

User avatar
Republic of Coldwater
Senator
 
Posts: 4500
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of Coldwater » Mon May 11, 2015 7:41 pm

I don't see what the fuss is about, it is just a toy, and it isn't some evil plan from the patriarchy to disregard females.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 7:42 pm

Llamalandia wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Never stated that it was any such thing, only an annoying aspect of a larger trend.


You said in the link text that you were "angry about this" and have subsequently given a number of feminist sounding arguments in support of your position. I may be paraphrasing a bit I don't think I am that far off the mark of characterizing your position am I? I mean that is why I said, or something. I acknowledge it wasn't especially explicit in the OP specifically, though certainly in the quote and the second to last paragraph the feminist premise comes out. I mean you have alink to disney and princresses and what not. And then the final paragraph is about how you want your daughter to have strong female role models. I am not saying that is a bad thing I am just saying it sounds as though you are putting this perhaps not on par with say the wage gap but certainly just by discussing here are elevating pretty darn close to it.


Angry is as good a word as any.

My arguments sound like feminist arguments because I believe in gender equality. When arguments have that basis, they will sound feminist. The reason is because they are. This does not make it a major battle, only one aspect of a much larger and more troubling cultural trend that is a major battle. Don't confuse a single shot with the battle itself. Of course, the war metaphor isn't exactly accurate either, as I don't think that this is so much an aggressive move on their part as a stupid and blind one.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 7:44 pm

Republic of Coldwater wrote:I don't see what the fuss is about, it is just a toy, and it isn't some evil plan from the patriarchy to disregard females.


1. Then you don't have to pay any attention to it.

2. Please note where anyone said that it was an evil plan from the patriarchy before continuing on with this conversation. I'd hate to waste my time talking with someone who is willing to make up positions that aren't actually held by anyone, and while I'm sure that you'd never do such a thing, I'd still like to see the post where that was stated.

User avatar
Meryuma
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14922
Founded: Jul 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Meryuma » Mon May 11, 2015 7:55 pm

The toy industry is one of the most chauvinistic and gender-segregated parts of the media. I feel like society tolerates a level of sexism with children that they wouldn't so openly with adults.

Des-Bal wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Captain America wasn't the most interesting character from the scene.

What conspiracy have I implied? They've blatantly decided that there's no market for girls when it comes to action figures. That's not a conspiracy, it's business. The fact that it's a self-fulfilling prophecy is what interests me, since with a dearth of women action figures, there will obviously be less of an opportunity for girls to collect figures that they can relate to, which in turn means that they get to go back and say "See? Girls don't like action figures." It's the same reason that we're not getting a Black Widow movie despite the enormous popularity of the character.


Captain America is a household name and has been so well before the Avengers movie franchise, or even the comic movie thing that spider man sort of kicked off. He is a super powered man-flag that has a fucking shield. I'm sort of a nerd and I hadn't even heard of black widow before she was Scarlet Johansson. She's not a great character.


Captain America is hella boring though. Square-jawed, straight-laced macho guys are the blandest superheroes, especially when you throw in patriotism.
Last edited by Meryuma on Mon May 11, 2015 7:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ᛋᛃᚢ - Social Justice Úlfheðinn
Potarius wrote:
Neo Arcad wrote:Gravity is a natural phenomenon by which physical bodies attract with a force proportional to their mass.


In layman's terms, orgy time.


Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.


Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."


Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.



Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.

Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...

*puts on sunglasses*

blow out of proportions."

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

...so here's your future

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 8:00 pm

Meryuma wrote:The toy industry is one of the most chauvinistic and gender-segregated parts of the media. I feel like society tolerates a level of sexism with children that they wouldn't so openly with adults.

Des-Bal wrote:
Captain America is a household name and has been so well before the Avengers movie franchise, or even the comic movie thing that spider man sort of kicked off. He is a super powered man-flag that has a fucking shield. I'm sort of a nerd and I hadn't even heard of black widow before she was Scarlet Johansson. She's not a great character.


Captain America is hella boring though. Square-jawed, straight-laced macho guys are the blandest superheroes, especially when you throw in patriotism.


Despite the fact that we're on the same side in this particular debate, I have to say that I disagree. Captain America, as he's been portrayed in the movies, is anything but boring. He's admittedly straightforward in his approach, but he's also willing and able to differentiate between what he represents as an ideal and the government itself. He's devoted to the nation, but that often means being devoted to what the idea of the nation and taking on those within its governing structure who subvert the ideals while claiming patriotism. It's an interesting mix that Evans pulls off nicely.

But it's also off-topic. Interesting subject, though, since I used to have the same take on him that you do.

User avatar
Republic of Coldwater
Senator
 
Posts: 4500
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of Coldwater » Mon May 11, 2015 8:02 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Republic of Coldwater wrote:I don't see what the fuss is about, it is just a toy, and it isn't some evil plan from the patriarchy to disregard females.


1. Then you don't have to pay any attention to it.

2. Please note where anyone said that it was an evil plan from the patriarchy before continuing on with this conversation. I'd hate to waste my time talking with someone who is willing to make up positions that aren't actually held by anyone, and while I'm sure that you'd never do such a thing, I'd still like to see the post where that was stated.

Nobody literally said that this was some evil plan from the patriarchy, however, from what I have read about this, there seems to be a good amount of people arguing that this is a way for women to be disregarded, to be thrown aside, for there to be a lack of female role models. Yet, I don't see how this is the case, as this is one toy, one single case, yet the Black Widow is still represented in the Hasbro toy line, and can still serve as a role model, and not place women in a position of subservience.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Mon May 11, 2015 8:04 pm

Llamalandia wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
That's actually a myth.

