Bible citations on military gun sights

[Maurepas]

Epic.

Just the thought of flaming lead projectiles blasting their way through terrorists (and haters of Jews and Christians at that!) after emerging from weapons bearing Scriptural cites puts a smile on my lips.

It also brings Warhammer 40K to mind

But you claim Jihad is barbaric, right?

I don't care whether or not it's "barbaric." I just care about crushing it, once and for all, by whatever means expedient. As should have been done at any time since 636 A.D.

Because you always complain whenever someone subjects the Crusades to our "modern day morality", yet you see no issue with exporting centuries-old morality into the modern era.

The complaints are only when its done in a negative light,

[Buffett and Colbert]

Epic.

Just the thought of flaming lead projectiles blasting their way through terrorists (and haters of Jews and Christians at that!) after emerging from weapons bearing Scriptural cites puts a smile on my lips.

It also brings Warhammer 40K to mind

But you claim Jihad is barbaric, right?

I don't care whether or not it's "barbaric." I just care about crushing it, once and for all, by whatever means expedient. As should have been done at any time since 636 A.D.

And you honestly don't see the connection between Bible verses on guns (that happen to kill people, you know) and Jihad?

[Neu Mitanni]

Epic.

Just the thought of flaming lead projectiles blasting their way through terrorists (and haters of Jews and Christians at that!) after emerging from weapons bearing Scriptural cites puts a smile on my lips.

It also brings Warhammer 40K to mind

Aw, do you have a bad case of xenophobia?

Educate yourself about the world, I pray your still a kid and there's still hope.

I've probably forgotten more about "the world" than you've ever known. I've traveled extensively, especially in Asia. I've worked in South Korea and done business in Japan. And I'm long past being a "kid". On the other hand, there may still be hope for you

Just thought I'd let you know that Jews, Christians, and Muslims all worship the same God. I love it when my ignorant countrymen hear that one, especially after they say "Damn Allah".

Just thought I'd let you know that Moslems, by their own words, do not "worship the same God" as Jews, Christians, or Hindus, Buddhists or Amazonian jungle shamans for that matter.

Sura 109: The Disbelievers
Say: O disbelievers!
I worship not that which ye worship,
Nor worship ye that which I worship.
And I shall not worship that which ye worship.
Nor will ye worship that which I worship.
Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion.
(see http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc ... 9.qmt.html )

So much for "worshipping the same God."

The "Allah" of Islam is no more the One True God of Christianity than Zeus, Re or Odin is. Onomastics don't determine theological identity.

So, you like theocratic dystopias with aliens killing willy nilly. Somehow, I'm not entirely suprised

I like the game. I think the Emperor is Josef Stalin with psychic powers, and not very smart at that. My Space Marines chapter only pays lip service to the Imperial Cult anyway.

And that's as far as I'm going with this. Continue it in Forum 7 if you like.

[Farnhamia]

Epic.

Just the thought of flaming lead projectiles blasting their way through terrorists (and haters of Jews and Christians at that!) after emerging from weapons bearing Scriptural cites puts a smile on my lips.

It also brings Warhammer 40K to mind

But you claim Jihad is barbaric, right?

I don't care whether or not it's "barbaric." I just care about crushing it, once and for all, by whatever means expedient. As should have been done at any time since 636 A.D.

And you honestly don't see the connection between Bible verses on guns (that happen to kill people, you know) and Jihad?

NM doesn't really care, Buffy. Anyway, crushing Islam became coulds-woulda-shoulda in August of 636. After the Yarmouk, the Romans weren't in a position to crush anyone.

[Neu Mitanni]

Epic.

Just the thought of flaming lead projectiles blasting their way through terrorists (and haters of Jews and Christians at that!) after emerging from weapons bearing Scriptural cites puts a smile on my lips.

It also brings Warhammer 40K to mind

But you claim Jihad is barbaric, right?

I don't care whether or not it's "barbaric." I just care about crushing it, once and for all, by whatever means expedient. As should have been done at any time since 636 A.D.

Because you always complain whenever someone subjects the Crusades to our "modern day morality", yet you see no issue with exporting centuries-old morality into the modern era.

The complaints are only when its done in a negative light,

People can subject the Crusades to whatever "morality" they like, I don't care. I won't agree with any such analysis anyway.

I don't care about "complaints" in general. I call it like I see it. If enough voters agree with the position I advocate for, we win. If not, not.

[Buffett and Colbert]

Epic.

Just the thought of flaming lead projectiles blasting their way through terrorists (and haters of Jews and Christians at that!) after emerging from weapons bearing Scriptural cites puts a smile on my lips.

It also brings Warhammer 40K to mind

But you claim Jihad is barbaric, right?

I don't care whether or not it's "barbaric." I just care about crushing it, once and for all, by whatever means expedient. As should have been done at any time since 636 A.D.

And you honestly don't see the connection between Bible verses on guns (that happen to kill people, you know) and Jihad?

NM doesn't really care, Buffy.

I'm young and naive. Cut me some slack.

[Neu Mitanni]

Epic.

Just the thought of flaming lead projectiles blasting their way through terrorists (and haters of Jews and Christians at that!) after emerging from weapons bearing Scriptural cites puts a smile on my lips.

It also brings Warhammer 40K to mind

But you claim Jihad is barbaric, right?

I don't care whether or not it's "barbaric." I just care about crushing it, once and for all, by whatever means expedient. As should have been done at any time since 636 A.D.

And you honestly don't see the connection between Bible verses on guns (that happen to kill people, you know) and Jihad?

NM doesn't really care, Buffy. Anyway, crushing Islam became coulds-woulda-shoulda in August of 636. After the Yarmouk, the Romans weren't in a position to crush anyone.

Sad but true, at least until 1097 A.D. and subsequent squandered opportunities. And I'm impressed with your recognition of the cited date. Go to the head of the class.

[Wikipedia and Universe]

If I were to be issued one with a verse on it, I would simply do the following:

- Sweep my two forefingers diagonally across my, chest, to curse it.
- Get a file, apply elbow grease, and start filing off the verse.
- Allow others who are concerned with it to deal with the problem, seeing as they are already on it.

[North Suran]

Epic.

Just the thought of flaming lead projectiles blasting their way through terrorists (and haters of Jews and Christians at that!) after emerging from weapons bearing Scriptural cites puts a smile on my lips.

It also brings Warhammer 40K to mind

But you claim Jihad is barbaric, right?

I don't care whether or not it's "barbaric." I just care about crushing it, once and for all, by whatever means expedient. As should have been done at any time since 636 A.D.

Because you always complain whenever someone subjects the Crusades to our "modern day morality", yet you see no issue with exporting centuries-old morality into the modern era.

The complaints are only when its done in a negative light,

People can subject the Crusades to whatever "morality" they like, I don't care. I won't agree with any such analysis anyway.

Then why are you even here?

I don't care about "complaints" in general. I call it like I see it.

And more often than not, your world view is self-servingly distorted.

[Yootopia]

I don't care about "complaints" in general. I call it like I see it.

And more often than not, your world view is self-servingly distorted.

To be fair is there really anyone for whom that isn't true?

[Maurepas]

I don't care about "complaints" in general. I call it like I see it.

And more often than not, your world view is self-servingly distorted.

To be fair is there really anyone for whom that isn't true?

Buddha?

[Neu Mitanni]

The "Allah" of Islam is no more the One True God of Christianity than Zeus, Re or Odin is. Onomastics don't determine theological identity.

I think a more apt comparison would be Zeus to Jupiter...

Unlike the God/"Allah" comparison, that would be valid. The two names are actually etymologically related, as well as denoting roughly theologically equivalent deities.

[Neu Mitanni]

I don't care about "complaints" in general. I call it like I see it.

And more often than not, your world view is self-servingly distorted.

To be fair is there really anyone for whom that isn't true?

Buddha?

Om my god! Good one.

[North Suran]

I don't care about "complaints" in general. I call it like I see it.

And more often than not, your world view is self-servingly distorted.

To be fair is there really anyone for whom that isn't true?

I'm an authoritarian, but that doesn't mean I won't argue that all authoritarian regimes are benevolent, nor will I not admit that a majority of them just end up being corrupt and oppressive.

John Newington Mitanni's view of the world happily eliminates any and all details that do not gel with his beliefs.

[Blob-land]

Who freaking cares? If i had one of those sights (which would be beatly, I wanna red dot) I'd feel fine, im christian.
only over-active atheists freak out at these things. And no I am not flame-baiting, just telling the truth.

[Maurepas]

The "Allah" of Islam is no more the One True God of Christianity than Zeus, Re or Odin is. Onomastics don't determine theological identity.

I think a more apt comparison would be Zeus to Jupiter...

Unlike the God/"Allah" comparison, that would be valid. The two names are actually etymologically related, as well as denoting roughly theologically equivalent deities.

Its similar in the sense that they both come from the same source, the differences come in when you decide to take Jesus or Mohammed as his final profit...

Or are still waiting for it entirely, of course...

[North Suran]

Who freaking cares? If i had one of those sights (which would be beatly, I wanna red dot) I'd feel fine, im christian.
only over-active atheists freak out at these things. And no I am not flame-baiting, just telling the truth.

I would imagine that most Christians would feel a little uneasy when their Scriptures - which notably promote "Thou shalt not kill" as one of the Ten Commandments - are being etched out on firearms.

Not to mention the fact that using guns with Bible citations on them would be a propaganda dream for al-Qaeda.

