Beer, or at least everything that isn't fosters, Carling etc. is always a hit and miss. Best way is to find a beer you like, then see what pubs the brewery owns.
Advertisement
by The Matthew Islands » Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:57 am
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1
by The Matthew Islands » Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:59 am
The Archregimancy wrote:The Matthew Islands wrote:Only if they stopped bringing in money. Then it would probably be off to the blasphemy trials with them.
Or rather to reword it, the UAE likely allows Europeans to do all that because they know they wouldn't get away with treating them like they treat other immigrants from poorer countries that don't have the means to stand up to then. You know, torture, people vanishing, sexual abuse of domestic workers.
I wouldn't dispute for a second that South Asians labourers are often treated very badly in the UAE, but there's a substantial community of middle class and wealthy South Asians - who outnumber both white European immigrants and Emiratis. They have their own supermarkets, their own restaurants, their own places of worship (including at least one prominent Hindu temple), and I can assure you that there are large parts of Dubai - especially Old Dubai - that are considerably more like, say, Islamabad or Mumbai, than London is.
So it's not just about Europeans, and it's a vast oversimplification to think that 'immigrants from poorer countries' in the UAE are all poor Indians and Nepalis who are being forced to work on dangerous construction sites and/or being sexually abused.
And regardless of the above, the percentage of Europeans in Dubai is higher than the percentage of Pakistanis in London, so the basic point stands.
If Belivonia is opposed to what immigration from Islamic countries is allegedly doing to London, then he's presumably equally opposed to what European immigration is doing to places like Dubai; unless he thinks the principle only applies in one direction.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

by The Archregimancy » Wed Aug 26, 2015 7:14 am
The Matthew Islands wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:
I wouldn't dispute for a second that South Asians labourers are often treated very badly in the UAE, but there's a substantial community of middle class and wealthy South Asians - who outnumber both white European immigrants and Emiratis. They have their own supermarkets, their own restaurants, their own places of worship (including at least one prominent Hindu temple), and I can assure you that there are large parts of Dubai - especially Old Dubai - that are considerably more like, say, Islamabad or Mumbai, than London is.
So it's not just about Europeans, and it's a vast oversimplification to think that 'immigrants from poorer countries' in the UAE are all poor Indians and Nepalis who are being forced to work on dangerous construction sites and/or being sexually abused.
And regardless of the above, the percentage of Europeans in Dubai is higher than the percentage of Pakistanis in London, so the basic point stands.
If Belivonia is opposed to what immigration from Islamic countries is allegedly doing to London, then he's presumably equally opposed to what European immigration is doing to places like Dubai; unless he thinks the principle only applies in one direction.
Fair enough I suppose. Although I wouldn't place any bets on Belivonia thinking that way.
by The Matthew Islands » Wed Aug 26, 2015 7:23 am
)Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

by The Nihilistic view » Wed Aug 26, 2015 7:46 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:
"Women have problems. One thing we could do to address these problems is this. I will talk to women to see what their ideas are."
At no point has "women-only carriages" become "a proposal".

by The Nihilistic view » Wed Aug 26, 2015 7:53 am

by The Nihilistic view » Wed Aug 26, 2015 7:55 am
The Matthew Islands wrote:Napkiraly wrote:And the beer is hit or miss in a lot of pubs these days. I stuck to buying good German or Czech ones even though they're pricier.
Beer, or at least everything that isn't fosters, Carling etc. is always a hit and miss. Best way is to find a beer you like, then see what pubs the brewery owns.
by The Matthew Islands » Wed Aug 26, 2015 7:59 am
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

by L Ron Cupboard » Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:00 am
The Matthew Islands wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:
Carling and Fosters aren't beer anyway, basically piss with additives.
Fun anecdote.
Some friends and I were once discussing that its better to drink things like real ale because you can go all round the country and taste different ales that you can't get anywhere else because its like a local speciality.
One of our friends then declared: "Its best to drink lagers because no matter where I go I will always get the same pint of chemical fizzy piss.*"
Is that not the most depressing thing ever?
*I may or may not have embellished the quote.

