NATION

PASSWORD

An answer to all our prayers...

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Eternal Mysteries
Envoy
 
Posts: 280
Founded: Jul 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Eternal Mysteries » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:24 pm

Barringtonia wrote:Someone has invented a symbol denoting sarcasm..

You may not yet have heard of Michigan-based Sarcasm, Inc but it would be no exaggeration to say that it may soon be as big a household name as Tesco or Google.

Its product, perhaps the most innovative and original of the century so far, is a punctuation mark for sarcasm. Although strangers to the mark might mistake it for a squiggle with a dot inside, the "SarcMark" will soon be turning up in our inboxes every day. The question that will baffle future generations is how we managed to live without it for so long.


Genius right (dammit, where's my sarcmark)

Though there've been contenders..

It's surprising, given the brilliance of the idea, that it has never been suggested before. Admittedly, French poet Alcanter de Brahm proposed using a backward-facing question mark to denote irony in the late 19th century. But that's in no way similar to the scribbled brilliance of the SarcMark. And the fact that US writer and satirist Josh Greenman proposed the upside-down exclamation mark as a "sarcasm point" in an article for Slate magazine in 2004 is equally immaterial.

The existence of numerous alternative solutions already in use, from emoticons such as :P, ;) and :) to pseudo-html markers such as [/s] and </sarcasm>, is unlikely to be an obstacle to the SarcMark's overnight success.


The real breakthrough of Sarcasm, Inc is the realisation that, despite having used sarcasm and irony in the written word for hundreds of years, humans are simply too stupid to consistently recognise when someone has said the opposite of what they mean.


No, really? (Dammit again!)

The SarcMark solves that problem, and you can download it as a font for the reasonable price of $1.99 (£1.20). Our prayers are answered.


Oh, well worth the price (for f***k's sake, can someone hack it)

You can see the mark here - http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/20 ... e-sarcmark

What else do we need?


This is so incredibly interesting!!!
:kiss: :bow: :D

User avatar
DaWoad
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9066
Founded: Nov 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby DaWoad » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:27 pm

how bout we just use this $ I mean its already an s (for . . .well sarcasm) with a line through it (for "this means the opposite) . . .its on every keyboard, requires no font change whatsoever and its purpose is easily determined by both context and where in the sentance you put it.

ie.
"$ a million here a million there . . . .its all just pocket change anyway right?"

"100 000$ is . . .significant"
Official Nation States Trainer
Factbook:http://nationstates.wikia.com/wiki/User:Dawoad
Alliances:The Hegemony, The GDF, SCUTUM

Supporter of making [citation needed] the official NSG way to say "source?"

User avatar
Barringtonia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9908
Founded: Feb 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Barringtonia » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:47 pm

Eternal Mysteries wrote:This is so incredibly interesting!!!
:kiss: :bow: :D


OMG, what an original answer! No one's gone there yet!
I hear babies cry, I watch them grow
They'll learn much more than I'll ever know
And I think to myself, what a wonderful world



User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:00 pm

Barringtonia wrote:
Eternal Mysteries wrote:This is so incredibly interesting!!!
:kiss: :bow: :D


OMG, what an original answer! No one's gone there yet!

If only there was some symbol to tell me how to see what was being done there!

User avatar
Barringtonia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9908
Founded: Feb 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Barringtonia » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:02 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Barringtonia wrote:
Eternal Mysteries wrote:This is so incredibly interesting!!!
:kiss: :bow: :D


OMG, what an original answer! No one's gone there yet!

If only there was some symbol to tell me how to see what was being done there!


Mods won't check this thread much, we can spam the hell out of it.
I hear babies cry, I watch them grow
They'll learn much more than I'll ever know
And I think to myself, what a wonderful world



User avatar
Unidox
Minister
 
Posts: 2619
Founded: Jan 25, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Unidox » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:46 pm

Khornate Worshippers wrote:Image


This will be the new bane of English teachers everywhere.
Caninope wrote:It's NSG. The 20th Circle of LIMBO!

Buffett and Colbert wrote:Always here to ruin the day. 8)

Living Freedom Land wrote:Oh, so now you want gay people to take part in the sacred institution of tax rebates too? You liberals sicken me.

Lacadaemon wrote:I mean, hell, in a properly regulated market, pension stripping schemes like Zynga wouldn't ever have a sniff of an IPO (see Groupon). But it's all wild westy now. Lie down with dogs and so forth.

User avatar
Enistopia
Envoy
 
Posts: 279
Founded: Jan 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Enistopia » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:53 pm

Epic =)

User avatar
Christmahanikwanzikah
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12073
Founded: Nov 24, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Christmahanikwanzikah » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:56 pm

Now that sarcasm has its own symbol, can we now put units behind it and create a unit value for sarcasm?

If so, I'm all for naming it somthing like the Wilde or the LG.

User avatar
Czardas
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6922
Founded: Feb 25, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Czardas » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:48 am

Barringtonia wrote:
Blitzkrenia wrote:Meh, already been done.

The article is nonsense. It also sounds trollish, denouncing anything that could devalue the so-called "innovation" of the SarcMark.


Do you not think the article is, in itself, sarcastically devaluing the purpose of a sarcmark?

I think it's making the point that the phrasing itself should denote sarcasm and that, if you need a symbol, well you're probably a bit stupid to be honest... ahem.

Well, note that the article has a sarcmark. In fact, quite a large one. If anyone still misses the sarcasm, they can easily be slotted into the "too dumb to live" category.
30 | she/her | USA | ✡︎ | ☭ | ♫

I have devised a truly marvelous signature, which this textblock is too small to contain

User avatar
Extreme Ironing
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 409
Founded: Jan 03, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Extreme Ironing » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:00 am

My, that article is terribly unfunny.
“music” includes sounds wholly or predominantly characterised by the emission of a succession of repetitive beats - Section 63 (1)(b) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:21 am

Yeah, like this sarcmarkthing is ever going to work :roll:
The Blaatschapen should resign

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], Nova Universo Headquarters, Ntomenichka, Raskana, Santa Llorela, The Holy Therns, Trump Almighty, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads