Today is Ascension Day. Legally mandated four day weekend.
Advertisement

by Kannap » Thu May 14, 2015 3:51 am
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy

by Jute » Thu May 14, 2015 3:52 am
I only have today off, tomorrow is a normal day for me

Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Kannap » Thu May 14, 2015 3:52 am
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy

by Laerod » Thu May 14, 2015 3:55 am
I only have today off, tomorrow is a normal day for me :(Laerod wrote:Today is Ascension Day. Legally mandated four day weekend.

by The Holy Therns » Thu May 14, 2015 3:59 am
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

by Jute » Thu May 14, 2015 4:09 am
I disagree, and this salad in particular was good.
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Barboneia » Thu May 14, 2015 4:15 am
Bralia wrote:Strange that this "Ascension Day" thing isn't big in America. It seems very Christian-y . . .

by The Holy Therns » Thu May 14, 2015 4:19 am
Bralia wrote:Strange that this "Ascension Day" thing isn't big in America. It seems very Christian-y . . .
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

by Immoren » Thu May 14, 2015 4:19 am

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Gallade » Thu May 14, 2015 4:21 am
Bralia wrote:Strange that this "Ascension Day" thing isn't big in America. It seems very Christian-y . . .

by Hurdegaryp » Thu May 14, 2015 4:22 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Immoren » Thu May 14, 2015 4:24 am

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Gallade » Thu May 14, 2015 4:28 am

by Hurdegaryp » Thu May 14, 2015 4:29 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Wulfenia » Thu May 14, 2015 4:32 am
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:It's called being a reactionary. No wonder you're unpopular.

by Hurdegaryp » Thu May 14, 2015 4:33 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Gallade » Thu May 14, 2015 4:36 am

by Hurdegaryp » Thu May 14, 2015 4:40 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Wulfenia » Thu May 14, 2015 4:43 am
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:It's called being a reactionary. No wonder you're unpopular.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aisenia, Angel Encarmine, Bienenhalde, Bradfordville, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, Greater Marine, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Juansonia, Kernen, Neo-American States, New Dascos, Perikuresu, Picairn, Rary, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Uiiop, Valkalan, Valles Marineris Mining co
Advertisement