NATION

PASSWORD

2015 UK Politics Megathread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who would you _currently_ vote for?

Conservatives
73
21%
Labour
71
21%
Liberal Democrats
47
14%
UKIP
57
17%
Greens [England & Wales, Scotland, or NI]
39
11%
SNP
19
6%
Plaid Cymru
3
1%
Northern Ireland SF/SDLP
11
3%
Northern Ireland DUP/UUP
2
1%
Other (please explain)
18
5%
 
Total votes : 340

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Thu May 07, 2015 4:02 am

Angleter wrote:I know it's silly, but the one concern I have remaining about STV (and specifically STV - I'd oppose any system that would involve party lists) is that it'd in all likelihood ruin election night. But oh, well.

It'd ruin it? How so?
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19884
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Costa Fierro » Thu May 07, 2015 4:03 am

Steamtopia wrote:Good thing MMP isn't being suggested by.. anyone, as far as I know. STV is the suggested method going forward.


Well, objectively, MMP is better because it gives the smaller parties better representation at the expense of larger parties. It would mean Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives lose seats but parties like SNP, Plaid Cymru etc. can get access to more seats and a greater voice in the House of Commons than they would have under the current system, or indeed, STV.

If memory serves me correctly, Northern Ireland and Scotland already use STV for their Assembly/Parliamentary elections.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Thu May 07, 2015 4:08 am

Costa Fierro wrote:
Steamtopia wrote:Good thing MMP isn't being suggested by.. anyone, as far as I know. STV is the suggested method going forward.


Well, objectively, MMP is better because it gives the smaller parties better representation at the expense of larger parties. It would mean Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives lose seats but parties like SNP, Plaid Cymru etc. can get access to more seats and a greater voice in the House of Commons than they would have under the current system, or indeed, STV.

If memory serves me correctly, Northern Ireland and Scotland already use STV for their Assembly/Parliamentary elections.

SNP? More seats? Let's not.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Vyvland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 657
Founded: Aug 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Vyvland » Thu May 07, 2015 4:12 am

Costa Fierro wrote:
Steamtopia wrote:Good thing MMP isn't being suggested by.. anyone, as far as I know. STV is the suggested method going forward.


Well, objectively, MMP is better because it gives the smaller parties better representation at the expense of larger parties. It would mean Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives lose seats but parties like SNP, Plaid Cymru etc. can get access to more seats and a greater voice in the House of Commons than they would have under the current system, or indeed, STV.

If memory serves me correctly, Northern Ireland and Scotland already use STV for their Assembly/Parliamentary elections.

That's actually not true. The SNP are on course to win 9% of seats on a 5% vote share in this election. So they'd be the biggest proportional loser of any party under MMP - because they're winning 90%+ of the FPTP seats in Scotland on less than 50% of the vote.

The real beneficiaries of MMP would be the Greens and UKIP, and potentially the Lib Dems if they regain popularity. Or other minor parties who people feel will have a chance, like the TUSC or whatever.
Last edited by Vyvland on Thu May 07, 2015 4:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Esquarium's favourite Germanic island nation - De lubsde germanig iylaan Esgerms
Wiki
Region: Esquarium
Population: 28.2 million
Languages: Vyvlander and Dutch
Capital: Lorence/Lohrec, Largest cities: Vlud and Lyksdal
President: Robert Ujson (Liberal), Prime Minister: Kurt Blymont (Conservative)
Area: 260,000 km2
Demonym: Vyvlander

User avatar
Angleter
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12359
Founded: Apr 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Angleter » Thu May 07, 2015 4:15 am

Steamtopia wrote:
Angleter wrote:I know it's silly, but the one concern I have remaining about STV (and specifically STV - I'd oppose any system that would involve party lists) is that it'd in all likelihood ruin election night. But oh, well.

It'd ruin it? How so?


Considering that the electorates would be at least three times the size and that the counters would have to count the votes at least three times over, we'd be unlikely to get a single result before noon the next day.
[align=center]"I gotta tell you, this is just crazy, huh! This is just nuts, OK! Jeezo man."

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Thu May 07, 2015 4:16 am

Angleter wrote:
Steamtopia wrote:It'd ruin it? How so?


Considering that the electorates would be at least three times the size and that the counters would have to count the votes at least three times over, we'd be unlikely to get a single result before noon the next day.

So? Even more suspense.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10010
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Thu May 07, 2015 4:17 am

Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Thu May 07, 2015 4:18 am

TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10010
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Thu May 07, 2015 4:20 am

Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Thu May 07, 2015 4:29 am

Steamtopia wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:
Well, objectively, MMP is better because it gives the smaller parties better representation at the expense of larger parties. It would mean Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives lose seats but parties like SNP, Plaid Cymru etc. can get access to more seats and a greater voice in the House of Commons than they would have under the current system, or indeed, STV.

If memory serves me correctly, Northern Ireland and Scotland already use STV for their Assembly/Parliamentary elections.

SNP? More seats? Let's not.


Being as they're already going to win a very large proportion of the seats they're running in, I'm pretty confident that the SNP would actually lose seats, overall.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Frasers
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 500
Founded: Apr 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frasers » Thu May 07, 2015 4:32 am

Charlotte Ryberg wrote:I can confirm that the polls have opened, and I am voter No. 1 again at my polling station. To prevent influencing eligible voters on NationStates, I will not disclose my binding vote as a courtesy.