This is something that I have observed happening in real life. If you have sources showing that Marvel is making an actual effort to market to girls and young women, I'd consider that as evidence that contradicts my point.


But you aren't you presupposing that marvel/disney whoever is supposed to market to girls? I am seriously asking here, because it seems to me there priority is to the bottom line and shareholders. I mean they have a legal obligation to maximize profits. Now, ok maybe you can say that they are in error and would make more money aiming products at boys and girls equally, but I haven't seen that point really be firmly assert and supported with evidence as yet.

How does marketing to only 50% of children maximize their profits?

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 8:04 pm

Republic of Coldwater wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
1. Then you don't have to pay any attention to it.

2. Please note where anyone said that it was an evil plan from the patriarchy before continuing on with this conversation. I'd hate to waste my time talking with someone who is willing to make up positions that aren't actually held by anyone, and while I'm sure that you'd never do such a thing, I'd still like to see the post where that was stated.

Nobody literally said that this was some evil plan from the patriarchy, however, from what I have read about this, there seems to be a good amount of people arguing that this is a way for women to be disregarded, to be thrown aside, for there to be a lack of female role models. Yet, I don't see how this is the case, as this is one toy, one single case, yet the Black Widow is still represented in the Hasbro toy line, and can still serve as a role model, and not place women in a position of subservience.


If nobody said it, then you shouldn't state that people did say it. I've already covered the rest of your points in previous arguments, and don't feel like rehashing them.

User avatar
Conservative Values
Envoy
 
Posts: 331
Founded: Mar 29, 2013
Right-wing Utopia

Postby Conservative Values » Mon May 11, 2015 9:13 pm

It is Captain America's bike even though she rode it that one time, if I recall correctly the line right before she dropped out of the plane implied she wouldn't enjoy riding it. He rode it far more often in the movie, she rode in that one scene. Perhaps Hasbro just assumed kids would have wider imaginary uses for Cap on his own bike than Black Widow who only rode it that one time. Other characters have held his shield too, but it would seem to be a weird item to sell along side another character even if they were super badass with it.

[AoU SPOILER NOW] And in the opening fight Cap was on his bike when they were behind enemy lines, so it is conceivable he dropped out on it then, we don't know how the bike got there. He was on his bike and every other character was flying, except Thor and Hulk who can get around by jumping and Hawkeye and Black Widow who stole one of the enemies cars. It got to the battle somehow, this is a stretch as to what they were actually thinking, I'm aware, I'm just saying. :P

I could see arguments for it being either character in the toy, but I don't think choosing the non-female option is sexist. :roll:

User avatar
Russels Orbiting Teapot
Senator
 
Posts: 4024
Founded: Jan 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Russels Orbiting Teapot » Mon May 11, 2015 9:27 pm

Conservative Values wrote:It is Captain America's bike even though she rode it that one time, if I recall correctly the line right before she dropped out of the plane implied she wouldn't enjoy riding it. He rode it far more often in the movie, she rode in that one scene. Perhaps Hasbro just assumed kids would have wider imaginary uses for Cap on his own bike than Black Widow who only rode it that one time. Other characters have held his shield too, but it would seem to be a weird item to sell along side another character even if they were super badass with it.


I kinda have to be on board with you here. Kids don't really want the toys to play out the scenes from the movies, they want them so they can play out their own scenes.

User avatar
DARGLED
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 157
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DARGLED » Mon May 11, 2015 9:37 pm

The motorcycle is Captain America's NOT Black Widow's, so your offense is unfounded.

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21292
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Mon May 11, 2015 9:48 pm

I don't think this is a huge issue, but if you think the toy is sending the wrong message, then you don't have to buy it.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 9:52 pm

Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:
Conservative Values wrote:It is Captain America's bike even though she rode it that one time, if I recall correctly the line right before she dropped out of the plane implied she wouldn't enjoy riding it. He rode it far more often in the movie, she rode in that one scene. Perhaps Hasbro just assumed kids would have wider imaginary uses for Cap on his own bike than Black Widow who only rode it that one time. Other characters have held his shield too, but it would seem to be a weird item to sell along side another character even if they were super badass with it.


I kinda have to be on board with you here. Kids don't really want the toys to play out the scenes from the movies, they want them so they can play out their own scenes.


True, but what does removing the character from the equipment that was pivotal to the scene, and putting another character in her place do in terms of a message sent? Note that I'm not asking whether or not Hasbro has to worry about said message--they do in my estimation, but that's another point entirely--but what message is there, if any?

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 9:53 pm

DARGLED wrote:The motorcycle is Captain America's NOT Black Widow's, so your offense is unfounded.


Thanks for the compelling argument that does not address the dramatic impact of the moment, or what it did to further establish the character. I'll be sure to give it the compelling attention that it deserves when I have the time4.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 9:56 pm

Nazi Flower Power wrote:I don't think this is a huge issue, but if you think the toy is sending the wrong message, then you don't have to buy it.


I think that it's established that I won't be. I also wrote a letter to the company. In addition, I'm publicizing the issues that I have with this online, and discussing their relevance and import in a forum that was set up to address issues of cultural and political significance both large and small.

If you have any further suggestions, I'm all ears.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bradfordville, Concejos Unidos, Elejamie, Estebere, Feralia, Google [Bot], Incelastan, Ors Might, Port Caverton, Stellar Colonies, TheKeyToJoy, Valyxias, Warvick, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads