Advertisement
by Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:17 pm
by Grand Calvert » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:18 pm
Mysterious Stranger wrote:Grand Calvert wrote:
...By extorting everyone who worked for their money? My point is that Jesus commanded voluntary charity, not that we should just pass legislations to knock everyone down to the same level. Taxation is extortion, which the Bible condemns.
The implication is that Jesus is advocating voluntary charity, but the government saying, "this person owns the factory, so half of what is produced by others must go to him" and using violence to force the workers to go along with it isn't voluntary. We're calling for the cessation of an involuntary act of theft.
by Mysterious Stranger » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:18 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:The Bible says you should submit to taxation and obey the government, and it also says give to the poor and rich people aren't good people.
I'm not seeing the issue.
No. Submission to the State over God is idolatry. Everyone is subject to God's laws, presidents and civilians alike. I can't extort someone, neither can a politician.
by Mysterious Stranger » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:19 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Mysterious Stranger wrote:The implication is that Jesus is advocating voluntary charity, but the government saying, "this person owns the factory, so half of what is produced by others must go to him" and using violence to force the workers to go along with it isn't voluntary. We're calling for the cessation of an involuntary act of theft.
That's just how selling things works. Sure, you made something, but you used my equipment to do it, so I make profit, too. I don't see the issue with that.
by Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:19 pm
Mysterious Stranger wrote:Grand Calvert wrote:
No. Submission to the State over God is idolatry. Everyone is subject to God's laws, presidents and civilians alike. I can't extort someone, neither can a politician.
This isn't over God, it's consistent with both the letter and spirit of Jesus' teachings and is clearly what God wants. It would be idolatry if you did what the state wanted when it was wrong.
by Threlizdun » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:20 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Mysterious Stranger wrote:The implication is that Jesus is advocating voluntary charity, but the government saying, "this person owns the factory, so half of what is produced by others must go to him" and using violence to force the workers to go along with it isn't voluntary. We're calling for the cessation of an involuntary act of theft.
That's just how selling things works. Sure, you made something, but you used my equipment to do it, so I make profit, too. I don't see the issue with that.
by Liberusy » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:20 pm
Mysterious Stranger wrote:Liberusy wrote:I am not talking about Liberyarians I am talking about Libertarians [JKing ]
In all seriousness Libertarian, Classical Liberal, Voluntarist, Freedom Loving American, Rand Paul Freak, Bigot, whatever you want to call my ideology I don't care, my beliefs don't change. I believe in freedom and natural rights [those being life, liberty and property] as well as an opportunity for those who work in life to achieve.
Freedom and the opportunity to achieve on your own merits are far more strongly protected under socialism. And it certainly seems like natural law is more consistent with a system that allows more people's needs to be met, while abstaining from domination, exploitation, coercion, and harm.
by Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:22 pm
by Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:22 pm
Liberusy wrote:Mysterious Stranger wrote:Freedom and the opportunity to achieve on your own merits are far more strongly protected under socialism. And it certainly seems like natural law is more consistent with a system that allows more people's needs to be met, while abstaining from domination, exploitation, coercion, and harm.
Under socialism over achievers are punished. Think about group projects as school even. You have the kid who tries his hardest on it [and probably does most of the work] yet you also have the kid who does next to nothing on it, yet regardless they still get the same grade [the Try hard should have got an A, well the not-tryer should have got a F] they as a group got a C-.
You are anti-corporations having to much power and corruption so you want to make government have a monopoly on varies things, because government is made up of angels right?
by Grand Calvert » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:23 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:I like how no one is addressing my Bible verses.
by Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:26 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:I like how no one is addressing my Bible verses.
I like how you think all of Christianity needs to be centered around a misinterpreted Romans 13
http://libertarianchristians.com/2008/1 ... heology-2/
by Mysterious Stranger » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:26 pm
Liberusy wrote:Mysterious Stranger wrote:Freedom and the opportunity to achieve on your own merits are far more strongly protected under socialism. And it certainly seems like natural law is more consistent with a system that allows more people's needs to be met, while abstaining from domination, exploitation, coercion, and harm.
Under socialism over achievers are punished. Think about group projects as school even. You have the kid who tries his hardest on it [and probably does most of the work] yet you also have the kid who does next to nothing on it, yet regardless they still get the same grade [the Try hard should have got an A, well the not-tryer should have got a F] they as a group got a C-.
You are anti-corporations having to much power and corruption so you want to make government have a monopoly on varies things, because government is made up of angels right?
by Grand Calvert » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:27 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Grand Calvert wrote:
I like how you think all of Christianity needs to be centered around a misinterpreted Romans 13
http://libertarianchristians.com/2008/1 ... heology-2/
That article does not say in any way that the rich should not have the shit taxed out of them.
by Threlizdun » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:27 pm
Socialism means that you benefit when those around you do. By helping others you help yourself. You still get rewarded for your labour, and you have protections should anything ever happen to you. Productivity and efficiency is promoted rather than profitability. What benefits everyone is promoted over what only benefits a few but hurts society at large.Liberusy wrote:Mysterious Stranger wrote:Freedom and the opportunity to achieve on your own merits are far more strongly protected under socialism. And it certainly seems like natural law is more consistent with a system that allows more people's needs to be met, while abstaining from domination, exploitation, coercion, and harm.