You voted for Jeremy Corbyn

User avatar
Frasers
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 500
Founded: Apr 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frasers » Thu May 07, 2015 4:34 am

The Archregimancy wrote:The degree is formally in anthropology, but at Cambridge this required him to study both archaeology and anthropology.

And anyway, I have an anthropology degree too.


Yeah I'm doing an anthropology degree but it's in the Archaeology department at uni, it's all tied up.

User avatar
Old Tyrannia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 16569
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby Old Tyrannia » Thu May 07, 2015 4:36 am

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:
Illyiah wrote:The problem is referendums are really expensive.

well worth the cost.

That's a matter of opinion. I would say it's definitely not worth wasting that much money consulting the largely apathetic and ill-informed mob that is the British public on every minute issue. Big things like EU membership may justify the cost, but only if they are a rare occurrence.
Anglican monarchist, paternalistic conservative and Christian existentialist.
"It is spiritless to think that you cannot attain to that which you have seen and heard the masters attain. The masters are men. You are also a man. If you think that you will be inferior in doing something, you will be on that road very soon."
- Yamamoto Tsunetomo
⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING

User avatar
Frasers
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 500
Founded: Apr 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frasers » Thu May 07, 2015 4:53 am

Steamtopia wrote:Vote in new parties that want to deal with those issues, it's not that difficult. If people choose to keep voting in the same parties, they should expect the same results.


People tried that but FPTP sort of shafted us a bit really

User avatar
Shamhnan Insir
Minister
 
Posts: 2737
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Shamhnan Insir » Thu May 07, 2015 4:58 am

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:
Illyiah wrote:The problem is referendums are really expensive.

well worth the cost.

The Scottish Independence referendum sure as hell wasn't worth it..
Call me Sham

-"Governments may think and say as they like, but force cannot be eliminated, and it is the only real and unanswerable power. We are told that the pen is mightier than the sword, but I know which of these weapons I would choose." Sir Adrian Paul Ghislain Carton de Wiart VC, KBE, CB, CMG, DSO.

Nationalism is an infantile disease, it is the measles of humanity.
Darwinish Brentsylvania wrote:Shamhnan Insir started this wonderful tranquility, ALL PRAISE THE SHEPHERD KING

User avatar
Frasers
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 500
Founded: Apr 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frasers » Thu May 07, 2015 4:59 am

Shamhnan Insir wrote:The Scottish Independence referendum sure as hell wasn't worth it..


Was for the SNP

User avatar
Shamhnan Insir
Minister
 
Posts: 2737
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Shamhnan Insir » Thu May 07, 2015 5:03 am

Frasers wrote:
Shamhnan Insir wrote:The Scottish Independence referendum sure as hell wasn't worth it..


Was for the SNP


True, sadly not for Scotland though.
Call me Sham

-"Governments may think and say as they like, but force cannot be eliminated, and it is the only real and unanswerable power. We are told that the pen is mightier than the sword, but I know which of these weapons I would choose." Sir Adrian Paul Ghislain Carton de Wiart VC, KBE, CB, CMG, DSO.

Nationalism is an infantile disease, it is the measles of humanity.
Darwinish Brentsylvania wrote:Shamhnan Insir started this wonderful tranquility, ALL PRAISE THE SHEPHERD KING

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10010
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Thu May 07, 2015 5:05 am

Shamhnan Insir wrote:
Frasers wrote:
Was for the SNP


True, sadly not for Scotland though.

I don't know, a 55-45 result I think justified the cost. There was a significant independence sentiment. If it was something like 80-20, then maybe not, but that it was quite a close result says a bit.
Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
Frasers
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 500
Founded: Apr 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frasers » Thu May 07, 2015 5:05 am

Shamhnan Insir wrote:True, sadly not for Scotland though.


Ah but that is entirely subjective and down to opinion.

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Thu May 07, 2015 5:05 am

Bit the bullet, Voted Liberal Democrat. I'm now going to have a shower and hope that this time tomorrow we aren't talking about Farron as leader.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Frasers
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 500
Founded: Apr 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frasers » Thu May 07, 2015 5:08 am

Greater-London wrote:Bit the bullet, Voted Liberal Democrat. I'm now going to have a shower and hope that this time tomorrow we aren't talking about Farron as leader.


You'll still have Clegg don't you worry.

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Thu May 07, 2015 5:08 am

Frasers wrote:
Ah but that is entirely subjective and down to opinion.


Of course. To be honest though I think regardless of how you feel about the SNP and the independence issue things in some regards have gone sour north of the border. P

This isn't "the fault of the SNP" but this is the result of a very long and heartfelt campaign which wasn't that decisive for either side.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Thu May 07, 2015 5:26 am

Just got back from voting

User avatar
United Kingdom of Kent
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1055
Founded: Feb 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby United Kingdom of Kent » Thu May 07, 2015 5:34 am

Voting cast in favour of UKIP, now the waiting game for the results.
Ducit Amor Patriae

The Falkland Islands are British

User avatar
Frasers
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 500
Founded: Apr 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frasers » Thu May 07, 2015 5:38 am

United Kingdom of Kent wrote:Voting cast in favour of UKIP, now the waiting game for the results.


Which Kent constituency?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Great Britain eke Northern Ireland, The peoples commune

Advertisement

Remove ads