NATION

PASSWORD

International Law: Contracts?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Solm
Senator
 
Posts: 3582
Founded: Jul 23, 2008
Corporate Bordello

International Law: Contracts?

Postby Solm » Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:54 pm

My friends recently confirmed an apartment rental in Italy, we live in the United States. The company required that all the money be paid up in front. Of course they made sure it was legit. It was not a cheap. They signed a contract, to assure of everything. However, they are in two different nations (Italy and the US), let's say the apartment owners stick them in a rotten beat-up apartment or none at all, and not give my friends anything. I know if that happened in the United States, my friends would just sue the apartment owners for breech of contract. However, since they are of two different nationalities, how would it work? Could my friends get their money back? Or would they be lost? Could they sue them through the Italian Justice System? Can a non-civlian sue in a foreign nation?

So, I ask the most knowledgeable NSG.
Last edited by Solm on Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Retired: ns .hellodot. solm @ gmail .dot. com

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5771
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Neu Leonstein » Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:05 pm

That depends on what the contract itself said. They must have a clause stating the legal mechanisms under which disputes will be settled, ie what mediation mechanisms, what court of arbitration and, if necessary, which court system. That could be Italy, the US, or Togo. There are no rules there other than what both sides agree upon.

I hope your friends read the contract properly, because choosing dispute resolution mechanisms is usually an important negotiation point in international business contracts.

Yay, that is the first time I have ever used my IB Management degree for anything! :clap:
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
Solm
Senator
 
Posts: 3582
Founded: Jul 23, 2008
Corporate Bordello

Postby Solm » Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:07 pm

Neu Leonstein wrote:That depends on what the contract itself said. They must have a clause stating the legal mechanisms under which disputes will be settled, ie what mediation mechanisms, what court of arbitration and, if necessary, which court system. That could be Italy, the US, or Togo. There are no rules there other than what both sides agree upon.

I hope your friends read the contract properly, because choosing dispute resolution mechanisms is usually an important negotiation point in international business contracts.

Yay, that is the first time I have ever used my IB Management degree for anything! :clap:


Ha! See You Never Know When You Can Use those stuff!

But, even if they say it will be dissolved in Italy, the contract can't change law, what if Italian law says only citizens can sue (which it probably does), then my friends, even though the contract said so, would have no legal power. And what if it said it would be settled in the US, would Italy really deport their own citizen to another nation?

Retired: ns .hellodot. solm @ gmail .dot. com

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5771
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Neu Leonstein » Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:12 pm

Solm wrote:But, even if they say it will be dissolved in Italy, the contract can't change law, what if Italian law says only citizens can sue (which it probably does), then my friends, even though the contract said so, would have no legal power. And what if it said it would be settled in the US, would Italy really deport their own citizen to another nation?

Why should the law say that? They have a contract, under Italian law, which they argue is broken and needs resolving by Italian courts, as would be stated in the contract. Whether or not a plaintiff happens to be Italian or not is irrelevant. As I said, if the contract said so, they as Americans could sue Italians for breach of contract in Togo. And that would still be okay.
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:12 pm

I would suggest that there are three ways of working out what jurisdiction the contract falls under:

1) What country was the contract concluded in,
2) Did the contract cite any legislation, or failing both of those
2) Did the contract state what jurisdiction it was concluded under (i.e. what countries laws it was under and, therefore, what country it was to be mediated in should a dispute arise; this one is a long shot, it can apply in commercial contracts, but I imagine the landlord wasn't anticipating that when he drew up the contract)?
Last edited by Nadkor on Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:40 pm

Jurisdiction of a case ordinarily follows the venue which has the clearest connection to the parties and the subject matter.

A couple in New Hampshire were able to avoid a lease in Aruba, in a trial held in the US; SCOTUS said that ordinarily there would not have been proper jurisdiction here, but the defendant Caribbean leasing firm had conducted extensive business here and so placed itself under our jurisdiction.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Psychotic Mongooses
Diplomat
 
Posts: 804
Founded: Mar 07, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Psychotic Mongooses » Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:16 am

Not a lot of info to go on, here's my 2 cents.

Solm wrote:My friends recently confirmed an apartment rental in Italy, we live in the United States. The company required that all the money be paid up in front
That's highly unusual in itself. I'd check Italian rental law to see if that's even allowed/legal.