by Napkiraly » Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:02 am
L Ron Cupboard wrote:The Matthew Islands wrote:Fun anecdote.
Some friends and I were once discussing that its better to drink things like real ale because you can go all round the country and taste different ales that you can't get anywhere else because its like a local speciality.
One of our friends then declared: "Its best to drink lagers because no matter where I go I will always get the same pint of chemical fizzy piss.*"
Is that not the most depressing thing ever?
*I may or may not have embellished the quote.
It might have been worse, they could have said cider.
by The Matthew Islands » Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:04 am
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

by The Nihilistic view » Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:08 am
The Matthew Islands wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:
Carling and Fosters aren't beer anyway, basically piss with additives.
Fun anecdote.
Some friends and I were once discussing that its better to drink things like real ale because you can go all round the country and taste different ales that you can't get anywhere else because its like a local speciality.
One of our friends then declared: "Its best to drink lagers because no matter where I go I will always get the same pint of chemical fizzy piss.*"
Is that not the most depressing thing ever?
*I may or may not have embellished the quote.

by L Ron Cupboard » Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:08 am
by The Matthew Islands » Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:13 am
The Nihilistic view wrote:The Matthew Islands wrote:Fun anecdote.
Some friends and I were once discussing that its better to drink things like real ale because you can go all round the country and taste different ales that you can't get anywhere else because its like a local speciality.
One of our friends then declared: "Its best to drink lagers because no matter where I go I will always get the same pint of chemical fizzy piss.*"
Is that not the most depressing thing ever?
*I may or may not have embellished the quote.
Hahaha, I don't know why it is but Anglo larger is total rubbish. Europeans do it well on the continent so I think we should just give up and stick to making Ale.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

by The Nihilistic view » Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:17 am

by The Archregimancy » Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:36 am
by The Matthew Islands » Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:39 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Can I gently steer this away from turning into the CAMRA thread?
Back to UK politics, please.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

by Sam Hyde » Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:39 am
Redsection wrote:Idk if your an racist , but you are funny in an weird way.
WCJNSTBH wrote:Sam Hyde is the least racist motherfucker in this thread.
Confederate Ramenia wrote:This is when he showed the world that he was based; that he was not a cuck; that he is not a degenerate. This will be a crucial moment and I want to preserve this.
Byzantium Imperial wrote:You sir are a legend

by The Huskar Social Union » Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:53 am
Sam Hyde wrote:My great-great uncle once knew a guy who visited Ireland. Therefore, I'm actually 100% Irish and more Irish than the Irish themselves and I hate Britain and I have informed opinions on the Northern Ireland conflict.

by Angleter » Wed Aug 26, 2015 9:02 am
The Matthew Islands wrote:Atlanticatia wrote:
I'd consider it a proposal. He proposed one idea of many. It is not a Jeremy Corbyn policy, but it is a Jeremy Corbyn proposal.
Well not really. IIRC he basically said "Something needs to be done about sexual assault on trains. Somebody suggested women only carriages, which is something that I would first offer to women to discuss whether it is a valid idea and take the feedback on board ()

by Imperializt Russia » Wed Aug 26, 2015 9:07 am
The Nihilistic view wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:"Women have problems. One thing we could do to address these problems is this. I will talk to women to see what their ideas are."
At no point has "women-only carriages" become "a proposal".
To propose : put forward (a plan or suggestion) for consideration by others.
In what way has saying he will consider it not him proposing this as a possible solution is his eyes?
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Imperializt Russia » Wed Aug 26, 2015 9:09 am
Angleter wrote:The Matthew Islands wrote:Well not really. IIRC he basically said "Something needs to be done about sexual assault on trains. Somebody suggested women only carriages, which is something that I would first offer to women to discuss whether it is a valid idea and take the feedback on board ()
Does this mean we all accept now that replacing the NHS with an insurance-based system isn't UKIP policy, officially or unofficially?
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by CoraSpia » Wed Aug 26, 2015 9:16 am
Angleter wrote:The Matthew Islands wrote:Well not really. IIRC he basically said "Something needs to be done about sexual assault on trains. Somebody suggested women only carriages, which is something that I would first offer to women to discuss whether it is a valid idea and take the feedback on board ()
Does this mean we all accept now that replacing the NHS with an insurance-based system isn't UKIP policy, officially or unofficially?
by Alyakia » Wed Aug 26, 2015 9:21 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Great Britain eke Northern Ireland, The peoples commune
Advertisement