unfortunately that's not far from the truth. like he has some good lines but I don't feel as drawn to him as I should be.

Advertisement

by Fanosolia » Mon May 11, 2015 6:18 pm


by Llamalandia » Mon May 11, 2015 6:33 pm
Zeinbrad wrote:Llamalandia wrote:
Ok, first off you called her a "good guy" second, yeah, but how many parent how many grandparents know that? I mean keep in mind the toy buyers are not always the same as the movie goers. It is especially complicated as children generally aren't buying the toys directly, teens maybe but not like 8 year olds usually. they are usually bought by parents or given as presents.
Yes, I did, sue me.
This is meant for the Black Widow from the movie, not from the comics or other media. I'm pretty sure they have made action figures for alternate universe characters with no problem. Why is Black Widow different?

by Tahar Joblis » Mon May 11, 2015 6:34 pm
Empire of Narnia wrote:I think this has more to do with the fact that Hawkeye and Black Widow....kinda suck. I mean they don't have any superpowers and their uniforms are boring, generic military style suits. Hawkeye uses a bow and arrow in a world of machine guns and missiles. Black Widow is just an "action girl" we've all seen a million times in so many spy and action movies. Her most interesting weapon is a pistol.

by Llamalandia » Mon May 11, 2015 6:36 pm
Kaboomlandia wrote:Llamalandia wrote:
I don't know hawkeye seems to be the most parodied character though that may have been from before the movies came out. I think Black widow is probably more popular than him but certainly not nearly as popular as captain american. She does seem to have a bit of that generic action girl vibe, but honestly I am just not familiar enough with her character. Has she had a movie of here own. I know what Capt. America has a couple I think? The hulk as one recently plus the old tv show. Iron man had like 3 movies and thor had what a couple? I know hawkeye doesn't have any specifically centered on him and I am not aware of any black widow movies.
Captain America: 2, another coming 2016
Thor: 2, another coming 2017
Iron Man: 3
Hulk: 1
Black Widow: Iron Man 2, Avengers (both), Captain America: Civil War

by Tahar Joblis » Mon May 11, 2015 6:40 pm
Llamalandia wrote:Kaboomlandia wrote:Captain America: 2, another coming 2016
Thor: 2, another coming 2017
Iron Man: 3
Hulk: 1
Black Widow: Iron Man 2, Avengers (both), Captain America: Civil War
Exactly, black widow is in 4 movies and the lead star in exactly zero of them. Like people said they excluded hawkeye too, soooo... maybe it has something to do with prominence of the character?

by Dakini » Mon May 11, 2015 7:07 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Captain America wasn't the most interesting character from the scene.
What conspiracy have I implied? They've blatantly decided that there's no market for girls when it comes to action figures. That's not a conspiracy, it's business. The fact that it's a self-fulfilling prophecy is what interests me, since with a dearth of women action figures, there will obviously be less of an opportunity for girls to collect figures that they can relate to, which in turn means that they get to go back and say "See? Girls don't like action figures." It's the same reason that we're not getting a Black Widow movie despite the enormous popularity of the character.
Captain America is a household name and has been so well before the Avengers movie franchise, or even the comic movie thing that spider man sort of kicked off. He is a super powered man-flag that has a fucking shield. I'm sort of a nerd and I hadn't even heard of black widow before she was Scarlet Johansson. She's not a great character.

by Llamalandia » Mon May 11, 2015 7:21 pm
Tahar Joblis wrote:Llamalandia wrote:
Exactly, black widow is in 4 movies and the lead star in exactly zero of them. Like people said they excluded hawkeye too, soooo... maybe it has something to do with prominence of the character?
IDK, she had a lot of air time and lines in this movie. It was much more about Hawkeye and Black Widow than anyone else.
That said, I have no trouble finding a bucketload of Black Widow merch related to the Avengers: Ultron movie on Amazon.com. It's not like they're ignoring her in the toy line, they just didn't package her in with that particular Quinjet action figure set.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 7:23 pm
Llamalandia wrote:Tahar Joblis wrote:IDK, she had a lot of air time and lines in this movie. It was much more about Hawkeye and Black Widow than anyone else.
That said, I have no trouble finding a bucketload of Black Widow merch related to the Avengers: Ultron movie on Amazon.com. It's not like they're ignoring her in the toy line, they just didn't package her in with that particular Quinjet action figure set.
Yeah pretty much. I think the premise of the OP was this was a major feminist battle for justice or something. I mean I know it was personal as well wrt the daughter but really? Yeah, it is basically a nonissue, which is what a lot of this thread has been arguing about, whether or not this is even an issue to begin with. The consensus seems to be leaning to it being fairly insignificant.

by Llamalandia » Mon May 11, 2015 7:36 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Llamalandia wrote:
Yeah pretty much. I think the premise of the OP was this was a major feminist battle for justice or something. I mean I know it was personal as well wrt the daughter but really? Yeah, it is basically a nonissue, which is what a lot of this thread has been arguing about, whether or not this is even an issue to begin with. The consensus seems to be leaning to it being fairly insignificant.
Never stated that it was any such thing, only an annoying aspect of a larger trend.