Of course they made sure it was legit. It was not a cheap. They signed a contract, to assure of everything.

Just because it's a contract doesn't mean it's legit.

However, they are in two different nations (Italy and the US), let's say the apartment owners stick them in a rotten beat-up apartment or none at all, and not give my friends anything. I know if that happened in the United States, my friends would just sue the apartment owners for breech of contract. However, since they are of two different nationalities, how would it work? Could my friends get their money back? Or would they be lost? Could they sue them through the Italian Justice System? Can a non-civlian sue in a foreign nation?

As far as I know yes.
/not a 'contract' lawyer, but still did law

Nadkor's seems the best advice so far to me.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55310
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:47 am

Solm wrote:My friends recently confirmed an apartment rental in Italy, we live in the United States. The company required that all the money be paid up in front. Of course they made sure it was legit. It was not a cheap. They signed a contract, to assure of everything. However, they are in two different nations (Italy and the US), let's say the apartment owners stick them in a rotten beat-up apartment or none at all, and not give my friends anything. I know if that happened in the United States, my friends would just sue the apartment owners for breech of contract. However, since they are of two different nationalities, how would it work? Could my friends get their money back? Or would they be lost? Could they sue them through the Italian Justice System? Can a non-civlian sue in a foreign nation?
So, I ask the most knowledgeable NSG.


Is the company Italian? If it is, I'm quite sure you can sue it under Italian law. Anyway, here in Italy, at the end of a contract, you'll find generally a standard line stating what court is to be referred to in case of controversy. ("Il tribunale di -insert city here- è competente per le controversie / le violazioni al presente contratto").

"Non civilian"? You mean your friends are military? Or do you mean they're not citizens of Italy?
Anyway, civil rights in Italy (like the right to justice) apply to any person that is (legally) on Italian territory, regardless of citizenship, or that has some (lawful) business in Italy. Even if they're foreign military of course.

Anyway, if they suspect, upon their arrival to their new place in Italy, a breech of contract, the best thing they can do is to call either the Carabinieri (telephone 112) or the Guardia di Finanza (telephone 117), and the US Embassy in Rome. Skip the first part if they cannot speak at least a bit of Italian, though.
.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55310
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:52 am

Psychotic Mongooses wrote:Just because it's a contract doesn't mean it's legit.


In Italy, house rental contracts must be verified by a civil law notary ("notaio") and/or by the local municipality.
If a contract has non-legitimate parts in it, two things can happen:
1.for minor violations to laws about contracts, the non-legitimate parts are considered automatically invalid and hence non-binding
2.for major violations, the contract itself is considered invalid, and any sum paid as consequence of that contract must be refunded - this doesn't take away, of course, the right to sue for fraud.
.

User avatar
Mean Feat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 962
Founded: Dec 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Mean Feat » Thu Jan 21, 2010 2:06 am

Risottia wrote:
Psychotic Mongooses wrote:Just because it's a contract doesn't mean it's legit.


In Italy, house rental contracts must be verified by a civil law notary ("notaio") and/or by the local municipality.
If a contract has non-legitimate parts in it, two things can happen:
1.for minor violations to laws about contracts, the non-legitimate parts are considered automatically invalid and hence non-binding
2.for major violations, the contract itself is considered invalid, and any sum paid as consequence of that contract must be refunded - this doesn't take away, of course, the right to sue for fraud.


That would be a good result. Live in the house while the matter is settled in court, then get a refund on all the rent. Good times !
— written by Mean Feat.

Mean Feat wrote:The Latham of the Liberals. Tony Abbott.

Tanya Plibersek Mon 22 Feb 2010 wrote:"Tony is the 'Mark Latham' of the Liberal Party.

She didn't get to explain why.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Asucki, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bienenhalde, Corporate Collective Salvation, El Lazaro, Elejamie, Ethel mermania, Glorious Freedonia, Google [Bot], Gylcheri, Herador, Ifreann, Jibjibistan, Neu California, New haven america, Post War America, Saiwana, Shrillland, Stellar Colonies, Suriyanakhon, Theyra, Tungstan, United Defense, Unmet Player, Welskerland

Advertisement

Remove ads