Under socialism over achievers are punished. Think about group projects as school even. You have the kid who tries his hardest on it [and probably does most of the work] yet you also have the kid who does next to nothing on it, yet regardless they still get the same grade [the Try hard should have got an A, well the not-tryer should have got a F] they as a group got a C
Socialism is ownership and democratic administration by the workers. This can be done with all of society owning and administrating the means of production through councils or through a market structure. Markets and socialism are hardly incompatible.You are anti-corporations having to much power and corruption so you want to make government have a monopoly on varies things, because government is made up of angels right?
by Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:27 pm
by Grand Calvert » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:29 pm
by Washington Resistance Army » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:30 pm
by Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:31 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Where does the Bible say that?
Luke 3:13-14
And he said to them, "Collect no more than what you have been ordered to." Some soldiers were questioning him, saying, "And what about us, what shall we do?" And he said to them, "Do not take money from anyone by force, or accuse anyone falsely, and be content with your wages."
What is taxation other than taking money by force, no matter what it's for?
by Mysterious Stranger » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:32 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Where does the Bible say that?
Luke 3:13-14
And he said to them, "Collect no more than what you have been ordered to." Some soldiers were questioning him, saying, "And what about us, what shall we do?" And he said to them, "Do not take money from anyone by force, or accuse anyone falsely, and be content with your wages."
What is taxation other than taking money by force, no matter what it's for?
by Grand Calvert » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:34 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Grand Calvert wrote:
Luke 3:13-14
And he said to them, "Collect no more than what you have been ordered to." Some soldiers were questioning him, saying, "And what about us, what shall we do?" And he said to them, "Do not take money from anyone by force, or accuse anyone falsely, and be content with your wages."
What is taxation other than taking money by force, no matter what it's for?
He said don't collect more than you've been ordered to. Collecting taxes is fine. He's saying, don't break the law and take more than you're supposed to, for yourself.
Are you saying Paul the Apostle is contradicting Christ, by saying you should pay your taxes?
by Threlizdun » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:34 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:I like how no one is addressing my Bible verses.
I like how you think all of Christianity needs to be centered around a misinterpreted Romans 13
http://libertarianchristians.com/2008/1 ... heology-2/
by Threlizdun » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:36 pm
Even if that were true, you should apply it today and pay your taxes.Grand Calvert wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:He said don't collect more than you've been ordered to. Collecting taxes is fine. He's saying, don't break the law and take more than you're supposed to, for yourself.
Are you saying Paul the Apostle is contradicting Christ, by saying you should pay your taxes?
You obviously don't understand the historical context of Romans 13. Paul is saying that that Christians should obey all of Romes laws so that Rome wouldn't be able to find a legal reason to persecute the Christians.
by Mysterious Stranger » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:36 pm
Threlizdun wrote:Grand Calvert wrote:
I like how you think all of Christianity needs to be centered around a misinterpreted Romans 13
http://libertarianchristians.com/2008/1 ... heology-2/
Very lazy and honestly desperate work. The Bible states that government is divinely mandated, and states that people have a duty to follow them. No, by comparing this to how Satan is divinely mandated you do not get to reject government, as just as you cannot destroy satan because he is divinely mandated you cannot destroy governments. They are created by God for a purpose, and that purpose is to rule over the earthly kingdom before you enter the heavenly kingdom.
by Liberusy » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:36 pm
Mysterious Stranger wrote:Liberusy wrote:Under socialism over achievers are punished. Think about group projects as school even. You have the kid who tries his hardest on it [and probably does most of the work] yet you also have the kid who does next to nothing on it, yet regardless they still get the same grade [the Try hard should have got an A, well the not-tryer should have got a F] they as a group got a C-.
You are anti-corporations having to much power and corruption so you want to make government have a monopoly on varies things, because government is made up of angels right?
Make sure to listen to my arguments, because what you're criticizing isn't my actual position. I want the government to stop forcing the workers of the various industries to obey and give a huge cut of their profits to a class of elites. I want the corporations to be controlled by their workers.
In group projects, you're forced to be in a particular group. But in workplace democracy, you're not forced in name or fact to participate in a particular company. If groups at school were like workplace democracy and the other people weren't working hard, you could leave that group, join a different group where people worked harder, and get a better result. You're also not competing for grades in workplace democracy because you're not being paid wages determined by a boss class, you're competing for results because you get to keep whatever you produce.
Threlizdun wrote:Socialism means that you benefit when those around you do. By helping others you help yourself. You still get rewarded for your labour, and you have protections should anything ever happen to you. Productivity and efficiency is promoted rather than profitability. What benefits everyone is promoted over what only benefits a few but hurts society at large.Liberusy wrote:Under socialism over achievers are punished. Think about group projects as school even. You have the kid who tries his hardest on it [and probably does most of the work] yet you also have the kid who does next to nothing on it, yet regardless they still get the same grade [the Try hard should have got an A, well the not-tryer should have got a F] they as a group got a CSocialism is ownership and democratic administration by the workers. This can be done with all of society owning and administrating the means of production through councils or through a market structure. Markets and socialism are hardly incompatible.You are anti-corporations having to much power and corruption so you want to make government have a monopoly on varies things, because government is made up of angels right?
by Prussia-Steinbach » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:37 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:He said don't collect more than you've been ordered to. Collecting taxes is fine. He's saying, don't break the law and take more than you're supposed to, for yourself.
Are you saying Paul the Apostle is contradicting Christ, by saying you should pay your taxes?
You obviously don't understand the historical context of Romans 13. Paul is saying that that Christians should obey all of Romes laws so that Rome wouldn't be able to find a legal reason to persecute the Christians.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Republics of the Solar Union, Second Peenadian
Advertisement