[Maurepas]

Who freaking cares? If i had one of those sights (which would be beatly, I wanna red dot) I'd feel fine, im christian.
only over-active atheists freak out at these things. And no I am not flame-baiting, just telling the truth.

I would imagine that most Christians would feel a little uneasy when their Scriptures - which notably promote "Thou shalt not kill" as one of the Ten Commandments - are being etched out on firearms.

Not to mention the fact that using guns with Bible citations on them would be a propaganda dream for al-Qaeda.

Which is my point exactly, this isnt about "PC" or "Christian victims of Atheism" or whatever...

Its about denying Al-Qaeda their best weapon to date,

[Blob-land]

Who freaking cares? If i had one of those sights (which would be beatly, I wanna red dot) I'd feel fine, im christian.
only over-active atheists freak out at these things. And no I am not flame-baiting, just telling the truth.

I would imagine that most Christians would feel a little uneasy when their Scriptures - which notably promote "Thou shalt not kill" as one of the Ten Commandments - are being etched out on firearms.

Not to mention the fact that using guns with Bible citations on them would be a propaganda dream for al-Qaeda.

True, true. But the propaganda dream? I don't understand what you mean by that.

[North Suran]

Who freaking cares? If i had one of those sights (which would be beatly, I wanna red dot) I'd feel fine, im christian.
only over-active atheists freak out at these things. And no I am not flame-baiting, just telling the truth.

I would imagine that most Christians would feel a little uneasy when their Scriptures - which notably promote "Thou shalt not kill" as one of the Ten Commandments - are being etched out on firearms.

Not to mention the fact that using guns with Bible citations on them would be a propaganda dream for al-Qaeda.

True, true. But the propaganda dream? I don't understand what you mean by that.

Al-Qaeda's whole platform is that they are defending Islam from the Western Christian Crusaders, out to enslave the Middle East and enforce their religion upon its population.

Can you see how using guns with Bible citations may add some veracity to these claims?

[Maurepas]

Who freaking cares? If i had one of those sights (which would be beatly, I wanna red dot) I'd feel fine, im christian.
only over-active atheists freak out at these things. And no I am not flame-baiting, just telling the truth.

I would imagine that most Christians would feel a little uneasy when their Scriptures - which notably promote "Thou shalt not kill" as one of the Ten Commandments - are being etched out on firearms.

Not to mention the fact that using guns with Bible citations on them would be a propaganda dream for al-Qaeda.

True, true. But the propaganda dream? I don't understand what you mean by that.

One of Al-Qaeda's primary recruitment tools is convincing young, impressionable Muslims that the West is engaging in a "10th Crusade", so to speak, against them...

Allowing Christian Epithets to be used on our Weapons would be among the greater justifications for that assertion...

[Neu Mitanni]

Who freaking cares? If i had one of those sights (which would be beatly, I wanna red dot) I'd feel fine, im christian.
only over-active atheists freak out at these things. And no I am not flame-baiting, just telling the truth.

I would imagine that most Christians would feel a little uneasy when their Scriptures - which notably promote "Thou shalt not kill" as one of the Ten Commandments - are being etched out on firearms.

Not to mention the fact that using guns with Bible citations on them would be a propaganda dream for al-Qaeda.

Which is my point exactly, this isnt about "PC" or "Christian victims of Atheism" or whatever...

Its about denying Al-Qaeda their best weapon to date,

"Best weapon to date?" Naw, that would be Eric Holder.

But there might, just possibly, be some merit in the argument that the guns may be counter-productive, seeing as we have not yet publicly admitted that this is in fact a holy war against Islamo-Nazism. If we ever do admit it, then it won't matter what's on our guns, only what comes out of them.

[Maurepas]

But there might, just possibly, be some merit in the argument that the guns may be counter-productive, seeing as we have not yet publicly admitted that this is in fact a holy war against Islamo-Nazism. If we ever do admit it, then it won't matter what's on our guns, only what comes out of them.

If you want a Holy War, probably better to ask the Pope, than the US Government, as I think he's the Authority on the subject...

[Gauthier]

"Best weapon to date?" Naw, that would be Eric Holder.

You can always be counted on for cute, baseless hyperbole that could land you a career on FOXNews. Got and direct proof that Eric Holder is supporting Al'Qaeda? Probably not knowing you but I'd ask anyways.

But there might, just possibly, be some merit in the argument that the guns may be counter-productive, seeing as we have not yet publicly admitted that this is in fact a holy war against Islamo-Nazism. If we ever do admit it, then it won't matter what's on our guns, only what comes out of them.

So you finally admit that you're hoping for a holy war against Islam. Well, that's a change of pace coming from you.

[Buffett and Colbert]

holy war against Islamo-Nazism.

Lol. Funny word.