by Republic of Coldwater » Mon May 11, 2015 7:41 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 7:42 pm
Llamalandia wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Never stated that it was any such thing, only an annoying aspect of a larger trend.
You said in the link text that you were "angry about this" and have subsequently given a number of feminist sounding arguments in support of your position. I may be paraphrasing a bit I don't think I am that far off the mark of characterizing your position am I? I mean that is why I said, or something. I acknowledge it wasn't especially explicit in the OP specifically, though certainly in the quote and the second to last paragraph the feminist premise comes out. I mean you have alink to disney and princresses and what not. And then the final paragraph is about how you want your daughter to have strong female role models. I am not saying that is a bad thing I am just saying it sounds as though you are putting this perhaps not on par with say the wage gap but certainly just by discussing here are elevating pretty darn close to it.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 7:44 pm
Republic of Coldwater wrote:I don't see what the fuss is about, it is just a toy, and it isn't some evil plan from the patriarchy to disregard females.

by Meryuma » Mon May 11, 2015 7:55 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Captain America wasn't the most interesting character from the scene.
What conspiracy have I implied? They've blatantly decided that there's no market for girls when it comes to action figures. That's not a conspiracy, it's business. The fact that it's a self-fulfilling prophecy is what interests me, since with a dearth of women action figures, there will obviously be less of an opportunity for girls to collect figures that they can relate to, which in turn means that they get to go back and say "See? Girls don't like action figures." It's the same reason that we're not getting a Black Widow movie despite the enormous popularity of the character.
Captain America is a household name and has been so well before the Avengers movie franchise, or even the comic movie thing that spider man sort of kicked off. He is a super powered man-flag that has a fucking shield. I'm sort of a nerd and I hadn't even heard of black widow before she was Scarlet Johansson. She's not a great character.
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

by Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 8:00 pm
Meryuma wrote:The toy industry is one of the most chauvinistic and gender-segregated parts of the media. I feel like society tolerates a level of sexism with children that they wouldn't so openly with adults.Des-Bal wrote:
Captain America is a household name and has been so well before the Avengers movie franchise, or even the comic movie thing that spider man sort of kicked off. He is a super powered man-flag that has a fucking shield. I'm sort of a nerd and I hadn't even heard of black widow before she was Scarlet Johansson. She's not a great character.
Captain America is hella boring though. Square-jawed, straight-laced macho guys are the blandest superheroes, especially when you throw in patriotism.

by Republic of Coldwater » Mon May 11, 2015 8:02 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Republic of Coldwater wrote:I don't see what the fuss is about, it is just a toy, and it isn't some evil plan from the patriarchy to disregard females.
1. Then you don't have to pay any attention to it.
2. Please note where anyone said that it was an evil plan from the patriarchy before continuing on with this conversation. I'd hate to waste my time talking with someone who is willing to make up positions that aren't actually held by anyone, and while I'm sure that you'd never do such a thing, I'd still like to see the post where that was stated.

by Dakini » Mon May 11, 2015 8:04 pm
Llamalandia wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
That's actually a myth.
This is something that I have observed happening in real life. If you have sources showing that Marvel is making an actual effort to market to girls and young women, I'd consider that as evidence that contradicts my point.
But you aren't you presupposing that marvel/disney whoever is supposed to market to girls? I am seriously asking here, because it seems to me there priority is to the bottom line and shareholders. I mean they have a legal obligation to maximize profits. Now, ok maybe you can say that they are in error and would make more money aiming products at boys and girls equally, but I haven't seen that point really be firmly assert and supported with evidence as yet.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 8:04 pm
Republic of Coldwater wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
1. Then you don't have to pay any attention to it.
2. Please note where anyone said that it was an evil plan from the patriarchy before continuing on with this conversation. I'd hate to waste my time talking with someone who is willing to make up positions that aren't actually held by anyone, and while I'm sure that you'd never do such a thing, I'd still like to see the post where that was stated.
Nobody literally said that this was some evil plan from the patriarchy, however, from what I have read about this, there seems to be a good amount of people arguing that this is a way for women to be disregarded, to be thrown aside, for there to be a lack of female role models. Yet, I don't see how this is the case, as this is one toy, one single case, yet the Black Widow is still represented in the Hasbro toy line, and can still serve as a role model, and not place women in a position of subservience.

by Conservative Values » Mon May 11, 2015 9:13 pm



by Russels Orbiting Teapot » Mon May 11, 2015 9:27 pm
Conservative Values wrote:It is Captain America's bike even though she rode it that one time, if I recall correctly the line right before she dropped out of the plane implied she wouldn't enjoy riding it. He rode it far more often in the movie, she rode in that one scene. Perhaps Hasbro just assumed kids would have wider imaginary uses for Cap on his own bike than Black Widow who only rode it that one time. Other characters have held his shield too, but it would seem to be a weird item to sell along side another character even if they were super badass with it.

by Nazi Flower Power » Mon May 11, 2015 9:48 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 9:52 pm
Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:Conservative Values wrote:It is Captain America's bike even though she rode it that one time, if I recall correctly the line right before she dropped out of the plane implied she wouldn't enjoy riding it. He rode it far more often in the movie, she rode in that one scene. Perhaps Hasbro just assumed kids would have wider imaginary uses for Cap on his own bike than Black Widow who only rode it that one time. Other characters have held his shield too, but it would seem to be a weird item to sell along side another character even if they were super badass with it.
I kinda have to be on board with you here. Kids don't really want the toys to play out the scenes from the movies, they want them so they can play out their own scenes.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 9:53 pm
DARGLED wrote:The motorcycle is Captain America's NOT Black Widow's, so your offense is unfounded.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Mon May 11, 2015 9:56 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:I don't think this is a huge issue, but if you think the toy is sending the wrong message, then you don't have to buy it.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bradfordville, Concejos Unidos, Elejamie, Estebere, Feralia, Google [Bot], Incelastan, Ors Might, Port Caverton, Stellar Colonies, TheKeyToJoy, Valyxias, Warvick, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement