NATION

PASSWORD

Legalization of All Consensual Marriage

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which of the following marriages should be allowed?

Monogamous male-female couples
292
27%
Monogamous same-sex couples
240
22%
Polygamous partners and group marriages between men and women
170
16%
Polygamous partners and group marriage between members of the same sex
168
16%
Marriages between male and female family members
105
10%
Marriages between same-sex family members
108
10%
 
Total votes : 1083

User avatar
Mysterious Stranger
Diplomat
 
Posts: 659
Founded: Apr 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Mysterious Stranger » Sat May 02, 2015 11:08 pm

I don't see why we need our government to "allow" or disallow marriages in the first place.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40487
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sat May 02, 2015 11:13 pm

Mysterious Stranger wrote:I don't see why we need our government to "allow" or disallow marriages in the first place.


Because there are certain rights and privileges attached to it
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Living Freedom Land
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1582
Founded: Jul 07, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Living Freedom Land » Sat May 02, 2015 11:43 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Mysterious Stranger wrote:I don't see why we need our government to "allow" or disallow marriages in the first place.


Because there are certain rights and privileges attached to it

why should we give privileges to people based on this?

it's blatant discrimination against singles

*cue forever alone meme*
fnord

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40487
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sat May 02, 2015 11:48 pm

Living Freedom Land wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Because there are certain rights and privileges attached to it

why should we give privileges to people based on this?

it's blatant discrimination against singles

*cue forever alone meme*


Simple because to fail to do so harms society. There are certain monetary issues that come up when two people share income and the such. These issues are dealt with in marriage. Single people do not face those issues.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Living Freedom Land
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1582
Founded: Jul 07, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Living Freedom Land » Sun May 03, 2015 12:02 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Living Freedom Land wrote:why should we give privileges to people based on this?

it's blatant discrimination against singles

*cue forever alone meme*


Simple because to fail to do so harms society. There are certain monetary issues that come up when two people share income and the such. These issues are dealt with in marriage. Single people do not face those issues.

harms society only if you assume it's a good thing for married couples to have said privileges.
fnord

User avatar
Mysterious Stranger
Diplomat
 
Posts: 659
Founded: Apr 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Mysterious Stranger » Sun May 03, 2015 12:21 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Living Freedom Land wrote:why should we give privileges to people based on this?

it's blatant discrimination against singles

*cue forever alone meme*


Simple because to fail to do so harms society. There are certain monetary issues that come up when two people share income and the such. These issues are dealt with in marriage. Single people do not face those issues.

So deal with it when people share income.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40487
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sun May 03, 2015 12:22 am

Mysterious Stranger wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Simple because to fail to do so harms society. There are certain monetary issues that come up when two people share income and the such. These issues are dealt with in marriage. Single people do not face those issues.

So deal with it when people share income.


that is what marriage does...
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40487
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sun May 03, 2015 12:24 am

Living Freedom Land wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Simple because to fail to do so harms society. There are certain monetary issues that come up when two people share income and the such. These issues are dealt with in marriage. Single people do not face those issues.

harms society only if you assume it's a good thing for married couples to have said privileges.


Explain to me how you deal with taxes where income is shared, how do you deal when two people pay for the same car, how do you deal when a person is is a hospital, how do you deal when a person is a citizen and the significant other is not? Marriage allows legal strangers to be recognized as not legal strangers.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Mysterious Stranger
Diplomat
 
Posts: 659
Founded: Apr 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Mysterious Stranger » Sun May 03, 2015 12:27 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Mysterious Stranger wrote:So deal with it when people share income.


that is what marriage does...

Why does it have to be marriage for it to be sharing income? What if I want to open a commune? What if I'm shit with money and want to share income with my brother, who's better with it?

User avatar
Living Freedom Land
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1582
Founded: Jul 07, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Living Freedom Land » Sun May 03, 2015 12:36 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Living Freedom Land wrote:harms society only if you assume it's a good thing for married couples to have said privileges.


Explain to me how you deal with taxes where income is shared, how do you deal when two people pay for the same car, how do you deal when a person is is a hospital, how do you deal when a person is a citizen and the significant other is not? Marriage allows legal strangers to be recognized as not legal strangers.

draw up a contract???

how do people deal with being in business agreements?
fnord

User avatar
Torisakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16473
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Torisakia » Sun May 03, 2015 12:47 am

Mysterious Stranger wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
that is what marriage does...

Why does it have to be marriage for it to be sharing income? What if I want to open a commune? What if I'm shit with money and want to share income with my brother, who's better with it?

It would seem as though marriage is the only way to share income. Thus, if you're shit with money the only option is to get married. At least that's what I can draw out.
Royal Alexandre Hockey Invitational II Champions, NS Sports' Unofficial Champions of Life™
Pro: truth
Anti: uptight short sided narrow minded hypocrites, neurotic psychotic pigheaded politicians, short-haired yellow-bellied sons of Tricky Dick who try to mother-hubbard soft soap me with pockets full of hopes, tight-lipped condescending mama's little chauvinists, Schizophrenic egocentric paranoiac primadonnas

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Sun May 03, 2015 1:04 am

Living Freedom Land wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Explain to me how you deal with taxes where income is shared, how do you deal when two people pay for the same car, how do you deal when a person is is a hospital, how do you deal when a person is a citizen and the significant other is not? Marriage allows legal strangers to be recognized as not legal strangers.

draw up a contract???


A contract that would be identical to a marriage contract ?
Why not simply call it marriage then ?
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Lumeau
Envoy
 
Posts: 280
Founded: Nov 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lumeau » Sun May 03, 2015 3:05 am

This thread is awesome. Nothing like seeing authoritarian radfems and authoritarian traditionalists both try to peddle their BS in the exact same place.

Anyway, yeah, legalize everything. Why should I care who marries whom, as long as no one's forced into anything?

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Sun May 03, 2015 3:09 am

And another reason to leave to the UK. They don't recognise polygamy. And that with homophobia bring ok for religious reasons.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Russels Orbiting Teapot
Senator
 
Posts: 4024
Founded: Jan 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Russels Orbiting Teapot » Sun May 03, 2015 3:18 am

Val Halla wrote:And another reason to leave to the UK. They don't recognise polygamy. And that with homophobia bring ok for religious reasons.


Does the US recognize polygamy now?

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Sun May 03, 2015 3:21 am

Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:
Val Halla wrote:And another reason to leave to the UK. They don't recognise polygamy. And that with homophobia bring ok for religious reasons.


Does the US recognize polygamy now?

I guess not. But here there's a pretty negative stance on just having multiple relationships.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Lumeau
Envoy
 
Posts: 280
Founded: Nov 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lumeau » Sun May 03, 2015 3:22 am

Val Halla wrote:And another reason to leave to the UK. They don't recognise polygamy. And that with homophobia bring ok for religious reasons.


Have fun with that. The only places that have legal polygamy are Muslim-majority states.

I'm not saying that we should be chucking people in jail for consensual polygamy, but that is not a good reason to leave Britain.

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Sun May 03, 2015 3:25 am

Lumeau wrote:
Val Halla wrote:And another reason to leave to the UK. They don't recognise polygamy. And that with homophobia bring ok for religious reasons.


Have fun with that. The only places that have legal polygamy are Muslim-majority states.

I'm not saying that we should be chucking people in jail for consensual polygamy, but that is not a good reason to leave Britain.

Was gonna leave anyways. I heard the laws are changing in some parts too.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Bungle
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Oct 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bungle » Sun May 03, 2015 3:33 am

I'm personally disgusted by the idea of marrying a sibling, and really don't see why someone would want to marry more than one person. However, I don't think polygamous marriages or marriages between family members should be illegal because it's not my place to tell them who they can or can't marry. My only concern surrounding it is whether or not they would be good environments to bring up children.

User avatar
Lumeau
Envoy
 
Posts: 280
Founded: Nov 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lumeau » Sun May 03, 2015 3:39 am

Bungle wrote:I'm personally disgusted by the idea of marrying a sibling, and really don't see why someone would want to marry more than one person. However, I don't think polygamous marriages or marriages between family members should be illegal because it's not my place to tell them who they can or can't marry. My only concern surrounding it is whether or not they would be good environments to bring up children.


Incredibly overused argument. A lot of traditional male/female couples are incredibly shitty parents on a number of levels.

A kid brought up in that environment might be outcast but that's more a problem with society at large than it is with people who want to have polygamous marriages.

You also have the fact that some people in polyamorous relationships don't want to have kids but still want legal recognition of their relationship and the rights that go along with it.

If we're going to be concerned about kids, there are a lot more things a parent could do to screw up their kid's upbringing than be married to more than one person.
Last edited by Lumeau on Sun May 03, 2015 3:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Living Freedom Land
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1582
Founded: Jul 07, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Living Freedom Land » Sun May 03, 2015 10:40 am

Polygamy is/was the norm in many societies that prospered. It's pretty obvious there's nothing harmful to kids about it (unless we're talking some kind of subjective, immeasurable moral "harm").
fnord

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Sun May 03, 2015 10:41 am

Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:
Val Halla wrote:And another reason to leave to the UK. They don't recognise polygamy. And that with homophobia bring ok for religious reasons.


Does the US recognize polygamy now?


No. Polygamous marriages and relationships are unrecognized
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Sun May 03, 2015 10:43 am

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:
Does the US recognize polygamy now?


No. Polygamous marriages and relationships are unrecognized

Just being in a relationship is legally recognised?
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Sun May 03, 2015 10:46 am

Val Halla wrote:
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
No. Polygamous marriages and relationships are unrecognized

Just being in a relationship is legally recognised?

Only for the religious. Bigamy is illegal, so I would think polygamy is too.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Sun May 03, 2015 10:49 am

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
Val Halla wrote:Just being in a relationship is legally recognised?

Only for the religious. Bigamy is illegal, so I would think polygamy is too.

A few states are looking to legalize it, IIRC. I don't see why it was outlawed in the first place, TBH
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Alris, American Legionaries, Bradfordville, Grinning Dragon, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Ifreann, Ko-oren, Maya Luna, Necroghastia, Past beans, Shrillland, The Black Forrest, Tinhampton, Vyahrapura

Advertisement

Remove ads